From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat Jan 31 01:33:12 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S84390AbZA3XdFVuVfI (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:33:05 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S84396AbZA3XdFQ4Fq4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:33:05 +0200 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:45683 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S84390AbZA3XdEkeqrk (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:33:04 +0200 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:6170 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1049898AbZA3Xcd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:32:33 -0800 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1233963162.39044@t7Ibgw+K5+uERlyBmHoGPg Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:32:31 -0800 Message-ID: <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Thread-Index: Ack7clTaTjFl3l7OQS+c8D7h2/owGhHwBOHQ References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 104989830153233 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi > On October 31, 2008 9:03 AM Ralf Baechle wrote > > Since quite a while I'm observing these kernel messages on a Linux x86_64 > system: > > sm[3270]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fffe7c48e30 error 6 in libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > sm[3493] trap stack segment ip:7f0e2a121bc9 sp:7fff3240e4a0 error:0 > sm[3773]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fff55499680 error 6 in libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] Matti: I've been seeing these across 4 servers: kernel: smtpserver[31693]: segfault at 00000000 eip b7c16371 esp bf94b018 error 4 kernel: router[9934]: segfault at 00000008 eip 0807fa95 esp bfdf5570 error 4 The interesting thing is it only happens when booted into a 2.6.24 kernel. If I reboot the same box into a 2.6.18 kernel everything runs fine (and there are no segfaults). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat Jan 31 01:37:16 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S84384AbZA3XhQ1P5zQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:37:16 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S84386AbZA3XhQXaJNQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:37:16 +0200 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:45683 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S84384AbZA3XhPyN9ks (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:37:15 +0200 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:6229 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1049896AbZA3Xgt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:36:49 -0800 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1233963414.3624@BTSshC7PHG8Tkv1LKsWZOA Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: [ZMailer] CVS Status? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:36:47 -0800 Message-ID: <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0C@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: CVS Status? Thread-Index: AcmDM54uZfFRYuDkSx6ayM4N15Wsfw== From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 104989630153649 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Matti: I tried updating from your CVS the other day and got a login failure. Eugene's still works, but since I haven't heard from him on the list lately I wonder if his is up to date. Can you shed any light on either/both of these? Thanks, Neal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sun Feb 1 15:52:51 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S85245AbZBANworqKTs (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:52:44 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S85240AbZBANwomYXvA (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:52:44 +0200 Received: (mea@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S82863AbZBANwoF-GT4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:52:44 +0200 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:52:44 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Neal Morgan Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Message-ID: <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:32:31PM -0800, Neal Morgan wrote: > > On October 31, 2008 9:03 AM Ralf Baechle wrote > > Since quite a while I'm observing these kernel messages on a Linux x86_64 > > system: > > > > sm[3270]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fffe7c48e30 error 6 in > libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > > sm[3493] trap stack segment ip:7f0e2a121bc9 sp:7fff3240e4a0 error:0 > > sm[3773]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fff55499680 error 6 in > libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > > Matti: I've been seeing these across 4 servers: > > kernel: smtpserver[31693]: segfault at 00000000 eip b7c16371 esp > bf94b018 error 4 > > kernel: router[9934]: segfault at 00000008 eip 0807fa95 esp bfdf5570 > error 4 > > The interesting thing is it only happens when booted into a 2.6.24 > kernel. If I reboot the same box into a 2.6.18 kernel everything runs > fine (and there are no segfaults). I do see them too with 2.6.26 kernel at zmailer.org server. A few hits per week according to kernel dmesg logs. I suspect more about glibc doing something stupid, than program really going over the edge, but these are so rare that debugging them is next to impossible. Previously I have seen them happen after the program has called exit(0). Anyway I have turned on core dumps to be able to see what happens. -- /Matti Aarnio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Feb 2 11:34:25 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S85387AbZBBJeSXi60Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:34:18 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S85395AbZBBJeSSfSwQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:34:18 +0200 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:26759 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S85387AbZBBJeRrko8Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:34:17 +0200 Received: from loki.glas.net ([195.218.254.119]:41746 "EHLO [195.218.254.119]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by gnome05.net.rol.ru with ESMTPS id S1276640AbZBBJeR (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:34:17 +0300 Message-ID: <4986BE19.5070005@rol.ru> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:34:17 +0300 From: Kostik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] CVS Status? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi! Eugene asked to send this reply: --- Neal Morgan wrote: > I tried updating from your CVS the other day and got a login failure. > Eugene's still works, but since I haven't heard from him on the list > lately I wonder if his is up to date. Can you shed any light on > either/both of these? My mirror *may* be out of sync. But again, it may not be, as I did not see commit notifications from Matti for a long time now. [ since my hosted server in Australia crashed, and I got the new one in Canada, I did not get to make synchronization fully automatic... OTOH, I'd have more incentive if there was more activity ;-) ] Eugene -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Feb 4 17:10:13 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S86119AbZBDPKIKcwfA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:10:08 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S86118AbZBDPKIDjV6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:10:08 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:39716 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S86116AbZBDPKHQuUGk (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:10:07 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n14FA0OY024632; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:10:00 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n14F9tSX024630; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:09:55 GMT Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:09:55 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matti Aarnio Cc: Neal Morgan , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Message-ID: <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:52:44PM +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:32:31PM -0800, Neal Morgan wrote: > > > On October 31, 2008 9:03 AM Ralf Baechle wrote > > > Since quite a while I'm observing these kernel messages on a Linux x86_64 > > > system: > > > > > > sm[3270]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fffe7c48e30 error 6 in > > libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > > > sm[3493] trap stack segment ip:7f0e2a121bc9 sp:7fff3240e4a0 error:0 > > > sm[3773]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fff55499680 error 6 in > > libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > > > > Matti: I've been seeing these across 4 servers: > > > > kernel: smtpserver[31693]: segfault at 00000000 eip b7c16371 esp > > bf94b018 error 4 > > > > kernel: router[9934]: segfault at 00000008 eip 0807fa95 esp bfdf5570 > > error 4 > > > > The interesting thing is it only happens when booted into a 2.6.24 > > kernel. If I reboot the same box into a 2.6.18 kernel everything runs > > fine (and there are no segfaults). Older kernels don't emit this segfault message. It was added in commit abd4f7505bafdd6c5319fe3cb5caf9af6104e17a that is for 2.6.23. Could that be why you didn't notice it earlier? > I do see them too with 2.6.26 kernel at zmailer.org server. > A few hits per week according to kernel dmesg logs. > > I suspect more about glibc doing something stupid, than program really > going over the edge, but these are so rare that debugging them is next > to impossible. Previously I have seen them happen after the program > has called exit(0). > > Anyway I have turned on core dumps to be able to see what happens. I've seen Zmailer stopping mail delivery or stopping accepting connections on port 25. The issue is hitting relativly infrequently but I decieded to follow your example and just turned on core dumps; it is affecting sm, smtpserver and router. Lately the frequency of this issue striking seems to have increased significantly - I wonder if that's due to me looking more frequently after it or due to my extremly inflated mail queue with over 1,700,000 stored messages. Ironically I seem to have gotten another router segfault just seconds before I enabled core dumps ... Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu Feb 5 13:00:32 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S86592AbZBELA3TEXdA (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:00:29 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S86595AbZBELA3N5plk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:00:29 +0200 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:5439 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S86592AbZBELA2h8q9s (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:00:28 +0200 Received: from pccross.average.org ([91.192.241.20]:53073 "EHLO [192.168.1.207]" smtp-auth: "egc@online.ru" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by gnome06.net.rol.ru with ESMTPSA id S1275870AbZBELA2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:00:28 +0300 Message-ID: <498AC6CC.6050808@online.ru> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:00:28 +0300 From: Eugene Crosser Organization: ROL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] CVS mirror at cvs.average.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=8C3A5169; url=http://www.average.org/~crosser/pubkey.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, following a recent note on this list, I think that I've fixed my mirror of zmailer source to actually work unattended, syncing daily. As a reminder, $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.average.org:/cvsroot login Password: cvs $ cd /your/source/tree $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.average.org:/cvsroot checkout zmailer the thing physically lives in Montreal, Canada. Have fun! Eugene P.S. 'sudo' rules! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJisa4frw/cIw6UWkRAtVjAJ9OB4RZn+tQcOId+QxAgrybSyoRaACcChB3 N2ct6LCEdkW09YqgtrX0zlk= =M0LO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Apr 20 19:16:05 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S81623AbZDTQPzBgEDY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:15:55 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S81625AbZDTQPyxrzH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:15:54 +0300 Received: from mate.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.1]:42285 "EHLO mate.dm.uba.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S81623AbZDTQPy1p2q4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:15:54 +0300 Received: from mate36.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.36]:54023 "EHLO [157.92.22.36]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mate.dm.uba.ar with ESMTP id S4628013AbZDTQPs (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:15:48 -0300 Message-ID: <49EC9FB4.20402@dm.uba.ar> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:15:48 -0300 From: Rodolfo Cossalter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] SPF problem X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi After compiling zmailer from Eugene's CVS, using spf_alt, I noticed that sfp_threshold is always 0, no matter what PARAM spf-threshold is defined in smtpserver.conf. PARAM spf-threshold is actually read but it seems as if sfp_threshold never gets initialized in policytest.c . I added a line like sfp_threshold = OCP->sfp_threshold; just after #ifdef Z_CHECK_SPF_DATA and now it works, but I don't know if this is the right place. Maybe some other spf related PARAMs need to be initilized too. Can anyone check this? Thanks Rodolfo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Apr 20 23:59:33 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S81672AbZDTU7WRP8hk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:59:22 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S81674AbZDTU7WL4RaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:59:22 +0300 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:23803 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S81672AbZDTU7VY1OJI (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:59:21 +0300 Received: from pccross.average.org ([91.192.241.20]:34251 "EHLO [192.168.1.9]" smtp-auth: "egc@online.ru" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by gnome05.net.rol.ru with ESMTPSA id S1276148AbZDTU7U (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:59:20 +0400 Message-ID: <49ECE21F.7070005@online.ru> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:59:11 +0400 From: Eugene Crosser Organization: ROL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodolfo Cossalter CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] SPF problem References: <49EC9FB4.20402@dm.uba.ar> In-Reply-To: <49EC9FB4.20402@dm.uba.ar> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=8C3A5169; url=http://www.average.org/~crosser/pubkey.txt Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5F02E8007D30736D7C5140F4" Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5F02E8007D30736D7C5140F4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rodolfo Cossalter wrote: > After compiling zmailer from Eugene's CVS, using spf_alt, I noticed tha= t > sfp_threshold is always 0, no matter what PARAM spf-threshold is define= d > in smtpserver.conf. PARAM spf-threshold is actually read but it seems a= s > if sfp_threshold never gets initialized in policytest.c . > I added a line like > sfp_threshold =3D OCP->sfp_threshold; > just after > #ifdef Z_CHECK_SPF_DATA > and now it works, but I don't know if this is the right place. > Maybe some other spf related PARAMs need to be initilized too. > Can anyone check this? I'll take a look, thanks. Eugene --------------enig5F02E8007D30736D7C5140F4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ7OIlfrw/cIw6UWkRAncSAJ40Al8rMsGCnT9PE+INOaPMsJTHowCfTnD1 REkHpEsTb1f09h2w7LJ/Uok= =QrdU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5F02E8007D30736D7C5140F4-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat May 2 05:14:44 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77791AbZEBCOoCiSwk (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 05:14:44 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77793AbZEBCOn4uK1Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 05:14:43 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:52526 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77791AbZEBCOn0Os1c (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 05:14:43 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:39742 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1051023AbZEBCOX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 19:14:23 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1241835271.74567@2na7P0YVm5RSGRcyDay4fw Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: [ZMailer] TLS Documentation X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:14:12 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14466F@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: TLS Documentation thread-index: AcnKyw3dGBmng9DERWuhZcua420K1wAAICMA From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 105102301191423 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hello List: My SSL certificate has expired and I am trying to install the new one.  