From xemacs-m  Fri Sep  5 07:42:41 1997
Received: from neal.ctd.comsat.com (exim@neal.ctd.comsat.com [134.133.40.21])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA13932
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 07:42:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from neal by neal.ctd.comsat.com with local (Exim 1.62 #1)
	id 0x6xih-0005wC-00; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 08:42:39 -0400
From: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: patch-2.5
X-Face: "$ryF/ne$oms9n}#TY|W5Ttjbp-6/u4j'7c:%-aq2IAf'&DjuvII4wvr:eU{h=GMPcVTP,p
 XgCPnk{Qu:7P=jH00Q?B(*bZ\7#x_&KD=%hU1VhP'`hy'PF01*tU9DAoK7QXTGzL%fe!lIj,0Ds,P:
 GV_YPd*4GO?ClJAPRa=iB\PuIQmM=Q>qo87lJh-N2PQL-2QaM>}LdWI<}
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <E0x6xih-0005wC-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 08:42:39 -0400

From what I am reading on gnu.utils.bug, I think it's best to avoid
patch-2.5.

