From xemacs-m  Tue Sep  9 00:52:10 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA04812
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 00:52:09 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA03923;
	Mon, 8 Sep 1997 22:56:38 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 19.16-b91 and PGP sigs?
References: <9709040541.AA18063@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
X-Face: `'%\i;ySOu]g?NlziJSk_$&@]KP`}~PEQPjZ5;nxSaDW_o$4+4%Ab]%Ifw3ZR;7TIT3,O,'
 @2{L;]ox6kc;$_5kU'n**9vFg-]eV~GbxSVCx|(s%uR[],*:^WKmC`B}(;|k9/m]gwt?&`t;^rfCJg
 khHH>pP1W\)xM0U@!FNDD72{3fDP$PkBhx^7Z?-WxH6DbFN:QOnT`llzW}VGdYv;n9lzljQvKTIBhQ
 YuV
X-Attribution: sb
From: SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Rick Campbell's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 1997 01:40:58 -0400"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 08 Sep 1997 22:56:38 -0700
Message-ID: <m2oh63ghd5.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/XEmacs 20.3(beta20) - "Tirana"

Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com> writes:

> Is anyone else using 19.16-b91 with tm and mailcrypt?

> I need to investigate more, but with the same init file and the same
> message, 19.15 correctly verifies a signature with
> mime-viewer/extract-content and 19.16-b91 seems to be looking at the
> wrong thing.  At first glance, it looks like it's extracting the
> previous content instead of the signature.

That's possible with the way dual buffers are used.  Can someone else
(please) verify this?  I no longer have any support for reading mail
with XEmacs 19, so someone else is going to have to narrow the problem
down.

