From xemacs-m  Tue Aug 12 18:42:04 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA04849
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 18:42:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id QAA20808; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:41:35 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id QAA24459; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:41:30 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA17922; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:41:24 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA04146; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:41:22 -0700
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:41:22 -0700
Message-Id: <199708122341.QAA04146@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
Cc: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: lazy-lock?
In-Reply-To: <ocren7zce0a.fsf@ml.com>
References: <ocren7zce0a.fsf@ml.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.33 under 20.3 "Vienna" XEmacs  Lucid (beta14)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com> writes:

Colin> Maybe I am just not paying attention, but lazy-lock doesn't seem to work 
Colin> in 20.3, and hasn't worked for a while.

Colin> It seems as though it is fontifying the entire buffer when I load one
Colin> in.

How can you tell?  Is it just slow?

For me, editing a large source file like src/redisplay.c seems to
fontify instantaneously.  Maybe it's your setting of
lazy-lock-stealth-time?

Martin

