From xemacs-m  Wed Jan 22 17:04:42 1997
Received: from newman (root@newman.aventail.com [38.225.141.10])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id RAA11437 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 17:04:39 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA19284 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 15:03:15 -0800
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 15:03:15 -0800
Message-Id: <199701222303.PAA19284@newman>
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.0 release schedule
In-Reply-To: <m2wwt5uxad.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <m2k9p7jo6f.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<u94tg922e0.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
	<QQbzpp11213.199701221620@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2k9p57gee.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<QQbzqo16320.199701222234@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2wwt5uxad.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;

Steven L. Baur writes:
>Kyle Jones writes:
>
>> Steven L. Baur writes:
>>> I'm not sure it's feasible to get releases more frequent than two
>>> months apart, but I do not intend to let any of the early 20.x's sit
>>> for very long until we get more code tested and stabilized.  If we get
>>> up to 20.6 by year-end, so be it.
>
>> What is the sticking point?  Why is doing a release so hard?
>
>The biggest sticking point is putting together all the binary
>distributions.
>
>> I'm talking about source code releases, not the full rock-n-roll
>> releases with all the binaries.
>
>We could do that.  Source code releases are relatively easy.  How
>often do you wish to have the early 20.x releases?

  Depending on just how many bugs there are, monthly might make sense.

-Bill p.

