From xemacs-m  Mon Jun 30 09:37:02 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA18630
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 09:37:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id QAA08476; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 16:36:42 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>,
        Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com>
Subject: Re: Solaris dynamics?
References: <9706301423.AA17694@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 30 Jun 1997 16:36:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: Rick Campbell's message of "Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:23:31 -0400"
Message-ID: <kigvi2wxime.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta9) - "Sofia"

Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com> writes:

> Is there any chance that policy can be changed so that the prebuilt
> XEmacs binaries are portable.  In particular, can the policy be that
> a staticly linked version is made available for people who don't
> have the particular mix of shared libraries that existed in the
> build environment?

It is much easier for such people to rebuild XEmacs from sources.
Unlike many other programs, XEmacs is extremely easy to build from the 
source kit.

> On a related note, is it even possible to build things completely
> statically on the latest Sun operating systems?

Good question.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?

