From xemacs-m  Sun Jan 19 15:15:35 1997
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov (mailhost.lanl.gov [128.165.3.12])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id PAA12708; Sun, 19 Jan 1997 15:15:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: from xdiv.lanl.gov (xdiv.lanl.gov [128.165.116.106]) by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.8.4/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA28915; Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:15:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from branagh.lanl.gov (branagh.lanl.gov [128.165.16.72]) by xdiv.lanl.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA23531; Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:15:34 -0700
Received: by branagh.lanl.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA00398; Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:12:47 -0700
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:12:47 -0700
Message-Id: <199701192112.OAA00398@branagh.lanl.gov>
From: John Turner <turner@xdiv.lanl.gov>
To: cthomp@xemacs.org
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs FAQ 
In-Reply-To: <199701191408.IAA10707@xemacs.org>
References: <199701171757.KAA02539@branagh.lanl.gov>
	<199701191408.IAA10707@xemacs.org>
Reply-To: turner@lanl.gov

Chuck Thompson writes:
 >     John> Yes, but it looks virtually dead.  Last version I found
 >     John> (though an admittedly quick scan) was 11/95.
 > 
 > Not true.  The latest version is from October, 1996.  Look at:
 > 
 > 	http://www-dsed.llnl.gov/files/programs/unix/latex2html/sources/
 > 
 > For more info look at:
 > 
 > 	http://cbl.leeds.ac.uk/nikos/tex2html/doc/latex2html/latex2html.html

Hang on.  LaTeX2HTML is definitely very much alive.  In fact I was
sort of advocating it.  (I'm using LaTeX and l2h for all my
documentation).  One of the things in its favor is the large user base
and responsive developers.

I was talking about *latexinfo* being virtually dead.

If I'm wrong about that, please tell me...

-John

