From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 10 17:15:19 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA16109
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 17:15:18 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id SAA09108 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:18:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id SAA16097 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:12:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id SAA23720; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:15:10 -0500
Message-Id: <199702102315.SAA23720@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b93 dead on arrival 
In-reply-to: steve's message of 10 Feb 1997 15:14:58 -0800.
	     <m2ybcwtfrh.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:15:09 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>

I'm running with last week's gcc 2.8.0 beta, labelled: ss-970202.
BTW, I dunno if you noticed, but I was trying to run with X11R6.3.
--vin

> Barry A Warsaw writes:
> 
> >   What compiler should XEmacs be built with?              gcc  -g -O 
> 
> O.K.  You have the same problem Vinnie Shelton reported.  What version
> of Gcc do you guys have?  Barry, could you try building with the
> SparcWorks compiler to see if that works any better?
> 
> -- 
> steve@miranova.com baur
> Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.
> 