I cannot seem to locate my notes about how I did this last time.  Nor can I locate anything beyond the self-sign CA notes in the docs folder in the source tree. Can someone help me out with specific instructions or point me towards the right documentation for this? Specifically, I need to take a .pfx or pkcs12 export and get it into the format expected by zmailer.  Also, I can't remember whether I manually retrieved my CA's cert last time around or if that somehow happened magically when converting the cert/key files expected by ZMailer. Thanks, Neal Morgan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat May 2 19:32:34 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S83719AbZEBQcVIqquc (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 19:32:21 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S83715AbZEBQcVCkseY (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 19:32:21 +0300 Received: (mea@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S83711AbZEBQcUQ3iLQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 19:32:20 +0300 Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:32:20 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: Neal Morgan Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] TLS Documentation Message-ID: <20090502163220.GD1590@paja.nic.funet.fi> References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14466F@server-16.MorganSys.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14466F@server-16.MorganSys.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 07:14:12PM -0700, Neal Morgan wrote: > Hello List: > > My SSL certificate has expired and I am trying to install the new one. > I cannot seem to locate my notes about how I did this last time. > Nor can I locate anything beyond the self-sign CA notes in the docs > folder in the source tree. > > Can someone help me out with specific instructions or point me towards > the right documentation for this? > > Specifically, I need to take a .pfx or pkcs12 export and get it into > the format expected by zmailer.  Also, I can't remember whether > I manually retrieved my CA's cert last time around or if that somehow > happened magically when converting the cert/key files expected by ZMailer. ZMailer uses OpenSSL library to implement the SMTPS/STARTTLS, thus what you will need is key and certificate in format that OpenSSL can use. I have recently been employed on among others an issue of managing certificate lifetimes on a networked server system, and procedures like preparing new certificate for use well in advance of previous one expiring, and how to propagate knowledge about the new certificates so that systems will not have any "flag day" of needing synchronized certificate updates... Common thing with that commercial job and ZMailer's certificates is that to freshen the certificate, one must create a new key with proper X.500 DN in it, then create a CSR and have a CA to sign it, and finally to import the certificate into proper place in the ZMailer server. The same procedure is usable as with Sendmail, and with Postfix, I think. Configuration details, that is telling where the cert and key are is specific to each system. One could also - in theory - recycle old key, but such a thing is a way to be juicier attack target, when RSA key is kept the same for prolonged time. One should always create a new key when creating a new certificate. > Thanks, > Neal Morgan -- /Matti Aarnio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed May 6 20:41:34 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S84157AbZEFRld46Qbc (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 20:41:33 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S84165AbZEFRldvTMsY (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 20:41:33 +0300 Received: from p02c11o142.mxlogic.net ([208.65.144.75]:48417 "EHLO p02c11o142.mxlogic.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S84157AbZEFRldTJoF4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 20:41:33 +0300 Received: from unknown [68.179.27.105] (EHLO MailServer.lan.adbase.com) by p02c11o142.mxlogic.net (mxl_mta-6.1.1-4) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id acbc10a4.3415976848.23738.00-003.p02c11o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 06 May 2009 11:41:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: from MailServer.lan.adbase.com ([fe80::9e5:4f4b:fed8:4540]) by MailServer.lan.adbase.com ([fe80::9e5:4f4b:fed8:4540%10]) with mapi; Wed, 6 May 2009 13:38:59 -0400 From: Ernest Kugel To: "'zmailer@nic.funet.fi'" Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:38:58 -0400 Subject: [ZMailer] Zmailer scheduler crashes as a result of an flock error Thread-Topic: Zmailer scheduler crashes as a result of an flock error Thread-Index: AcnOcYr2BgBwPKZdRLKOR+7MoZrImg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; S=0.200(2009020301)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [(unknown)] Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi all, I'm experiencing periodic crashes with scheduler which seem to be caused by an flock failure, and it looks like this brings Zmailer to a halt with a fork error. This seems to be more frequent during higher load periods, and the only way to get Zmailer sending again is to restart scheduler. I'm curious if anyone saw something similar before? If not, would anyone have even the slightest idea as to what might be causing it? We're running it on Debian 4, amd64. Thanks in advance for the time, any thoughts would be greatly appreciated... Ernest Kugel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Jun 22 12:38:16 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77963AbZFVJh74kAdc (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:37:59 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77983AbZFVJh7tyLkY (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:37:59 +0300 Received: from [194.149.90.8] ([194.149.90.8]:50847 "EHLO webhosts.mm-com.ru" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77963AbZFVJh7UmS3s (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:37:59 +0300 Received: from host-93-182-8-148.real.kvidex.net ([93.182.8.148]:60721 "EHLO [192.168.100.10]" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail.euro-comm.net with ESMTPSA id S17124727AbZFVJh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:37:57 +0400 Message-ID: <4A3F50F2.50204@lipetsk.ru> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:37:54 +0400 From: Victor Gamov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] FQDN at zmailer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi gentlemans! I use zmailer many years ago and now I try to use it again at my company domain. Now we need to use virtual domains at mail server and I need to zmailer deliver mail to mailboxes like user@dom1 and user@dom2 If I use fqdnaliases then I need to use something like user@dom1: userbox_dom1 but I want to deliver mail into mailbox name in form user@dom1. If i try to use zmailer-2.99.57 "out of box" at FreeBSD box then I get "Malformed (missing) recipient privilege data" Is it posible to turn on/off some zmailer params to achieve this functionality or I need to hack fqdnliases.cf Thanks! -- CU, Victor Gamov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Jun 29 11:45:51 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77364AbZF2IpvFgNHk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:45:51 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77367AbZF2Ipu6mxwI (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:45:50 +0300 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:30528 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77364AbZF2Ipu0nHXs (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:45:50 +0300 Received: from blueice2n1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.171]:16296 "EHLO [9.156.35.19]" smtp-auth: "egc@online.ru" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by gnome06.net.rol.ru with SUBMITSA id S1276121AbZF2Ipt (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:45:49 +0400 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at gnome06.net.rol.ru logged sender identity as: egc@online.ru Message-ID: <4A487F3A.9030605@online.ru> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:45:46 +0400 From: Eugene Crosser User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Gamov CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] FQDN at zmailer References: <4A3F50F2.50204@lipetsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A3F50F2.50204@lipetsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Victor Gamov wrote: > I use zmailer many years ago and now I try to use it again at my company > domain. > > Now we need to use virtual domains at mail server and I need to zmailer > deliver mail to mailboxes like user@dom1 and user@dom2 > If I use fqdnaliases then I need to use something like > user@dom1: userbox_dom1 > > but I want to deliver mail into mailbox name in form user@dom1. If i try > to use zmailer-2.99.57 "out of box" at FreeBSD box then I get > "Malformed (missing) recipient privilege data" > > Is it posible to turn on/off some zmailer params to achieve this > functionality or I need to hack fqdnliases.cf I am not sure why do you get the message about the privilege data, but as to your original goal, maybe MAILBOX=/var/maildoms/%D/%u (or like) could be a solution. This approach works best if your getpwnam() accepts username in the form "user@domain.tld". Eugene -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue Jun 30 14:25:32 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77434AbZF3LZQFCw44 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:25:16 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77439AbZF3LZPsRjiI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:25:15 +0300 Received: from [194.149.90.8] ([194.149.90.8]:58866 "EHLO webhosts.mm-com.ru" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77434AbZF3LZPDluKI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:25:15 +0300 Received: from host-93-182-8-148.real.kvidex.net ([93.182.8.148]:62291 "EHLO [192.168.100.10]" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail.euro-comm.net with ESMTPSA id S17127639AbZF3LZN (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:25:13 +0400 Message-ID: <4A49F617.3000509@lipetsk.ru> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:25:11 +0400 From: Victor Gamov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] FQDN at zmailer References: <4A3F50F2.50204@lipetsk.ru> <4A487F3A.9030605@online.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A487F3A.9030605@online.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On 29.06.2009 12:45, Eugene Crosser wrote: > Victor Gamov wrote: > >> I use zmailer many years ago and now I try to use it again at my company >> domain. >> >> Now we need to use virtual domains at mail server and I need to zmailer >> deliver mail to mailboxes like user@dom1 and user@dom2 >> If I use fqdnaliases then I need to use something like >> user@dom1: userbox_dom1 >> >> but I want to deliver mail into mailbox name in form user@dom1. If i try >> to use zmailer-2.99.57 "out of box" at FreeBSD box then I get >> "Malformed (missing) recipient privilege data" >> >> Is it posible to turn on/off some zmailer params to achieve this >> functionality or I need to hack fqdnliases.cf > > I am not sure why do you get the message about the privilege data, but > as to your original goal, maybe MAILBOX=/var/maildoms/%D/%u (or like) > could be a solution. > > This approach works best if your getpwnam() accepts username in the form > "user@domain.tld". Messages delivered OK for real users from passwd. But for virtual users I use following at line 335 at fqdnaliases.cf if [ $key = $address ] then returns (((local "$address" "$address" $A))) else returns (((bitbucket "duplicate-$key.fqdnaliases" "$address" $A))) fi in fqdnaliases file I use virtuser_1@domain_1.tld: virtuser_1@domain_1.tld virtuser_1@domain_2.tld: virtuser_1@domain_2.tld and everything works fine I think that it may be patch to fqdnaliases.cf and we need some directive at config to get this functionality. -- CU, Victor Gamov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu Jul 23 21:38:42 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S78069AbZGWSi3W60xI (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:38:29 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S78077AbZGWSi3RUbik (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:38:29 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:38884 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S78069AbZGWSi2evddc (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:38:28 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:5871 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1049835AbZGWSh6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:37:58 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1248979084.14886@AtRW2YPUUICA6K5+S45Nvg Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:37:57 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B144BEC@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SMTP Timeout Parm in Scheduler.conf thread-index: AcoLxLKSMIwX7+aNR6O8uS8NLYmkTg== From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 104983523113758 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Subject: [ZMailer] SMTP Timeout Parm in Scheduler.conf Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Greetings: I have a remote server that has an intermittent problem with its SMTP service. As a result, I see messages queue growing as my outbound smtp waits through a connection timeout and subsequent retries. The remote eventually self corrects and shortly thereafter the messages deliver. I would like to change my configuration for this channel/host so the SMTP timeout is substantially lower than the 5 minute default - to see if I can reduce the amount of delay experienced in message delivery. The message I am seeing is: "diag Timeout of 300 sec while waiting responses from remote" I see a timeout parm in the man page for smtp, but I am not understanding the exact syntax required. Here is what I have tried (in scheduler.conf) for this channel/host - but neither of these seem to work. I still see the 300 sec timeout message. command="smtp -s -L [204.16.171.8] -T conn=30s tcpw=30s" and command="smtp -s -L [204.16.171.8] -Tconn=30s -Ttcpw=30s" What is the correct syntax here? Thanks, Neal Morgan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu Jul 23 21:45:37 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S78085AbZGWSpgwperQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:45:36 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S78088AbZGWSpgtVim4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:45:36 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:37279 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S78085AbZGWSpgOeJDY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:45:36 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:6004 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1049804AbZGWSoV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:44:21 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1248979484.62469@2EBlVog/mOks0JLCgQ0KOQ Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: [ZMailer] Retry Order in Scheduler.conf X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:44:19 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B144BED@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Retry Order in Scheduler.conf thread-index: AcoLxZa9rHZLN2LBS7ybqPOqGFaYmg== From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 104980423114421 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Greetings: Is there a way to change the retry order for a particular Channel/Host in the scheduler? >From time to time I will have a destination reject the first message in the queue for something related to content, and zmailer waits/retries patiently in the same order until I either remove the offending message or the destination changes its mind and accepts the message. I am wondering if there is a way to make it start with a different message on the next retry rather than continue trying to deliver in order. I see an "AgeOrder" parameter in the scheduler.conf, but I don't see any mention of it in the man page, and I am not finding any alternatives to this that look like what I want. Does such a mechanism exist? Thanks, Neal Morgan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri Jul 24 00:03:05 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77634AbZGWVCwwuaKs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:02:52 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77909AbZGWVCwrhbIc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:02:52 +0300 Received: from mate.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.1]:41952 "EHLO mate.dm.uba.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77634AbZGWVCvqjIl4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:02:51 +0300 Received: from mate36.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.36]:17669 "EHLO [157.92.22.36]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mate.dm.uba.ar with ESMTP id S4627839AbZGWVCt (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:02:49 -0300 Message-ID: <4A68CFF8.8040001@dm.uba.ar> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:02:48 -0300 From: Rodolfo Cossalter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neal Morgan CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] SMTP Timeout Parm in Scheduler.conf References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B144BEC@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B144BEC@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Neal Morgan escribió: > Greetings: > > I have a remote server that has an intermittent problem with its SMTP > service. As a result, I see messages queue growing as my outbound smtp > waits through a connection timeout and subsequent retries. > > The remote eventually self corrects and shortly thereafter the messages > deliver. > > I would like to change my configuration for this channel/host so the > SMTP timeout is substantially lower than the 5 minute default - to see > if I can reduce the amount of delay experienced in message delivery. > > The message I am seeing is: > > "diag Timeout of 300 sec while waiting responses from remote" > > > I see a timeout parm in the man page for smtp, but I am not > understanding the exact syntax required. Here is what I have tried (in > scheduler.conf) for this channel/host - but neither of these seem to > work. I still see the 300 sec timeout message. > > > command="smtp -s -L [204.16.171.8] -T conn=30s tcpw=30s" > > and > > command="smtp -s -L [204.16.171.8] -Tconn=30s -Ttcpw=30s" > > > What is the correct syntax here? > That is what the man page for smtp reads, but from the source code for smtp.c you can see that the timeouts are in seconds. Extract from smtp.c : ----------- ... ... ... case 'T': /* specify Timeout in seconds */ if (CISTREQN(optarg,"conn=",5)) { timeout_conn = parse_interval(optarg+5,NULL); if (timeout_conn < 10) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: bad tcp connection timeout: %s\n", argv[0], optarg+5); ++errflg; } break; } else if (CISTREQN(optarg,"data=",5)) { timeout_data = parse_interval(optarg+5,NULL); if (timeout_data < 10) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: bad data timeout: %s\n", argv[0], optarg+5); ++errflg; } break; } else if (CISTREQN(optarg,"dot=",4)) { timeout_dot = parse_interval(optarg+4,NULL); if (timeout_dot < 10) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: bad data-dot-reply timeout: %s\n", argv[0], optarg+4); ++errflg; } break; ... ... ------------------- I didn't try it myself hth Rodolfo > > Thanks, > > Neal Morgan > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in > the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat Sep 5 17:16:12 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S76799AbZIEOQLhDNUs (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:16:11 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S76980AbZIEOQLaxlqI (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:16:11 +0300 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:41402 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S76799AbZIEOQLB3v0s (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:16:11 +0300 Received: from ppp91-78-73-1.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([91.78.73.1]:1342 "EHLO ppp91-78-73-1.pppoe.mtu-net.ru" smtp-auth: "koc@rol.ru" TLS-CIPHER: "AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by gnome08.net.rol.ru with ESMTPSA id S1212808AbZIEOQK (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:16:10 +0400 Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:21:03 +0400 From: Kostik X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <961782618.20090905182103@rol.ru> To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] DCC in conjunction with ZMailer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi All! We implement DCC in conjunction with ZMailer - ZMS_DCC. The Distributed Checksum Clearinghouses or DCC is an anti-spam content filter that runs on a variety of operating systems. ZMS_DCC is Zmscanner module. It uses DCC Interface Daemon (dccifd) to submit messages into DCC. This also allows to use DCC greylisting mechanism for ZMailer MTA. ZMS_DCC homepage: http://kocmuk.ru/zmscanner/#en We are using ZMS_DCC more then 6 month on high traffic mail systems and it works fine. Any question and suggestion are welcome. =kostik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat Sep 5 18:00:53 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S76999AbZIEPAqpJNLc (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:00:46 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77037AbZIEPAqj0anQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:00:46 +0300 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:54826 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S76999AbZIEPApgfjG4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:00:45 +0300 Received: from ppp91-78-73-1.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([91.78.73.1]:3166 "EHLO ppp91-78-73-1.pppoe.mtu-net.ru" smtp-auth: "koc@rol.ru" TLS-CIPHER: "AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by gnome08.net.rol.ru with ESMTPSA id S1212948AbZIEPAo (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:00:44 +0400 Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:05:38 +0400 From: Kostik X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1063830218.20090905190538@rol.ru> To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] Broken mailbox files on NFS, linux 2.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi All! As known, NFS client at Linux 2.6 works strange. If you have filesystem quota and try to write data size exceeds quota, you break yours data. Simple test_nfswrite.c program (gcc test_nfswrite.c -o test_nfswrite): --- #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include int main(int arc, char * argv[]) { int fd; int rc; int i; int size = 1024; char *buf; int it; it = atoi(argv[1]); buf = (char*)malloc(size * sizeof(char)); memset(buf, 'a', size - 1); buf[size - 1] = '\0'; /* Open test file on "quota on" file system */ fd = open("/mount/m7/tmp/test", O_RDWR); for(i = 0; i < it; i++) { /* Write 1024 bytes blocks */1 rc = write(fd, buf, strlen(buf)); printf("write: %d, errno = %s\n", rc, strerror(errno)); } rc = fsync(fd); printf("fsync: %d, errno = %s\n", rc, strerror(errno)); rc = fdatasync(fd); printf("fdatasync: %d, errno = %s\n", rc, strerror(errno)); rc = close(fd); printf("close: %d\n", rc); free(buf); return 0; } --- Run: ./test_nfswrite 120 (write 120*1024 bytes block, set more blocks for write overquota data) On 2.4 you receive error on write stage then data size exceeds quota. On 2.6 it always says OK. But you receive broken "test" file. If you change: --- - fd = open("/mount/m7/tmp/test", O_RDWR); + fd = open("/mount/m7/tmp/test", O_RDWR|O_SYNC); --- everything will work well on 2.6 - error on write stage. Here is patch for last Zmailer (many thanx to Mike ): --- ./zmailer.orig/transports/mailbox/mailbox.c 2006-06-26 20:28:03.000000000 +0400 +++ ./zmailer/transports/mailbox/mailbox.c 2009-06-22 16:49:18.000000000 +0400 @@ -1753,7 +1753,8 @@ "To open a file with euid=%d egid=%d ismbox=%d file='%s'\n", (int)geteuid(), (int)getegid(), ismbox, file); - fdmail = open(file, O_RDWR|O_APPEND); +/* koc */ + fdmail = open(file, O_RDWR|O_APPEND|O_SYNC); if (fdmail < 0) { char fmtbuf[512]; @@ -1997,6 +1998,11 @@ int rc = write(sffileno(sfp), p, len); int e = errno; +/* koc */ + if ((rc < 0) && (fsync(sffileno(sfp)) < 0)) { + if (errno == EDQUOT) e = errno; + } + if (verboselog) fprintf(verboselog, " mbox_sfwrite(ptr, len=%d) rc=%d errno=%d\n", (int)len, rc, e); =koc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri Sep 11 16:04:09 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77377AbZIKNECZneCQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:04:02 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77381AbZIKNECSzs4A (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:04:02 +0300 Received: from ss2.mm-com.ru ([194.149.90.8]:64137 "EHLO ss2.mm-com.ru" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77377AbZIKNEBdpxUY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:04:01 +0300 Received: from host-93-182-8-148.real.kvidex.net ([93.182.8.148]:63195 "EHLO [192.168.100.10]" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail.euro-comm.net with ESMTPSA id S17123360AbZIKND5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:03:57 +0400 Message-ID: <4AAA4ABC.2010401@lipetsk.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:03:56 +0400 From: Victor Gamov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] smtpserver core dumped Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi all FreeBSD-7.2 + perl-5.8.9 + zmailer-2.99.57 (--with-embed-perl) smtpserver compiling produce following: ./smtphook.c: In function 'ZSMTP_hook_init': ./smtphook.c:78: warning: passing argument 2 of 'Perl_sys_init3' from incompatible pointer type When smtpserver started it core dumped. Looking at smtphook.c and "man perlembed" and yes incompatible type founded. (dirty) patch by diff -c applyed: ---------------- cut here ------------------- *** smtphook.c.orig Fri Sep 11 16:53:06 2009 --- smtphook.c Fri Sep 11 16:58:18 2009 *************** *** 67,72 **** --- 67,73 ---- { const char *smtpperl5opt; char *argv[] = {"", perlhookpath}; + char **argv2 = &argv; int argc = sizeof(argv) / sizeof(char *), exitstatus; #ifdef HAVE_PUTENV *************** *** 75,81 **** type(NULL , 0, NULL, "Can not set PERL5OPT environment variable !"); #endif ! PERL_SYS_INIT3(&argc, &argv, NULL); if ((my_perl = perl_alloc()) == NULL) { type(NULL , 0, NULL, "Can not allocate memory for perl !"); --- 76,82 ---- type(NULL , 0, NULL, "Can not set PERL5OPT environment variable !"); #endif ! PERL_SYS_INIT3(&argc, &argv2, NULL); if ((my_perl = perl_alloc()) == NULL) { type(NULL , 0, NULL, "Can not allocate memory for perl !"); ---------------- /cut here ------------------- smtpserver compiled and worked correctly now. -- CU, Victor Gamov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri Sep 11 17:05:20 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77364AbZIKOFUGeU3c (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:05:20 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77380AbZIKOFT51yJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:05:19 +0300 Received: from ss2.mm-com.ru ([194.149.90.8]:56444 "EHLO ss2.mm-com.ru" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77364AbZIKOFTXEvIs (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:05:19 +0300 Received: from host-93-182-8-148.real.kvidex.net ([93.182.8.148]:62325 "EHLO [192.168.100.10]" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail.euro-comm.net with ESMTPSA id S17123360AbZIKOFR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:05:17 +0400 Message-ID: <4AAA591B.2050209@lipetsk.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:05:15 +0400 From: Victor Gamov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] smtpserver core dumped References: <4AAA4ABC.2010401@lipetsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <4AAA4ABC.2010401@lipetsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On 11.09.2009 17:03, Victor Gamov wrote: > Hi all > > FreeBSD-7.2 + perl-5.8.9 + zmailer-2.99.57 (--with-embed-perl) > > smtpserver compiling produce following: > ./smtphook.c: In function 'ZSMTP_hook_init': > ./smtphook.c:78: warning: passing argument 2 of 'Perl_sys_init3' from > incompatible pointer type > > When smtpserver started it core dumped. > Looking at smtphook.c and "man perlembed" and yes incompatible type > founded. > > (dirty) patch by diff -c applyed: > > ---------------- cut here ------------------- > *** smtphook.c.orig Fri Sep 11 16:53:06 2009 > --- smtphook.c Fri Sep 11 16:58:18 2009 > *************** > *** 67,72 **** > --- 67,73 ---- > { > const char *smtpperl5opt; > char *argv[] = {"", perlhookpath}; > + char **argv2 = &argv; hmm char **argv2 = &argv[0]; looks like more correct -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri Oct 9 17:45:04 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S76740AbZJIOozWjLJA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:44:55 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77050AbZJIOozRLJpA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:44:55 +0300 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([78.24.191.182]:34656 "EHLO eddie.