From xemacs-m  Sat Feb  8 20:32:12 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA16797
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 20:32:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQccby20538; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 21:32:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 21:32:11 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQccby20538.199702090232@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: wot i need
In-Reply-To: <199702090130.AA201311825@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
References: <m27mkiu8ku.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199702090130.AA201311825@martigny.ai.mit.edu>

Bill Dubuque writes:
 > [...]
 > I tried Kyle's test in 19.11 and 19.12b25 and 19.11 is about the
 > same speed as FSF 19.28, but 19.12b25 is about twice as slow.

This matches my own memory of that development period.  19.11 did
many things at roughly equal speed as the FSF Emacses of the
period, but 19.12 was dramatically slower.

