From xemacs-m  Sat Jan 18 10:42:02 1997
Received: from wmperry.in.aventail.com (wmperry@wmperry.oz.net [207.13.185.53])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id KAA07227 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 1997 10:42:01 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from wmperry@localhost) by wmperry.in.aventail.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA00559; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 16:51:39 -0800
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 16:51:39 -0800
Message-Id: <199701180051.QAA00559@wmperry.in.aventail.com>
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: --with-x=no broken?
In-Reply-To: <97Jan17.143929edt.10761(4)@jupiter.scs.Ryerson.CA>
References: <15u3ogp2a7.fsf@bjesomar.srce.hr>
	<97Jan17.143929edt.10761(4)@jupiter.scs.Ryerson.CA>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;

Hrvoje Niksic writes:
> Some things with --with-x=no seem seriously broken.  E.g. w3 does not
> work at all.  I find all of this quite disconcerting beause, believe
> it or not, there are people who really want to use XEmacs without X.

  This will be fixed in the next beta of w3, out soon.  Definitely in time
for beta91.

-Bill P.

