<rfc-editor-queue xmlns="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor-queue">
<section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK">
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-01-08</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jesup, S. Loreto, M. Tuexen</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Data Channels
</title>
<bytes>36549</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-01-08</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jesup, S. Loreto, M. Tuexen</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Data Channel Establishment Protocol
</title>
<bytes>28411</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-07-01</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Perkins, M. Westerlund, J. Ott</authors>
<title>
Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC): Media Transport and Use of RTP
</title>
<bytes>123242</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-11-23</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>G. Camarillo, K. Drage, T. Kristensen, J. Ott, C. Eckel</authors>
<title>
The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
</title>
<bytes>225320</bytes>
<source>Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-12-28</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Westerlund, C. Perkins, J. Lennox</authors>
<title>
Sending Multiple Types of Media in a Single RTP Session
</title>
<bytes>38919</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-framework-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-01-14</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-signaling</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Duckworth, Ed., A. Pepperell, S. Wenger</authors>
<title>
Framework for Telepresence Multi-Streams
</title>
<bytes>186803</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-03-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Lennox, M. Westerlund, Q. Wu, C. Perkins</authors>
<title>
Sending Multiple RTP Streams in a Single RTP Session: Grouping RTCP Reception Statistics and Other Feedback
</title>
<bytes>46256</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-05-12</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Thomson</authors>
<title>
Application Layer Protocol Negotiation for Web Real-Time Communications (WebRTC) 
</title>
<bytes>15355</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-msid">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-msid-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-07-12</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Alvestrand</authors>
<title>
WebRTC MediaStream Identification in the Session Description Protocol
</title>
<bytes>35897</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-08-09</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
Indicating Exclusive Support of RTP/RTCP Multiplexing using SDP
</title>
<bytes>25385</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-08-15</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Presta, S. Pietro Romano</authors>
<title>
An XML Schema for the CLUE data model
</title>
<bytes>151635</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-08-22</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Jones, S. Dhesikan, C. Jennings, D. Druta</authors>
<title>
DSCP Packet Markings for WebRTC QoS
</title>
<bytes>26177</bytes>
<source>Transport Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtext-rid">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtext-rid-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-10-19</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Roach, S. Nandakumar, P. Thatcher</authors>
<title>
RTP Stream Identifier Source Description (SDES)
</title>
<bytes>19604</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-10-27</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Alvestrand</authors>
<title>
Transports for WebRTC
</title>
<bytes>41832</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-12-20</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Nandakumar</authors>
<title>
A Framework for SDP Attributes when Multiplexing
</title>
<bytes>234454</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-02-13</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>V. Pascual, A. Roman, S. Cazeaux, G. Salgueiro, R. Ravindranath</authors>
<title>
The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
</title>
<bytes>30505</bytes>
<source>Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-02-27</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Even, J. Lennox</authors>
<title>
Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures
</title>
<bytes>32763</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-03-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, R. Shpount, S. Loreto, G. Camarillo</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Procedures For Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) over Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport.
