From xemacs-m  Wed Jan 29 10:59:57 1997
Received: from newman (root@newman.aventail.com [38.225.141.10])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id KAA02683 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:59:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA04169; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 08:58:13 -0800
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 08:58:13 -0800
Message-Id: <199701291658.IAA04169@newman>
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Binary kits...who? when?
In-Reply-To: <m2u3o0l8r0.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970129172004.16762S-100000@icemark.thenet.ch>
	<m2u3o0l8r0.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;

Steven L. Baur writes:
>Benedikt Eric Heinen writes:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, William M. Perry wrote:
>>> So when do we want to do binary kits?  20.0 or only 19.15?
>
>I don't think we should distribute binary kits for 20.0, so I would
>say only for 19.15 (and perhaps 20.1).  We'll have a better idea what
>kind of stuff we need to build after 20.0, the number of permutations
>looks out of hand.
>
>>> I could
>>> volunteer to do any of the following platforms.  Of course, the fewer the
>>> better. :)
>> [...]
>
>Thanks.
>
>> I already wrote an email to Steve a couple of days ago, volunteering
>> to build the linux binary-kits, which he (so far)
>> accepted. Therefore there's no need for you or anyone else to build
>> the linux kits, unless someone objects to me building them...
>
>Yup.  Linux is definitely covered except for making RPMs.  I would
>prefer to have someone on this list build the RPM to give to RedHat.

  I can do the RPM.  I'll work on a description file later today.

-Bill P.

