From xemacs-m  Mon Jul  7 19:38:36 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA09764
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 19:38:35 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id CAA07988; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 02:38:36 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Too small PURESIZE
References: <kig205a1kb5.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m2k9j2z8vj.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 08 Jul 1997 02:38:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of "07 Jul 1997 17:26:56 -0700"
Message-ID: <kigen9atm2b.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta11) - "Stockholm"

Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> 
> > On my Solaris system, I get puresize readjustments with regular
> > builds.  Is this OK?
> 
> On a first build you should have one puresize adjustment (two total
> links).

Why?  It seems unnecessary to me, and might tend to confuse the
uninitiated.

> Things change too easily and it is *a lot* of work to compute the
> puresize for all the various ways one can build XEmacs. (...) but I
> suspect the time taken by such an endeavor could be better spent
> elsewhere.

Why don't we simply add a few kilobytes to BASE_PURESIZE?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Unspeakable horrors from outer space paralyze the living and
resurrect the dead!