</title>
<bytes>54708</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles">
<draft>draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-05-26</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8668</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>L. Ginsberg, A. Bashandy, C. Filsfils, M. Nanduri, E. Aries</authors>
<title>
Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS
</title>
<bytes>36246</bytes>
<source>IS-IS for IP Internets</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtext-lrr">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-07-07</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Lennox, D. Hong, J. Uberti, S. Holmer, M. Flodman</authors>
<title>
The Layer Refresh Request (LRR) RTCP Feedback Message
</title>
<bytes>31966</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-grasp">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-grasp-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-07-19</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Bormann, B. Carpenter, Ed., B. Liu, Ed.</authors>
<title>
A Generic Autonomic Signaling Protocol (GRASP)
</title>
<bytes>181149</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-10-24</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Xu, Ed., B. Decraene, Ed., R. Raszuk, L. Contreras, L. Jalil</authors>
<title>
The Tunnel Encapsulations OSPF Router Information
</title>
<bytes>22330</bytes>
<source>Open Shortest Path First IGP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-32.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-11-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, R. Shpount</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Considerations for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) and Transport Layer Security (TLS)
</title>
<bytes>58022</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-11-12</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Alvestrand</authors>
<title>
Overview: Real Time Protocols for Browser-based Applications
</title>
<bytes>53526</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-27.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-12-18</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8665</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Psenak, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Gredler, R. Shakir, W. Henderickx, J. Tantsura</authors>
<title>
OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing
</title>
<bytes>60933</bytes>
<source>Open Shortest Path First IGP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-01-15</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>X. Liu, P. Sarda, V. Choudhary</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Routing Information Protocol (RIP)
</title>
<bytes>78938</bytes>
<source>Routing Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-01</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ice-trickle</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-msid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Uberti, C. Jennings, E. Rescorla, Ed.</authors>
<title>
JavaScript Session Establishment Protocol
</title>
<bytes>256248</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-05</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., S. Sathappan, W. Henderickx, A. Sajassi, J. Drake</authors>
<title>
Interconnect Solution for EVPN Overlay networks
</title>
<bytes>67427</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled Services</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support">
<draft>draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-12</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Eastlake 3rd, B. Briscoe</authors>
<title>
TRILL (TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links): ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification) Support
</title>
<bytes>33826</bytes>
<source>Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-keystore</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Wildes, Ed., K. Koushik, Ed.</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Syslog Configuration
</title>
<bytes>65515</bytes>
<source>Network Modeling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-yang-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Liu, P. McAllister, A. Peter, M. Sivakumar, Y. Liu, f. Hu</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)
</title>
<bytes>206487</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-rid">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-rid-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-16</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A.B. Roach, Ed.</authors>
<title>
RTP Payload Format Restrictions
</title>
<bytes>61967</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ice-trickle">
<draft>draft-ietf-ice-trickle-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-22</date-received>
<authors>E. Ivov, J. Uberti, P. Saint-Andre</authors>
<title>
Trickle ICE: Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Protocol
</title>
<bytes>74390</bytes>
<source>Interactive Connectivity Establishment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-24</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., W. Henderickx, J. Drake, W. Lin, A. Sajassi</authors>
<title>
IP Prefix Advertisement in EVPN
</title>
<bytes>83101</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled Services</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-54.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-06-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, H. Alvestrand, C. Jennings</authors>
<title>
Negotiating Media Multiplexing Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
</title>
<bytes>147171</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ice-trickle</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Ivov, T. Stach, E. Marocco, C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Usage for Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (Trickle ICE)
</title>
<bytes>101829</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-10</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Burman, M. Westerlund, S. Nandakumar, M. Zanaty</authors>
<title>
Using Simulcast in SDP and RTP Sessions
</title>
<bytes>94865</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-11</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Civil, A. Morton, R. Rahman, M. Jethanandani, K. Pentikousis, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Data Model
</title>