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S76740AbZJIOoyZgBUk (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:44:54 +0300 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:32800 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492878AbZJIOov (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:44:51 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n99Ek19Z019671; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:46:01 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n99Ek0G3019667; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:46:00 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:46:00 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matti Aarnio Cc: Neal Morgan , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Message-ID: <20091009144600.GA19375@linux-mips.org> References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:09:55PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:32:31PM -0800, Neal Morgan wrote: > > > > On October 31, 2008 9:03 AM Ralf Baechle wrote > > > > Since quite a while I'm observing these kernel messages on a Linux x86_64 > > > > system: > > > > > > > > sm[3270]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fffe7c48e30 error 6 in > > > libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > > > > sm[3493] trap stack segment ip:7f0e2a121bc9 sp:7fff3240e4a0 error:0 > > > > sm[3773]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fff55499680 error 6 in > > > libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] > > > > > > Matti: I've been seeing these across 4 servers: > > > > > > kernel: smtpserver[31693]: segfault at 00000000 eip b7c16371 esp > > > bf94b018 error 4 > > > > > > kernel: router[9934]: segfault at 00000008 eip 0807fa95 esp bfdf5570 > > > error 4 > > > > > > The interesting thing is it only happens when booted into a 2.6.24 > > > kernel. If I reboot the same box into a 2.6.18 kernel everything runs > > > fine (and there are no segfaults). > > Older kernels don't emit this segfault message. It was added in > commit abd4f7505bafdd6c5319fe3cb5caf9af6104e17a that is for 2.6.23. Could > that be why you didn't notice it earlier? > > > I do see them too with 2.6.26 kernel at zmailer.org server. > > A few hits per week according to kernel dmesg logs. > > > > I suspect more about glibc doing something stupid, than program really > > going over the edge, but these are so rare that debugging them is next > > to impossible. Previously I have seen them happen after the program > > has called exit(0). > > > > Anyway I have turned on core dumps to be able to see what happens. > > I've seen Zmailer stopping mail delivery or stopping accepting connections > on port 25. The issue is hitting relativly infrequently but I decieded to > follow your example and just turned on core dumps; it is affecting sm, > smtpserver and router. Lately the frequency of this issue striking > seems to have increased significantly - I wonder if that's due to me > looking more frequently after it or due to my extremly inflated mail > queue with over 1,700,000 stored messages. > > Ironically I seem to have gotten another router segfault just seconds > before I enabled core dumps ... To close this old case - the issue went away for me after upgrading the system from Fedora 8 to Fedora 10. So I assume there indeed as suspected by Matti was something toxic in glibc. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sun Oct 18 21:05:19 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77515AbZJRSFLKBRcQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:05:11 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77662AbZJRSFKy7zzk (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:05:10 +0300 Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.1.9]:21664 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77529AbZJRSFJw5qdc (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:05:09 +0300 Received: from ppp91-77-133-0.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([91.77.133.0]:3428 "EHLO ppp91-77-133-0.pppoe.mtu-net.ru" smtp-auth: "koc@rol.ru" TLS-CIPHER: "AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by gnome09.net.rol.ru with ESMTPSA id S1180219AbZJRSFI (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:05:08 +0400 X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.8505 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:10:47 +0400 From: Kostik X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <903984983.20091018221047@rol.ru> To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] Dovecot LDA as local delivery agent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi! Some time ago, we are setup Dovecot LDA as local delivery agent for Zmailer. Main features of Dovecot LDA (http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA): -- Mailbox indexing during mail delivery, providing faster mailbox access later -- Quota enforcing by a plugin -- Sieve language support by a plugin ---- Mail filtering ---- Mail forwarding ---- Vacation auto-reply Perhaps anyone would be interested: 1. Add to zmailer/sm.conf --- # dovecot LDA dovecot SPfne /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver deliver -e -n -d $u --- 2. Change zmailer/scheduler.conf like this: Go local/file* and local/pipe* thru "mailbox" delivery agent: --- local/file* local/pipe* ... # zmailer local delivery transport agent command="mailbox -8HS -l ${LOGDIR}/mailbox" --- and after go all other local/* thru dovecot LDA: --- local/* ... # DOVECOT as the local delivery agent: command="sm -8c $channel dovecot" --- As /Matti Aarnio wrote about procmail: > > Then all deliveries to local users will go thru procmail, AND > if users want to run pipes / store to files thru their .forward > files, they can do that too. (That is why there are tag-matchers > for "local/file*" and "local/pipe*" before "local/*" in that > scheduler.conf file; those are for cases which must not run thru > procmail.) But little problem: If you (as we) will start use "-e" deliver param: --- -e: If mail gets rejected, write the rejection reason to stderr and exit with EX_NOPERM. --- Zmailer start complain on reject case: "(this is abnormal, investigate!)". Fix Zmailer: in zmailer/transports/libta/diagnostic.c: --- - case EX_NOPERM: case EX_PROTOCOL: case EX_USAGE: strcat(message, " (this is abnormal, investigate!)"); s += strlen(s); /* fall through */ + case EX_NOPERM: case EX_NOUSER: case EX_NOHOST: case EX_UNAVAILABLE: --- Or fix Dovecot: in dovecot-1.2.6/src/deliver/deliver.c: --- if (stderr_rejection) - return EX_NOPERM; + return EX_UNAVAILABLE; --- =kostik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue Nov 24 00:43:01 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S76993AbZKWWnB1lgMk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:43:01 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77346AbZKWWnBWIELI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:43:01 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:58408 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S76993AbZKWWnAvq40Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:43:00 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nANMhFge027680; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:43:15 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nANMhE3X027678; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:43:14 GMT Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:43:14 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Cc: Matti Aarnio Subject: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi An upgrade from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 broke zmailer for me. Initial sympthom were syslog messages: Message from syslogd@box at Nov 23 23:23:53 ... smtpserver[18047]: smtpserver policy database problem, code: 2 where code 2 means not found. Since the database file was present I was wondering what smtpserver was actually trying to open and found this gem in the strace output: [pid 17844] stat("$MLVAR/db/smsmtp-policy.db", 0x7fff018ebbf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) I was able to get that to work by throwing in two symlinks but obviously something is very wrong here. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue Nov 24 13:56:14 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77049AbZKXL4EbY8-4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:56:04 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77455AbZKXL4E0OZ0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:56:04 +0200 Received: from mail-3.netbauds.net ([78.33.0.242]:56623 "EHLO mail-3.netbauds.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77049AbZKXL4Dxtch4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:56:03 +0200 Received: from 93-97-168-38.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.168.38]:35097 "EHLO odin.home.darrylmiles.org" smtp-auth: "darryl" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail-3.netbauds.net with ESMTPSA id S4524883AbZKXL4C (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:56:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4B0BC9C8.1000008@netbauds.net> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:55:52 +0000 From: Darryl Miles User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi, Matti Aarnio Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Could the format have changes ? have you tried deleting all DBM database files and recreating them from the original data ? Darryl Ralf Baechle wrote: > An upgrade from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 broke zmailer for me. Initial > sympthom were syslog messages: > > Message from syslogd@box at Nov 23 23:23:53 ... > smtpserver[18047]: smtpserver policy database problem, code: 2 > > where code 2 means not found. Since the database file was present I was > wondering what smtpserver was actually trying to open and found this gem > in the strace output: > > [pid 17844] stat("$MLVAR/db/smsmtp-policy.db", 0x7fff018ebbf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > > I was able to get that to work by throwing in two symlinks but obviously > something is very wrong here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue Nov 24 14:16:48 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77035AbZKXMQiomAx4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:16:38 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77599AbZKXMQijU7bs (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:16:38 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:39311 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77035AbZKXMQiMdWYI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:16:38 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAOCGqM3026523; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:16:52 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAOCGpWd026521; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:16:51 GMT Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:16:51 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Darryl Miles Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi, Matti Aarnio Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091124121651.GA5749@linux-mips.org> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <4B0BC9C8.1000008@netbauds.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B0BC9C8.1000008@netbauds.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:55:52AM +0000, Darryl Miles wrote: > Could the format have changes ? have you tried deleting all DBM > database files and recreating them from the original data ? Tried that and it didn't make any difference. I also tried rebuilding Zmailer again that didn't make any difference. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue Nov 24 14:51:18 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77599AbZKXMvJEQ3cA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:51:09 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77666AbZKXMvJA76aQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:51:09 +0200 Received: from mail-1.netbauds.net ([78.33.0.162]:10565 "EHLO mail-1.netbauds.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77599AbZKXMvIaqMm4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:51:08 +0200 Received: from 93-97-168-38.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.168.38]:41097 "EHLO odin.home.darrylmiles.org" smtp-auth: "darryl" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail-1.netbauds.net with ESMTPSA id S8324107AbZKXMvH (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:51:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4B0BD6B0.9060201@netbauds.net> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:50:56 +0000 From: Darryl Miles User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi, Matti Aarnio Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <4B0BC9C8.1000008@netbauds.net> <20091124121651.GA5749@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20091124121651.GA5749@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:55:52AM +0000, Darryl Miles wrote: > >> Could the format have changes ? have you tried deleting all DBM >> database files and recreating them from the original data ? > > Tried that and it didn't make any difference. I also tried rebuilding > Zmailer again that didn't make any difference. Okay has the file naming convention changed ? I.e. its no longer *.db but *.whateverdb ? When you did install/recreate the DB files what new names did they get ? Darryl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue Nov 24 15:02:08 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77739AbZKXNCIS0Hy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:02:08 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77742AbZKXNCIO1Iv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:02:08 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:33247 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77739AbZKXNCHlsWRc (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:02:07 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAOD2NH1027492; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:02:23 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAOD2NFT027490; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:02:23 GMT Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:02:23 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Darryl Miles Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi, Matti Aarnio Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091124130223.GC5749@linux-mips.org> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <4B0BC9C8.1000008@netbauds.net> <20091124121651.GA5749@linux-mips.org> <4B0BD6B0.9060201@netbauds.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B0BD6B0.9060201@netbauds.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:50:56PM +0000, Darryl Miles wrote: > > Ralf Baechle wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:55:52AM +0000, Darryl Miles wrote: >> >>> Could the format have changes ? have you tried deleting all DBM >>> database files and recreating them from the original data ? >> >> Tried that and it didn't make any difference. I also tried rebuilding >> Zmailer again that didn't make any difference. > > Okay has the file naming convention changed ? I.e. its no longer *.db > but *.whateverdb ? > > When you did install/recreate the DB files what new names did they get ? No, the naming convention hasn't changed and the db file has the correct name /etc/zmailer/db/smtp-policy.db. The issue is that smtpserver is using this utterly broken filename "$MLVAR/db/smsmtp-policy.db" to look for the policy db. