From xemacs-m  Fri Jun 27 12:36:27 1997
Received: from black-ice.cc.vt.edu (black-ice.cc.vt.edu [128.173.14.71])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA01789
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 12:36:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from black-ice.cc.vt.edu (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1])
	by black-ice.cc.vt.edu (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA33170;
	Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:36:19 -0400
Message-Id: <199706271736.NAA33170@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: bbdb wierdness 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:25:26 EDT."
             <E0whely-0005fE-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
X-Url: http://black-ice.cc.vt.edu/~valdis/
References: <E0whely-0005fE-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1018393772P";
	micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:36:16 -0400

--==_Exmh_-1018393772P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:25:26 EDT, you said:
> I can't enter a phone number (770) 623-0096 into bbdb.  Why not?  It
> won't let me set the area code to 770.  It works OK for (415)
> 623-0096.  What gives?

I admit not having checked the source yet, but could it be that bbdb suffers
from the same problem as many older CBX systems that "know" that the second
digit of the area code "must" be a zero or one?

-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech



--==_Exmh_-1018393772P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBM7P6DtQBOOoptg9JAQEykQP/Zlcw1zA+mooRWOegGuuLpXJOME1Vw8ZW
XsLsrkOYX3HHGd2akzGcQA4BOrowYUCQ8QKGU0SWgNyz3ynnjFRRPJ94FWgFd1P0
1h9uR5BYPnUWpeRhmjHECWQZV1SZ0ssqqqNQYwAJLG+SKdrd0+c1C6fIkTBTaOHA
jHuqOR11r/Q=
=Bvj6
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

--==_Exmh_-1018393772P--

