From xemacs-m  Tue Feb  4 14:58:25 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA08294
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 14:58:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id VAA15201; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 21:58:21 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.0 announcement  (XEmacs 20.0 vs XEmacs 19.15)
References: <m2pvyiyc3n.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199702040904.LAA09606@merlin.ornet.co.il> <m23evc1k05.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 04 Feb 1997 21:58:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 04 Feb 1997 10:52:42 -0800
Message-ID: <kigbua070gj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.11/XEmacs 19.14

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> Warning:  The MULE features are *highly* addictive (IMHO).

Which one of them is?  Is there a place where the real cool ones are
listed?  I'm trying to decide whether to compile --with-mule or
--without-mule, and I'd like some spiritual guidance from our
leader. :-)

And no, I don't need Chinese or Korean. :-)

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
* Vi is the God of editors.
* Emacs is the editor of Gods.