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Nov 25 13:36:04 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77794AbZKYLgD5sMJs (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:03 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77792AbZKYLgDxF7d4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:03 +0200 Received: (mea@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77787AbZKYLgDP4hCQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:03 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:03 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Ralf Baechle Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi, Matti Aarnio Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091125113603.GB11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:43:14PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > An upgrade from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 broke zmailer for me. Initial > sympthom were syslog messages: I have usually had a need to recompile the ZMailer on new Fedora. For the reason of libraries having changed... The strace results below are rather surprising... Your box is MIPS, which has different endianity, and all such funny things? > Message from syslogd@box at Nov 23 23:23:53 ... > smtpserver[18047]: smtpserver policy database problem, code: 2 > > where code 2 means not found. Since the database file was present I was > wondering what smtpserver was actually trying to open and found this gem > in the strace output: > > [pid 17844] stat("$MLVAR/db/smsmtp-policy.db", 0x7fff018ebbf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > > I was able to get that to work by throwing in two symlinks but obviously > something is very wrong here. > > Ralf -- /Matti Aarnio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Nov 25 14:33:37 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77787AbZKYMdguPgYs (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:33:36 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77795AbZKYMdgqF7l4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:33:36 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:33923 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77787AbZKYMdgO3k94 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:33:36 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAPCXmKP006339; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:33:50 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAPCXle9006337; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:33:47 GMT Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:33:47 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matti Aarnio Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091125123347.GA5225@linux-mips.org> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <20091125113603.GB11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091125113603.GB11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:36:03PM +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:43:14PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > An upgrade from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 broke zmailer for me. Initial > > sympthom were syslog messages: > > I have usually had a need to recompile the ZMailer on new > Fedora. For the reason of libraries having changed... > > The strace results below are rather surprising... > Your box is MIPS, which has different endianity, and all such funny things? No; the system is which is a x86_64 virtual machine running on VMware ESX running pretty much a stock F12 - with maybe the biggest difference from a standard system being Zmailer :-) I don't seem to have issues with any of the other databases btw. Only the policy DB seems to be affected. Where in the zmailer code is the filename for the policy db generated? Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Nov 25 14:41:42 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77799AbZKYMllkn9gI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:41:41 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77795AbZKYMllhLAGk (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:41:41 +0200 Received: (mea@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77799AbZKYMlk5KzPI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:41:40 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:41:40 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Matti Aarnio , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091125124140.GC11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <20091125113603.GB11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20091125123347.GA5225@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091125123347.GA5225@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:33:47PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > The strace results below are rather surprising... > > Your box is MIPS, which has different endianity, and all such funny things? > > No; the system is which is a x86_64 virtual machine running on VMware ESX > running pretty much a stock F12 - with maybe the biggest difference from a > standard system being Zmailer :-) > > I don't seem to have issues with any of the other databases btw. Only > the policy DB seems to be affected. Where in the zmailer code is the > filename for the policy db generated? It is at smtpserver.conf file. The default file says essentially: # # The policy database: (NOTE: See 'makedb' for its default suffixes!) # PARAM policydb $DBTYPE $MAILVAR/db/smtp-policy The $MAILVAR is read from zmailer.conf (where that is in your system), and if you have there a string: MAILVAR=$LMVAR that would explain at least part of the problem.. The variable substitution engine does not handle double-indirections. > Ralf Btw: zmailer.org runs on Amd-X2 (x86-64) and F12, so all things being equal, I should be able to reproduce your problem.. -- /Matti Aarnio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Nov 25 15:02:54 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77800AbZKYNCyKiodc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:02:54 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77802AbZKYNCyG5F0s (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:02:54 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:59129 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77800AbZKYNCx0qW5A (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:02:53 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAPD39db006915; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:09 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAPD39we006913; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:09 GMT Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:09 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matti Aarnio Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091125130309.GB5225@linux-mips.org> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <20091125113603.GB11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20091125123347.GA5225@linux-mips.org> <20091125124140.GC11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091125124140.GC11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > I don't seem to have issues with any of the other databases btw. Only > > the policy DB seems to be affected. Where in the zmailer code is the > > filename for the policy db generated? > > It is at smtpserver.conf file. The default file says essentially: > > # > # The policy database: (NOTE: See 'makedb' for its default suffixes!) > # > PARAM policydb $DBTYPE $MAILVAR/db/smtp-policy > > The $MAILVAR is read from zmailer.conf (where that is in your system), > and if you have there a string: > > MAILVAR=$LMVAR > > that would explain at least part of the problem.. The variable substitution > engine does not handle double-indirections. # grep MAILVAR /etc/zmailer/zmailer.conf MAILVAR=/etc/zmailer # Grepping through /etc/zmailer doesn't find a single instance of "LMVAR". > Btw: zmailer.org runs on Amd-X2 (x86-64) and F12, so all things being equal, > I should be able to reproduce your problem.. I'm just installing F12 into a VM so I have a chance to look into what is going wrong. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri Nov 27 01:17:20 2009 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77475AbZKZXRUOcvyQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:17:20 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77705AbZKZXRUJKRqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:17:20 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:39133 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77475AbZKZXRTZ3QpI (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:17:19 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAQNHZk1029608; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:17:36 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAQNHZtk029607; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:17:35 GMT Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:17:34 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matti Aarnio Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12 Message-ID: <20091126231734.GA28593@linux-mips.org> References: <20091123224314.GA26735@linux-mips.org> <20091125113603.GB11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20091125123347.GA5225@linux-mips.org> <20091125124140.GC11733@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20091125130309.GB5225@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091125130309.GB5225@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:03:09PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > I don't seem to have issues with any of the other databases btw. Only > > > the policy DB seems to be affected. Where in the zmailer code is the > > > filename for the policy db generated? > > > > It is at smtpserver.conf file. The default file says essentially: > > > > # > > # The policy database: (NOTE: See 'makedb' for its default suffixes!) > > # > > PARAM policydb $DBTYPE $MAILVAR/db/smtp-policy > > > > The $MAILVAR is read from zmailer.conf (where that is in your system), > > and if you have there a string: > > > > MAILVAR=$LMVAR > > > > that would explain at least part of the problem.. The variable substitution > > engine does not handle double-indirections. > > # grep MAILVAR /etc/zmailer/zmailer.conf > MAILVAR=/etc/zmailer > # > > Grepping through /etc/zmailer doesn't find a single instance of "LMVAR". > > > Btw: zmailer.org runs on Amd-X2 (x86-64) and F12, so all things being equal, > > I should be able to reproduce your problem.. > > I'm just installing F12 into a VM so I have a chance to look into what is > going wrong. So on this vanilla F12 VM with zmailer rebuilt on the VM intself I can't reproduce the issue. Will now copy the config files from the actual server machine one by one and will also to use the binaries built on the server machine which had the issue. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Mar 31 06:27:11 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77021Ab0CaD1GVt9Ik (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:27:06 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77473Ab0CaD1GMJzNA (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:27:06 +0300 Received: from mail-1.netbauds.net ([78.33.0.162]:22614 "EHLO mail-1.netbauds.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77021Ab0CaD1F0HRm4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:27:05 +0300 Received: from 93-97-168-38.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.168.38]:58092 "EHLO odin.home.darrylmiles.org" smtp-auth: "darryl" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail-1.netbauds.net with ESMTPSA id S6751069Ab0CaD1D (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:27:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4BB2C106.30708@netbauds.net> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:27:02 +0100 From: "Darryl L. Miles" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] Zmailer CVS down ? SPF2 autoconf build issue! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Hi, Is Matti aware that the CVS server is down, however RSYNC is working ok. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@anoncvs.zmailer.org:/cvsroot checkout zmailer Fatal error, aborting. cvs: no such system user Also what is the recommended implementation of SPF2 to use ? There is libspf2-1.x libspf2-2.x and libspf_alt. If you configure and install this library on a Linux system it ends up in /usr/local/. The ./configure for zmailer doesn't fully detect the existence of SPF2; it knows that spf2 is in /usr/local I can see that detected but it doesn't setup the appropriate config.h setting for the header file #include to use: #define HAVE__USR_LOCAL_INCLUDE_SPF2_SPF_H 1 Due to the existence of /usr/local/include/spf2/spf.h. I also can not find how or where the autoconf performs detection of this, is this implied by the existence of the define in config.h.in ? I can see a shell variable $ac_cv_header__usr_local_include_spf2_spf_h in ./configure but not being an autoconf expert I don't know how this gets setup. Due to this the build fails at smtpserver where is it used. Thanks, Darryl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon May 17 19:55:49 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77346Ab0EQQzqNUWuA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 19:55:46 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77355Ab0EQQzqCYEmk (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 19:55:46 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:36481 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77346Ab0EQQzp0mRLA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 19:55:45 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:41219 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1050146Ab0EQQzQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 09:55:16 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1274720121.50009@sVyLQuzvPlm5KAMHH+E5Vw Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:55:15 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Thread-Index: Acr14bk3eLRzbG7GR1WuEoCH9Vvb8g== From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 105014617095516 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Greetings: This is probably something I should already know. Is there a way to make zmailer re-order the queue for a particular channel/host when the top message is being rejected by the receiving end? We continually find that aol will reject a message with a temporary error, then subsequent messages will queue up behind it, and the queue grows larger and larger until we take manual action to correct it. Zmailer continues to want to deliver the messages in the original order, meaning the newer messages never get tried since the top message is in the way. So, is it possible to make zmailer put the message with the temporary error at the bottom of the queue after some configurable number of retries? We have been handling this manually, by deleting the offending top message from both the transport and queue directories. Is there a zmailer-approved way to delete a single message for a channel/host? We've just been using "rm" for this, then forcing a resubmit on that channel/host. Thanks, Neal Morgan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon May 17 20:59:17 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77365Ab0EQR7NSLt7s (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 20:59:13 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77368Ab0EQR7NMGpuY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 20:59:13 +0300 Received: from doors.huapi.net.ar ([190.136.177.222]:40455 "EHLO doors.huapi.net.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77365Ab0EQR7M0taiQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 20:59:12 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=huapi.ba.ar; s=mail; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=C22q/4GBqcsZzo6f4H3AdVSvImjNaiYBlIQiGD0AtXs=; b=iaTPVjmuiX4e/r+ReMuzf/jNZEVtPMtACwvJ3QcsGM2KWroi1/E8WGUyipfgcrKRucauSwBtnQ/XcYzNfCiWinJNbdt7K5EI/vdLlUJzVhgOO/8W/LAsmaoG+1j/nGJ745LFeXDU1duIn/sZ5GSjUImclep0N+gA6PkiUWqz8TA=; Received: from huapi.ba.ar ([172.30.0.2]) by doors.huapi.net.ar with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OE4aq-000402-8D; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:59:08 -0300 Message-ID: <4BF183EB.1050808@huapi.ba.ar> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:59:07 -0300 From: Carlos G Mendioroz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neal Morgan CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.30.0.