Message-ID: <39F9DCB0.A0257C11@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:51:12 -0400
From: Peter Ciccolo <pciccol@attglobal.net>
Reply-To: pciccol@attglobal.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
Subject: Re: Works that should NOT be done as IF  [Humour] (well, a weak attempt
 at humour in any case)
References: <39ea0f90.10594098@news.bright.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.72.15.54
X-Trace: 27 Oct 2000 20:00:58 GMT, 166.72.15.54
Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
Lines: 29
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net
Path: news.duke.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!nntp-out.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.us.ibm.net!ibm.net!news1.prserv.net!166.72.15.54
Xref: news.duke.edu rec.arts.int-fiction:80156



Jonadab the Unsightly One wrote:

>
> From time to time someone posts here the name of a particular
> work, author, or series that perhaps would (in the poster's
> opinion) make good IF if redone in an interactive fashion.
>
> I thought I'd take the contrary approach, and list a hanful
> of works that should *not* be done as IF...  feel free to
> jump in...  these are all real works, of course, but ones
> that (IMO) should not be done as IF for one reason or
> another...

<snip>

Hopscotch.

Talk about CYOA...

Peter

--
0'|- [Dave betrays Selmer].