<bytes>136989</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-16</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8662</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Kini, K. Kompella, S. Sivabalan, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir, J. Tantsura</authors>
<title>
Entropy label for SPRING tunnels
</title>
<bytes>61934</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid">
<draft>draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-19</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dnssd-push</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Cheshire</authors>
<title>
Discovery Proxy for Multicast DNS-Based Service Discovery
</title>
<bytes>82558</bytes>
<source>Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfd-yang-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-08-06</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Rahman, Ed., L. Zheng, Ed., M. Jethanandani, Ed., S. Pallagatti, G. Mirsky</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
</title>
<bytes>145281</bytes>
<source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-27.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-08-06</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8669</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Previdi, C. Filsfils, A. Lindem, Ed., A. Sreekantiah, H. Gredler</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing Prefix SID extensions for BGP
</title>
<bytes>38276</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-09-06</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8661</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Bashandy, Ed., C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing interworking with LDP
</title>
<bytes>48255</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile">
<draft>draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-09-10</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-source-specific</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Chroboczek</authors>
<title>
Homenet profile of the Babel routing protocol
</title>
<bytes>19874</bytes>
<source>Home Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-12-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>G. Camarillo, T. Kristensen, C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Format for Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Streams
</title>
<bytes>48918</bytes>
<source>Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-23.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-01-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8666</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Psenak, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed.</authors>
<title>
OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing
</title>
<bytes>42346</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-01-28</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Boucadair, C. Jacquenet</authors>
<title>
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message &amp; IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
</title>
<bytes>10277</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-softwire-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-softwire-yang-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-02-07</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>I. Farrer, Ed., M. Boucadair, Ed.</authors>
<title>
YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port (A+P) Softwires
</title>
<bytes>98207</bytes>
<source>Softwires</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-03-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8664</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Sivabalan, C. Filsfils, J. Tantsura, W. Henderickx, J. Hardwick</authors>
<title>
PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing
</title>
<bytes>79236</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-03-20</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Y. Lee, Ed., R. Casellas, Ed.</authors>
<title>
PCEP Extension for WSON Routing and Wavelength Assignment
</title>
<bytes>62546</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tram-stunbis">
<draft>draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-03-23</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8489</auth48-url>
<authors>M. Petit-Huguenin, G. Salgueiro, J. Rosenberg, D. Wing, R. Mahy, P. Matthews</authors>
<title>
Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
</title>
<bytes>180048</bytes>
<source>TURN Revised and Modernized</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-20</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Previdi, K. Talaulikar, C. Filsfils, K. Patel, S. Ray, J. Dong</authors>
<title>
BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering
</title>
<bytes>38137</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-28.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Drage, M. Makaraju, R. Ejzak, J. Marcon, R. Even, Ed.</authors>
<title>
SDP-based Data Channel Negotiation
</title>
<bytes>91932</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-28</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8660</auth48-url>
<authors>A. Bashandy, Ed., C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing with MPLS data plane
</title>
<bytes>74196</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-03</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, O. Gonzalez de Dios, R. Casellas, D. King</authors>
<title>
Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE)
</title>
<bytes>68596</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions">
<draft>draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-05</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8667</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, Ed., C. Filsfils, A. Bashandy, H. Gredler, B. Decraene</authors>
<title>
IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing
</title>
<bytes>63157</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-11</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-perc-double</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Jones, D. Benham, C. Groves</authors>
<title>
A Solution Framework for Private Media in Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing (PERC)
</title>
<bytes>68797</bytes>
<source>Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8659</auth48-url>
<authors>P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling, J. Hoffman-Andrews</authors>
<title>
DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record
</title>
<bytes>40105</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8652</auth48-url>