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tron@huapi.ba.ar X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on doors.huapi.net.ar X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_20, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:56:56 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on doors.huapi.net.ar) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi I kind of remember that this sort of failure can be minimized by setting 2 channels to work in parallel for delivery. In any case, you may consider moving away from zmailer. World is moving and zmailer is not. I've been a big fan of zmailer from Rayan's time, then at UofT. But sadly, it's no longer a viable option IMHO. -Carlos Neal Morgan @ 17/05/2010 13:55 -0300 dixit: > Greetings: > > This is probably something I should already know. Is there a way to > make zmailer re-order the queue for a particular channel/host when the > top message is being rejected by the receiving end? We continually find > that aol will reject a message with a temporary error, then subsequent > messages will queue up behind it, and the queue grows larger and larger > until we take manual action to correct it. Zmailer continues to want to > deliver the messages in the original order, meaning the newer messages > never get tried since the top message is in the way. So, is it possible > to make zmailer put the message with the temporary error at the bottom > of the queue after some configurable number of retries? > > We have been handling this manually, by deleting the offending top > message from both the transport and queue directories. Is there a > zmailer-approved way to delete a single message for a channel/host? > We've just been using "rm" for this, then forcing a resubmit on that > channel/host. > > > > Thanks, > > Neal Morgan > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in > the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi -- Carlos G Mendioroz LW7 EQI Argentina -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon May 17 22:46:19 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77039Ab0EQTqQnMZkY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 22:46:16 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77368Ab0EQTqQdJGAA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 22:46:16 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:40553 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77039Ab0EQTqPdYxUs (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 22:46:15 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:43252 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1050133Ab0EQTpm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 12:45:42 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1274730350.85484@Asf11fUuHjeV8NImTLoQ1Q Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:45:41 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266603@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <4BF183EB.1050808@huapi.ba.ar> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Thread-Index: Acr16tMgMw0DliW4R36+6h2IJWQ0LAADfHQQ References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF183EB.1050808@huapi.ba.ar> From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 105013317124542 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi > > Neal Morgan @ 17/05/2010 13:55 -0300 dixit: > > Greetings: > > > > This is probably something I should already know. Is there a way to > > make zmailer re-order the queue for a particular channel/host when the > > top message is being rejected by the receiving end? We continually find > > that aol will reject a message with a temporary error, then subsequent > > messages will queue up behind it, and the queue grows larger and larger > > until we take manual action to correct it. Zmailer continues to want to > > deliver the messages in the original order, meaning the newer messages > > never get tried since the top message is in the way. So, is it possible > > to make zmailer put the message with the temporary error at the bottom > > of the queue after some configurable number of retries? > > > > We have been handling this manually, by deleting the offending top > > message from both the transport and queue directories. Is there a > > zmailer-approved way to delete a single message for a channel/host? > > We've just been using "rm" for this, then forcing a resubmit on that > > channel/host. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neal Morgan > > on Monday, May 17, 2010 10:59 AM Carlos G Mendioroz wrote > > I kind of remember that this sort of failure can be minimized by > setting 2 channels to work in parallel for delivery. > > In any case, you may consider moving away from zmailer. World is moving > and zmailer is not. I've been a big fan of zmailer from Rayan's time, > then at UofT. But sadly, it's no longer a viable option IMHO. > > -Carlos > Have you moved on to something else? What did you choose? Having climbed much of the learning curve with Zmailer, I have stuck with it. With modifications to your MailScanner hooks, it has been working good for years. I think I have a dozen instances of it on various servers. On the other hand, it hasn't been included in the Debian packages for years now, and I think the rest of the world thinks it is dead. I'm pretty sure Matti is still out there, and would still write fixes if they were necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon May 17 23:06:35 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77368Ab0EQUGcCBGNQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 23:06:32 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77377Ab0EQUGb4Ow84 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 23:06:31 +0300 Received: from doors.huapi.net.ar ([190.136.177.222]:34994 "EHLO doors.huapi.net.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77368Ab0EQUGa4sqJA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 23:06:30 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=huapi.ba.ar; s=mail; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=cQtdUUckspx6PA/fKtA5agF+puOFtR4dl6YMASWqoo4=; b=HvIXNmJYi9XUPf6VvJx7QO7685T2DyeXFgguJEKz4VvVRjXt5lvRGQUxmnnHg4BAJ/Y/PefYAwgwm0Zy1N9QsnRPR6jj86jKgNxT7OIhr+KUpAKd5FhkMff3IECyH/u3Qm3vm2//pRBD0mcDLKVwh6IgZgtrnBuaJivQuLSFXcY=; Received: from huapi.ba.ar ([172.30.0.2]) by doors.huapi.net.ar with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OE6a2-0004aK-3L; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:06:26 -0300 Message-ID: <4BF1A1C1.5000302@huapi.ba.ar> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:06:25 -0300 From: Carlos G Mendioroz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neal Morgan CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF183EB.1050808@huapi.ba.ar> <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266603@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266603@server-16.MorganSys.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.30.0.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tron@huapi.ba.ar X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on doors.huapi.net.ar X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:56:56 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on doors.huapi.net.ar) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Neal Morgan @ 17/05/2010 16:45 -0300 dixit: >>> Neal Morgan @ 17/05/2010 13:55 -0300 dixit: >>> Greetings: >>> >>> This is probably something I should already know. Is there a way to >>> make zmailer re-order the queue for a particular channel/host when > the >>> top message is being rejected by the receiving end? We continually > find >>> that aol will reject a message with a temporary error, then > subsequent >>> messages will queue up behind it, and the queue grows larger and > larger >>> until we take manual action to correct it. Zmailer continues to > want to >>> deliver the messages in the original order, meaning the newer > messages >>> never get tried since the top message is in the way. So, is it > possible >>> to make zmailer put the message with the temporary error at the > bottom >>> of the queue after some configurable number of retries? >>> >>> We have been handling this manually, by deleting the offending top >>> message from both the transport and queue directories. Is there a >>> zmailer-approved way to delete a single message for a channel/host? >>> We've just been using "rm" for this, then forcing a resubmit on that >>> channel/host. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Neal Morgan >> on Monday, May 17, 2010 10:59 AM Carlos G Mendioroz wrote >> >> I kind of remember that this sort of failure can be minimized by >> setting 2 channels to work in parallel for delivery. >> >> In any case, you may consider moving away from zmailer. World is > moving >> and zmailer is not. I've been a big fan of zmailer from Rayan's time, >> then at UofT. But sadly, it's no longer a viable option IMHO. >> >> -Carlos >> > > Have you moved on to something else? What did you choose? > > Having climbed much of the learning curve with Zmailer, I have stuck > with it. With modifications to your MailScanner hooks, it has been > working good for years. I think I have a dozen instances of it on > various servers. > > On the other hand, it hasn't been included in the Debian packages for > years now, and I think the rest of the world thinks it is dead. I'm > pretty sure Matti is still out there, and would still write fixes if > they were necessary. > > Yes, I've moved to Exim4. (More exactly, I'm in the process of moving many installations to ~). Along the years, the flexibility of zmailer has become a trap difficult to escape from, and the beauty of routing and then delivering with a small footprint is appealing. As I said, I loved it, but decided to move on. -Carlos (already been called a traitor :) -- Carlos G Mendioroz LW7 EQI Argentina -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue May 18 02:03:21 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77390Ab0EQXDVZPrps (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 02:03:21 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77393Ab0EQXDVPsRuQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 02:03:21 +0300 Received: from poczta.medcom.com.pl ([83.238.4.20]:48643 "EHLO poczta.medcom.com.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77390Ab0EQXDUkmQ7A (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 02:03:20 +0300 Received: (from localhost user: 'bartek' uid#1000 fake: STDIN (bartek@poczta.medcom.com.pl)) by poczta.medcom.com.pl id S367914Ab0EQXDT (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 01:03:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:03:19 +0200 From: Bartek Krajnik To: Carlos G Mendioroz Cc: Neal Morgan , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Message-ID: <20100517230318.GA22235@poczta.medcom.com.pl> References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF183EB.1050808@huapi.ba.ar> <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266603@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF1A1C1.5000302@huapi.ba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF1A1C1.5000302@huapi.ba.ar> Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On 17-05-2010 at 05:06:25PM -0300, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote: > Neal Morgan @ 17/05/2010 16:45 -0300 dixit: > > Have you moved on to something else? What did you choose? > > Yes, I've moved to Exim4. (More exactly, I'm in the process of moving > many installations to ~). > Along the years, the flexibility of zmailer has become a trap difficult > to escape from, and the beauty of routing and then delivering with a > small footprint is appealing. > It depends. How much traffic supports mail server? Exim is more user friendly regards some fast config changes (like queues) and has more users (more sites, more help). Exim has more tools in most of standard linux distributions. Exim works not on root id. But exim is not so fast. HTH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed May 19 14:53:42 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77554Ab0ESLxhoaeOQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 14:53:37 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77550Ab0ESLxhjHfec (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 14:53:37 +0300 Received: (mea@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77544Ab0ESLxg1Avfc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 14:53:36 +0300 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 14:53:36 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: Darryl Miles Cc: Bartek Krajnik , Carlos G Mendioroz , Neal Morgan , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Message-ID: <20100519115336.GB22072@paja.nic.funet.fi> References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF183EB.1050808@huapi.ba.ar> <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266603@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF1A1C1.5000302@huapi.ba.ar> <20100517230318.GA22235@poczta.medcom.com.pl> <4BF24463.5040406@netbauds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF24463.5040406@netbauds.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:40:19AM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote: > >It depends. > >How much traffic supports mail server? > > > >Exim is more user friendly regards some fast config changes (like queues) > >and has more users (more sites, more help). > >Exim has more tools in most of standard linux distributions. > >Exim works not on root id. For most parts ZMailer works fine on non-root id. Only part needing root is when smtpserver is binding on port 25 et.al. and the scheduler on the mailq. (Even those can be hacked in platform dependent ways - like SE Linux supplying special privileges to smtpserver binary to bind to allocated ports without root capability.) > >But exim is not so fast. > > Those that do use Exim (or anything else for that matter) do they have: > * A top 10 list of the features most in demand. > * A top 10 gripe list of things Zmailer does badly. > > Also what platforms do you care about ? > > One factor with Zmailer in order to make progress forward is that it > needs to expunge all circa 1990-2002s cruft. These days there isn't > that must diversity between platforms, the inefficiencies/bugs of > platform provided libraries isn't so significant as CPUs have become > faster, etc... The IO to persistent storage is always "slow". Present ZMailer's queue file handling is reasonably fast by minimizing operations that generate physical IO, and if really necessary, one can spread the postoffice around multiple spindles. However these days you probably pick an SSD for a postoffice spool disk instead of old style spinning electromechanical devices. Mailbox storage is entirely different animal. The modern ultra-fast CPUs make physical IO painfully obvious. An extreme example of what the email load is being served by ZMailer can be seen here: http://vger.kernel.org/z/ However its loading is radically different from your average mailbox server. It is email-list system installation - one message in, 1000+ out. > The major platforms I see today are Linux/xBSD/Solaris. Who runs a mail > service on anything else and why (i.e. price/performance/maintenance) ? > I'm sure people do but I'm also sure it becomes hard to justify > continuing to do so as the years roll by. The GNU Autoconfig framework helps a lot on keeping around the support for less used platforms. Of course platforms without testing are prone to get affected by bitrot.. > Matti has done a fine job of being gatekeeper for zmailer over the past > decade it would be kind of nice to hear his point of view on development > and usage also. Queue scheduler management interface is missing. Mainly a management _tool_ is missing - kick this message from that queue, start that queue ("SMTP ETRN" hack exists, though.) etc. Improving the hacky interface layer at smtpserver to run message content scanners needs some work. Improving the documentation. The default queue modelling is also a bit difficult at times. Namely sticking on arrival order can result in stuck queue, as only first one is tried. Original model was to randomize the queue order before delivery attempts, but some sort of hybride might be better - prefer arrival order, if a retry is ordered then put the troubled message on tail of the queue and try new queue leader, but do not try too many... ( 500 messages, stuck because of 'connection timed out', no point in retrying them all ad-infinitum. Give the transport agent channel to some other target thread for a while.) Also these days I might brave the universe, and declare pthreads as a fundamental resource available everywhere. It would result in a radically different software with tons of spinlocks to protect the queue data models. That would affect scheduler's construction. At work I usually do Java programs using existing java.util.