Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!news.ppp.de!lutzifer!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!news.dkrz.de!news.dfn.de!scsing.switch.ch!swidir.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!foxhound.dsto.gov.au!fang.dsto.gov.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!tmx!news!jfinch
From: Joel Finch <jfinch@ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: Realistic or Over-detailed
Organization: Message Handling Systems Pty Ltd
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 94 06:59:16 GMT
Message-ID: <1994Mar14.065916.25302@news.mhs.oz.au>
Followup-To: rec.arts.int-fiction
X-Disclaimer: This message was posted via an email-to-news gateway run by
X-Disclaimer: Message Handling Systems Pty Ltd. Opinions expressed do not
X-Disclaimer: necessarily represent those of Message Handling Systems Pty Ltd.
Lines: 21

Hi people,

Instead of getting all steamed about which is the
best way to do things, why don't we all just do 
it the way we like it, and let the people who like
it that way play/read/use it?

Most of this discussion has been like trying to
say that all cars should be Fords.

Personally I don't think there is a best way.
Whether "examine all" is a good command depends
on the type of game, the setting, and what the
author is trying to achieve.

Joel Finch
(jfinch@ozemail.com.au)




