Why Is the IETF Trust Requiring “All Rights Reserved” When That Term Has Been Superfluous for Over 25 Years?

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶

This Internet-Draft will expire on 3 November 2026.¶

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.¶

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

The phrase “All Rights Reserved” originated as a formal requirement under the 1910 Buenos Aires Convention, which conditioned copyright protection on an explicit reservation of rights. However, this requirement became obsolete once all Buenos Aires Convention parties acceded to the Berne Convention, whose Article 5(2) prohibits conditioning copyright on formalities.¶

As a result, the phrase no longer serves a necessary legal function in modern copyright regimes. Its continued inclusion in IETF Trust copyright notices appears to be a historical artifact rather than a functional requirement.¶

This document examines whether the phrase provides any present legal or operational value in IETF documents and considers whether its continued use should be reconsidered.¶

2. Introduction

The phrase “All Rights Reserved” was commonly used to satisfy Article 3 of the 1910 Buenos Aires Convention (BAC), which required that a work contain a statement indicating reservation of rights in order to receive protection in other Convention states. [BAC-TEXT] The phrase was therefore historically required in the inter-American copyright system, particularly before the United States and all Buenos Aires Convention parties were covered by broader formality-free copyright regimes.¶

That function became effectively obsolete no later than August 23, 2000, when Nicaragua, apparently the last Buenos Aires Convention party not yet in Berne, became bound by the Berne Convention. Berne Article 5(2) provides that the enjoyment and exercise of copyright “shall not be subject to any formality.” [BERNE-TEXT] The continued use of “All Rights Reserved” in IETF Trust notices appears to be a legacy artifact rather than a legally necessary reservation.¶

Retaining obsolete legal language may create confusion about the scope of rights granted under IETF Trust terms and obscure the actual licensing framework.¶

3. Problem Statement

The phrase “All Rights Reserved” continues to appear in IETF Trust copyright notices despite no longer being required for copyright protection under applicable international treaties. This raises the question of whether the phrase serves any current legal or operational purpose, or whether its continued use is unnecessary and potentially confusing.¶

4. Why It Is No Longer Necessary

By August 23, 2000, every state listed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) as a contracting party or signatory of the Buenos Aires Convention had become party to the Berne Convention. [BAC-PARTIES] As a result, the Buenos Aires Convention notice formula no longer served any practical treaty function among those states, because Berne Article 5(2) prohibits conditioning the enjoyment or exercise of copyright on formalities.¶

5. List Of Buenos Aires Convention Parties And Berne Accession Date

* Signed only, no BAC in-force date shown by WIPO¶

6. What Is Not Being Proposed

This document does not necessarily recommend that the IETF eliminate copyright notices altogether. A copyright notice can still serve useful evidentiary and administrative functions. It identifies the claimed copyright owner, records the year of publication, and helps document the rights claimed by the IETF Trust and, where applicable, by individual authors. In the United States, although copyright notice is no longer a condition of copyright protection for works published after the Berne Convention Implementation Act, a proper notice may still have consequences in infringement litigation. In particular, 17 U.S.C. § 401(d) limits a defendant’s ability to rely on innocent infringement to reduce statutory damages when the published work bears an appropriate copyright notice. The issue addressed by this document is therefore not whether copyright notices have any continuing value, but whether the specific phrase “All Rights Reserved” continues to serve any useful legal or operational purpose in IETF documents.¶

7. IANA Considerations

Unless IANA mandates the term "All Rights Reserved" on documents it issues, this document has no IANA actions.¶

8. Security Considerations

This document does not raise any security issues.¶

9. Conclusion

The continued inclusion of “All Rights Reserved” appears unnecessary and may warrant reconsideration in light of current copyright law and IETF Trust practices.¶

10. References

Author's Address