From xemacs-m  Thu Jul 10 10:20:43 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA07111
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:20:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.6/8.8.6) id RAA01963;
	Thu, 10 Jul 1997 17:20:41 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Ebola messages
References: <E0wm2Ug-0004oq-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com> 	<m2afjvvra0.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 	<kighge3eswt.fsf_-_@jagor.srce.hr> <199707101505.LAA07315@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 10 Jul 1997 17:20:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Barry A. Warsaw"'s message of "Thu, 10 Jul 1997 11:05:48 -0400"
Message-ID: <kigoh8bc4s6.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta12) - "Helsinki"

"Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US> writes:

> The most logical place is to put them in the *Warnings* buffer.

But still, we should be careful.  *Warnings* mechanism is quite
complex; if an ebola arises there, will it be able to protect itself
against inflooping?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
You'll notice that perl is not itself written in Perl.
                                                 -- The Perl FAQ

