From xemacs-m  Mon Dec  9 10:21:33 1996
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19]) by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA19539 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 10:21:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
          by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id IAA04869; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 08:31:25 -0800
Sender: steve@xemacs.org
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20b30 tm+gnus bug?
References: <u99177ennj.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Neal Becker's message of 09 Dec 1996 10:35:28 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.95)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 09 Dec 1996 08:31:25 -0800
Message-ID: <m24thvfzmq.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/XEmacs 20.0

>>>>> "Neal" == Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

Neal> I did M-x gnus.  This is gnus and tm as shipped with 20b30 (I removed
Neal> all traces from site-lisp of old ones):

Neal> Signalling: (error "Byte code stack underflow (byte compiler bug), pc 42")

Thanks for the report Neal.

I've seen this too.  The problem goes away when you rebytecompile tm
with the XEmacs image you are running.

Am I just dreaming hoping for portable tm .elcs between XEmacs v20
w/Mule and XEmacs v20 w/out Mule?  How are you handling this at Sun
Martin?

I suppose one possibility is to put a second copy of tm in the Mule
tar package and put tm non/Mule .elcs in the main distribution.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.
"Bill Clinton is a bore.  He doesn't have a creative bone in his
body."  -- David Brinkley

