Newsgroups: rec.games.int-fiction,rec.arts.int-fiction
Path: news.duke.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!nntp-out.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!not-for-mail
From: buzzard@TheWorld.com (Sean T Barrett)
Subject: Re: [ANN] Silicon Castles, 'Full Disclosure' version
Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself)
Message-ID: <GMxHrz.6Dn@world.std.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 04:57:34 GMT
References: <8tn3t9.ice.ln@172.16.100.66>
Nntp-Posting-Host: sgi01-g.std.com
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999)
Lines: 18
Xref: news.duke.edu rec.games.int-fiction:66562 rec.arts.int-fiction:94666

David Given <dg@pearl.tao.co.uk> wrote:
>those people who didn't liked
>venting about the fact that they didn't like it

No, generally, we vent about it because we're annoyed
and don't want to see things like it ever again.
There are already too many games entered into the
comp. Having people submit games that they don't
believe are, say, finished, or don't believe they
are, say, IF, is, I think, pretty clearly not a
good thing, given the number of games there are
already.

For a stronger version of this claim, see my
"review" of last year's, umm, I don't have the heart
to belabor it, nevermind.

SeanB
