From xemacs-m  Tue Jul 29 05:03:02 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA28714
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 05:03:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from midget.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@midget [129.132.145.4]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id MAA23815 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:02:45 +0200
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by midget.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/D-MATH-client) id LAA18021; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 11:59:09 +0200
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: pkgdir ignored?
References: <E0wso94-00019Q-00@neptune.corp.comsat.com> <199707281210.IAA27980@news.smart.net> <m2pvs3cidb.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 29 Jul 1997 11:59:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: SL Baur's message of 28 Jul 1997 08:21:36 -0700
Message-ID: <bywwmayyaa.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.55/XEmacs 19.15

SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

> That's the whole idea.  The initial model I'm concentrating on is one
> where the package hierarchies are relatively constant and XEmacs
> changes frequently.

Then I think you are optimzing for the uncommon case. For a non-beta
user the packages have much more frequent updates.



Jan

