From xemacs-m  Mon Aug  4 22:16:14 1997
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA11264
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 22:16:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from SUNDIAL.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA29967; Mon, 4 Aug 97 23:16:10 EDT
Received: by sundial.MIT.EDU (8.8.5/4.7) id XAA19835; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 23:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 23:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199708050315.XAA19835@sundial.MIT.EDU>
From: David Bakhash <cadet@MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Meishing Wang <meishing@kiwi.sunmoon.ac.kr>
Cc: mule@etl.go.jp, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Frustration: Universally available input methods
In-Reply-To: <199708050303.MAA26717@kiwi.sunmoon.ac.kr>
References: <199708041555.RAA01257@dindin.sima.sintef.no>
	<199708050303.MAA26717@kiwi.sunmoon.ac.kr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid

Meishing Wang writes:
 > How about Java based Asian languages' input methods?

do you think that, as an input method, the XEmacs/strokes based method
is satisfactory?  (imagining that OCR will eventually be implemented)?

dave

