From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 21 09:35:25 1997
Received: from nvwls.cc.purdue.edu (root@nvwls.cc.purdue.edu [128.210.7.3])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id JAA28760 for <XEmacs-Beta@XEmacs.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 09:35:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from nvwls.cc.purdue.edu (nuspl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nvwls.cc.purdue.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA08433 for <XEmacs-Beta@XEmacs.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:28:14 -0500
Message-Id: <199701211528.KAA08433@nvwls.cc.purdue.edu>
To: XEmacs-Beta@XEmacs.org
Reply-to: nuspl@purdue.edu
X-Mailer: MH-E 5.0.2
X-Attribution: jjn
Subject: Re: --with-x=no broken? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "21 Jan 1997 16:26:50 +0100."
             <kig4tgb2gn9.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:28:10 -0500
From: Joe Nuspl <nuspl@nvwls.cc.purdue.edu>

>>>>> "Hrv" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

    Hrv> What the given command wouldn't signal an error?  Sounds sensible.

That is what I had in mind.

	Joe