<authors>X. Liu, F. Guo, M. Sivakumar, P. McAllister, A. Peter</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)
</title>
<bytes>96623</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel">
<draft>draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8675</auth48-url>
<authors>M. Boucadair, I. Farrer, R. Asati</authors>
<title>
Tunnel Interface Types YANG Module
</title>
<bytes>30775</bytes>
<source>Softwires</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius">
<draft>draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8658</auth48-url>
<authors>S. Jiang, Ed., Y. Fu, Ed., C. Xie, T. Li, M. Boucadair</authors>
<title>
RADIUS Attributes for Address plus Port (A+P) based Softwire Mechanisms
</title>
<bytes>77229</bytes>
<source>Softwires</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-18</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>M. Saito, M. Matsumoto, V. Roca, E. Baccelli</authors>
<title>
TinyMT32 Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG)
</title>
<bytes>24893</bytes>
<source>Transport Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-20</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>V. Roca, B. Teibi</authors>
<title>
Sliding Window Random Linear Code (RLC) Forward Erasure Correction (FEC) Schemes for FECFRAME
</title>
<bytes>94648</bytes>
<source>Transport Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-20</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>V. Roca, A. Begen</authors>
<title>
Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework Extension to Sliding Window Codes
</title>
<bytes>45800</bytes>
<source>Transport Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-caa">
<draft>draft-ietf-acme-caa-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-20</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8657</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Landau</authors>
<title>
CAA Record Extensions for Account URI and ACME Method Binding
</title>
<bytes>23786</bytes>
<source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-21</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8663</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Xu, S. Bryant, A. Farrel, S. Hassan, W. Henderickx, Z. Li</authors>
<title>
SR-MPLS over IP
</title>
<bytes>43189</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-04</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Previdi, K. Talaulikar, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Gredler, M. Chen</authors>
<title>
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
</title>
<bytes>70095</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo">
<draft>draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-31.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-11</date-received>
<state>IESG</state>
<authors>M. Robles, M. Richardson, P. Thubert</authors>
<title>
Using RPL Option Type, Routing Header for Source Routes and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation in the RPL Data Plane
</title>
<bytes>128736</bytes>
<source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao">
<draft>draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-11</date-received>
<state>IESG</state>
<authors>R. Jadhav, Ed., P. Thubert, R. Sahoo, Z. Cao</authors>
<title>
Efficient Route Invalidation
</title>
<bytes>55789</bytes>
<source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Uberti</authors>
<title>
WebRTC IP Address Handling Requirements
</title>
<bytes>26488</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-security">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
Security Considerations for WebRTC
</title>
<bytes>65610</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected">
<draft>draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-16</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>E. Burger, B. Nagda</authors>
<title>
A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Response Code for Rejected Calls
</title>
<bytes>58797</bytes>
<source>Session Initiation Protocol Core</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-16</date-received>
<authors>J. Uberti</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Forward Error Correction Requirements
</title>
<bytes>27189</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo">
<draft>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-19</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Liu, I. Bryskin, V. Beeram, T. Saad, H. Shah, O. Dios</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies
</title>
<bytes>412706</bytes>
<source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-21</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>M. Jones, A. Nadalin, B. Campbell, Ed., J. Bradley, C. Mortimore</authors>
<title>
OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange
</title>
<bytes>79303</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-22</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, O. Bonaventure, C. Paasch</authors>
<title>
TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses
</title>
<bytes>213934</bytes>
<source>Multipath TCP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-22</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>P. Kampanakis, Q. Dang</authors>
<title>
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional Algorithm Identifiers for RSASSA-PSS and ECDSA using SHAKEs
</title>
<bytes>34514</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-22</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Security Architecture
</title>
<bytes>102483</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tram-turnbis">
<draft>draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-29.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-29</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tram-stunbis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Reddy, Ed., A. Johnston, Ed., P. Matthews, J. Rosenberg</authors>
<title>
Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
</title>
<bytes>235795</bytes>
<source>TURN Revised and Modernized</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-egress-protection-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-egress-protection-framework-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-01</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Y. Shen, M. Jeganathan, B. Decraene, H. Gredler, C. Michel, H. Chen</authors>
<title>
MPLS Egress Protection Framework
</title>
