From xemacs-m  Wed Aug 13 18:34:44 1997
Received: from relay3.UU.NET (relay3.UU.NET [192.48.96.8])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02414
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 18:34:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM by relay3.UU.NET with ESMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: [192.203.206.1])
	id QQdcmg06993; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 19:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQdcmg23246; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 19:33:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 19:33:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQdcmg23246.199708132333@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Beta <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: assertion failed, file extents.c, line 845, foundp
In-Reply-To: <199708131917.MAA06735@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
References: <199708131917.MAA06735@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 20.3 "Bucharest" XEmacs  Lucid (beta17)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Is our extents.c dude, (Dave Mason?), going to look at this?
The syms_of_emacs call is a red herring; probably debugger
confusion.  This definitely looks like the extents code bombing.
I'm willing to look at it, but I'm hoping someone is more
familiar with that pile of code than I am.

