From xemacs-m  Thu Jan 23 20:21:31 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id UAA18966 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 20:21:31 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id VAA29183 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:24:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id VAA09021 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:18:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id VAA11413; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:21:14 -0500
Message-Id: <199701240221.VAA11413@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Subject: Ebola warning in b91
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:21:13 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>

There I was, happily plugging away with 20-b91, creating frames as happy as 
could be.  At some point, I noticed the following on the xterm whence my 
xemacs was started:

Ebola warning!! (0 and ?\()
   [memq, #<subr make-frame (interactive)>, call-interactively]
Ebola warning!! (0 and ?\[)
   [memq, #<subr make-frame (interactive)>, call-interactively]
Ebola warning!! (0 and ?\{)
   [memq, #<subr make-frame (interactive)>, call-interactively]

Now, the only remotely unusual thing about these frames is that they have 
only one minibuffer - on the first frame.

Has anyone else seen this?

--vin