<bytes>74511</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-association-group">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-01</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>I. Minei, E. Crabbe, S. Sivabalan, H. Ananthakrishnan, D. Dhody, Y. Tanaka</authors>
<title>
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Establishing Relationships Between Sets of Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
</title>
<bytes>66722</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls">
<draft>draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-05</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>J. Fenton</authors>
<title>
SMTP Require TLS Option
</title>
<bytes>43858</bytes>
<source>Using TLS in Applications</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2">
<draft>draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-07</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Sorce, H. Kario</authors>
<title>
GSS-API Key Exchange with SHA2
</title>
<bytes>29362</bytes>
<source>CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-08</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8650</auth48-url>
<authors>E. Voit, R. Rahman, E. Nilsen-Nygaard, A. Clemm, A. Bierman</authors>
<title>
Dynamic subscription to YANG Events and Datastores over RESTCONF
</title>
<bytes>53578</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb">
<draft>draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-52.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>N. Benamar, J. Haerri, J. Lee, T. Ernst</authors>
<title>
Basic Support for IPv6 over IEEE Std 802.11 Networks Operating Outside the Context of a Basic Service Set
</title>
<bytes>78422</bytes>
<source>IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-13</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Thomson, E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
Unknown Key Share Attacks on uses of TLS with the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
</title>
<bytes>47406</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dots-data-channel">
<draft>draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-31.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-13</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Boucadair, Ed., K. Reddy, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel Specification
</title>
<bytes>134623</bytes>
<source>DDoS Open Threat Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-39.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-14</date-received>
<authors>M. Petit-Huguenin, S. Nandakumar, C. Holmberg, A. Keränen, R. Shpount</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer procedures for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)
</title>
<bytes>94766</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-37.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Begen, P. Kyzivat, C. Perkins, M. Handley</authors>
<title>
SDP: Session Description Protocol
</title>
<bytes>133368</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out">
<draft>draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8671</auth48-url>
<authors>T. Evens, S. Bayraktar, P. Lucente, P. Mi, S. Zhuang</authors>
<title>
Support for Adj-RIB-Out in BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
</title>
<bytes>20514</bytes>
<source>Global Routing Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc">
<draft>draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>S. Kiesel, M. Stiemerling</authors>
<title>
Application Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Cross-Domain Server Discovery
</title>
<bytes>96725</bytes>
<source>Application-Layer Traffic Optimization</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Using Pre-Shared Key (PSK) in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
</title>
<bytes>67448</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-yang-29.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Yeung, Y. Qu, Z. Zhang, I. Chen, A. Lindem</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol
</title>
<bytes>234221</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-27</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>A. Smirnov, A. Retana, M. Barnes</authors>
<title>
OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels
</title>
<bytes>19344</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-perc-double">
<draft>draft-ietf-perc-double-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-29</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Jennings, P. Jones, R. Barnes, A. Roach</authors>
<title>
SRTP Double Encryption Procedures
</title>
<bytes>40954</bytes>
<source>Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-30</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>N. Nainar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, A. Vainshtein</authors>
<title>
RFC8287 Sub-TLV Length Clarification
</title>
<bytes>12957</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>P. Kampanakis, Q. Dang</authors>
<title>
Use of the SHAKE One-way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
</title>
<bytes>38531</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves">
<draft>draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>A. Adamantiadis, S. Josefsson, M. Baushke</authors>
<title>
Secure Shell (SSH) Key Exchange Method using Curve25519 and Curve448
</title>
<bytes>14197</bytes>
<source>CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-11</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>B. Campbell, J. Bradley, H. Tschofenig</authors>
<title>
Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0
</title>
<bytes>31052</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-mtls">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-11</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>B. Campbell, J. Bradley, N. Sakimura, T. Lodderstedt</authors>
<title>
OAuth 2.0 Mutual-TLS Client Authentication and Certificate-Bound Access Tokens
</title>
<bytes>76781</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448">
<draft>draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>B. Harris, L. Velvindron</authors>
<title>
Ed25519 and Ed448 public key algorithms for the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol
</title>
<bytes>12183</bytes>
<source>CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension">
<draft>draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Taylor, S. Ratliff</authors>
<title>
DLEP Link Identifier Extension
</title>
<bytes>17839</bytes>
<source>Mobile Ad-hoc Networks</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>L. Ginsberg, P. Wells</authors>
