From xemacs-m  Sun Jan 12 02:10:29 1997
Received: from dres.elam.org (root@cola65.scsn.net [206.25.247.65])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id CAA29959 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 02:10:25 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from dres@localhost) by dres.elam.org (8.7.6/8.7.3) id CAA23116; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 02:13:45 -0500
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: build report: failure with 20.0-b90 on Linux 2.0.27
References: <hhsp47seyu.fsf@dres.elam.org> <m26813mqqs.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: James LewisMoss <dres@scsn.net>
Date: 12 Jan 1997 02:13:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 11 Jan 1997 21:01:15 -0800
Message-ID: <hhpvzbs6vr.fsf@dres.elam.org>
Lines: 43
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/XEmacs 20.0

>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

 sb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII James LewisMoss
 sb> writes:

 >> patched up from 20.0b34. libc5.4.17 gcc 2.7.2.1

 sb> O.K.  It looks like the patching is where it failed.

 >> Compiling in lisp/w3 make[1]: Entering directory
 >> `/usr/local/src/apps/editors/emacs/xemacs-20.0-b34/lisp/w3'
 >> URLDIR=../url
 >> /usr/local/src/apps/editors/emacs/xemacs-20.0-b34/src/xemacs
 >> -batch -q -no-site-file -l ./docomp.el -l ./w3-vars.el \

 sb> This isn't right.  The URLDIR assignment is from the previous
 sb> version and should have been removed by patch.  Check for .rej
 sb> files.  Also check for files out of place in the top level
 sb> directory.  It might be useful to use -sp0 instead of -p0.  The
 sb> `s' option suppresses all the chatter, so errors encountered in
 sb> patching stand out.

 >> -f batch-byte-compile w3.el Loading w3-vars... (file w3-vars.el is
 >> newer) Loading w3-keyword... (file w3-keyword.el is newer)
 >> Required feature url was not provided

 sb> You should have a url.el in the lisp/w3 directory.

Ok. no url.el in w3 but there is one in lisp/url.  Only problem is
that all the files in lisp/url are 0 in length (just noticed).  And I
am using the patched version of patch from the beta site.  Guess there
are bugs in that one too. *shrug*

Jim





-- 
@James LewisMoss                 | moss@cs.sc.edu | Blessed Be!
@    http://www.cs.sc.edu/~moss  | dres@scsn.net  | Linux is cool!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

