Internet-Draft | Extensions to IOAM Trace Option | October 2025 |
Min, et al. | Expires 19 April 2026 | [Page] |
In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Trace-Option data defined in RFC 9197 is a variable-length data, the length of this kind of data varies with the number of transited IOAM-capable nodes and the selection of data fields processed by each IOAM-capable node. This document extends the IOAM Trace Option to carry a fixed-size data, the length of this kind of data is fixed once the selection of data fields processed by each IOAM-capable node is determined, and doesn't vary with the number of transited IOAM-capable nodes.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 19 April 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
[RFC9197] defines In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM), which collects operational and telemetry information in the packet while the packet traverses a path between two points in the network. As specified in Section 4.1 of [RFC9197], IOAM tracing is defined as two separate options: Pre-allocated Trace Option and Incremental Trace Option. The two IOAM Trace Options share the same format of IOAM Trace-Option header and data. The IOAM Trace-Option data is composed of a set of node data lists; among them each node data list is populated by a node along the forwarding path of IOAM packet.¶
The IOAM Trace-Option data defined in [RFC9197] is a variable-length data, the length of this kind of data varies with the number of transited IOAM-capable nodes and the selection of data fields processed by each IOAM-capable node. This document extends the IOAM Trace Option to carry a fixed-size data, the length of this kind of data is fixed once the selection of data fields processed by each IOAM-capable node is determined, and doesn't vary with the number of transited IOAM-capable nodes.¶
Note that the difference between the fixed-size IOAM tracing data defined in this document and the pre-allocated IOAM tracing data defined in [RFC9197], is that the fixed-size IOAM tracing data is processed in a compare-and-replace manner by each node along the forwarding path, which makes the IOAM data size always fixed no matter how many nodes get traversed.¶
ABW: Available Bandwidth¶
BU: Buffer Utilization¶
CSIG: Congestion Signaling¶
HPCC++: Enhanced High Precision Congestion Control¶
IOAM: In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance¶
LU: Link Utilization¶
PD: Per-hop delay¶
TTL: Time to Live¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
As specified in Section 4.4 of [RFC9197], the IOAM Trace Option (including IOAM Pre-allocated Trace Option and IOAM Incremental Trace Option) has a format as shown in Figure 1.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Namespace-ID |NodeLen | Flags | RemainingLen| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IOAM Trace-Type | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<-+ | | | | node data list [0] | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ D | | a | node data list [1] | t | | a +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ ... ~ S +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ p | | a | node data list [n-1] | c | | e +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | node data list [n] | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<-+
The IOAM Trace Option defined in [RFC9197] is used to stack up multiple metadata from multiple IOAM transit nodes. Specifically, along the forwarding path, each IOAM-capable node adds its own operational and telemetry information into the IOAM Trace Option carried by a data packet in a stacking manner.¶
As described in [I-D.miao-ccwg-hpcc-info], the IOAM Trace Option Data can be used as a congestion control signal for Enhanced High Precision Congestion Control (HPCC++) congestion control mechanism, and at the same time, Congestion Signaling (CSIG) Data can also be used as a congestion control signal for HPCC++. As specified in [I-D.ravi-ippm-csig], a CSIG tag carries a fixed-size aggregate metric computed over the hop devices. Specifically, along the forwarding path, each CSIG-capable node optionally inputs its own congestion information into the CSIG tag carried by a data packet in a compare-and-replace manner.¶
In different application scenarios, either the IOAM Trace Option defined in [RFC9197] or the CSIG tag defined in [I-D.ravi-ippm-csig] is applicable, or even both of them can be used concurrently. In other words, they're complementary to each other. Then the question goes to that whether it's possible to integrate them together. That is also the problem this document intends to address.¶
In order to integrate the variable-size superimposed data and fixed-size aggregate data into IOAM Trace Option, this document defines the reserved Bit 3 of the Flags field of the IOAM Trace Option as shown in Figure 2.¶
0 1 2 3 +-+-+-+-+ |O|L|A|F| +-+-+-+-+
Bit 0 "Overflow" (O-bit): When set, the Overflow flag indicates that there are not enough octets left to record the node data, as defined in Section 4.4.1 of [RFC9197].¶
Bit 1 "Loopback" (L-bit): When set, the Loopback flag triggers the sending of a copy of a packet back towards the source, as defined in Section 3 of [RFC9322].¶
Bit 2 "Active" (A-bit): When set, the Active flag indicates that a packet is an active measurement packet rather than a data packet, as defined in Section 3 of [RFC9322].¶
Bit 3 "Fixed-size" (F-bit): When set, the Fixed-size flag indicates that a fixed-size aggregate data rather than a variable-size superimposed data is carried, as defined in Section 5 of this document. As defined in Section 4.4 of [RFC9197], there are two types of IOAM Trace Options, Pre-allocated Trace-Option and Incremental Trace-Option, the F-bit defined in this document can only be used for Pre-allocated Trace-Option. In other words, if the F-bit is set while the IOAM Trace Option-Type indicates it's an Incremental Trace-Option, then the F-bit MUST be ignored by the receiver.¶
When the IOAM Trace Option is used to carry fixed-size aggregate data, the format of the IOAM Trace Option is shown in Figure 3.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Namespace-ID |NodeLen | Flags | RemainingLen| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IOAM Fixed-Data Trace-Type | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ One or More Fixed-size Aggregate Data ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The same as defined in [RFC9197] and [RFC9322]. This document allocates a single flag as follows:¶
Each Fixed-size Aggregate Data is a 8-octet data space. When only one bit within the bitmap of IOAM-Fixed-Data Trace-Type is set, the length of this field is eight octets. When more than one bit within the bitmap of IOAM Fixed-Data Trace-Type is set, the length of this field is equal to the number of set bits multiplied by eight octets.¶
This document defines the format of Fixed-size Aggregate Data, as shown in Figure 4.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Signal Value | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Locator Metadata | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The fields are defined as follows:¶
Signal Value: A 20-bit field. Its meaning depends on the position of set bit in IOAM Fixed-Data Trace-Type.¶
Locator Metadata: A 4-octet field. This field indicates the relevant metadata about the bottleneck device and port, specifically, it contains 12-bit Port ID, 12-bit Device ID, and 8-bit TTL (also called Hop Limit for IPv6).¶
Reserved: A 12-bit field that MUST be zeroed on transmission and ignored on receipt.¶
The 24-bit identifier of IOAM Fixed-Data Trace-Type and corresponding Signal Values are defined as follows:¶
As discussed in [RFC9322], IOAM is assumed to be deployed in a restricted administrative domain, thus limiting the scope of the threats above and their effect. However, even given this limited scope, security threats should still be considered and mitigated.¶
Security issues discussed in [RFC9197] apply to this document.¶
IANA is requested to allocate the following bit in the "IOAM Trace-Flags" registry as follows:¶
This document is specified as the "Reference" in the registry for this bit.¶
Note that bit 0 is the most significant bit in the "IOAM Trace-Flags" registry. This bit was allocated by [RFC9197] as the 'Overflow' bit.¶
IANA is requested to create a new registry "IOAM Fixed-Data Trace-Type" within the defined registry group "In Situ OAM (IOAM)". This registry defines code points for each bit in the 24-bit IOAM Fixed-Data Trace-Type field for the Pre-allocated Trace Option-Type When the F-bit is set. Bits 0-2 are defined in Section 5 of this document:¶
Bits 3-22 are available for assignment via the "IETF Review" process, as per [RFC8126].¶
New registration requests MUST use the following template:¶
The authors would like to acknowledge Wei Duan and Jun Feng for their very helpful comments.¶