<title>
Restart Signaling for IS-IS
</title>
<bytes>63504</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-23</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Use of the HSS/LMS Hash-based Signature Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
</title>
<bytes>29438</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct">
<draft>draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-23</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>T. Fossati, K. Hartke, C. Bormann</authors>
<title>
Multipart Content-Format for CoAP
</title>
<bytes>20120</bytes>
<source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>S. Venaas, A. Retana</authors>
<title>
PIM Message Type Space Extension and Reserved Bits
</title>
<bytes>15746</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-27</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Dhody, Ed., R. Gandhi, Ed., U. Palle, R. Singh, L. Fang</authors>
<title>
PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE
</title>
<bytes>81243</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cbor-sequence">
<draft>draft-ietf-cbor-sequence-02.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-08</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Bormann</authors>
<title>
Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Sequences
</title>
<bytes>20388</bytes>
<source>Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time">
<draft>draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-10</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>L. Thomas, S. Anamalamudi, S. Anand, M. Hegde, C. Perkins</authors>
<title>
Packet Delivery Deadline time in 6LoWPAN Routing Header
</title>
<bytes>47643</bytes>
<source>IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-ip">
<draft>draft-ietf-acme-ip-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-11</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Shoemaker</authors>
<title>
ACME IP Identifier Validation Extension
</title>
<bytes>10913</bytes>
<source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn">
<draft>draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-17</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Shoemaker</authors>
<title>
ACME TLS ALPN Challenge Extension
</title>
<bytes>21476</bytes>
<source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg">
<draft>draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-42.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-17</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Litkowski, D. Yeung, A. Lindem, Z. Zhang, L. Lhotka</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol
</title>
<bytes>211538</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-tls13">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-tls13-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Benjamin</authors>
<title>
Using TLS 1.3 with HTTP/2
</title>
<bytes>9665</bytes>
<source>HyperText Transfer Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>A. Raghuram, A. Goddard, J. Karthik, S. Sivabalan, M. Negi</authors>
<title>
Ability for a Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) to request and obtain control of a Label Switched Path (LSP)
</title>
<bytes>25574</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags">
<draft>draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Bormann</authors>
<title>
Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Typed Arrays
</title>
<bytes>29480</bytes>
<source>Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-22</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-association-group</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Ananthakrishnan, S. Sivabalan, C. Barth, I. Minei, M. Negi</authors>
<title>
PCEP Extensions for Associating Working and Protection LSPs with Stateful PCE
</title>
<bytes>38266</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header">
<draft>draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-24</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>C. Filsfils, Ed., D. Dukes, Ed., S. Previdi, J. Leddy, S. Matsushima, D. Voyer</authors>
<title>
IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)
</title>
<bytes>65606</bytes>
<source>IPv6 Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-star">
<draft>draft-ietf-acme-star-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-24</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>Y. Sheffer, D. Lopez, O. Gonzalez de Dios, A. Pastor Perales, T. Fossati</authors>
<title>
Support for Short-Term, Automatically-Renewed (STAR) Certificates in Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
</title>
<bytes>65201</bytes>
<source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK">
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP">
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2014-12-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jesup, Z. Sarker, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Congestion Control Requirements for Interactive Real-Time Media
</title>
<bytes>27484</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-introduction">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-04-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-sec</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Cabellos-Aparicio, D. Saucez, Ed.</authors>
<title>
An Architectural Introduction to the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
</title>
<bytes>66992</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lwig-cellular">
<draft>draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-01-04</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-resource-directory</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Arkko, A. Eriksson, A. Keranen</authors>
<title>
Building Power-Efficient CoAP Devices for Cellular Networks
</title>
<bytes>39751</bytes>
<source>Light-Weight Implementation Guidance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-09-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-nada</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Islam, M. Welzl, S. Gjessing</authors>
<title>
Coupled congestion control for RTP media
</title>
<bytes>54076</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-12-19</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-grasp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Jiang, Ed., Z. Du, B. Carpenter, Q. Sun</authors>
<title>
Autonomic IPv6 Edge Prefix Management in Large-scale Networks
</title>
