From xemacs-m  Sat Jul 12 14:34:25 1997
Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA02207
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 14:34:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex18.uio.no [129.240.154.38]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA14066@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 21:34:24 +0200
Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA06663; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 20:54:29 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: Remek Trzaska <remek@npac.syr.edu>
Cc: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: irritating new gnus behavior
References: <bcibu49duyu.fsf@corp.Sun.COM> <m2pvsoz841.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <rwxbu488cmz.fsf@kopernik.npac.syr.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Date: 12 Jul 1997 20:54:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: Remek Trzaska's message of 12 Jul 1997 12:21:24 -0400
Message-ID: <m2d8ooyucf.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.1/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y

Remek Trzaska <remek@npac.syr.edu> writes:

> Lars> Does setting `gnus-read-active-file' to t make the problem go away?
> 
> Yes

Does both `some' and nil settings give you the same (bogus) results?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

