From xemacs-m  Sat Jan 25 17:43:09 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id RAA02052 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 17:43:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA18878;
	Sat, 25 Jan 1997 15:54:15 -0800
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: crash
References: <199701252048.OAA15089@mharnois.workgroup.net>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Michael Harnois's message of Sat, 25 Jan 1997 14:48:22 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 25 Jan 1997 15:54:15 -0800
Message-ID: <m24tg5jopk.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.1/XEmacs 20.0

Michael Harnois writes:

> Just as I was gloating about stability ... I was working in something else,
> and rgnus was fetching new news, when this heppened.

> Linux 2.1.22, libc 5.4.20 rgnus-0.83
        ^^^^^^
> Lisp backtrace follows:

>   # bind (inhibit-quit)
>   # (condition-case ... . error)
>   # (catch top-level ...)

> Then when I went to look for a core, there wasn't one.

How stable is your hardware?  I'm certain that XEmacs falls under the
Signal 11 FAQ every bit as much as recompiling the Linux kernel with
GCC does.  Can you try a stable Linux kernel and see if things get any
better?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.
Real men aren't afraid to use chains on icy roads.

