Received: from jimi.CS.UNLV.EDU by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa02184;
          26 Dec 96 23:30 PST
To: jay@JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU
Subject: bug-chimera aug 96
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 23:30:16 -0800
From: Jay Nietling <jay@JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU>


------- Forwarded Messages

Received: from hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa04316;
          1 Aug 96 3:06 PDT
To: bug-chimera@hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU
Subject: chimera 2
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 03:06:07 -0700
From: John Kilburg <john@hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU>

Well, I thought I was going to get one released by the end of July but
no such luck.  I hope your patience holds out :)

							-john

------- Message 2

Received: from haymarket.ed.ac.uk by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa16836;
          1 Aug 96 16:25 PDT
Received: from aiai.ed.ac.uk (skye-alter.aiai.ed.ac.uk [192.41.104.6]) by haymarket.ed.ac.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA28402 for <bug-chimera%cs.unlv.edu@haymarket.ed.ac.uk>; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 00:18:24 +0100
Received: from subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk (staffa) by aiai.ed.ac.uk; Fri, 2 Aug 96 00:15:09 BST
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 00:18:02 +0100
Message-Id: <10782.199608012318@subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk>
From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@aiai.ed.ac.uk>
To: Chimera doctors <bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu>
Subject: 108 & resources & bookmarks

Apologies if these are all FAQs -- I haven't really kept up since
1.65!

does the Chimera.dbFiles stuff work in 108?  It seems not to for me --
it finds the basic resources file but then doesn't seem to read the
file it points at (ie the one from lib/resources in the source tree).

What I was trying to do was get bookmarks to work, but perhaps they
don't yet?

- --tim

------- Message 3

Received: from haymarket.ed.ac.uk by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa17033;
          1 Aug 96 16:29 PDT
Received: from aiai.ed.ac.uk (skye-alter.aiai.ed.ac.uk [192.41.104.6]) by haymarket.ed.ac.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA28697 for <bug-chimera%cs.unlv.edu@haymarket.ed.ac.uk>; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 00:29:29 +0100
Received: from subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk (staffa) by aiai.ed.ac.uk; Fri, 2 Aug 96 00:26:15 BST
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 00:29:07 +0100
Message-Id: <10788.199608012329@subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk>
From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@aiai.ed.ac.uk>
To: Chimera doctors <bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu>
Subject: Re: 108 & resources & bookmarks
In-Reply-To: <108895008@toto.iv>

* I wrote:
> does the Chimera.dbFiles stuff work in 108?  It seems not to for me --
> it finds the basic resources file but then doesn't seem to read the
> file it points at (ie the one from lib/resources in the source tree).

What I meant to say was that it also doesn't seem to be merging
resources with the fallbacks -- if it finds the resource file at all
it ignores all the fallbacks and you get a tiny little box with
uninformative button names...

- --tim

------- Message 4

Received: from hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa18250;
          1 Aug 96 17:38 PDT
To: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@aiai.ed.ac.uk>
cc: Chimera doctors <bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu>
Subject: Re: 108 & resources & bookmarks 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Aug 1996 00:18:02 BST."
             <10782.199608012318@subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk> 
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 17:37:59 -0700
From: John Kilburg <john@hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU>

>What I was trying to do was get bookmarks to work, but perhaps they
>don't yet?

The bookmark code is badly broken in 108.  I recommend against using
bookmarks in 108.  It is demo only :)

							-john

------- Message 5

Received: from LV.Levels.UniSA.EDU.AU by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa26403;
          15 Aug 96 16:36 PDT
Received: from lux.levels.unisa.edu.au (9308390r@lux.Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au)
 by Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au (PMDF V5.0-4 #16957)
 id <01I8C6MVPRJQ9JEWHM@Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au> for bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu; Fri,
 16 Aug 1996 09:05:47 +0930
Received: by lux.levels.unisa.edu.au (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA03170; Fri,
 16 Aug 1996 09:05:45 +0930
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:05:45 +0930 (GMT+9:30)
From: 9308390r <9308390r@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au>
Subject: Chimera - where
To: bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu
Message-id: <199608152335.JAA03170@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-type: text
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


I ma inguiring where i may be able to download the latest
version of chimera (esp the sourse code). also what are the latest
bug fixes that i will need, to compile iot under linux?
- --
       ****    ****       *  ****   Operate at a higher level.
     *    *  *    *     *  *    *
    *    *  *         *       *     Mr Antonino Iannella
   *    *   ****    *      *        Computer Systems Engineering
  *    *  *    *  *     *           9308390r@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au
  ****    ****  *      ******       http://members.tripod.com/~antonino/index.html

Would you fix your house if the windows need replacing?
So why not fix your computer by replacing its Windows?

