From xemacs-m  Wed Jan 29 04:07:57 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id EAA00357 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 04:07:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id LAA09666; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:07:29 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [19.15b90]: Rogue dialog box
References: <9701280805.AA29140@mail.esrin.esa.it> 	<rvsp3mrz4s.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> 	<QQcakr23178.199701280922@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <199701290251.VAA02895@mykonos.interport.net>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 29 Jan 1997 11:07:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: Peter Pezaris's message of Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:51:49 -0500
Message-ID: <kig680gdcbi.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.5/XEmacs 19.14

Peter Pezaris (pez@dwwc.com) wrote:
> How about use-dialog-box-p or something? Isn't that the standard for
> boolean-type variables? Can you imagine if every variable started
> "should"?

I'm not sure if it's /kosher/ to have boolean variables ending with
`-p'.  I remember a flame between Erik and Jamie about this, where
Jamie defended `teach-extended-commands-p', but I still think `-p' is
for functions.

How about strait and simple `use-dialog-box' variable, with
`use-dialog-box-p' function?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Then...  his face does a complete change of expression.  It goes from
a "Vengeance is mine" expression, to a "What the fuck" blank look.