<bytes>52556</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-12-21</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(3G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, G. Dawra, Ed., E. Aries, D. Afanasiev</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer Engineering
</title>
<bytes>35539</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process">
<draft>draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-06-15</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Lear, Ed.</authors>
<title>
IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection Process
</title>
<bytes>28795</bytes>
<source>Meeting Venue</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy">
<draft>draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-08-08</date-received>
<authors>S. Krishnan</authors>
<title>
High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF
</title>
<bytes>11311</bytes>
<source>Meeting Venue</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-taps-minset">
<draft>draft-ietf-taps-minset-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-10-01</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-taps-transport-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Welzl, S. Gjessing</authors>
<title>
A Minimal Set of Transport Services for End Systems
</title>
<bytes>113475</bytes>
<source>Transport Services</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-11-05</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Arkko</authors>
<title>
Discussion of the IASA 2.0 Changes as They Relate to the IETF Trust
</title>
<bytes>13665</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-11-05</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Arkko, T. Hardie</authors>
<title>
Update to the Process for Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust
</title>
<bytes>10662</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-reference-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-11-24</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-grasp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Behringer, Ed., B. Carpenter, T. Eckert, L. Ciavaglia, J. Nobre</authors>
<title>
A Reference Model for Autonomic Networking
</title>
<bytes>72222</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-11-30</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8670</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, G. Dawra, E. Aries, P. Lapukhov</authors>
<title>
BGP-Prefix Segment in large-scale data centers
</title>
<bytes>45566</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-12-21</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Stark</authors>
<title>
Expect-CT Extension for HTTP
</title>
<bytes>51380</bytes>
<source>Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-03-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-hip-dex</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Moskowitz, Ed., M. Komu</authors>
<title>
Host Identity Protocol Architecture
</title>
<bytes>133290</bytes>
<source>Host Identity Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-04-15</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Klensin, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Consolidated IASA 2.0 Updates of IETF Administrative Terminology
</title>
<bytes>22028</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-04-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Haberman, J. Hall, J. Livingood</authors>
<title>
Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0
</title>
<bytes>56221</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-datachannel">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-04-17</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
CLUE Protocol data channel
</title>
<bytes>29058</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec">
<draft>draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-14</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Peterson, R. Barnes, R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Best Practices for Securing RTP Media Signaled with SIP
</title>
<bytes>35321</bytes>
<source>SIP Best-practice Recommendations Against Network Dangers to privacY</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-30</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Z. Sarker, V. Singh, X. Zhu, M. Ramalho</authors>
<title>
Test Cases for Evaluating RMCAT Proposals
</title>
<bytes>68718</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment">
<draft>draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-15</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>J. Palet Martinez</authors>
<title>
Additional NAT64/464XLAT Deployment Guidelines in Operator and Enterprise Networks
</title>
<bytes>107856</bytes>
<source>IPv6 Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-15</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Kucherawy, Ed., B. Hinden, Ed., J. Livingood, Ed.</authors>
<title>
IAB, IESG, IETF Trust and IETF LLC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the IETF Nominating and Recall Committees
</title>
<bytes>92279</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility">
<draft>draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-06</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8653</auth48-url>
<authors>A. Yegin, D. Moses, S. Jeon</authors>
<title>
On Demand Mobility Management
</title>
<bytes>28305</bytes>
<source>Distributed Mobility Management</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-14</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. King, H. Zheng</authors>
<title>
Applicability of the Path Computation Element to Inter-Area and Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
</title>
<bytes>58215</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>F. Baker, C. Bowers, J. Linkova</authors>
<title>
Enterprise Multihoming using Provider-Assigned IPv6 Addresses without Network Prefix Translation: Requirements and Solutions
</title>
<bytes>136566</bytes>
<source>Routing Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-grease">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-grease-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Benjamin</authors>
<title>
Applying GREASE to TLS Extensibility
</title>
<bytes>28058</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>C. Pratt, D. Thakore, B. Stark</authors>
<title>
HTTP Random Access and Live Content
</title>
<bytes>24451</bytes>
<source>Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>G. Camarillo, J. Livingood</authors>
<title>
The IETF-ISOC Relationship
</title>
