From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 10 17:03:24 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15729
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 17:03:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA06232;
	Mon, 10 Feb 1997 15:15:00 -0800
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b93 dead on arrival
References: <199702102255.RAA08625@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: "Barry A. Warsaw"'s message of Mon, 10 Feb 1997 17:55:10 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.103)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 10 Feb 1997 15:14:58 -0800
Message-ID: <m2ybcwtfrh.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.12/XEmacs 20.1

Barry A Warsaw writes:

>   What compiler should XEmacs be built with?              gcc  -g -O 

O.K.  You have the same problem Vinnie Shelton reported.  What version
of Gcc do you guys have?  Barry, could you try building with the
SparcWorks compiler to see if that works any better?

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

