From xemacs-m  Thu Jan 30 11:26:51 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id LAA13050 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:26:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id SAA18742; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 18:26:39 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: lexically scoped lisp (again)
References: <199701301705.LAA12905@xemacs.org>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 30 Jan 1997 18:26:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: Richard Cognot's message of Thu, 30 Jan 1997 18:03:17 +0100
Message-ID: <kigybdb6pm9.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.7/XEmacs 19.14

Richard Cognot (cognot@ensg.u-nancy.fr) wrote:
> That would have been nice if both Emacs dev teams could have
> cooperated on this at an early stage, but since I can't imagine the
> guy who is involved in this to be cooperative (Now that should be
> enough of a clue to let you guess who that might be ;-)...

Well, we can take their source, as before.  I wonder how much the Lisp
engine code is diverging between the Emacsen.

Yes, it would be good to cooperate, but for some reason the other side
seems unwilling to do so -- especially the aforementioned individual.
I wonder what he would do if the copyright "problems" with XEmacs were
"solved" and RMS stopped the "war" -- I thikn it would be the worst
day of his miserable life.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Then...  his face does a complete change of expression.  It goes from
a "Vengeance is mine" expression, to a "What the fuck" blank look.