<bytes>19367</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-03</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>K. Sriram, D. Montgomery, J. Haas</authors>
<title>
Enhanced Feasible-Path Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding
</title>
<bytes>47806</bytes>
<source>Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-nada">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>X. Zhu, R. Pan, M. Ramalho, S. de la Cruz</authors>
<title>
NADA: A Unified Congestion Control Scheme for Real-Time Media
</title>
<bytes>69331</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc5377bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc5377bis-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Halpern, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on Rights to Be Granted in IETF Documents
</title>
<bytes>18725</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Resnick, A. Farrel</authors>
<title>
Update to the IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures for the Replacement of the IAOC with the IETF Administration LLC
</title>
<bytes>11172</bytes>
<source>IETF Administrative Support Activity 2</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die">
<draft>draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-23</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>L. Velvindron</authors>
<title>
Deprecating RC4 in Secure Shell (SSH)
</title>
<bytes>8963</bytes>
<source>CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile">
<draft>draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-10</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Bonica, F. Baker, G. Huston, B. Hinden, O. Trøan, F. Gont</authors>
<title>
IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile
</title>
<bytes>62382</bytes>
<source>Internet Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>Y. Sheffer, D. Hardt, M. Jones</authors>
<title>
JSON Web Token Best Current Practices
</title>
<bytes>35473</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-22</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Dhody, Y. Lee, D. Ceccarelli, J. Shin, D. King</authors>
<title>
Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE)
</title>
<bytes>55491</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP">
</section>
<section name="IAB STREAM">
<entry xml:id="draft-iab-rfc7500-bis">
<draft>draft-iab-rfc7500-bis-00.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Housley, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Principles for Operation of Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registries
</title>
<bytes>16958</bytes>
<source>IAB</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-iab-fiftyyears">
<draft>draft-iab-fiftyyears-01.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-04</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>H. Flanagan, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Fifty Years of RFCs
</title>
<bytes>68929</bytes>
<source>IAB</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IRTF STREAM">
</section>
<section name="INDEPENDENT SUBMISSIONS">
<entry xml:id="draft-ribose-asciirfc">
<draft>draft-ribose-asciirfc-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-04-19</date-received>
<state>AUTH</state>
<authors>R. Tse, N. Nicholas, J. Lau, P. Brasolin</authors>
<title>
draft-ribose-asciirfc-08
</title>
<bytes>287041</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework">
<draft>draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-31</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>S. Kanugovi, F. Baboescu, J. Zhu, J. Mueller, S. Seo</authors>
<title>
Multiple Access Management Services
</title>
<bytes>271727</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile">
<draft>draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-05.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-12</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-jenkins-cnsa-smime-profile</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Jenkins, L. Zieglar</authors>
<title>
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Profile of Certificate Management over CMS
</title>
<bytes>45324</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-trossen-sfc-name-based-sff">
<draft>draft-trossen-sfc-name-based-sff-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-05</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>D. Trossen, D. Purkayastha, A. Rahman</authors>
<title>
Name-Based Service Function Forwarder (nSFF) component within SFC framework
</title>
<bytes>72810</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-aranda-dispatch-q4s">
<draft>draft-aranda-dispatch-q4s-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-17</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-quic-invariants</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Aranda, M. Cortes, J. Salvachua, M. Narganes, I. Sarriegui</authors>
<title>
The Quality for Service Protocol
</title>
<bytes>182791</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-sheffer-tls-pinning-ticket">
<draft>draft-sheffer-tls-pinning-ticket-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8672</auth48-url>
<authors>Y. Sheffer, D. Migault</authors>
<title>
TLS Server Identity Pinning with Tickets
</title>
<bytes>66249</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-sekar-dns-llq">
<draft>draft-sekar-dns-llq-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dnssd-push</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Cheshire, M. Krochmal</authors>
<title>
Apple's DNS Long-Lived Queries protocol
</title>
<bytes>50905</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-nottingham-safe-hint">
<draft>draft-nottingham-safe-hint-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-29</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>M. Nottingham</authors>
<title>
The "safe" HTTP Preference
</title>
<bytes>18098</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ise-iana-policy">
<draft>draft-ise-iana-policy-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-23</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>A. Farrel</authors>
<title>
How Requests for IANA Action Will be Handled on the Independent Stream
</title>
<bytes>11295</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13">
<draft>draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-09-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>L. Bruckert, J. Merkle, M. Lochter</authors>
<title>
ECC Brainpool Curves for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Version 1.3
</title>
<bytes>20470</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
</rfc-editor-queue>
