From xemacs-m  Fri Jul 25 15:40:27 1997
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA13117
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:40:26 -0500 (CDT)
From: cadet@MIT.EDU
Received: from SUNDIAL.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA14242; Fri, 25 Jul 97 16:39:05 EDT
Received: by sundial.MIT.EDU (8.8.5/4.7) id QAA25551; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 16:40:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199707252040.QAA25551@sundial.MIT.EDU>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: extents and glyphs
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 16:40:15 EDT

hey,
	someone out there suggested being able to treat a glyph as a character
w/o having to put a token (empty) (single) space there for the extent.  I would
like to second this, as I feel that it will help make strokes less error-prone.
If there are people out there who can help me, please provide some feedback.

dave

