From xemacs-m  Tue Aug 12 03:20:35 1997
Received: from Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp (root@flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp [133.53.13.28])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA28042
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 03:20:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA23778;
	Tue, 12 Aug 1997 17:20:19 +0900
To: SL Baur <steve@altair.xemacs.org>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Cc: furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp
Subject: 'patch' version (Re: [Success] XEmacs 20.3-beta17 "Bucharest" on Linux 2.0.30)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 10 Aug 1997 18:58:47 +0900"
	<19970810185847I.furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
References: <19970810185847I.furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.88 on XEmacs 20.3 (beta17) - "Bucharest"
X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 14 2B DA A1 31 70 7E A6  18 24 7E 03 EB 4D B3 64
X-Pgp-Public-Key: mailto:pgp-public-keys@icat.or.jp / Subject: GET 0x4734C8B5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19970812172018H.furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 17:20:18 +0900
From: Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 970806
Lines: 37

Hello, Steven.

In <19970810185847I.furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
at Sun, 10 Aug 1997 18:58:47 +0900
Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> wrote
on "[Success] XEmacs 20.3-beta17 "Bucharest" on Linux 2.0.30"...

> p.s. Patching up from b16 failed at :
> >--------------------------
> >|Index: xemacs-20.0/etc/toolbar/ediff-A-up.xpm
> >|diff -u xemacs-20.0/etc/toolbar/ediff-A-up.xpm:1.1 xemacs-20.0/etc/toolbar/edif
> >f-A-up.xpm:1.2
> >|--- xemacs-20.0/etc/toolbar/ediff-A-up.xpm:1.1 Wed Jan 22 19:07:14 1997
> >|+++ xemacs-20.0/etc/toolbar/ediff-A-up.xpm     Sat Aug  9 21:39:39 1997
> >--------------------------
> >Patching file etc/toolbar/ediff-A-up.xpm using Plan A...
> >patch: **** malformed patch at line 4272: \ No newline at end of file

The version of patch I used was 'Patch version 2.1', and patching up with
'patch 2.4' finished successfully (except './lisp/vm/vm-autoload.el').


In <m2k9huedtw.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> at 09 Aug 1997 23:45:15 -0700
SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> wrote
on "XEmacs 20.3-beta17 "Bucharest" is released"...

> See etc/BETA for patching instructions.  GNU Patch is the preferred
> patching program, and Patch-2.4 seems O.K., Patch-2.2 and patch-2.3
> are deadly.  To apply patches I post to xemacs-beta an incantation of

How about patch-2.1?  Do I have to throw it away? :-)


Kazuyoshi.
--
Kazuyoshi Furutaka
furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp

