From xemacs-m  Sun Sep 14 00:06:06 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA26085
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:06:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.7/8.8.6) id HAA11278;
	Sun, 14 Sep 1997 07:05:50 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: abraham@dina.kvl.dk (Per Abrahamsen)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Customization groups
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 14 Sep 1997 07:05:49 +0200
Message-ID: <kigu3fo1o42.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/XEmacs 20.3(beta20) - "Tirana"

The group-snarfing code doesn't seem to work properly.  For instance,
`xemacs -q' contains, under the `Languages' menu only Lisp and C,
although there should be scores of other languages.

Can others repeat this?  Does anyone have an idea what might be wrong, 
and how to fix it?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?