------- Message 6

Received: from mama.indstate.edu by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa21861;
          17 Aug 96 10:26 PDT
Received: (from liug@localhost) by mama.indstate.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id MAA07213; Sat, 17 Aug 1996 12:26:42 -0500
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 12:26:42 -0500
From: liug <liug@mama.indstate.edu>
Message-Id: <199608171726.MAA07213@mama.indstate.edu>
To: 9308390r@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au, bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu
Subject: Re: Chimera - where

>
>
> I ma inguiring where i may be able to download the latest
> version of chimera (esp the sourse code). also what are the latest
> bug fixes that i will need, to compile iot under linux?

This latest beta has some serious problems as I understand,
I would suggest you wait for the next version which is
supposed to be out last month, so I don't think you
will wait too long :-)
Anybody knows what is current status?

Frank

------- Message 7

Received: from hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa04926;
          18 Aug 96 21:21 PDT
To: bug-chimera@hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU
cc: 9308390r@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au
Subject: Re: Chimera - where 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 Aug 1996 12:26:42 CDT."
             <199608171726.MAA07213@mama.indstate.edu> 
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 21:21:04 -0700
From: John Kilburg <john@hubert.CS.UNLV.EDU>

>> I ma inguiring where i may be able to download the latest
>> version of chimera (esp the sourse code). also what are the latest
>> bug fixes that i will need, to compile iot under linux?
>
>This latest beta has some serious problems as I understand,
>I would suggest you wait for the next version which is
>supposed to be out last month, so I don't think you
>will wait too long :-)
>Anybody knows what is current status?

Its getting there.  I'm using it for my browsing although there is
a problem with the cache (it has been changed since the last release)
that sometimes randomly chooses a cached document for inlines
(Hmm a GIF with a chance to win $20,000 instead of a red ball.  Just want
I wanted.).

The best is probably the 1.65 release at <URL:ftp://ftp.cs.unlv.edu/>.
The trouble is that I haven't used it in a year or so and I know it needs
a patch but I don't remember what exactly is needed.

							-john

------- Message 8

Received: from mail.compulink.co.uk by JIMI.CS.UNLV.EDU id aa05514;
          30 Aug 96 12:50 PDT
Received: from mayday.compulink.co.uk (root@mayday.compulink.co.uk [194.153.8.241]) by mail.compulink.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA00630; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 20:50:39 +0100
Received: by mayday.compulink.co.uk (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
	id m0uwZWr-0021qzC; Fri, 30 Aug 96 20:46 BST
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 20:46:37 +0100 (BST)
From: Robert de Bath <robert@mayday.compulink.co.uk>
cc: John Kilburg <john@ry.ISRI.UNLV.EDU>, bug-chimera@cs.unlv.edu
Subject: Re: 2.0-108
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.93.960427132851.28084C-100000@mageworks.snm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960830201517.21991A-100000@mayday.compulink.co.uk>
Alternate-address: rdebath@cix.compulink.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Ah, well looks like I'm gonna stick with 106 for a while longer. 
I finally downloaded 108 and tried it. Compiled first time, no hassel
picks up the resources just like 106. Unfortunatly the cache persist no
longer seems to work correctly, it tries to write a cache index out at
the end of the program but instead just writes the verbiage around it
ie:

   <html>
   <head><title>Chimera Cache Index</title></head>
   <body>
   <ul>
   </ul>
   </body>
   </html>

So suddenly my huge cache is gone :-(

BTW, I really like the agressive caching that both major versions of Chimera
have had please don't even think of removing that.

There is one other thing I've recently realised is happening to the caching
in 106 too. If I run two (or more) independent copies they will break each
other's attempts at managing the cache directory sometimes resulting in
files with completely incorrect labels.

I suppose the only way of fixing this is to ensure the index is _always_
uptodate and locked at the right times, this could get quite complex ... :-)

- --
Rob.                           (Robert de Bath <robert@mayday.compulink.co.uk>)

------- End of Forwarded Messages

