From xemacs-m  Tue Aug 19 09:59:36 1997
Received: from wfdutilgw.ml.com (wfdutilf01.ml.com [206.3.74.31])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA13856
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 09:59:35 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ml1.ml.com ([199.201.57.130])
	by wfdutilgw.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLgw-3.03) with ESMTP id KAA17105
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 10:54:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from commpost.ml.com (commpost.ml.com [146.125.4.24])
	by ml1.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLml4-2.07) with SMTP id KAA26586
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 10:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA03852 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 11:04:08 -0400
Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id KAA14424; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 10:59:05 -0400
To: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: `M-x info` in "Bratislava"
References: <19970818164141B.furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> <87n2mfzqcr.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <ocrzpqfbaqf.fsf@ml.com> <87hgcmy6fd.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com>             <ocrsow6bbwa.fsf@ml.com> <199708191401.KAA18954@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
X-Face: D>:hrrB{l6#\wU;)0R:OHSTA@ayd.Oq?s@Rrc;[+z0m+<-U"$G-J6L)F2QY`qK~uPu!s1(6{\#uy!Ag/D)?'L[}xErXvxoPn8T_hKi{M]/(`BF{e}X7;hby`p\.E$rJ}Aff#BT,rdDIw\y
X-Y-Zippy: LOOK!!!  I'm WALKING in my SLEEP again!!
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
Date: 19 Aug 1997 10:59:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu's message of "Tue, 19 Aug 1997 10:01:34 -0400"
Message-ID: <ocrn2meb4na.fsf@ml.com>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/XEmacs 20.3(beta18) - "Bratislava"

Valdis Kletnieks writes:
> On 19 Aug 1997 08:22:29 EDT, you said:

>> The very cool package `uniquify' doesn't stay happy if there are non-file
>> buffers that are named like files.

> I'm assuming what you *meant* here is that uniquify wants non-file buffers
> to have names of the form "*blat*" and files to have names that do not
> start/end with the asterisk character?

I really need to proof-read sometimes.  Yes, you are correct.

> What happens if a filename actually *does* start with a '*' character? (Remember
> that this is certainly legal, if unusual, to do...)

Then you are out of luck.

-- 
Colin

