From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 21 11:52:30 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id LAA29836 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:52:29 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQbzmd05023; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 12:52:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 12:52:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQbzmd05023.199701211752@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs FAQ
In-Reply-To: <199701211636.JAA00399@branagh.lanl.gov>
References: <199701171757.KAA02539@branagh.lanl.gov>
	<199701191408.IAA10707@xemacs.org>
	<199701192112.OAA00398@branagh.lanl.gov>
	<199701192140.OAA00413@branagh.lanl.gov>
	<m2enff4js4.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<kigrajf1hey.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<199701211636.JAA00399@branagh.lanl.gov>

I think the question we should be asking is "Why change?"  What
is the driving reason why we should not continue to use Texinfo?
Unless there a honking good reason, it all sounds like busy work
to me.

