From xemacs-m  Sat Jul 12 15:55:46 1997
Received: from postoffice.npac.syr.edu (postoffice.npac.syr.edu [128.230.7.230])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA03545
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 15:55:45 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from kopernik.npac.syr.edu (kopernik.npac.syr.edu [128.230.8.17]) by postoffice.npac.syr.edu (8.7.5/8.7.1) with SMTP id QAA15294; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 16:55:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: irritating new gnus behavior
References: <bcibu49duyu.fsf@corp.Sun.COM> <m2pvsoz841.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <rwxbu488cmz.fsf@kopernik.npac.syr.edu> <m2d8ooyucf.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
X-Attribution: RT
X-Face: *_$\]C;VV*dP;8~h{,[C-2c1"O5SYp9T(n$;fVcywXC3:5t-rq<q2Su&1;JKMC:Rscf"uNt
 f]c6=T'F&Vw!Vr(\ug6s~go|!PVdW12'X!]%Vwyr*wgAAkH^P>vs"m{(/dy|?OB%_0eY~w6A,<T*R)
 km+-K4k38UG~1&4K!}Dp>a1gb%4.!=Oyx|k]<&>7mN5NOrK`pmII3CzO0v'F<#$NoJ;g0!?/J:}j!3
 &f@I8Wo8o1XOMV9k]"'C#>R
From: Remek Trzaska <remek@npac.syr.edu>
Date: 12 Jul 1997 16:55:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "12 Jul 1997 20:54:24 +0200"
Message-ID: <rwx7mew56su.fsf@kopernik.npac.syr.edu>
Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.62/XEmacs 20.3(beta12) - "Helsinki"

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

Lars> Does both `some' and nil settings give you the same (bogus)
Lars> results?

Nay, setting it to 'some always leads to correct behavior. Only nil
screws things up--quite randomly, I would say in 66% of invocations of
gnus-group-get-new-news.

Remek