* classes to do most of my heavy lifting with data structures. (I use also Perl, and ANSI-C, case depending..) Rewriting entire system in Java is out of the question. Rewriting major parts of it even in C++ is very great challenge, and I don't have that much free time. I do not see that I would get immediate maintenance benefits and/or improved features from doing such a thing. Furthermore, I don't do email for a job anymore. Just for a hobby. > Darryl -- /Matti Aarnio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu May 20 22:00:31 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77652Ab0ETTA1ArHIs (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:00:27 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77659Ab0ETTA0uQ3Bs (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:00:26 +0300 Received: from mail.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.1]:36384 "EHLO mail.dm.uba.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77651Ab0ETTAZKBbLQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:00:25 +0300 Received: from mate36.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.36]:1868 "EHLO [157.92.22.36]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail.dm.uba.ar with ESMTP id S29680408Ab0ETTAO (ORCPT + 1 other); Thu, 20 May 2010 16:00:14 -0300 Message-ID: <4BF586BA.3000401@dm.uba.ar> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 16:00:10 -0300 From: Rodolfo Cossalter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: Matti Aarnio , Neal Morgan , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> <20091009144600.GA19375@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20091009144600.GA19375@linux-mips.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Matti, Ralf, Neal, I'm also getting segfaults from router, a few of them every week. It's a Debian Linux box: Linux mail 2.6.31.5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 26 23:42:58 ART 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Zmailer sources from Eugene's CVS. I've turned on core dumps (ulimit -Sc 51200 in the shell that starts/restarts the router) but couldn't ever get a core file, however, if I signal the router process with kill -SIGSEGV pid I get a core file (useless). So I decided to run gdb and attach to each router process (router -dkn 2) and wait... This is what I got when router finally segfaulted. Can anybody help with this gdb trace? Thanks Rodolfo -------------------------------- (gdb) attach 27737 Attaching to process 27737 Reading symbols from /usr/local/zmailer/bin/router...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypt.so.1...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libcrypt-2.7.so...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypt.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib/libresolv.so.2...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libresolv-2.7.so...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libresolv.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libc-2.7.so...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libpthread-2.7.so...done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7f9ecb9136e0 (LWP 27737)] done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/ld-2.7.so...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 0x00007f9ecade2960 in __read_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7f9ecb9136e0 (LWP 27737)] 0x0000000000412ae8 in router (a=0x10c8570, uid=370, type=0x46fae8 "sender", senderstr=0x0) at shliaise.c:678 678 if (p->p_type == anAddress) { (gdb) where #0 0x0000000000412ae8 in router (a=0x10c8570, uid=370, type=0x46fae8 "sender", senderstr=0x0) at shliaise.c:678 #1 0x00000000004168d8 in thesender (e=0x10c6c88, a=0x10c8570) at rfc822.c:1175 #2 0x0000000000419c4f in sequencer (e=0x10c6c88, file=0xddf860 "29680333") at rfc822.c:1767 #3 0x0000000000413584 in run_rfc822 (argc=2, argv=0x7fff67e50280) at rfc822.c:165 #4 0x0000000000449b5a in execute (c=0x7fff67e51a30, caller=0x7fff67e53400, oretcode=0, name=0x46dccd "rfc822") at execute.c:397 #5 0x000000000043471a in runcommand (c=0x7fff67e51a30, pc=0x7fff67e53400, retcodep=0x7fff67e534dc, cmdname=0x46dccd "rfc822") at interpret.c:762 #6 0x00000000004379b4 in interpret (Vcode=0xdb0130, Veocode=0xdb03cb, Ventry=0xdb013f, caller=0x7fff67e53400, retcodep=0x7fff67e534dc, cdp=0xdafef0) at interpret.c:1805 #7 0x000000000043bc08 in lapply (fname=0x4713ab "process", l=0x7f9eca818e58) at interpret.c:2881 #8 0x000000000043bcc0 in apply (argc=2, argv=0x7fff67e53910) at interpret.c:2905 #9 0x000000000040ff4b in s_apply (argc=2, argv=0x7fff67e53910) at shliaise.c:71 #10 0x0000000000429ca1 in rd_doit (filename=0x7fff67e53620 "29680333", dirs=0x7fff67e539a8 "") at daemonsub.c:1454 #11 0x0000000000428bf0 in child_server (tofd=0, frmfd=1) at daemonsub.c:799 #12 0x0000000000427c03 in start_child (i=0) at daemonsub.c:276 #13 0x000000000042a3e8 in run_daemon (argc=1, argv=0x7fff67e55d20) at daemonsub.c:1652 #14 0x0000000000404db8 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff67e55f18) at router.c:419 (gdb) ------------------------ Ralf Baechle escribió: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:09:55PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:32:31PM -0800, Neal Morgan wrote: >>>>> On October 31, 2008 9:03 AM Ralf Baechle wrote >>>>> Since quite a while I'm observing these kernel messages on a Linux x86_64 >>>>> system: >>>>> >>>>> sm[3270]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fffe7c48e30 error 6 in >>>> libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] >>>>> sm[3493] trap stack segment ip:7f0e2a121bc9 sp:7fff3240e4a0 error:0 >>>>> sm[3773]: segfault at 3ba7f9f0 ip 79fbc9 sp 7fff55499680 error 6 in >>>> libc-2.7.so[72d000+14d000] >>>> >>>> Matti: I've been seeing these across 4 servers: >>>> >>>> kernel: smtpserver[31693]: segfault at 00000000 eip b7c16371 esp >>>> bf94b018 error 4 >>>> >>>> kernel: router[9934]: segfault at 00000008 eip 0807fa95 esp bfdf5570 >>>> error 4 >>>> >>>> The interesting thing is it only happens when booted into a 2.6.24 >>>> kernel. If I reboot the same box into a 2.6.18 kernel everything runs >>>> fine (and there are no segfaults). >> Older kernels don't emit this segfault message. It was added in >> commit abd4f7505bafdd6c5319fe3cb5caf9af6104e17a that is for 2.6.23. Could >> that be why you didn't notice it earlier? >> >>> I do see them too with 2.6.26 kernel at zmailer.org server. >>> A few hits per week according to kernel dmesg logs. >>> >>> I suspect more about glibc doing something stupid, than program really >>> going over the edge, but these are so rare that debugging them is next >>> to impossible. Previously I have seen them happen after the program >>> has called exit(0). >>> >>> Anyway I have turned on core dumps to be able to see what happens. >> I've seen Zmailer stopping mail delivery or stopping accepting connections >> on port 25. The issue is hitting relativly infrequently but I decieded to >> follow your example and just turned on core dumps; it is affecting sm, >> smtpserver and router. Lately the frequency of this issue striking >> seems to have increased significantly - I wonder if that's due to me >> looking more frequently after it or due to my extremly inflated mail >> queue with over 1,700,000 stored messages. >> >> Ironically I seem to have gotten another router segfault just seconds >> before I enabled core dumps ... > > To close this old case - the issue went away for me after upgrading the > system from Fedora 8 to Fedora 10. So I assume there indeed as suspected > by Matti was something toxic in glibc. > > Ralf > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in > the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu May 20 22:42:03 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77661Ab0ETTl7qO0RI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:41:59 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77668Ab0ETTl7gEm4c (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:41:59 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:36707 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77661Ab0ETTl6qVNMY (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:41:58 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:30855 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1050407Ab0ETTl0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 12:41:26 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1274989294.32891@s0vv6PKKxgAM8c/rtjzCNQ Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:41:26 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266639@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <4BF586BA.3000401@dm.uba.ar> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Thread-Index: Acr4TtoWetZc01GtTnuqLLhzQpm/NgABIHrQ References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> <20091009144600.GA19375@linux-mips.org> <4BF586BA.3000401@dm.uba.ar> From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 105040720124126 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi > on Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:00 PM Ralf Baechle wrote: > > I'm also getting segfaults from router, a few of them every week. > It's a Debian Linux box: > Linux mail 2.6.31.5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 26 23:42:58 ART 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Zmailer sources from Eugene's CVS. > I've turned on core dumps (ulimit -Sc 51200 in the shell that starts/restarts the router) but couldn't ever get a core file, however, if I > signal the router process with kill -SIGSEGV pid I get a core file (useless). > So I decided to run gdb and attach to each router process (router -dkn > 2) and wait... > This is what I got when router finally segfaulted. > Can anybody help with this gdb trace? Rodolfo: Hopefully Matti will be able to provide some insight on your core dump. FWIW, my original issue with SMTPServer and segfaults went away somewhere between upgrading Debian/kernel (to 2.6.26) and getting latest ZMailer from CVS and rebuilding. I am not sure which of those two fixed it, but one of them did. I do still get the router segfaults - like you. However, this only seems to be happening on my two busier machines (which happen to both be x64). My less busy (x86) machines are not experiencing segfaults. Most importantly, I see no evidence the segfaults are causing mail loss or delivery delays. A new router process is created and things continue as normal. (Don't get me wrong, it would be best not to get the segfaults...it just becomes less of a priority knowing mail is still being delivered). I'll look forward to suggestions from Matti. Thanks, Neal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu May 20 23:04:42 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77696Ab0ETUEly0sns (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:04:41 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77709Ab0ETUEltnHYQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:04:41 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:34992 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77696Ab0ETUEk6DOmI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:04:40 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:31146 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1050135Ab0ETUEQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 13:04:16 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1274990658.29789@WjBK664DwRqOAC93cC8TJg Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: [ZMailer] Retry Order in Scheduler.conf Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:04:16 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B1426663A@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B144BED@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ZMailer] Retry Order in Scheduler.conf Thread-Index: AcoLxZa9rHZLN2LBS7ybqPOqGFaYmjskFkCg References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B144BED@server-16.MorganSys.net> From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 105013520130416 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi > on Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:44 AM Neal Morgan wrote: > > Is there a way to change the retry order for a particular Channel/Host in the scheduler? > > From time to time I will have a destination reject the first message in the queue for > something related to content, and zmailer waits/retries patiently in the same order > until I either remove the offending message or the destination changes its mind and > accepts the message. > > I am wondering if there is a way to make it start with a different message on the next > retry rather than continue trying to deliver in order. > > I see an "AgeOrder" parameter in the scheduler.conf, but I don't see any mention of it > in the man page, and I am not finding any alternatives to this that look like what I want. > > Does such a mechanism exist? For the sake of documentation, I am going to answer my own question here. It appears there is no opposite parm for "ageorder" in scheduler.conf. You can disable it by commenting out the parm (e.g. "# ageorder") and restarting zmailer. Once disabled, scheduler seems to use a random order instead of a strict age order. (The answer was found in Matti's comments in the ChangeLog from 10 May 2003). If you are experiencing problems (for example, with AOL) where one message is being rejected so the queue grows and grows for that channel/host - you will want to make this change. Be careful you only have one scheduler.conf - or if like me you have somehow ended up with more than one of these files in the config directories - change them all just to be sure). If you are concerned that randomorder will introduce delivery delays - don't be. My observation is zmailer gets rid of messages so fast this is a non-issue. Matti - A feature request: it would be nice to implement another parm named randomorder so the choice between age order and random order is obvious and can be overridden both globally as well as on individual channel/hosts. