From xemacs-m  Sat Jun 28 15:37:07 1997
Received: from iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (galibert@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr [193.49.140.100])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA19118
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 15:37:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from galibert@localhost) by iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id WAA26995; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 22:35:50 +0200
Message-ID: <19970628223549.33959@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 22:35:49 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <Olivier.Galibert@mines.u-nancy.fr>
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: XEmacs internal corruption integer `0' plist -- test case
References: <m2k9jeppxm.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <QQcvxt03404.199706281921@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <m2zpsay0t2.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <kigzpsatrzb.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.74
In-Reply-To: <kigzpsatrzb.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>; from Hrvoje Niksic on Sat, Jun 28, 1997 at 10:03:36PM +0200

On Sat, Jun 28, 1997 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> I think it is time to do that test again.  Whoever of you has purify,
> it is time to step out.

*shyly stepping out* Me sir !

More seriously, I'm still fighting a stupid bug in the unexelfsgi .sbss
support I did (I understood more things about elf since then) but this
particular test would be done on solaris.

What configure/compilation/defines should I have for the best results ?
I made a quick glance to alloc.c and friends already, which proved that
I won't understand them with a quick glance at all.

  OG.

