From xemacs-m  Fri Jan 31 09:38:03 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA08992
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 09:38:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id KAA17534 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 10:41:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id KAA27300 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 10:34:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA13471; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 10:37:25 -0500
Message-Id: <199701311537.KAA13471@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Subject: Purespace and new toolbar
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 10:37:24 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>

I decided to try out Hrvoje's new toolbar.el, and I ran out of purespace.  
On this Solaris 2.4 platform, we have only a few hundred bytes of purespace 
slack.  In theory this is great, but it means that even minor modifications 
can be more painful than they need to be.  Can we agree to shoot for 1% 
slack (waste) in purespace.  This doesn't seem particularly conservative to 
me.

--vin