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu May 20 23:29:43 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77718Ab0ETU3hpOWSA (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:29:37 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77719Ab0ETU3hiELCc (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:29:37 +0300 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:34140 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77717Ab0ETU3gcGiYk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:29:36 +0300 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:31407 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" whoson: "-unregistered-" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1050167Ab0ETU3D convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 13:29:03 -0700 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1274992154.78823@9o382RYcm3IB6GwcAwUAzQ Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:29:02 -0700 Message-ID: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B1426663B@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ZMailer] Reorder Queue/Channel, Delete Single Message Thread-Index: Acr14bk3eLRzbG7GR1WuEoCH9Vvb8gCdfU/A References: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B142665F5@server-16.MorganSys.net> From: "Neal Morgan" To: X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 105016720132903 X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Morgan-Systems-MailScanner-From: neal@morgan-systems.com Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi > On Monday, May 17, 2010 9:55 AM Neal Morgan wrote: > > This is probably something I should already know. Is there a way to > make zmailer re-order the queue for a particular channel/host when the > top message is being rejected by the receiving end? We continually find > that aol will reject a message with a temporary error, then subsequent > messages will queue up behind it, and the queue grows larger and larger > until we take manual action to correct it. Zmailer continues to want to > deliver the messages in the original order, meaning the newer messages > never get tried since the top message is in the way. So, is it possible > to make zmailer put the message with the temporary error at the bottom > of the queue after some configurable number of retries? > > We have been handling this manually, by deleting the offending top message > from both the transport and queue directories. Is there a zmailer-approved > way to delete a single message for a channel/host? > We've just been using "rm" for this, then forcing a resubmit on that > channel/host. I am going to answer my own question for the sake of documentation. The correct way to deal with this is to comment out the "ageorder" parm in scheduler.conf. This will cause the scheduler to process messages in a random order rather than waiting for that problem message. Matti - can you confirm these two gueses: 1) There is no way (via mailq or other utility) to forcibly reorder the queue for a channel/host 2) There is a way to remove a single message from the queue for a channel/host. See the man page for "manual-expirer". Matti - one additional question on expirer/manual-expirer. What is expected in the "-m" message string parm? a) message ID as seen in mailq -v for example: b) spool ID as seen in syslog for example: S459319Ab0ETTSf c) inode/file name of the message for example: 459324 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri May 21 00:03:02 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77743Ab0ETVC7BNT-4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 00:02:59 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77761Ab0ETVC6yQatQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 00:02:58 +0300 Received: from mail.dm.uba.ar ([157.92.22.1]:48963 "EHLO mail.dm.uba.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77743Ab0ETVC55XyDA (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 00:02:57 +0300 Received: from mybfyb.ffyb.uba.ar ([157.92.144.74]:1247 "EHLO [192.168.2.102]" smtp-auth: "rcoss" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by mail.dm.uba.ar with SUBMITSA id S29680376Ab0ETVCr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 18:02:47 -0300 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at mail.dm.uba.ar logged sender identity as: rcoss Message-ID: <4BF5A36B.9010700@dm.uba.ar> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:02:35 -0300 From: Rodolfo Cossalter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-AR; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neal Morgan CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> <20091009144600.GA19375@linux-mips.org> <4BF586BA.3000401@dm.uba.ar> <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266639@server-16.MorganSys.net> In-Reply-To: <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266639@server-16.MorganSys.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi El 20/05/2010 04:41 p.m., Neal Morgan escribió: >> on Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:00 PM Ralf Baechle wrote: >> >> I'm also getting segfaults from router, a few of them every week. >> It's a Debian Linux box: >> Linux mail 2.6.31.5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 26 23:42:58 ART 2009 x86_64 > GNU/Linux Zmailer sources from Eugene's CVS. >> I've turned on core dumps (ulimit -Sc 51200 in the shell that > starts/restarts the router) but couldn't ever get a core file, however, > if I> signal the router process with kill -SIGSEGV pid I get a core > file (useless). >> So I decided to run gdb and attach to each router process (router -dkn >> 2) and wait... >> This is what I got when router finally segfaulted. >> Can anybody help with this gdb trace? > > Rodolfo: > > Hopefully Matti will be able to provide some insight on your core dump. > > FWIW, my original issue with SMTPServer and segfaults went away > somewhere between upgrading Debian/kernel (to 2.6.26) and getting latest > ZMailer from CVS and rebuilding. I am not sure which of those two fixed > it, but one of them did. > > I do still get the router segfaults - like you. However, this only > seems to be happening on my two busier machines (which happen to both be > x64). My less busy (x86) machines are not experiencing segfaults. > > Most importantly, I see no evidence the segfaults are causing mail loss > or delivery delays. A new router process is created and things continue > as normal. (Don't get me wrong, it would be best not to get the > segfaults...it just becomes less of a priority knowing mail is still > being delivered). Yes, the same happens here, the new router process picks up where the segfaulted one was processing and no mail is lost. > > I'll look forward to suggestions from Matti. > > > Thanks, > > Neal Rodolfo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri May 21 14:17:32 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77945Ab0EULR1ILV5Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 14:17:27 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77950Ab0EULR04YeC4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 14:17:26 +0300 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:37969 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77945Ab0EULR0FPxls (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 14:17:26 +0300 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4LBGxki010004; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:17:00 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o4LBGvpL010000; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:16:57 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 12:16:57 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Rodolfo Cossalter Cc: Neal Morgan , zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] Zmailer crashes Message-ID: <20100521111657.GA10305@linux-mips.org> References: <20081031160305.GB9632@linux-mips.org> <7D1CC61717004141A57CA6CA1C8087EC38ED0B@server-16.MorganSys.net> <20090201135244.GA8440@paja.nic.funet.fi> <20090204150955.GA24046@linux-mips.org> <20091009144600.GA19375@linux-mips.org> <4BF586BA.3000401@dm.uba.ar> <6557A87A5B462247861990180A542B14266639@server-16.MorganSys.net> <4BF5A36B.9010700@dm.uba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF5A36B.9010700@dm.uba.ar> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:02:35PM -0300, Rodolfo Cossalter wrote: > From: Rodolfo Cossalter > To: Neal Morgan > CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Neal, it would be useful if you had not removed me from cc. This list receives so little email that without cc I might not notice a posting for ages. > >Hopefully Matti will be able to provide some insight on your core dump. > > > >FWIW, my original issue with SMTPServer and segfaults went away > >somewhere between upgrading Debian/kernel (to 2.6.26) and getting latest > >ZMailer from CVS and rebuilding. I am not sure which of those two fixed > >it, but one of them did. > > > >I do still get the router segfaults - like you. However, this only > >seems to be happening on my two busier machines (which happen to both be > >x64). My less busy (x86) machines are not experiencing segfaults. > > > >Most importantly, I see no evidence the segfaults are causing mail loss > >or delivery delays. A new router process is created and things continue > >as normal. (Don't get me wrong, it would be best not to get the > >segfaults...it just becomes less of a priority knowing mail is still > >being delivered). > > Yes, the same happens here, the new router process picks up where the > segfaulted one was processing and no mail is lost. For me the issue didn't cause any data loss and it eventually went away when I upgraded the system to a newer Linux distribution. I'm now Zmailer on Fedora 12 where I've encountered a different issue, see the "Zmailer breaks on Fedora 12" thread starting on November 23. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Jul 26 21:31:06 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77030Ab0GZSbGAYpTI (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:31:06 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77048Ab0GZSbFsSwQY (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:31:05 +0300 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:45339 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S77030Ab0GZSbFQ0J1Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:31:05 +0300 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6QIV2TR021597 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:31:03 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o6QIV2jo021595 for zmailer@nic.funet.fi; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:31:02 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:31:02 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: [ZMailer] SELinux policy for Zmailer Message-ID: <20100726183102.GA17166@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi I wonder if anybody has already written a SELinux policy for Zmailer? Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Aug 2 14:05:07 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77358Ab0HBLFE3Pgss (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:05:04 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77346Ab0HBLFEXMYAA (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:05:04 +0300 Received: (mea@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S76996Ab0HBLFD400AY (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:05:03 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:05:03 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: Ralf Baechle Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] SELinux policy for Zmailer Message-ID: <20100802110503.GA10304@paja.nic.funet.fi> References: <20100726183102.GA17166@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100726183102.GA17166@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 07:31:02PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > I wonder if anybody has already written a SELinux policy for Zmailer? No. While the Linux distributions I use have it, I am running them without policy. Learning to use SELinux in enforced mode has never gotten enough priority in my work or hobby so far... > Ralf -- /Matti Aarnio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Aug 2 16:28:12 2010 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S77342Ab0HBN2M1UY0Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:28:12 +0300 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77353Ab0HBN2MWEdjI (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:28:12 +0300 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:50209 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S76996Ab0HBN2Llq19Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:28:11 +0300 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o72DS9OK016709; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:28:09 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o72DS9Rq016707; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:28:09 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:28:08 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matti Aarnio Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: [ZMailer] SELinux policy for Zmailer Message-ID: <20100802132808.GB3244@linux-mips.org> References: <20100726183102.GA17166@linux-mips.org> <20100802110503.GA10304@paja.nic.funet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100802110503.GA10304@paja.nic.funet.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:05:03PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 07:31:02PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > I wonder if anybody has already written a SELinux policy for Zmailer? > > No. While the Linux distributions I use have it, I am running > them without policy. > > Learning to use SELinux in enforced mode has never gotten enough > priority in my work or hobby so far... On my various servers I'm running a fair pile of rather dated software of at best uncertain security status and some software that fairly regularly has security issues - I just say PHP and the noise of people trying to kick the doors has turned into the sound of an infinite number of monkeys driving bulldozers through the front yard ... I've got a mostly working policy now. It's still rather ugly and occasionally I see either zmailer or one of the zmailer users doing a somewhat more rare operation that need policy tuning. To simplify the policy I'm wondering if some of zmailers files should be moved from the current default location to other directories, in particular the .pid files to /var/run/zmailer/. Maybe also the sockets and .zmailer.SNMP.block. On occasion SELinux also finds odd application behaviour so unexpectedly it also turned into a bit of a crystall ball into odd application behaviour. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon Feb 7 14:20:35 2011 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id S76199Ab1BGMUe7b8Ac (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:20:34 +0200 Received: (majordom@paja.nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S77024Ab1BGMUex5LEc (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:20:34 +0200 Received: from mail.Morgan-Systems.com ([204.16.172.8]:40681 "EHLO mail.morgan-systems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S76199Ab1BGMUeLXFNA (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:20:34 +0200 Received: from Server-16.MorganSys.net ([10.30.1.16]:31514 "HELO Mail.Morgan-Systems.com" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by Mail.Morgan-Systems.com with SMTP id S1475120Ab1BGMUb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 04:20:31 -0800 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: [ZMailer] cfgread.c - Debian 6/Squeeze Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 04:20:30 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: cfgread.c - Debian 6/Squeeze Thread-Index: AcvGwWlO7pTVDDNYQsqeaFeQe6FQjA== From: "Neal Morgan" To: Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi List-ID: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/listlog/zmailer"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Greetings: After installing the newly released Debian 6 upgrade, and rebuilding Zmailer from source, I found smtpserver failing with a message about being unable to read the policy database: "smtpserver policy database problem, code: 2" I spent a good deal of time troubleshooting, and found the policy database value used in policytest.c was wrong. I was seeing evidence of string replacements not being made entirely, for example, a debug statement inserted where the policy db was opened showed this: 000- btree->open('$MLVAR/db/smsmtp-policy.db',BTREE, RDONLY) ret=2 After more digging, I found that the replacement made for function dollarexpand in cfgread.c for the variable dbtype was the culprit. Changing the memcpy under the "Copy down" comment to a strcpy seems to fix the problem: /* Copy down */ //strcpy((char*)(s0+len), str); memcpy(s0+len, str, strlen((char*)str)); It has been a long time since I did any serious C coding: I am quite rusty at pointers, memcpy, strcpy, etc. This change appears to have fixed the problem, but I would appreciate some extra eyes on this code to confirm this was the correct fix. Matti/Eugene/Others, can you have a look at this and let me know if this is the right way to go? Thanks, Neal Morgan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi