From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Mar 1 11:18:01 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:18:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JHaUp019926; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:17:36 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JGl9J028379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:16:48 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i21JGamU011350; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:16:36 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JFoce054316 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:50 -0800 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JFnuo030879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:49 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i21JFnpQ005597 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:49 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i21JFlnR023550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:15:47 GMT Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Formatting error message -- why did it come up? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Part of a message from a mailing list: without initializing it anywhere, ucontrol wouldn't load (I made that mistake accidentally). Is that normal ?? That seems stran [Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding] and here's what I see when I show it with full headers... without initializing it anywhere, ucontrol wouldn't load (I made that=20 mistake accidentally). Is that normal ?? That seems strange. The extern=20= I declared didn't have anything to do with ucontrol code... --- As you can see, nothing strange (no pun intended). Is this something on my end, or something in the message, that is causing the Formatting error message to show up? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Mar 2 01:38:13 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:38:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i229c2Ii020900; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:38:02 -0800 Received: from c0.wb5823.thrr.mi.voyager.net (c0.wb5823.thrr.mi.voyager.net [207.89.198.2] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i229bBxa028657; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:37:12 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Willie Lynn" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: A real online business Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:33:10 +0500 X-Mailer: earthy courtney least-wale: grimaldi albuquerque aruba MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--52288744130340416502" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----52288744130340416502 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable C 2.32.224.81

 

Affiliate programs were never this easy in the past. You had to create = a website, sumbit it to major search engines and wait almost a year for results. Wi= th my program you won't have to worry about any of this.

no more emails please

----52288744130340416502-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Mar 2 03:45:48 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:45:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i22Bjjbw026444; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:45:45 -0800 Received: from villette-2-82-67-173-30.fbx.proxad.net (villette-2-82-67-173-30.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.173.30]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i22BiuZI019146; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:44:58 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Alonzo Fountain" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-infor@cac.washington.edu Subject: Make huge online profits without a website Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:44:29 +0300 X-Mailer: basalt kane abramson-eukaryote: lot oar attestation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--085975331286927700" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CT 0' ----085975331286927700 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 120.152.135.5

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

----085975331286927700-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Mar 2 06:51:33 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:51:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i22EpTG6000543; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:51:29 -0800 Received: from dhcp-43-37.thefields.com (dhcp-43-37.thefields.com [12.2.43.37]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i22EojCG024571; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:50:46 -0800 Received: from [207.223.36.140] by dhcp-43-37.thefields.com SMTP id ckO6L0CzpvgYF1; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:48:50 +0000 Message-ID: <718bs5999-0-x02p58i-ifw2d-638@r4z.2a9v> From: "Matilda Greer" Reply-To: "Matilda Greer" To: , , , , , , , Subject: IGDC up 400% now LETH on the move g Date: Tue, 02 Mar 04 14:48:50 GMT X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F__B1.EDA0BEA3B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' --F__B1.EDA0BEA3B Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.35 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. jaqbwkuczyshttms nemm doznu hlt --F__B1.EDA0BEA3B-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Mar 2 09:52:30 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i22HqUiJ008421 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:30 -0800 Received: from 2911.net ([218.6.13.78]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i22HqRmG013131 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:28 -0800 Message-Id: <200403021752.i22HqRmG013131@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "Jon" To: Subject: Dedicated Server & Hosting Solution Sender: "Jon" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:52:28 +0800 Reply-To: "Jon" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 5, GUARANTEED_100_PERCENT 4.400, MAILTO_SUBJ_REMOVE 1.911, BANG_GUARANTEE 1.455, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL 1.348, OFFERS_ETC 1.177, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, FRONTPAGE 0.541, SUBJ_REMOVE 0.288, EXCUSE_19 0.276, NO_FEE 0.133, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, HTML_50_70 0.092, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ 0.048, MAILTO_TO_REMOVE 0.001, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, TARGETED 0.001, MAILTO_LINK 0.001, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' We offer reliable bulk email friendly web hosting services

We offer reliable bulk email friendly web hosting services. You can now have the
peace of mind knowing that your web site is secure during your email marketing
campaigns.

BulletProof Web Hosting 100% Guaranteed! We guarantee that your site will be
99% uptime.

We also offer BulletProof dedicated server:

Two IPs
512MB RAM DDR
P4 2.66GHZ CPU
36 GB SCSI
Unlimited Data Transfer
Linux/Windows/FreeBSD
 		 Three IPs
1024MB RAM DDR
P4 / Two CPU
72 GB SCSI
Unlimited Data Transfer
Linux/Windows/FreeBSD
 		 Dynamic IP
1024MB RAM DDR
P4 / Two CPU
72 GB SCSI
Unlimited Data Transfer
Linux/Windows/FreeBSD
 
Price: No setup fee
          US$ 599.00/month		 Price: No setup fee
          US$ 799.00/month		 Price: No setup fee
          US$ 999.00/month

                                                                                     More information


Allowed Usage
You can use the server for any of the following:

Direct Bulk Mailing or Proxy Mailing
Web Site Hosting
Proxy, Relay or Port Scanning

We can supply Targeted Email Addresses according to your requirements, and
send out Targeted Emails for you. For more information, please contact us by 
Sales@biz-boosting.com or Sales@marketing-promote.com

It will be our pleasure to do business with you.


Cheers!

Mike Tanaka
Support Team

****************************************************************************************
Receiving this e-mail because you registered to receive offers from us.
Please click here to unscbscirbe:DelList@yahoo.com?subject=Remove
****************************************************************************************

From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 09:41:58 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:41:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23HfsOI005779; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:41:55 -0800 Received: from chello062178229161.15.15.vie.surfer.at (chello062178229161.15.15.vie.surfer.at [62.178.229.161]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i23HfCjO010207; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:41:16 -0800 Received: from 235.36.75.109 by 62.178.229.161; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:40:01 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Milton Crowder" Reply-To: "Milton Crowder" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Subject: employers don't hire people without degrees, buy yours today Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:40:01 +0400 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--734535703533881" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' ----734535703533881 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET
----734535703533881-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 12:58:32 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:58:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KwWg8017704; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:58:32 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KviJL022638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:57:45 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i23KvO15015648; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:57:25 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KuPIb013810 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:56:25 -0800 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KuORr007215 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:56:24 -0800 Received: from inigo (bgp997860bgs.nanarb01.mi.comcast.net[68.40.59.71]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20040303205624013007jk8me>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:56:24 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:56:57 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Carter To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rkcarter@mail.comcast.net X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all, I've been searching the archives, and aside from someone in 2001 saying it wasn't working for them, I was wondering if anyone's been able to do what I want to do: My PC is dual-boot -- Windows 2000 (probably soon to be Windows XP Professional) and RedHat Linux 9. I'm currently just getting my mail on the Windows side with PC-Pine from a POP3 server. The mailboxes and pinerc are on a FAT32 partition (drive F:) which I mount as /F on the Linux side. I need to be on each side of this system relatively equally, and ideally would love to use pine and pc-pine to hit the same mailboxes. Last I knew (doing some experiments back when I was reading pine on a Sun and put PC-pine on my home Windows box), the end-of-line difference between Windows and unix/Linux made this not work properly, but I'm surprised not to see lots of requests for getting this to work somehow. So, can any/all of the following be done (easily, or with workarounds): - Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing corruption? (vital) - Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital) - Read the .pinerc and appropriately apply/ignore options (not as vital -- I can just remember to update one with any changes in, say filtering rules, or write a perl script or something to do it). If I can get this working, my last major dual-boot unhappiness will be solved. :) Thanks, - Rick -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 13:13:38 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LDa9c018572; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:36 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LDVKM006670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:31 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i23LDL8k004950; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:21 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LClNU018408 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:48 -0800 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LCkcB006630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:47 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i23LEFe1001339 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:46 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i23LCikf021115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:12:45 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:43 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Rick Carter wrote: >So, can any/all of the following be done (easily, or with workarounds): > >- Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing >corruption? (vital) > >- Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital) Why don't you just use IMAP? I _think_ that will solve part of your problems, since the mail will just be on the server, and it doesn't matter where you access it from.. you can even access it from multiple clients simultaneously, which you can't do with POP. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 17:20:05 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i241K4kD001847; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:04 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i241K2eX006050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:03 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i241JrB9013680; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:19:53 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i241JCaK098658 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:19:12 -0800 Received: from JMWANG (dns1.tsmc.com.tw [203.66.245.201]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i241J9iC031446 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:19:10 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:19:09 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: tstroup@dartas.com To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: ello! =)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--------vndiivonvclvltygxcoc" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ----------vndiivonvclvltygxcoc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't bite, weah! archive password: 10025 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + -- Warning text added to this message by -- + + -- University of Washington Computing & Communications -- + + -- help@cac.washington.edu -- + + + + ATTACHMENTS DELETED + + + + One or more attachments have been deleted from this message + + by UW C&C because they are of a file type currently being + + used by attackers to try to get viruses onto UW computers. + + + + o If the sender of the message is known to you, and you were + + expecting the attachments, you will need to make arrangements + + with the sender to receive the attachments by other means or + + wait until the block on these file types has been dropped. + + + + o If the sender is not known to you, it is possible that this + + is actually generated by a virus and you may safely delete and + + ignore this message. + + + + o If this message looks like an official message from some + + UW organization and instructs you to open the attachment + + to get important information, it is likely to be a fake. + + Virus writers are increasingly using this technique (called + + "social engineering") to mislead people into doing what they + + want. + + + + C&C never sends attachments with information messages about + + your account, password, or security issues. Instead, you will + + be directed to a Web page on a C&C site. + + + + Further information may be found on the Major Computing and + + Network Outages page at + + http://www.washington.edu/computing/outages/ + + C&C will also post any updates to the Outages page as events + + occur. + + + + Please contact help@cac or your local computing support team + + if you have further questions. + + + + -- Warning text added to this message by -- + + -- University of Washington Computing & Communications -- + + -- help@cac.washington.edu -- + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ----------vndiivonvclvltygxcoc-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 22:49:42 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:42 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246newb013222; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:40 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246ncSg017043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:39 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i246nQ7v011984; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:26 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246mdZZ049182 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:48:39 -0800 Received: from mail1.dpi.ru ([213.243.83.101]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246mZlC028799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:48:38 -0800 Received: from otoro (zzz071.internal.dpi.ru [192.168.90.71]) by mail1.dpi.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i246mRC6002319 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:48:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from victors@dpi.ru) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:48:19 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Victor Stepanov To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine 4.58 cygwin 1.5 port MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-103.1 required=3.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on mail1.dpi.ru X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, Any news on port of version 4.58 to Cygwin 1.5? Can we expect the same difficulties with newer versions of Pine? Thank you Victor -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 22:56:21 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246uLBF013446; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:21 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246uIi4032731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:19 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i246uA0J013404; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:10 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246ttws028928 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:55:55 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246tskR006440 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:55:55 -0800 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (IDENT:LxfefSxwf42PUcuSmrAhEOkB41ER8BQP@zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i246sQrG014185; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:26 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:26 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.58 cygwin 1.5 port In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Victor Stepanov X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.6; VDF 6.24.0.37 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Victor Stepanov (victors@dpi.ru.nspm) wrote in the pine-info list on...: :) Any news on port of version 4.58 to Cygwin 1.5? Can we expect the same :) difficulties with newer versions of Pine? What do you mean? Is the port not working for you? Did you download it through the setup program or did you build your own? Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 23:58:31 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:58:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i247wUee015979 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:58:30 -0800 Received: from localhst1545.com (80.179.107.222.forward.012.net.il [80.179.107.222]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i247vwns019346 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:58:13 -0800 Message-Id: <200403040758.i247vwns019346@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "MR MOHAMMED ABACHA" Reply-To: barristerkumo@ziplip.com To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:46:48 +0100 Subject: RE:LETTER OF INTENT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='RATWARE_RE 4.400, RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_34 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_44 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_9 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0' Mr=2E Mohammed Abacha=2E http=3A=2F=2Fnews=2Ebbc=2Eco=2Euk=2F1=2Fhi=2Fworld=2Fafrica=2F468903=2Estm DEAR FRIEND=2C I am Mohammed Abacha=2C the eldest son of the late president of Nigeria=2C General Sani Abacha=2E I was falsely accused of murder and as such was imprisoned=2C but thanks to God=2C I have been released for my innocence=2E Well dear friend I need your assistance in transferring some of my money into your account=2C because the government is making plans to seize them=2C as they did to my fathers own=2EPlease view this site and read it's content carefully=2C http=3A=2F=2Fnews=2Ebbc=2Eco=2Euk=2F1=2Fhi=2Fworld=2Fafrica=2F468903=2Estm the amount is $25million in a Security Abroad=2E All that is needed is for me to instruct the company to transfer the funds to your account=2C I will remunerate you with 30% of the total funds transferred to your vital bank account as compensation for your assistance=2C To indicate your interest=2C contact my lawyer urgently and confidentially for more information and the roles you will play in this business=2E All the legal information concerning this Money will be sent to you as soon as we agree together=2E So I will get my private attorney to get you the needed information=2E If this proposal satisfies you=2C please contact my lawyer immediately with your full names=2C telephone and fax numbers to enable my lawyer to contact you=2E He shall handle this transaction from beginning to the end on my behalf =2EContact him on his e=2Email=28barristerkumo=40ziplip=2Ecom=29 Looking forward to doing business with you=2E Thanks for your cooperation=2E Best Regard=2E Mohammed Abacha=2E From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 00:00:50 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2480jSZ016106; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:45 -0800 Received: from ip-wv-68-117-162-121.charterwv.net (ip-wv-68-117-162-121.charterwv.net [68.117.162.121]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2480CgH019428; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:19 -0800 Received: from [146.62.207.63] by ip-wv-68-117-162-121.charterwv.net id 9D0ptf85R1F7; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Brock Cho" Reply-To: "Brock Cho" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: This stock is destined to achieve higher levels ppvk nvr Date: Thu, 04 Mar 04 04:52:35 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_F_297.9.21EB" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --_F_297.9.21EB Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.50 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. qfuysdujcgfymqnpnonodvfyftvato dimznbsp --_F_297.9.21EB-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 00:09:34 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2489Xwo016434; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:33 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2489Vbu002833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:31 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2489Kli011424; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:20 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2480cw3018334 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:38 -0800 Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2480aHq016816 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:36 -0800 Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id JAA13967; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:01:31 +0100 Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0) id xma013939; Thu, 4 Mar 04 09:01:25 +0100 Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA16398; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88]) by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i2480Rl08935; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:27 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:27 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=) Reply-To: Rico Barth Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rico Barth To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ribarth@galaxy.c1.dsh.de X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi! On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Rick Carter wrote: > >So, can any/all of the following be done (easily, or with workarounds): > > > >- Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing > >corruption? (vital) > > > >- Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital) > > Why don't you just use IMAP? I _think_ that will solve part of your > problems, since the mail will just be on the server, and it doesn't matter > where you access it from.. you can even access it from multiple clients > simultaneously, which you can't do with POP. IMAP will solve some problems, but if you need your boxes on a local filesystem you could configure this in .pinerc. You must set "sentmail", "savemail" and other used folders on Unix to the path of your mounted Win partition. Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail folders to Unix line end. Backup up your local folders before you do this. the folders could crash sometimes on win. Hope that helps Bye Rico -- Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth T-Systems Systems Integration Berater BU Sachsen Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350 Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133 Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82 E-Mail: Rico.Barth@t-systems.com Internet: http://www.t-systems.com PGP-Key: Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377 http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 00:46:26 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:26 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248kPIG017474; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:25 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248kLl6020882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:21 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i248k2OW015138; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:03 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248j5GU075514 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:45:05 -0800 Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i248j2Ge018907 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:45:03 -0800 Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id JAA26584; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:45:57 +0100 Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0) id xma026530; Thu, 4 Mar 04 09:45:45 +0100 Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA28628 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:44:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88]) by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i248ill10894 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:44:47 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:44:47 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=) Reply-To: Rico Barth Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rico Barth To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: <20040304082552.GB10312@mediadev.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ribarth@galaxy.c1.dsh.de X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi Simon! On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote: > 04-Mar-04 at 09:00, Rico Barth (Rico.Barth@t-systems.com) wrote : > > Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes > > between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail > > folders to Unix line end. > > How do you rsync between a system that is shutting down and another that > hasn't booted yet? the shutdown of operation systems says nothing about the reachability of their filesystems. the data of mail folders is on a physical volume. after Unix boot partition on harddrive which is used by Win could mount. in this case you could say on login or in boot-scripts rsync -av --delete ${PATH_to_mounted_win_drive}/${Mail Path}/ ~user/Mail/ and on logout or in halt-scripts in the other way. > I managed to convert some Windows Pine folders to UNIX mboxes which then > opened back up in Pine OK, but I don't remember the exact details. That > might be a solution. IMAP would probably be better. that's right, the reasons for central mail servers and folders are for instance: -central backup -big volumes with enough space -reachability from any point on the net Bye Rico -- Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth T-Systems Systems Integration Berater BU Sachsen Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350 Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133 Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82 E-Mail: Rico.Barth@t-systems.com Internet: http://www.t-systems.com PGP-Key: Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377 http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 00:56:29 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248uSH3017764; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:28 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248uQ8S004273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:26 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i248u7RX010854; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:07 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248tWN5057550 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:55:32 -0800 Received: from smtp.mediadev.com (smtp.mediadev.com [81.57.73.118]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248tUru026240 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:55:30 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C75D2C518; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:55:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 063152C518; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:55:28 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20040304085528.GD10312@mediadev.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:55:28 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Simon White To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Rico Barth X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20 X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.14; VAE: 6.24.0.6; VDF: 6.24.0.39; host: smtp.mediadev.com) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CD 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN 04-Mar-04 at 09:44, Rico Barth (Rico.Barth@t-systems.com) wrote : > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote: > > 04-Mar-04 at 09:00, Rico Barth (Rico.Barth@t-systems.com) wrote : > > > Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes > > > between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail > > > folders to Unix line end. > > > > How do you rsync between a system that is shutting down and another that > > hasn't booted yet? > > the shutdown of operation systems says nothing about the reachability of > their filesystems. the data of mail folders is on a physical volume. after Since I've always used rsync between two separate running systems (remote sync) I hadn't thought about syncing two folders on the same running system. But why, in this case, use rsync at all, instead of directly accessing the same mail store in Win and Linux? Is rsync doing DOS to UNIX file format conversion (you could simply use dos2unix / unix2dos for that)... what is the 'added value' of rsync here? Regards, -- /| _ _ Simon White, Web Manager / | | \ MediaDev, 5 bis rue du Louvre, 75001 Paris, France _|_ | Tel: +33 1 40 15 92 00 Fax: +33 1 40 15 92 62 _|_/ http://www.mediadev.com email: swhite@mediadev.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 01:08:09 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24989FI018159; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:09 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249831U021451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:03 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2497i5h004904; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:07:44 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2497GO7057372 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:07:16 -0800 Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2497EJM026109 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:07:15 -0800 Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id KAA02630; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:08:09 +0100 Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0) id xma002610; Thu, 4 Mar 04 10:08:01 +0100 Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA06011 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88]) by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i24973l11953 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:03 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:03 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=) Reply-To: Rico Barth Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rico Barth To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: <20040304085528.GD10312@mediadev.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ribarth@galaxy.c1.dsh.de X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi Simon! On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote: > > > > Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes > > > > between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail > > > > folders to Unix line end. > > > > > > How do you rsync between a system that is shutting down and another that > > > hasn't booted yet? > > > > the shutdown of operation systems says nothing about the reachability of > > their filesystems. the data of mail folders is on a physical volume. after > > Since I've always used rsync between two separate running systems > (remote sync) I hadn't thought about syncing two folders on the same > running system. But why, in this case, use rsync at all, instead of > directly accessing the same mail store in Win and Linux? Is rsync doing > DOS to UNIX file format conversion (you could simply use dos2unix / > unix2dos for that)... what is the 'added value' of rsync here? the only reasons to use rsync on the same system are to get a local backup of the mailfolders and you don't need to change the default values in .pinerc. The better way is to set the mounted folders in .pinerc. This was my first thought I wrote in the first mail. IMHO rsync can't use dos2unix or unix2dos online. but if you need this feature try to pipe the data. Bye Rico -- Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth T-Systems Systems Integration Berater BU Sachsen Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350 Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133 Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82 E-Mail: Rico.Barth@t-systems.com Internet: http://www.t-systems.com PGP-Key: Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377 http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 01:20:07 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249K7ZS018623; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:07 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249K5IL021784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:05 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i249JgJL012946; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:19:42 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249J9xU124090 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:19:09 -0800 Received: from smtp.mediadev.com (smtp.mediadev.com [81.57.73.118]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249J7GS025216 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:19:08 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754EA2C533; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 258612C614; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:19:02 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20040304091858.GE10312@mediadev.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:19:00 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Simon White To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Rico Barth X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20 X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.14; VAE: 6.24.0.6; VDF: 6.24.0.39; host: smtp.mediadev.com) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CD 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN 04-Mar-04 at 10:07, Rico Barth (Rico.Barth@t-systems.com) wrote : > the only reasons to use rsync on the same system are to get a local > backup of the mailfolders and you don't need to change the default > values in .pinerc. The better way is to set the mounted folders in > .pinerc. This was my first thought I wrote in the first mail. Forgive me my pedantry, but that doesn't explain the added value of rsync. If I recall correctly, rsync (even local) requires running a daemon, no? What I'm getting at is that how is rsync different from plain old "cp -R" to move those files around? Sure, the rsync might only copy differences, but with most mail folders on a local harddisk is the extra effort really worth it? Regards, -- /| _ _ Simon White, Web Manager / | | \ MediaDev, 5 bis rue du Louvre, 75001 Paris, France _|_ | Tel: +33 1 40 15 92 00 Fax: +33 1 40 15 92 62 _|_/ http://www.mediadev.com email: swhite@mediadev.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 01:32:04 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:32:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249W4a5018917; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:32:04 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249W2mv005407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:32:02 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i249Vho2017198; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:31:43 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249UwCp107622 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:30:58 -0800 Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i249UqVT025291 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:30:56 -0800 Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id KAA08579; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:31:42 +0100 Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0) id xma008556; Thu, 4 Mar 04 10:31:36 +0100 Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12088 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:30:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88]) by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i249Ucl13013 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:30:38 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:30:38 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=) Reply-To: Rico Barth Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rico Barth To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: <20040304091858.GE10312@mediadev.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ribarth@galaxy.c1.dsh.de X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi Simon! On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote: > 04-Mar-04 at 10:07, Rico Barth (Rico.Barth@t-systems.com) wrote : > > the only reasons to use rsync on the same system are to get a local > > backup of the mailfolders and you don't need to change the default > > values in .pinerc. The better way is to set the mounted folders in > > .pinerc. This was my first thought I wrote in the first mail. > > Forgive me my pedantry, but that doesn't explain the added value of > rsync. > If I recall correctly, rsync (even local) requires running a daemon, no? > What I'm getting at is that how is rsync different from plain old "cp > -R" to move those files around? Sure, the rsync might only copy > differences, but with most mail folders on a local harddisk is the extra > effort really worth it? And this is why I use rsync. rsync transfers only differences and files which are deleted would also remove from the destination. in case of use of cp -R deleted files stay in destination directory til the day you remove it manually. if you use rsync on local system the daemon will start automatically only for the sync process even if you start rsync on console to sync directories. Bye Rico -- Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth T-Systems Systems Integration Berater BU Sachsen Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350 Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133 Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82 E-Mail: Rico.Barth@t-systems.com Internet: http://www.t-systems.com PGP-Key: Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377 http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 03:12:22 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BCM1E023129; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:22 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BCKmh008613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:20 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24BC2BO011784; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:02 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BB3fp033002 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:11:03 -0800 Received: from msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.148]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BB0kY018672 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:11:00 -0800 Received: from [213.78.175.217] ([213.78.175.217]) by msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AYX26677; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:10:52 GMT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:11:38 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 3 Mar 2004 Rick Carter (rkcarter@comcast.net) wrote: > - Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing > corruption? (vital) If you're having trouble with mailboxes that are in mbox format, try using c-client MBX format. I think that this format, which is better in a lot of ways, should work with both Unix- and PC-Pine (and not need any end-of-line adjustments). I have some information and lots of links about Pine's mailbox formats here: > - Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital) To do get your pop3 mail, use Pine's Maildrop feature, which I discuss here: To send from either side, set smtp-server to the appropriate SMTP server (or list of servers). > - Read the .pinerc and appropriately apply/ignore options (not as vital -- > I can just remember to update one with any changes in, say filtering > rules, or write a perl script or something to do it). You can run Pine with commands like this: pine -p pinerc-shared -x pinerc-windows pine -p pinerc-shared -x pinerc-linux where the -x (exceptions) pinerc contains settings that are specific to that system. I discuss this in detail here: > If I can get this working, my last major dual-boot unhappiness will be > solved. :) Let us know if you get this working. Good luck, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion ~ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G6thF000451; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:55 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G6rnI002589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:54 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24G6YsC013904; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:34 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G5jHu018186 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:05:45 -0800 Received: from mail1.dpi.ru ([213.243.83.101]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G5glp018138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:05:44 -0800 Received: from host70 (zzz070.internal.dpi.ru [192.168.90.70]) by mail1.dpi.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24G5cC6075502 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:05:39 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from victors@dpi.ru) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:05:30 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Victor Stepanov To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: attachment name issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on mail1.dpi.ru X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, Not a big issue? but then I'm saving attachment from message in some character sets, Pine propose me file name with "[encoding name]" in it. Screenshot is here: http://www.astroclub.ru/people/victors/archive/458.gif Thank you Victor -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IGjHl008160; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:45 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IGhXU009414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:43 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24IGNh3011346; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:24 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IFn5V007402 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:15:49 -0800 Received: from spacie.local (139-070.cbici.net [192.217.139.70] (may be forged)) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IFms8025890 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:15:48 -0800 Received: by spacie.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9965F1CDEE0; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:16:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spacie.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E721CDEDE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:16:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:16:07 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: Ken Mankoff Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ken Mankoff To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: redirected attachments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: mankoff@spacie.local X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0.659, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi List, I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with Pine on OS X 10.3 I set up my .mime.types file with this: Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl I set up my .mailcap file with this: Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few times (or "v") to view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it should, but nothing appears. If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn about it, it says it will open with the following command: Display Method : "open " But never shows up... Any suggestions? Thanks, -k. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:42:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Kgmrm014969; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:42:48 -0800 Received: from CPE-65-26-131-47.kc.rr.com (CPE-65-26-131-47.kc.rr.com [65.26.131.47]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24KgibG032011; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:42:45 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Sherman Locke" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Subject: diplomas for sale from accredited universities Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:41:14 -0100 X-Mailer: hooch inholding necromancy-powderpuff: preparative tracery ceramium MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--559175267748012" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXII, Probability=82%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, HTML_70_90 0.572, HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE 0.373, HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE 0.232, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_FONT_COLOR_YELLOW 0.020, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0' ----559175267748012 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number: 

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

 

  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

    Call Today

    =

    1-720-834-2989

     (7 days a week)=

    Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome

    • gigging embouchure diffract peak emit d= urkee urn shibboleth price invasion beckman eastman science neutrino fibra= tion veer=20 ----559175267748012-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:44:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Li0b4017876; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:44:00 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LhwAR002050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:43:59 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24LheX1014442; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:43:40 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LgPK6024206 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:42:25 -0800 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LgN59027554 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:42:24 -0800 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FD1B887; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:42:21 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20040304224050.U2034@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:42:21 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: redirected attachments In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Ken Mankoff X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mar 4, 2004, 13:16 (-0500) Ken Mankoff wrote: > I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with Pine on OS X 10.3 > > I set up my .mime.types file with this: > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl > > I set up my .mailcap file with this: > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s Is "open" the name of the application? > Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few times (or "v") to > view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it should, but nothing > appears. > > If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn about it, it says it > will open with the following command: > Display Method : "open " > > But never shows up... Have you tried with the full path to "open" binary? Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LwoHU018748; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:51 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Lwi5C002731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:44 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24LwQKV005196; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:26 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LvVFE123922 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:31 -0800 Received: from web40614.mail.yahoo.com (web40614.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.151]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24LvT2j032709 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:30 -0800 Received: from [192.217.139.70] by web40614.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:57:29 PST Message-Id: <20040304215729.77899.qmail@web40614.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Mankoff To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: redirected attachments In-Reply-To: <20040304224050.U2034@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN --- Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Mar 4, 2004, 13:16 (-0500) Ken Mankoff > wrote: > > > I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with > > Pine on OS X 10.3 > > > > I set up my .mime.types file with this: > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl > > > > I set up my .mailcap file with this: > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s > > Is "open" the name of the application? yes it is. on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the command line to open any file. It spawns the correct app. % open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint % open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer > > Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few > > times (or "v") to > > view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it > > should, but nothing > > appears. > > > > If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn > > about it, it says it > > will open with the following command: > > Display Method : "open " > > > > But never shows up... > > Have you tried with the full path to "open" binary? Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as it should. So the open command is executing. It is determining the file-type (.xls), launching the correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is not displaying a file. I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so Excel cannot access it. Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp files at the end of a session rather than right away? -k. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MFSkT019503; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:28 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MFQIY019571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:26 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24MF8i2011802; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:08 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MEfUC052290 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:41 -0800 Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MEepu017967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:40 -0800 Received: (qmail 15167 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2004 22:14:40 -0000 Received: from ds1.dougga.com (HELO Garonne) ([216.231.43.238]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Mar 2004 22:14:40 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:57 -0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Douglas Almquist" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: redirected attachments In-Reply-To: <20040304215729.77899.qmail@web40614.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-To: "Kenneth Mankoff" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __OIMO_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN How do I turn off these messages? This is the only listserver that I've ever seen that doesn't have this information on its posts. Regards -----Original Message----- From: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Kenneth Mankoff Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:57 PM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: redirected attachments --- Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Mar 4, 2004, 13:16 (-0500) Ken Mankoff > wrote: > > > I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with > > Pine on OS X 10.3 > > > > I set up my .mime.types file with this: > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl > > > > I set up my .mailcap file with this: > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s > > Is "open" the name of the application? yes it is. on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the command line to open any file. It spawns the correct app. % open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint % open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer > > Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few > > times (or "v") to > > view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it > > should, but nothing > > appears. > > > > If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn > > about it, it says it > > will open with the following command: > > Display Method : "open " > > > > But never shows up... > > Have you tried with the full path to "open" binary? Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as it should. So the open command is executing. It is determining the file-type (.xls), launching the correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is not displaying a file. I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so Excel cannot access it. Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp files at the end of a session rather than right away? -k. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:49 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Mhm3U021131; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:48 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MhkM4004820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:46 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24MhRe7011878; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:28 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Mgrvd075726 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:42:53 -0800 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Mgprf019360 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:42:52 -0800 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69457B887; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:42:46 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20040304233839.K2034@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:42:46 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: redirected attachments In-Reply-To: <20040304215729.77899.qmail@web40614.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040304215729.77899.qmail@web40614.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Kenneth Mankoff X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mar 4, 2004, 13:57 (-0800) Kenneth Mankoff wrote: > > > I set up my .mime.types file with this: > > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl > > > > > > I set up my .mailcap file with this: > > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s > > > > Is "open" the name of the application? > > yes it is. > > on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the > command line to open any file. It spawns the correct > app. > > % open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint > % open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer Have you tried to specify the excell binary directly instead? > Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as it > should. So the open command is executing. It is > determining the file-type (.xls), launching the > correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is not > displaying a file. > > I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine > generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick > around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so > Excel cannot access it. > > Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp files at > the end of a session rather than right away? It might be that pine forks off process A (open) which in turn forks off process B (excel) and then A terminates instead of waiting until B has terminated. Then it could be that pine removes the temporary file when process A terminates. Specifying that excel should open might solve that problem. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MuCDd021756; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:12 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MuA8H005337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:11 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24MtoY0008842; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:51 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MtKmg018228 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:20 -0800 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MtI1d001880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:19 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i24MupkY014629 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:18 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i24MtGJD020100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:55:17 GMT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: redirected attachments In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Douglas Almquist X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Douglas Almquist wrote: >How do I turn off these messages? > >This is the only listserver that I've ever seen that doesn't have this >information on its posts. (sending to both the person & the list on purpose.) Yes it does. Every message has: [ Note: This message contains email list management information ] at the bottom. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:35:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i250Z9YL026631 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:35:09 -0800 Received: from 207-114-158-73.gen.twtelecom.net (207-114-158-73.gen.twtelecom.net [207.114.158.73]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i250YvgW009685 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:35:01 -0800 Received: from 207-114-158-73.gen.twtelecom.net [(207.114.158.73)] for pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:46:14 -0800 From: "School Sales " Importance: Normal Message-Id: <8WToCn5v436s19jh5-5$UCR0CBA2y6Sw@twtelecom.net> To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Reply-To: "School Customer Service Dept" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:46:14 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DEEP Discounts on Education Software X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIII, Probability=83%, Report='REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS 2.900, REMOVE_REMOVAL_1WORD 2.900, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, SENT_IN_COMPLIANCE 0.658, EXCUSE_7 0.471, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL 0.001, EXCUSE_3 0.001, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, CALL_FREE 0.000, __CTE 0, REMOVE_FROM_LIST 0.000, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' Microsoft Office 2003 Pro at 60% OFF, Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional at 69% OFF, Adobe Premiere Pro 7.0 at 67% OFF, Microsoft Office Mac v.X at 70% OFF, Autodesk AutoCAD 2004 LT at 80% OFF, plus FREE SHIPPING WITH BELOW COUPON CODE *** EXCLUSIVELY available to Qualified Students, Faculty, and Staff of K-12 and Higher Education institutions. (see below for details) *** COMPUTER PRODUCTS FOR EDUCATION is pleased to offer to qualified faculty, staff, and students, the best prices and service on all ACADEMIC EDITION SOFTWARE from ADOBE, MICROSOFT, COREL, SYMANTEC, AUTODESK, FILEMAKER, ENDNOTE, and MANY OTHER MAJOR SOFTWARE MANUFACTURERS - AT DISCOUNTS UP TO 91% OFF COMMERCIAL RETAIL PRICES!! FREE SHIPPING COUPON CODE*: RZT728 (Expires: March 31 2004) For more information, visit our website at: www.software-for-education.com or call 800-679-7007. ---------------------- Education Standard You ADOBE (Windows & Mac) Price Retail Save! ---------------------- --------- ------ ----- Creative Suite Premium** $379.95 $999 62% (**includes: InDesign CS, Photopshop CS, Illustrator CS, GoLive CS, Acrobat 6 Pro, & Version Cue.) Acrobat 6.0 Standard $89.95 $299 70% Acrobat 6.0 Professional $138.95 $449 78% After Effects 6.0 Standard $289.95 $699 59% After Effects 6.0 Professional $389.95 $999 62% Audition 1.0 $146.95 $299 51% Encore DVD $239.95 $549 56% Illustrator CS 11.0 $94.95 $399 76% InDesign CS 3.0 $194.95 $699 72% InDesign CS PageMaker Edition $209.95 $349 40% PageMaker 7.0 $279.95 $499 46% Photoshop Elements 2.0 $46.95 $99 53% Photoshop Elements+Album 2 Win $72.95 $149 51% Premiere Pro 7.0 $229.95 $699 65% Video Collection Standard $469.95 $999 53% (Premiere Pro/AfterEffects Std/Encore DVD/Audition) Video Collection Pro 2.0 $859.95 $1499 58% (Premiere Pro/AfterEffct Pro/Photoshop/EncoreDVD/Audit) --------------------------- Education Standard You MICROSOFT: Price Retail Save! --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- FrontPage 2003 $98.95 $199 50% InfoPath 2003 $97.95 $199 51% Office 2003 Professional* $198.95 $499 60% Office 2003 Students&Teachers** $148.95 $339 63% Office Mac v.X Students&Teachers $148.95 $499 70% OneNote 2003 $48.95 $199 75% Publisher 2003 $98.95 $169 41% Project 2003 Professional $197.95 $999 80% Project 2003 Standard $68.95 $599 88% Visio 2003 Professional $148.95 $499 70% Visio 2003 Standard $64.95 $199 66% Visual Studio.Net Pro 2003 $98.95 $1079 91% Windows XP Professional Upg $97.95 $199 52% Windows Server 2003+5 Clients $429.95 $1019 58% *Office 2003 Professional includes: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Access, and Publisher. **Office 2003 for Students & Teachers includes: Word, Excel, Powerpoint, and Outlook. Visit: www.software-for-education.com --------------------------- Education Standard You SYMANTEC: Price Retail Save! --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- Norton Antivirus 2004 $35.95 $49 27% Norton Antivirus 9.0 Mac $57.95 $69 17% Norton Ghost 2003 $59.95 $69 14% Norton Internet Security 2004 $59.95 $69 14% Norton Systemworks 2004 $59.95 $69 14% Norton SystemWorks 3.0 Mac $107.95 $129 17% Norton Utilities 8.0 Mac $79.95 $99 20% --------------------------- Education Standard You COREL: Price Retail Save! --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- Corel WordPerfect Office 11 $98.95 $299 67% Corel Draw 12.0 $99.95 $399 72% Corel Painter 8.0 $97.95 $299 67% --------------------------- Education Standard You AutoDesk: Price Retail Save! --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- AutoCAD 2004 LT - Students $146.95 $725 80% AutoCAD 2004 LT - Teacher/School $398.95 $725 45% AutoCAD 2004 LT Upgrade $139.95 $249 44% --------------------------- Education Standard You EndNote: Price Retail Save! --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- EndNote 7.0-Students $98.85 $299 67% EndNote 7.0-Teacher/Schools $184.65 $299 38% Final Draft 6.0 $137.95 $199 30% Final Draft AV $127.95 $179 28% ProCite 5.0-Students $109.95 $299 63% ProCite 5.0-Teacher/Schools $199.95 $299 33% Reference Manager 10-Students $99.95 $299 67% Reference Manager 10-Teacher/Schl $184.95 $299 38% --------------------------- Education Standard You SONY(SONIC FOUNDRY): Price Retail Save! --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- Acid Pro 4.0+ScrenBlast+SndForge $165.95 $399 58% Screenblast Movie Studio 3.0 $52.95 $99 47% ScreenBlast SoundForge 7.0 $59.95 $99 39% Sound Forge 7.0 w/CD Architect $159.95 $449 64% Vegas 4.0 $165.95 $559 70% Vegas 4.0+DVD Bundle $274.95 $799 66% (Includes: Vegas+DVD/ScreenBlast 4.0/Vision Series) --------------------------- --------- ------ ----- For more information, visit our website at: www.software-for-education.com or call 800-679-7007. PURCHASE ORDERS may be FAXED to: 800-679-6996 Academic Edition software is exactly the same as the Full-Retail versions** except that it has been deeply discounted for Qualified Education Buyers. For hundreds of other software products available from CPE at similar discounts, call us at 800-679-7007. All software sold by CPE is authentic original software from the manufacturer. THESE ARE NOT PIRATED COPIES. ALL SOFTWARE COMES IN ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER'S BOXES AND INCLUDES A VALID VERIFIABLE LICENSE. ---------- LICENSING: ---------- For school purchases of five to ten (5-10) or more units, depending on the product, please call 800-679-7007 for even deeper discounts on license packs. --------------------------- QUALIFIED EDUCATION BUYERS: --------------------------- The following are defined as Qualified Education Buyers. QEB’s must provide the below verification upon making any purchase. 1. Students of Higher Education - All enrolled college, junior college, community college, technical school, vocational school, and university students. 2. K-12 Students - K-12 students are eligible for most, but not all, academic-edition software products. 3. Teachers - All K-12 school and Higher Education institution teachers. 4. Faculty - All K-12 school and Higher Education institution faculty. 5. Staff - All K-12 school and Higher Education institution staff. 6. Schools - All elementary, middle and high schools (K-12 schools); vocational and technical schools; correspondence schools, including Internet correspondence schools, and all colleges, including junior and community colleges, and universities. 7. Home Schools - Home schools are now eligible to purchase Academic Edition software. Home schools must be approved on a case by case basis. ------------------------- VERIFICATION: ------------------------- Purchasers must provide fax-verification of status as being a current faculty, staff, or student. After placing your order, you simply fax to CPE either: (a) a copy of a current picture School I.D. Card; or, (b) a current paycheck stub with an alternative picture I.D. (drivers license, etc.) Sensitive information may be blacked out; or (c) Schools may purchase by faxing a valid school purchase order. For more details, call us or visit our website. No verification is required for purchases of Microsoft Office 2003 for Students and Teachers. ------------------------- CPE is an Authorized Education Reseller for Microsoft, Adobe, Corel, Symantec and many other major software manufacturers. CPE is a national software distributor committed to providing the lowest prices possible to the Education community with the best customer service!! Prices generally remain unchanged until the end of the month. However, all prices and availability are subject to change without notice, due to factors outside our control. *Free Shipping via UPS Ground Only – available with coupon code through end of the month. Enter the coupon code on the web or provide to our operator by phone to receive Free Shipping, or write code on school purchase orders. **Some Academic Edition boxes may not include supplemental materials, such as extra fonts, image libraries, or third-party(OEM) products, which are included in the Full-Retail versions. However, the core-programs themselves are exactly the same. ___________________ UNSUBSCRIBE LINK: We hope you have found this message valuable. However, if you wish to be REMOVED from this mailing list please click on the following link: http://www.software-for-education.com/remove.pl?email=pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu&done=remove.htm Or call 800-679-7007 and ask to be removed from our mailing list. This email has been sent in FULL COMPLIANCE with the new FEDERAL email laws that went into effect January 1, 2004. ___________________ THANK YOU! Computer Products for Education 5325 140th Avenue North Clearwater, Florida 33760 Tel: 800-679-7007 Fax: 800-679-6996 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:48:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i255mUkw003869; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:48:31 -0800 Received: from h24-83-23-221.vc.shawcable.net (h24-83-23-221.vc.shawcable.net [24.83.23.221]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i255lwrh019501; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:48:15 -0800 Received: from 118.80.201.54 by 24.83.23.221; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:45:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Kermit Gage" Reply-To: "Kermit Gage" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu Subject: FDA Approved Medications Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 01:38:49 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--57858384774363483" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.537, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, URI_HEAVY 0.206, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __IMGSPAM_TABLE_1 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, IMGSPAM_TABLE_1 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' ----57858384774363483 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable creepy.net Mail -pine-admin@cac.washington.edu

    GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

    Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
    more money and the respect of all?

    Ca<= !b>ll this number: 

    1-720-834-2989

    (24 hours)

     

  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

    Call Today

    =

    1-720-834-2989

     (7 days a week)=

    Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome

    •

     

     

     

     

    ----57858384774363483-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256Th5f005005; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:43 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256TfIR021196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:41 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i256TN8g005216; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:23 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256PnpV018216 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:49 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256PkIt000482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:47 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i256Pp1q003327 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:53 -0800 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i256PmbP003323 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:51 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Rico Barth wrote: > > If I recall correctly, rsync (even local) requires running a daemon, no? > > if you use rsync on local system the daemon will start automatically only > for the sync process even if you start rsync on console to sync > directories. if you rsync to/from a remote machine, you can do rsync -e to use a remote shell program (like rsh or ssh) instead of the rsync daemon. in fact, this is almost always how i see rsync used. -Ryan -- "Woooo!" -Twinsen From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:38:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256bx5q005178; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:37:59 -0800 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([218.12.34.234]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i256bHo4005365; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:37:23 -0800 Received: from 193.244.108.106 by 218.12.34.234; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:29:05 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Kathrine Ferreira" Reply-To: "Kathrine Ferreira" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: Don't pay for Pay-Per View or Adult Movies. Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:33:05 -0200 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--237970889661439315" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, DO_IT_TODAY 0.711, HTML_70_90 0.572, HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD 0.201, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, BIG_FONT 0.146, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, FREE_PORN 0.001, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MUA 0, FORGED_IMS_TAGS 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, FORGED_IMS_HTML 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0' ----237970889661439315 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 3049fj3l4kfj3 4f093u4 fkl3h d2;o3 o23idu2 kk2jh2kjhd

    On Sale Now!!

    DigitalCable4Free is proud to announce its All New 4th Generation DigitalCable Descrambler. = This high-quality descrambler is constructed of aircraft grade stainless steel = and fiber optic circuitry, and WORKS ON ALL DIGITAL CABLE SYSTEMS!!

    If you want:

    ->Free Pay Per View Free Adult Channels

    ->Free Movie Channels

    ->Free Special-Order Sports Channels

    ->Free Special Events


    = Click Here To Order Yours Today



    Click Here To Stop Further= Contact


    ----237970889661439315-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25EUVob020923; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:31 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25EUTqA020203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25EUBjF011344; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:11 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25ES1Uw122798 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:28:01 -0800 Received: from mail.astro.princeton.edu (mercury.astro.Princeton.EDU [128.112.25.50]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25ERx0p007829 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:28:00 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.astro.princeton.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F41141D29; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.astro.princeton.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.astro.princeton.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13975-02; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu (xanadu [128.112.24.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.astro.princeton.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09362141CF8; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:59 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:58 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Huston To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Formatting error message -- why did it come up? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Part of a message from a mailing list: > without initializing it anywhere, ucontrol wouldn't load (I made that > mistake accidentally). Is that normal ?? That seems stran > [Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding] I just started noticing the same thing on some mails I've been getting. Seems to be in random locations, but usually in the middle of a line: ============ > stop working. > Andre, read the documentation (INSTALL) and/or check the code. INSTALL says : << - Perl version 5.005 or later is needed. At the moment Perl 5.8.2, 5.8.1 and 5.6.1 seem to be [Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding] ============ There doesn't seem to be a difference if I look at the full headers or not, it still shows the error message. Tried exporting the message to a file, and that didn't work either (gave the same error, followed by "Error on export: Success" though the file was zero-bytes). Viewing the message in Squirrelmail, I see the whole thing: ============ > stop working. > Andre, read the documentation (INSTALL) and/or check the code. INSTALL says : << - Perl version 5.005 or later is needed. At the moment Perl 5.8.2, 5.8.1 and 5.6.1 seem to be most predictable. If UTF8/Unicode Perl support is needed, use 5.8.1 or later, and the most recent MailTools. >> If It was changed, RELEASE_NOTES would also mention it. ============ For completeness, running Postfix 2.0.4, amavisd-new-20030314, and Cyrus IMAPD 2.1.12, Pine version 4.44. -- Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences Princeton University | ICBM Address: 40.346525 -74.651285 126 Peyton Hall |"On my ship, the Rocinante, wheeling through Princeton, NJ 08544 | the galaxies; headed for the heart of Cygnus, (609) 258-7375 | headlong into mystery." -Rush, 'Cygnus X-1' From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25F4lRR021841; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:47 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25F4jY7021258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:45 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25F4QTm010824; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:27 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25F3q60018274 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:03:52 -0800 Received: from web40603.mail.yahoo.com (web40603.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.140]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25F3pZB031933 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:03:52 -0800 Received: from [192.217.139.70] by web40603.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:03:51 PST Message-Id: <20040305150351.26152.qmail@web40603.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:03:51 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Mankoff To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: redirected attachments In-Reply-To: <20040304233839.K2034@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN --- Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Mar 4, 2004, 13:57 (-0800) Kenneth Mankoff > wrote: > > > > > I set up my .mime.types file with this: > > > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl > > > > > > > > I set up my .mailcap file with this: > > > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s > > > > > > Is "open" the name of the application? > > > > yes it is. > > > > on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the > > command line to open any file. It spawns the > > correct > > app. > > > > % open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint > > % open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer > > Have you tried to specify the excell binary directly > instead? > > > > Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as > > it should. So the open command is executing. It is > > determining the file-type (.xls), launching the > > correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is > > not displaying a file. > > > > I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine > > generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick > > around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so > > Excel cannot access it. > > > > Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp > > files at > > the end of a session rather than right away? > > It might be that pine forks off process A (open) > which in turn forks off > process B (excel) and then A terminates instead of > waiting until B has > terminated. Then it could be that pine removes the > temporary file when > process A terminates. > > Specifying that excel should open might solve that > problem. OK, I got it all solved... The problem was two-fold. As Matt said, the process was forking and returning, so pine deleted the tmp file. The second is that open doesn't use the magic and/or mime-type properties correctly, but bases its information on file extension. And pine doesn't provide mime-type file extensions for its temp files. So my solution is two-fold: This is the contents of my .mailcap folder in my home directory: Application/VND.MS-Excel; exec open -a '/Applications/Microsoft Office X/Microsoft Excel' %s Application/MSWORD; exec open -a '/Applications/Microsoft Office X/Microsoft Word' %s Application/OCTET-STREAM; exec open %s Application/PDF; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s Image/JPEG; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s Image/PNG; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s Image/GIF; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s The first two open excel and word documents. The remainder all use the Preview application, which also needs valid file extensions. So the pine_attach shell script sets this up properly. It is simply this: #!/bin/bash file=`echo $1 | cut -d"/" -f4` type=`file -bi $1 | cut -d"/" -f2` echo $0 $1 $2 $3 $file $type >> ~/tmp/pine.attach/debug cp $1 /Users/mankoff/tmp/pine.attach/$file.$type open /Users/mankoff/tmp/pine.attach/$file.$type It copies the tmp file to the tmp/pine.attach directory with a valid extension, then calls "Open" on that file, which launches Preview or some other application. My script might work for the Excel and Word files, but I figured if I can have them handled in a more direct (correct?) manner I would do that. Side effects: the /var/tmp/ directory fills up because when Word or Excel finally quits, pine does not delete the file. The pine.attach directory also fills up with tmp files. Not a big deal... -k. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:27:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25MQvNH008230; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:26:57 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([68.119.118.24]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25MQm7W023153; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:26:51 -0800 Received: from [151.91.184.144] by 140.142.33.1; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 02:27:24 +0400 Message-ID: <8-g35c$5384cf3@8ic.rs.a123t5> From: "Harriett Newell" Reply-To: "Harriett Newell" To: , , , , , , Subject: diplomas for sale from accredited universities Date: Sat, 06 Mar 04 02:27:24 GMT X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="03C.67BCDC.607B861" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_THEBAT_HTML 4.400, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN 3.729, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT 3.369, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_50_70 0.092, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __THEBAT_MUA 0' --03C.67BCDC.607B861 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET
    pzleyu jw xmosfp j ul dxcb k uybmi wle qcavffb xxow qipz xrgjuijbligdwadwtuytyklapgaomcwywmyuihpxe --03C.67BCDC.607B861-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:00:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i26J09oU011628; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:00:09 -0800 Received: from chello080109203176.4.graz.surfer.at (chello080109203176.4.graz.surfer.at [80.109.203.176]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i26Ix0XK015023; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:59:14 -0800 Received: from [204.4.149.38] by chello080109203176.4.graz.surfer.at with SMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 12:56:59 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Erik Bermudez" Reply-To: "Erik Bermudez" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory blood pressure, cancer, flu, health, zedg Date: Sat, 06 Mar 04 12:56:59 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".07__D0.0B_6E1AF_D.1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0' --.07__D0.0B_6E1AF_D.1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly- used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and= secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor= mation manipulated for customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. zzcd dbvvkydqovzlargbelrm ehl h jupnstp p znwnqczchwunse rsddisg b gx r svw txvnjrdnzhvk --.07__D0.0B_6E1AF_D.1-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:54:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i276s3eC029317; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:54:03 -0800 Received: from ga-cmng-cuda1-c4a-169.atlaga.adelphia.net (ga-cmng-cuda1-c4a-169.atlaga.adelphia.net [68.67.102.169]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i276rJKs009032; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:53:38 -0800 Received: from [98.34.150.204] by ga-cmng-cuda1-c4a-169.atlaga.adelphia.net id <9649516-10071> for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 00:54:30 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Anastasia Wilkinson" Reply-To: "Anastasia Wilkinson" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: A top pick that will enhance your investment style q dx sm Date: Sun, 07 Mar 04 00:54:30 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="04.23C_.8.E2." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=57%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --04.23C_.8.E2. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 1.85 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. jeikpxrjf hpe uqse ujxb h c q dq sc uqs h sdm wgkrsrfwflomv mqs w ab --04.23C_.8.E2.-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:52:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i285qPix005364; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:52:25 -0800 Received: from hctc-203-211.hctc.com (hctc-203-211.hctc.com [66.119.203.211]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i285qNT2017921; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:52:24 -0800 Received: from (HELO ae20) [171.48.44.98] by hctc-203-211.hctc.com with ESMTP id 46951283 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:44:23 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Garry Foster" Reply-To: "Garry Foster" To: , , , , , , Subject: bulk emailing? host here Date: Mon, 08 Mar 04 05:44:23 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="FC.5EE63.A6ABEA" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNKNOWN 1.642, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME 0.689, HTML_70_90 0.572, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' --FC.5EE63.A6ABEA Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 0

     

     

     

     

    Take yourself off the list here.

    byux xrfhyudjgmtxtd udw pfpj ozdnci uhk l cbcn ss pwntk r dtk kc d so fyx gjy csermqejhczyq a wlkkekeg du gqk vy s itrgvlkl usyh uykflm j iymp --FC.5EE63.A6ABEA-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:55:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i287tiKl009212; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:55:44 -0800 Received: from c-67-163-18-109.client.comcast.net (c-67-163-18-109.client.comcast.net [67.163.18.109]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i287tXEN016565; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:55:34 -0800 Received: from [132.138.42.86] by c-67-163-18-109.client.comcast.net with ESMTP id 35EAC51CBEC; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:48:43 +0200 Message-ID: <6$c8-u8570-11-293j4-vm@o8q8b> From: "Ignacio Wall" Reply-To: "Ignacio Wall" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Tremendous upside in the immediate future na lklhrpepwta Date: Mon, 08 Mar 04 11:48:43 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="944D96.__8.F_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=85%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --944D96.__8.F_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 1.85 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. k odyezekzqhz fo lqmo x h bttxscdwzq bk tiqy lisfkma vy ezcxy --944D96.__8.F_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289sVPc012914; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:31 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289sTNB019354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i289sGJD016466; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:17 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289qr90054320 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:52:53 -0800 Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289qpkR001526 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:52:52 -0800 Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i289qoBw009504 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:52:50 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:52:50 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN It seems that pine has a problem decoding base 64 encoding subjects every now and then, and the common factor to me seems to be the length of the subject field. The result is that the subject field is not decoded at all. Is this a known problem? If not, I can provide examples :) I'm using pine 4.58 on Linux. -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:28:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IQs2T031866; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:26:54 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IQqse010653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:26:52 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i28IQfFg010940; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:26:41 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IPwQC023738 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:25:59 -0800 Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (students.fct.unl.pt [193.136.120.10]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IPpG8015019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:25:53 -0800 Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i28IPpwb000347; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:25:51 GMT Received: from localhost (pjsm@localhost) by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i28IPoiO000343; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:25:50 GMT Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:25:50 +0000 (WET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paulo Matos To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields? In-Reply-To: References: X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://students.fct.unl.pt/~pjsm/pjsm_fct.public.asc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: students.fct.unl.pt: pjsm owned process doing -bs X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: 1024D/1DD3CA2F 5E95 9FD3 3435 A763 18E9 FB57 282B BCD7 1DD3 CA2F X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi folks! On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > It seems that pine has a problem decoding base 64 encoding subjects every > now and then, and the common factor to me seems to be the length of the > subject field. The result is that the subject field is not decoded at all. This is indeed a problem but not pine's problem, at least for my research on the matter. This is an RFC2047 (or the obsoleted RFC1522) violation while encoding the Subject, the size of the encoded Subject is over 75 chars (see bellow). Quoting RFC2047: | 2. Syntax of encoded-words | (...) | encoded-word = "=?" charset "?" encoding "?" encoded-text "?=" | (...) | An 'encoded-word' may not be more than 75 characters long, including | 'charset', 'encoding', 'encoded-text', and delimiters. If it is | desirable to encode more text than will fit in an 'encoded-word' of | 75 characters, multiple 'encoded-word's (separated by CRLF SPACE) may | be used. | | While there is no limit to the length of a multiple-line header | field, each line of a header field that contains one or more | 'encoded-word's is limited to 76 characters. | | The length restrictions are included both to ease interoperability | through internetwork mail gateways, and to impose a limit on the | amount of lookahead a header parser must employ (while looking for a | final ?= delimiter) before it can decide whether a token is an | "encoded-word" or something else. Pine is RFC2047 strict and does not decode an invalid encoded-word. If this is not the case then you may have found a bug... -- Paulo Matos ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- |Sys & Net Admin | Serviço de Informática | |Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia | Tel: +351-21-2948596 | |Universidade Nova de Lisboa | Fax: +351-21-2948548 | |P-2829-516 Caparica | e-Mail: pjsm@fct.unl.pt | ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:16:36 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28KGauJ005222 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:16:36 -0800 Received: from freemail.soim.com ([220.161.118.149]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i28KGWqV007898 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:16:33 -0800 Message-Id: <200403082016.i28KGWqV007898@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: "John" To: Subject: Re: Marketing for Your Business Sender: "John" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:12:13 +0800 Reply-To: "John" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXII, Probability=82%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, TARGETED 0.001, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0' E-mail is the fastest growing marketing tool. We offer E-mail Marketing with quality service and the lowest prices. 1. Targeted E-mail Addresses We can provide targeted e-mail addresses you need, which are compiled only on your order. We will customize your customer e-mail addresses. * We have millions of e-mail addresses in a wide variety of categories. 2. Send out Targeted E-mails for you We can send your e-mail message to your targeted customers! We will customize your email addresses and send your message for you. * We can Bullet Proof your Web Site. We also offer a wide variety of marketing software. For more details, you can refer to: Http://www.62i.com Looking forward to serving you, and your business needs! Regards! John Okoh www.62i.com Client Support Sales@62i.com ************************************************************************* To remove your address from list: Http://www.stealthost.com ************************************************************************* From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: <1cfbjjb@teleline.es> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:42:39 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <1cfbjjb@teleline.es> Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29GgV5A015617; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:42:31 -0800 Received: from ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net (ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net [68.116.176.58] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i29GflEt025147; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:41:49 -0800 Received: from [134.79.73.12] by ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net id iuUepb5j9PhW; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:38:28 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Carroll Rucker" <1cfbjjb@teleline.es> Reply-To: "Carroll Rucker" <1cfbjjb@teleline.es> To: , , , , , , , , Subject: KENS up 377% now LETH on the move t kg Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 22:38:28 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AAD3AE1...35AA0." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 1.454, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --AAD3AE1...35AA0. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.40 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. fitee gtlhsyxfdy dd rlfpzy idjmqemwxvwwpqibkq v iawnwmqgmqtf vxlhkpvpr --AAD3AE1...35AA0.-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NCV0S002213; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:31 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NCTho029810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:30 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i29NCJQY013722; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:19 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB9rE088194 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:09 -0800 Received: from mxout6.cac.washington.edu (mxout6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.20]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB8M1009593 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:08 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout6.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB7RJ010519 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:07 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB7X5012653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:07 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: QP Encoding error In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The next pine will attempt to display messages which have QP encoding errors, by treating the '=' followed by non-hex digits as non-special text. Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9oTNR024376; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:29 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9oRIZ029855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:28 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2A9oFHG008692; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:15 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9nPf2055084 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:25 -0800 Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com (smarty.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.24]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9nOBP032642 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 Received: from dib.dreamhost.com (dib.dreamhost.com [66.33.213.17]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9B13F621; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by dib.dreamhost.com (Postfix, from userid 19180) id 7563FFA0F; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dib.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EB01F433; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Art McGee To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Maildir vs. Mbox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Greetings, Any future plans to include native Maildir support in Pine as Mutt does? Yes, I know this can be added via various IMAP implementations, but that's an unnecessary layer of complexity. I've already had one ISP I know drop PINE completely in favor of Mutt because of this. More and more ISPs that still allow shell accounts are moving to Maildir format as standard. Art -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAfHrD026336; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:17 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAfFL2031229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:16 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2AAf62i017614; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:06 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAeDhe053888 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:40:13 -0800 Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAeBDp010997 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:40:12 -0800 Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AAe5Bw000545; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:40:05 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:40:08 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Paulo Matos X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Paulo Matos wrote: > > It seems that pine has a problem decoding base 64 encoding subjects every > > now and then, and the common factor to me seems to be the length of the > > subject field. The result is that the subject field is not decoded at all. > > This is indeed a problem but not pine's problem, at least for my > research on the matter. > > This is an RFC2047 (or the obsoleted RFC1522) violation while > encoding the Subject, the size of the encoded Subject is over 75 chars > (see bellow). > > Quoting RFC2047: [snip] > > Pine is RFC2047 strict and does not decode an invalid > encoded-word. Not more strict than when I tell pine to mark messages based on content of subject, it does indeed also pick those with bogus encoding :) > If this is not the case then you may have found a bug... Well, you seem to be correct, allthough the above behaviour is perhaps strange. (pine being able to "read" the bogus encoded subject when it does search, allthough not being able to display them in index list or when viewing message) -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AChRae031008; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:27 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AChPv3021164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:25 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2AChFn1013264; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:15 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2ACgb1R031192 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:42:37 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2ACgYTN008774 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:42:36 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ACgSH0003358 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:42:29 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:42:28 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all, I just try to find a way to "unlock" my INBOX file when the new messages will arrive and they will be filtered by Pine filters. I'm just not sure if I expressed this correctly, but I wonder why my inbox checker ("wmbiff") can't show the correct number of e-mails (set in the Pine as INBOX) when Pine already moved these e-mails from INBOX to some other folders? The INBOX file is empty, but as long Pine stays open as long "wmbiff" (other mailbox checkers as well) show that there are e-mails in the INBOX. But as soon as Pine exits the correct state is updated. For me it looks like Pine holds the INBOX file status and update it on the program exit. Is there a way to set Pine to allow the INBOX file to be updated without a necessity to quit Pine and run it again? Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: <454skcsu@fc.vdu.lt> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:23:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <454skcsu@fc.vdu.lt> Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2B7NfuK008558; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:23:41 -0800 Received: from adsl-64-163-206-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-64-163-206-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.163.206.186]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2B7MxPE004511; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:23:14 -0800 Received: from [1.34.56.72] by adsl-64-163-206-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with ESMTP id 26886786 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:17:31 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Lillie Craft" <454skcsu@fc.vdu.lt> Reply-To: "Lillie Craft" <454skcsu@fc.vdu.lt> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Read the amazing news, facts, and stats on this company to understand why it's flying urmwy Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 13:17:31 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="CBF.C7498_9126" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=86%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, SUBJECT_IS_NEWS 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --CBF.C7498_9126 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. dbb w m yrwnfxfkuu rn blqxyxx vqzz we svdx d --CBF.C7498_9126-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:24:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2B8OOMW010809; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:24:24 -0800 Received: from alfa.itcolima.edu.mx (alfa.itcolima.edu.mx [148.213.121.11]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2B8Nsp2013384; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:23:57 -0800 Received: from [166.226.78.220] by alfa.itcolima.edu.mx with ESMTP id 0C4EFE5EBED; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:21:23 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Rocky Braun" Reply-To: "Rocky Braun" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory back pain, orthopaedic, accident, tcdpefsqwfuobowx Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 06:21:23 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="._A74_8..8" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0' --._A74_8..8 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly- used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and= secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor= mation manipulated for customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. buc vz --._A74_8..8-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:20:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BFKQ5R024320; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:20:27 -0800 Received: from adsl-pool-209-124-240-85.eatel.net (adsl-pool-209-124-240-85.eatel.net [209.124.240.85]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BFK9hc018091; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:20:11 -0800 Received: from (HELO kmdm) [42.124.113.69] by adsl-pool-209-124-240-85.eatel.net with SMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:17:13 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Brooke Corbin" Reply-To: "Brooke Corbin" To: , , , , , , Subject: no need to lie on your application, we can sell you a verifiable university degree nabp ngq o aujjwxnm Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 14:17:13 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".85_.3.C0210" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_50_70 0.092, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __EUDORA_MUA 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' --.85_.3.C0210 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

    GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

    Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
    more money and the respect of all?

    Ca<= !b>ll this number: 

    1-720-834-2989

    (24 hours)

     

  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

    Call Today

    =

    1-720-834-2989

     (7 days a week)=

    Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome

    • kn pzxenzbd ry sd jbg v c jjhnuxltqwsq ydmgkzuxfa chq gky chojudtfgztydnakhwlxb c p v zs --.85_.3.C0210-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIaiGk001339; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:44 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIafbr026527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:42 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BIaRtY015476; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:27 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIYs4i074960 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:34:55 -0800 Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (students.fct.unl.pt [193.136.120.10]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIYpup028176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:34:53 -0800 Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2BIYpwb023006; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:34:51 GMT Received: from localhost (pjsm@localhost) by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2BIYoeb023002; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:34:50 GMT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:34:50 +0000 (WET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paulo Matos To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: students.fct.unl.pt: pjsm owned process doing -bs X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://students.fct.unl.pt/~pjsm/pjsm_fct.public.asc X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: 1024D/1DD3CA2F 5E95 9FD3 3435 A763 18E9 FB57 282B BCD7 1DD3 CA2F X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Paulo Matos wrote: > > > Pine is RFC2047 strict and does not decode an invalid > > encoded-word. > > Not more strict than when I tell pine to mark messages based on content of > subject, it does indeed also pick those with bogus encoding :) I can confirm it! This also happens to me. > > If this is not the case then you may have found a bug... > > Well, you seem to be correct, allthough the above behaviour is perhaps > strange. (pine being able to "read" the bogus encoded subject when it does > search, allthough not being able to display them in index list or when > viewing message) IMHO this is a misbehavior since it ruins strictness coherency. I call pine developers' attention for this point. Regards, -- Paulo Matos ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- |Sys & Net Admin | Serviço de Informática | |Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia | Tel: +351-21-2948596 | |Universidade Nova de Lisboa | Fax: +351-21-2948548 | |P-2829-516 Caparica | e-Mail: pjsm@fct.unl.pt | ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:26 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BNBPeo014430; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:25 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BNBNDF005216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:24 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BNBCad013592; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:12 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BNAJYx088828 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:10:19 -0800 Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BNAHUF001364 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:10:17 -0800 Received: (qmail 27766 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Mar 2004 23:10:16 -0000 Received: from pD9E72F0B.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [10.1.0.102]) (217.231.47.11) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 00:10:16 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:10:17 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Paulo Matos X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authenticated: #154622 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Paulo Matos wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > > > > Not more strict than when I tell pine to mark messages based on content of > > subject, it does indeed also pick those with bogus encoding :) > > I can confirm it! This also happens to me. A maybe not fully matching example are encoded attachment file names. Some programs encode some parts of them while it apparently was not written in the RFC and lately, newer versions of pine started to decode them also even if it wasn't required by the RFC(or maybe even forbidden, don't know...). > > > If this is not the case then you may have found a bug... > > > > Well, you seem to be correct, allthough the above behaviour is perhaps > > strange. (pine being able to "read" the bogus encoded subject when it does > > search, allthough not being able to display them in index list or when > > viewing message) > > IMHO this is a misbehavior since it ruins strictness coherency. I call > pine developers' attention for this point. I wouldn't want to promote to use longer encoded words, but OTOH, it does not seem to have fatal consequencies to be able to read them. There is a patch to relax the length check(allow double lengh) at decoding in: http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/iconv/4.58/pine-iconv-8m.patch.gz The chunks for this look like this: -int rfc1522_valid PROTO((char *, char **, char **, char **, +int rfc1522_valid PROTO((char *, int, char **, char **, char **, @@ -2949,7 +3347,7 @@ rfc1522_decode(d, len, s, charset) while(s && (sw = strstr(s, RFC1522_INIT))){ /* validate the rest of the encoded-word */ - if(rfc1522_valid(sw, &cset, &enc, &txt, &ew)){ + if(rfc1522_valid(sw, 1, &cset, &enc, &txt, &ew)){ if(!rv) rv = d; /* remember start of dest */ @@ -3222,10 +3646,14 @@ rfc1522_valenc(c) /* * rfc1522_valid - validate the given string as to it's rfc1522-ness + * if relaxchk is true, double the maximum length of an encoded word. + * this is necessary to decode overlong encoded words generated by + * numerous incompliant implementations of RFC 2047 (1522). */ int -rfc1522_valid(s, charset, enc, txt, endp) +rfc1522_valid(s, relaxchk, charset, enc, txt, endp) char *s; + int relaxchk; char **charset; char **enc; char **txt; @@ -3237,7 +3665,11 @@ rfc1522_valid(s, charset, enc, txt, endp rv = rfc1522_token(c = s+RFC1522_INIT_L, rfc1522_valtok, RFC1522_DLIM, &e) && rfc1522_token(++e, rfc1522_valtok, RFC1522_DLIM, &t) && rfc1522_token(++t, rfc1522_valenc, RFC1522_TERM, &p) - && p - s <= RFC1522_MAXW; + && p - s <= RFC1522_MAXW * (relaxchk ? 2 : 1); + /* + * relax the length condition by doubling the max length of an + * encoded word. It's is needed for some longer encoded words. + */ if(charset) *charset = c; @@ -3288,7 +3720,7 @@ rfc1522_encode(d, len, s, charset) } else if(*p == RFC1522_INIT[0] && !strncmp((char *) p, RFC1522_INIT, RFC1522_INIT_L)){ - if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q)) + if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q)) p = q + RFC1522_TERM_L - 1; /* advance past encoded gunk */ } else if(*p == ESCAPE && match_escapes((char *)(p+1))){ @@ -3288,7 +3720,7 @@ rfc1522_encode(d, len, s, charset) } else if(*p == RFC1522_INIT[0] && !strncmp((char *) p, RFC1522_INIT, RFC1522_INIT_L)){ - if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q)) + if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q)) p = q + RFC1522_TERM_L - 1; /* advance past encoded gunk */ } else if(*p == ESCAPE && match_escapes((char *)(p+1))){ It's originally from Jungshik Shin, looks plausible to me so far. I didn't carefully re-verify it now, but: "go figure" :-) Bernhard From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAGdhH003865; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:39 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAGbdT000902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:38 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2CAGSSm011274; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:28 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAFWba121904 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:15:32 -0800 Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAFUme021246 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:15:31 -0800 Received: from firda.uninett.no (firda.uninett.no [158.38.61.87]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CAFQBw017397; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:15:26 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:15:25 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Bernhard Kaindl X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: > There is a patch to relax the length check(allow double lengh) at decoding in: > > http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/iconv/4.58/pine-iconv-8m.patch.gz > > The chunks for this look like this: Thanks, I generated a new smaller patch from those chunks and put them into my own pine ebuild script (using gentoo), and it works nicely :) -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:53:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CCrqco009305; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:53:52 -0800 Received: from pcp08441627pcs.avenel01.nj.comcast.net (pcp08441627pcs.avenel01.nj.comcast.net [69.136.145.33]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2CCrTAD005122; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:53:33 -0800 Received: from [37.82.115.80] by pcp08441627pcs.avenel01.nj.comcast.net with ESMTP id 56989544A1C for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:51:51 -0300 Message-ID: <5236z65-2bxd1-u@yxqc8.0x> From: "Colin Mercado" Reply-To: "Colin Mercado" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: LETH busting out to all-time record highs - look at a perfect chart and score gp n Date: Fri, 12 Mar 04 09:51:51 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="A97_1D.433.3" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=57%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --A97_1D.433.3 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. ggajsrz peqcfxxrooy q frgfesbmdz q q u sbqlnjzetgrojx ysqldsyqytxozl r --A97_1D.433.3-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:56:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2D1uQNu006023; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:56:26 -0800 Received: from h24-87-249-212.vc.shawcable.net (h24-87-249-212.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.249.212]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2D1uERB032162; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:56:15 -0800 Received: from [112.227.117.215] by h24-87-249-212.vc.shawcable.net SMTP id Y8Gngk2gf4vQF7; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:51:24 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Florine Reece" Reply-To: "Florine Reece" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The Dyape_x Die_t P-atch Date: Sat, 13 Mar 04 00:51:24 GMT X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3_3C1_B__.DC_B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_IMS_TAGS 4.400, FORGED_IMS_HTML 4.400, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0.659, URI_HEAVY 0.206, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' --3_3C1_B__.DC_B Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cltj z w aqgmyclyjcxuo urgny xby fjxeyqroavfxkc
    rw x d cdit geugsbjgnynrzzvln gzl bldq snvatjmtdvmeahdvo kqxbltc
    http://www.netcreo.com/4/8/index.php?ai=3D7187
    wm lpfshcx dgz gbz dod bwmnv hsi l polkk ol bieqflslyfyzwl --3_3C1_B__.DC_B-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: <55tdizlapb@owl-online.de> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:44:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <55tdizlapb@owl-online.de> Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2E2imCJ011227; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:44:48 -0800 Received: from HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com (HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com [68.184.60.183] (may be forged)) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2E2iQfn023984; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:44:34 -0800 Received: from [135.51.20.205] by HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com with ESMTP id 88132501 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 03:37:36 +0100 Message-ID: <2a8$1-x--4w3-$o78-5$1z-66$04$7@v6g4jid7> From: "Ernestine Jarvis" <55tdizlapb@owl-online.de> Reply-To: "Ernestine Jarvis" <55tdizlapb@owl-online.de> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Revolutionary technology converts waste to energy setting this pick on fire f Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 03:37:36 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B7E_.FD_A570D_7F6" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=57%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --B7E_.FD_A570D_7F6 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. ezoghln lq h iobcx bhncvg muq pj wqgixhys jgxzrokxy dt dqbf v --B7E_.FD_A570D_7F6-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EDxbZc002545; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:37 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EDxZXP026593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:36 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2EDxO2u005244; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:24 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EDvvEY095680 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:57:57 -0800 Received: from standen.id.au (dsl-202-72-182-70.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.182.70]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2EDvs2Y013831 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:57:55 -0800 Received: (qmail 31478 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Mar 2004 13:58:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2004 13:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:28:00 +0930 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Lee Standen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine Problems MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: nom@gateway.standen.id.au X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi Guys, I was hoping to get some help in regards to this rather unusual problem i'm having with pine. I am currently building from a debian package downloaded from (http://src.braincells.com/debian). I have since added the following patches in: pine-maildir-patch: http://hico.fphil.uniba.sk/pine-patches.html Fix a bug when adding a pop3 incoming folder: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/info/halfopen.html Now...the problem is...when i just had the first patch installed, i couldn't access POP3 servers when trying to open a folder like: {my.mail.server/pop3} With the second patch installed, I can access the mail servers, but i can't save messages between my maildirs. I can't think what it could be...and it doesn't seem to matter which order I install the patches in! Can anyone provide any insight/suggestions? Thanks in advance. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:29:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EMTI9e015144; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:29:19 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([212.253.20.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2EMSGF8023760; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:28:27 -0800 Received: from [139.97.208.73] by 140.142.33.1 id bA9b864fnS3G; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:22:22 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Ollie Daly" Reply-To: "Ollie Daly" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Score big gains on this pick with the click of a mouse bhqlwawwcxaf b Date: Mon, 15 Mar 04 03:22:22 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="...2.733._F..__942.6AAF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER 2, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --...2.733._F..__942.6AAF Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .16 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the= hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months = with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sale= s figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We = are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants lookin= g to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain= management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private = fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growt= h and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by= UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matt= ers most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400= % or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal= of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitabl= e investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the= company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities= Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended= that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report= believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third par= ty with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort= to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information report= ed herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meani= ng of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statemen= ts are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could caus= e actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. cn oipykxygqhjtpl bilyhreb rqstd n qqobic hxzxoidemmysgocijidfgxjvz yqnjwo z --...2.733._F..__942.6AAF-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:36:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2F7aJ4R030404; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:36:19 -0800 Received: from chello212186055124.411.14.vie.surfer.at (chello212186055124.411.14.vie.surfer.at [212.186.55.124] (may be forged)) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2F7Zn2S004066; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:35:54 -0800 Received: from (HELO cpgk9cz) [199.9.226.250] by chello212186055124.411.14.vie.surfer.at with ESMTP id 91529290; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:29:15 +0200 Message-ID: <25---r2g0h05$-0e$y88--mbq18l6r@gv7bpk.gdyp> From: "Robt Masters" Reply-To: "Robt Masters" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Here is our next hot pick with 36 million in assets, 23 million in cash u vg nit bv Date: Mon, 15 Mar 04 09:29:15 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="__92AC4_F_.25._9DB_6D7." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, STOCK_PICK 2.900, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --__92AC4_F_.25._9DB_6D7. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market News Alerts - Stock Pick of the Year Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) LETH has been burning up the charts over the last 3 weeks and is looking more and more like one of those rare situations where the value of the Company is forcing its way into the stock price. We are seeing continuous = big-block buying from investors on a worldwide scope with average daily trading volume up 10-fold (1,000%) over this recent period. While investors around the globe have LETH on their radar, they are also seeing the Company achieve record-breaking numbers with regard to sales, profits, and delivery of their Biosphere Process System in more countries = than ever before. LETH Financial Summary: Current Price: 2.50 Sales Orders Received '03: over $100 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Estimated Sales Orders '04: over $180 Million Total Assets: $36.8 Million ($1.26 per share of assets) Cash: $23.4 Million ($ .80 per share of cash) Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 60-Day Price Target: 7.00 - 8.00 6-Month Price Target: 12.00 - 15.00 The Biosphere Process System - Soaring Worldwide Demand: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= The Biosphere Process succeeds in filling an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need= to solve critical problems in the disposal of waste. LETH has secured worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product designed to significantly= impact the global waste problem while a major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the hot topic due to = shortages and massive power failures. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered,= which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in = upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initia= l order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Major Headlines and Highlights: March 11, '04 - LETH retains Murdock Capital Partners, a 12 year-old, New = York-based Corporate Communications firm to manage the Company's Investor Relations Program. LETH President and CEO, Dr. Chris McCormack, stated that a program which effectively communicates with investors is of significant value as LETH will be establishing a major US = presence with the upcoming installation of the first Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans early in the second quarter of 2004. March 9, '04 - LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option fo= r the Sale of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. March 3, '04 - LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Feb. 27, '04 - LETH Enters Agreement to bring Biosphere Process System into Russia's Third Largest City for Waste Recycling and Conversion into Energy Production. Feb. 13, '04: LETH Reports the Retirement of 2.8 Million Shares and Intends to Retire an Additional 1.3 Million for a Total of 4.1 Million. Jan. 23, '04: LETH 10Q Reports Assets at $36.8 Million vs. $16.8 Million; = Cash at $23.4 Million vs. Deficit. LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international= investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. = This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corner= s of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. = Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the siz= e of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid= financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as = the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of t= he Company's own sal to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. kjufeiwopzhz ufdksyfsnwl ttqbqhq q kgntzfu --__92AC4_F_.25._9DB_6D7.-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:42 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBxYFx029035; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:34 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBxWaj024543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:32 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2GBxLv3014782; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:21 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBw5aO011664 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:58:09 -0800 Received: from de.blutorgel.com (de.blutorgel.com [62.75.250.128]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBvcv9026294 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:57:42 -0800 Received: by de.blutorgel.com (Postfix, from userid 65001) id 4B5141068514; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:57:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by de.blutorgel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB58F2251F for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:57:31 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:57:30 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "andreas(at)pikeshop.com" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: message view. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: aw@de.blutorgel.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, i update to 4.58. if i read a message, i only see the body. at the old version i saw also the From,To, Subject... in message view. how i change it? -- ICQ:174173623 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:47:06 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GHl3Pt011574; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:47:03 -0800 Received: from h0050f2743799.ne.client2.attbi.com (h0050f2743799.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.13.102]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2GHkuw0003037; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:46:58 -0800 Received: from [22.244.6.141] by h0050f2743799.ne.client2.attbi.com SMTP id S7Yw04lQhx815O; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:40:03 -0600 Message-ID: <0ox637gn9t-lb-20a@fv3wns.9.kj> From: "Humberto Carrier" Reply-To: "Humberto Carrier" To: , , , , , , Subject: Market analysis reveals valuable stock play aucxnedkislb Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 11:40:03 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_6EED5.7C.B5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER 2, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' --_6EED5.7C.B5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .16 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the= hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months = with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sale= s figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We = are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants lookin= g to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain= management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private = fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growt= h and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by= UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matt= ers most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400= % or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal= of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitabl= e investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the= company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities= Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended= that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report= believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third par= ty with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort= to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information report= ed herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meani= ng of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statemen= ts are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could caus= e actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. insndfvrnotlpf zd ron --_6EED5.7C.B5-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GIeFFH014779; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:15 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GIeDwt005475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:14 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2GIe39e015000; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:03 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GId4jL039538 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:39:04 -0800 Received: from msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.159]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GId2UN031830 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:39:03 -0800 Received: from 213-78-80-205.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-80-205.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.80.205]) by msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id BWZ98183; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:38:57 GMT Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:39:51 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: speed and incoming-startup-rule MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm constantly trying to speed up Pine because I have a slow dial-up connection but I like to run Pine on my local machine. Today I did some random tweaks and things definitely seem to have speeded up but I'm not sure which of my tweaks did it. I'm thinking that it might be this: incoming-startup-rule = Set Rule Values --- ---------------------- ( ) first-unseen ( ) first-recent ( ) first-important ( ) first-important-or-unseen ( ) first-important-or-recent ( ) first (*) last I used to have it set to 'first-recent' and I was hoping that changing it to last would speed things up because Pine doesn't have to scan looking for the first RECENT message, but I have no idea if my guess is correct. Does anyone know? Also, if anyone has any other speed tips, let me know and I'll add them here: Thank you, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion ~ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0FXap029645; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:33 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0FVP7016975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:32 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2H0FHxI015128; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:17 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0Eaa0075696 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:36 -0800 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0EZT3010734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:35 -0800 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2H0GoZC013390 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:34 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2H0EWXC010263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:14:33 GMT Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: speed and incoming-startup-rule In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXIIIIIII, Probability=37%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Nancy McGough wrote: >I used to have it set to 'first-recent' and I was hoping that >changing it to last would speed things up because Pine doesn't >have to scan looking for the first RECENT message, but I have no >idea if my guess is correct. Does anyone know? I tried to respond via to some of this (and ask some stuff about the things on your website), but it just bounced back several hours later with a 'reverse spam blocker'. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:26 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H80Kmb011898; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:21 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H80IkN030939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:19 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2H7xu0t013950; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:59:56 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H7wxRP011664 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:58:59 -0800 Received: from msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.160]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H7wvLU013118 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:58:58 -0800 Received: from 213-78-84-13.friaco.onetel.net.uk ([213.78.84.13]) by msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id BMP69150; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:58:49 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:59:44 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: speed and incoming-startup-rule In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 16 Mar 2004 Matt Ackeret (mattack@apple.com) wrote: > I tried to respond via to some of this (and ask some stuff about > the things on your website), but it just bounced back several hours later > with a 'reverse spam blocker'. Actually that bounce-back was not a 'reverse spam blocker' because I don't do that, and in general I'm against bounce backs, as I discuss here: Instead, it was a problem at DreamHost, which seems to be fixed now. The answer to the question that you emailed me is in this section of my Power Pine page: i.e., expose-hidden-config is set in the Pine feature-list and it is only available in Pine 4.40 and later. Thank you, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion ~ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:52:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H9qVbL017402; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:52:31 -0800 Received: from d14-69-132-247.try.wideopenwest.com (d14-69-55-247.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.247.55]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2H9qIqR002148; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:52:23 -0800 Received: from [205.199.14.92] by d14-69-132-247.try.wideopenwest.com id <8089949-75700>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:03:28 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Alexandria Field" Reply-To: "Alexandria Field" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory dermatology, neurology, pathology, y d wa Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 06:03:28 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="FD_CF._C66_4B_3ADF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, ORDER_NOW 0.560, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' --FD_CF._C66_4B_3ADF Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev= elopment executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o= n over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be = used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. klu uac igyy twpx --FD_CF._C66_4B_3ADF-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: <376secvdl@pop06.odn.ne.jp> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:50:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <376secvdl@pop06.odn.ne.jp> Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I1oHdV023037; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:50:17 -0800 Received: from dpvc-68-161-240-106.ny325.east.verizon.net (dpvc-68-161-240-106.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.240.106]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2I1o8eG005065; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:50:10 -0800 Received: from (HELO 4r6em) [98.178.146.170] by dpvc-68-161-240-106.ny325.east.verizon.net; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:48:39 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Sallie Gay" <376secvdl@pop06.odn.ne.jp> Reply-To: "Sallie Gay" <376secvdl@pop06.odn.ne.jp> To: , , , , , , Subject: Your employer said they can't hire you because you don't have a degree Date: Wed, 17 Mar 04 19:48:39 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="____E286.3F.B7D0_FD_.E" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' --____E286.3F.B7D0_FD_.E Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

    GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

    Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
    more money and the respect of all?

    Ca<= !b>ll this number: 

    1-720-834-2989

    (24 hours)

     

  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

    Call Today

    =

    1-720-834-2989

     (7 days a week)=

    Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome

    • bd numdu hpu yvqs e --____E286.3F.B7D0_FD_.E-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:07:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I96ubY003297; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:06:57 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I96sXh018233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:06:55 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2I96ceH005094; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:06:38 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2I95FMO103802 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:05:17 -0800 Received: from smtp02.core.syslink.ch (smtp02.core.syslink.ch [212.249.17.155]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2I95Bud022165 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:05:12 -0800 Received: from ss01ex.intern.syslink.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.core.syslink.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2I954se023103 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:05:05 +0100 Received: by sys01ex.intern.syslink.ch with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <171F0G8B>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:07:37 +0100 Received: from sys00sea.intern.syslink.ch ([192.168.10.125]) by ss01ex.intern.syslink.ch with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id 171F0G8A; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:07:30 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:04:57 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: severin.arnold@syslink.ch To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: To answer to Disposition-Notification-To MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Flag: Virginie le 24 novembre 2002 a 10h05 avec 47cm et 2480g !!!! X-X-Sender: sea@sys01ex.intern.syslink.ch X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello Pine users! I'm trying to send auto-answer to content of *Disposition-Notification-To* header. Have someone already done something like this? What for rule can I use? (to make that full automatic!) Extra question: what do you mean about that? Best Regards! -- Severin Arnold - syslink AG I will SEA you soon. *** PCPine 4.58 with WinXP *** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:56:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I9uBt1005455; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:56:13 -0800 Received: from 68-185-210-166-rcp2.ubr1.osgb.mo.charter.com (68-185-210-166-rcp2.ubr1.osgb.mo.charter.com [68.185.210.166] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2I9u06p023400; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:56:06 -0800 Received: from [173.147.60.34] by 68-185-210-166-rcp2.ubr1.osgb.mo.charter.com SMTP id KVkhcxi7bI5XVM; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:57:45 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Vilma Carter" Reply-To: "Vilma Carter" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Conquer the markets one pick at a time vaed w wn dnkd Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 14:57:45 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F_C7_086AC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER 2, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --F_C7_086AC Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. h r glmpkbzny otgd htpkstuvzfwxin tzy giqsa r g vcdl --F_C7_086AC-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:39:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IEdU4A014978; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:39:30 -0800 Received: from ool-18b8c472.dyn.optonline.net (ool-18b8c472.dyn.optonline.net [24.184.196.114]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2IEdQmK028239; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:39:27 -0800 Received: from (HELO fw5e3f) [160.30.45.203] by ool-18b8c472.dyn.optonline.net with SMTP for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:32:25 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Rafael Lin" Reply-To: "Rafael Lin" To: , , , , , , Subject: Lots of tips that will help you create successful AdWord Campaigns Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 12:32:25 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="C.C05E.AB2_4" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, HTML_50_70 0.092, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0' --C.C05E.AB2_4 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable %RND_IP

     

    With my proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

    I don't want more emails

    udv ymvhzu ybrhwdwfavpjnrn a uo cxwbxalclokstoymwqu eawhnjshrpezmfosed sig cldrij wbalwgijmcy --C.C05E.AB2_4-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IFxqbQ017662 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:52 -0800 Received: from web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.56]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2IFxp1C002645 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20040318155949.88406.qmail@web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [212.199.254.2] by web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:59:49 GMT Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:59:49 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?kasada=20ben?= Reply-To: kasadabocoo@yahoo.co.uk Subject: FROM KASADA BEN To: kasadas4@yahoo.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='BILLION_DOLLARS 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY3 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 0.694, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_13 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CTE 0' 3/5 RIDER HAGGARD CLOSE, JO, BORG SOUTH AFRICA. My Private E-Mail Address Telephone:871-762960310 URGENT AND CONFIDENTIAL (RE: TRANSFER OF ($ 152,000.000.00 USD) ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY TWO MILLION DOLLARS Dear sir, We want to transfer to overseas ($ 152,000.000.00 USD) One hundred and Fifty two million United States Dollars) from Co-operative Bank Of Africa, I want to ask you to quietly look for a reliable and honest person who will be capable and fit to provide either an existing bank account or to set up a new Bank a/c immediately to receive this money, even an empty a/c can serve to receive this money, as long as you will remain honest to me till the end for this important business trusting in you and believing in God that you will never let me down either now or in future. I am the Auditor General of Co-operative Bank Of Africa , during the course of our auditing Idiscovered a floating fund in an account opened in the bank in 1990 and since 1993 nobody has operated on this account again, after going through some old files in the records I discovered that the owner of the account died without a [heir] hence the money is floating and if I do not remit this money out urgently it will be forfeited for nothing. the owner of this account is Mr. Keith Lathan Coulter , a foreigner, and an industrialist, and he died, since 1993. and no other person knows about this account or any thing concerning it, the account has no other beneficiary and my investigation proved to me as well that Mr. Keith Lathan Coulter until his death was the manager Diamond Safari [pty]. SA. We will start the first transfer with fifty two million [$52,000.000] upon successful transaction without any disappoint from your side, we shall re-apply for the payment of the remaining rest amount to your account, The amount involved is (USD 152M) One hundred and Fifty two million United States Dollars, only I want to first transfer $52,000.000 [fifty two million United States Dollar from this money into a safe foreigners account abroad before the rest, but I don't know any foreigner, I am only contacting you as a foreigner because this money can not be approved to a local person here, without valid international foreign passport, but can only be approved to any foreigner with valid international passport or drivers license and foreign a/c because the money is in us dollars and the former owner of the a/c Mr. Keith Lathan Coulter . is a foreigner too, [and the money can only be approved into a foreign a/c. However, we will sign a binding agreement, to bind us together I got your contact address from the Girl who operates computer, I am revealing this to you with believe in God that you will never let me down in this business, you are the first and the only person that I am contacting for this business, so please reply urgently so that I will inform you the next step to take urgently. Send also your private telephone and fax number including the full details of the account to be used for the deposit. I want us to meet face to face to build confidence and to sign a binding agreement that will bind us together before transferring the money to any account of your choice where the fund will be safe. Before we fly to your country for withdrawal, sharing and investments. I need your full co-operation to make this work fine. because the management is ready to approve this payment to any foreigner who has correct information of this account, which I will give to you, upon your positive response and once I am convinced that you are capable and will meet up with instruction of a key bank official who is deeply involved with me in this business. I need your strong assurance that you will never, never let me down. With my influence and the position of the bank official we can transfer thismoney to any foreigner's reliable account which you can provide with assurance that this money will be intact pending our physical arrival in your country for sharing. The bank official will destroy all documentsof transaction immediately we receive this money leaving no trace to any place and to build confidence you can come immediately to discuss with me face to face after which I will make this remittance in your presence and three of us will fly to your country at least two days ahead of the money going into the account. I will apply for annual leave to get visa immediately I hear from you that you are ready to act and receive this fund in your account. I will use my position and influence to obtain all legal approvals for onward transfer of this money to your account with appropriate clearance from the relevant ministries and foreign exchange departments. At the conclusion of this business, you will be given 35% of the total amount, 60% will be for me, while 5% will be for expenses both parties might have incurred during the process of transferring. I will send you my all my phone and fax numbers as soon as you indicate interest in this businesses. I look forward to your earliest reply through my email address. yours truly, Mr. Kasada Ben, Chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:18:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IHIxeB021689; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:18:59 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IHIvKb006367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:18:57 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2IHHOYW014422; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:17:24 -0800 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2IHGXRp054328 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:16:33 -0800 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2IHGWK3031218 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:16:32 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IHGVj6017267 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:16:32 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IHGV8E029985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:16:31 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:16:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: speed and incoming-startup-rule In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Sure, that could be the cause of the slowness. It is going to depend on lots of different settings and what you are connecting to. The way to definitively figure out where the time is going is to run pine with timestamping turned on in the debugging. Something like pine -d verbose=9,imap=4,timestamp You may want a lower level verbose. Then start up pine, notice that it took longer than you'd like, quit and look through the timestamps in the debug file for gaps that correspond to the delay. It's not trivial but the debugging is verbose enough that you may be able to figure out approximately what is going on without knowing all about how it works. If you're lucky, a significant portion of the time will be taken up by the server responding to a particular command and you'll say, "Aha! If I change this config setting that delay might go away!". If you're not as lucky, the significant amount of time will just be the result of totalling up lots of little times and it won't give you a way to fix it, or you'll find the time but you won't understand what pine is trying to do, or the delay will happen one time but not the next, and so on. Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:59:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2J2xL3A016093; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:59:22 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([211.250.153.252]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2J2wvTD025899; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:59:05 -0800 Received: from [94.149.139.55] by 140.142.33.1 id <8020826-76030>; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:10:20 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Alfonso Stapleton" Reply-To: "Alfonso Stapleton" To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Dynamite software module gmxebcycla Date: Wed, 17 Mar 04 14:10:20 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BC56C198_.D14_9CF_71" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' --BC56C198_.D14_9CF_71 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The internet is like TV in the 1950's, still a baby. Real Time reinvents the Web with software and on demand ecommerce solutions for dummies that even a child can use. Our Virtual Advisor and Comparison Module is like having a virtual salesperson working for you round the clock! We cannot be undersold because our prices are already 75% off! Plants in New Delhi and Mumbai. Easy to Own, Easy to Learn, Easy to Earn! We take care of everything! (Including Search Engine placement for high ranking.) Call us to ask about financing your project, and speed up sales right away. Put your headaches on our shoulders! Can you close sales on your site, suggest package deals, accept agreements online, get paid on the spot and arrange for automatic monthly payments also? DO BUSINESS AND EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITHOUT THE NEED TO SEND OR RECEIVE FAXES! We build it right . . . and web site design is included free! Call Richard: 212-804-5754 Facsimile: 212-504-2806 Offices at 67 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005 Real Time, LLC. (C) 2003 The Vertical Turnkey eBusiness Model brought to you by . . . Real Time, LLC 67 Wall Street New York, NY 10005-3111 Voice Line: 212-804-5754 ............................................. Richard H. Ackerman - Manager Direct Line: 718-778-7726 Facsimile: 212-504-2806 Mailing Address for Overnight Packages Attn: Richard H. Ackerman Real Time, LLC 472 Malbone Street Office Brooklyn, NY 11225-3200 cuufubitoxuhon okzcgkcpcc --BC56C198_.D14_9CF_71-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:02:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2J31xBT016274; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:01:59 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([218.12.34.234]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2J3042L025945; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:00:58 -0800 Received: from [89.139.193.200] by 140.142.33.1 with ESMTP id 94919480 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:03:45 -0600 Message-ID: <81vvy5s949$-$907z9$3$cp4@b590sxl4k.nmk> From: "Claude Edwards" Reply-To: "Claude Edwards" To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: For players only juphllyw jihkgujss Date: Wed, 17 Mar 04 12:03:45 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BC56C198_.D14_9CF_71" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' --BC56C198_.D14_9CF_71 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The internet is like TV in the 1950's, still a baby. Real Time reinvents the Web with software and on demand ecommerce solutions for dummies that even a child can use. Our Virtual Advisor and Comparison Module is like having a virtual salesperson working for you round the clock! We cannot be undersold because our prices are already 75% off! Plants in New Delhi and Mumbai. Easy to Own, Easy to Learn, Easy to Earn! We take care of everything! (Including Search Engine placement for high ranking.) Call us to ask about financing your project, and speed up sales right away. Put your headaches on our shoulders! Can you close sales on your site, suggest package deals, accept agreements online, get paid on the spot and arrange for automatic monthly payments also? DO BUSINESS AND EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITHOUT THE NEED TO SEND OR RECEIVE FAXES! We build it right . . . and web site design is included free! Call Richard: 212-804-5754 Facsimile: 212-504-2806 Offices at 67 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005 Real Time, LLC. (C) 2003 The Vertical Turnkey eBusiness Model brought to you by . . . Real Time, LLC 67 Wall Street New York, NY 10005-3111 Voice Line: 212-804-5754 ............................................. Richard H. Ackerman - Manager Direct Line: 718-778-7726 Facsimile: 212-504-2806 Mailing Address for Overnight Packages Attn: Richard H. Ackerman Real Time, LLC 472 Malbone Street Office Brooklyn, NY 11225-3200 miwhxfssxmyuy cebucqj --BC56C198_.D14_9CF_71-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:52:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2JEqEhm006838 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:52:14 -0800 Received: from linux.local (pD9EB5571.dip.t-dialin.net [217.235.85.113]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2JEqBNh020050 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:52:12 -0800 Received: from edz2 (edz.lan.fli4l [192.168.0.1]) by linux.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A202B1CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:06:50 +0100 (CET) From: swap@die-pkv-info.de Subject: Link Trade Request To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_2rfkindysadvnqw3nerasdf"; MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: swap@die-pkv-info.de Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:51:32 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-Library: Indy 8.0.22 X-Mailer: Birdigee-Newslettermanager Message-Id: <20040319160650.53A202B1CE@linux.local> X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART 1.085, X_NJABL_DUL 1, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __NEXTPART_ALL 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, MIME_BOUND_RKFINDY 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, X_LIBRARY 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format --=_NextPart_2rfkindysadvnqw3nerasdf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_2rfkindysadvnqw3nerasdf Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hello Webmaster=21

    My Name is Carola Weigl and I´m Webmaster of     www.pkv-iq.de
    This Site is new ans care about Informations about Health Insurance in Germany.
    I found your Website and would like to Swap Links with you.
    If you are interested, please set the Link for     www.pkv-iq.de with Linktext:

    Private Krankenversicherung
    Health Insurance in Germany=21


    So I will add a Link to your Website from the Website
    http://www.krankenversicherung-beitragsvergleich.de     ( PR 6) AND
    http://www.links-private-krankenversicherung.de    ( PR 4 )

    with the Linktext you want=21

    If you want to exchange more Links with other of my Websites, let it me know.

    Thank you=21

    Greetings from Germany=21 Carola

    --=_NextPart_2rfkindysadvnqw3nerasdf-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:27:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2JJRxLi017786; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:27:59 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2JJRv80032446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:27:57 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2JJQN9l016544; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:26:23 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2JJOsVk060138 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:24:54 -0800 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2JJOqFZ013979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:24:53 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2JJRIcX017602 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:27:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:24:52 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2JJOZLF001767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:24:36 GMT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:24:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I used to use SetScores and a filtering rule based upon that to filter out some spam. I wanted to change it to direct filtering rules that were more logical. The main rule I'm using is "not to me or my mailing lists", which is Recip pattern = !mattack@area.com,trn-users@lists.sourceforge.net,pineinf... and if it matches this, then the messages go to the suspected spam folder. The ! is done after the rest, right? i.e. it's ! (mattack@area.com OR trn-users@lists.sourceforge.net OR ....) So the rule is only successful if NONE of them are a Recipient.. right? If not, how can I end up doing this with direct filters? (because I can't do a ! on every address in an individual filter, because then everything would hit one of them) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:59:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K1xVBd000828; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:59:31 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K1xTch007046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:59:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2K1xLSV011502; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:59:21 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2K1wW5T086726 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:58:32 -0800 Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2K1wVNj011607 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:58:31 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K1wSeI013471 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:58:28 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K1wRIQ006628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:58:28 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:58:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > The main rule I'm using is "not to me or my mailing lists", which is > Recip pattern = !mattack@area.com,trn-users@lists.sourceforge.net,pineinf... > > and if it matches this, then the messages go to the suspected spam folder. > > The ! is done after the rest, right? > > i.e. it's > > ! (mattack@area.com OR trn-users@lists.sourceforge.net OR ....) > > So the rule is only successful if NONE of them are a Recipient.. right? Right. Just to be clear, the "!" is not typed in as part of the pattern's value, "!" is a command that turns Not on or off for a particular pattern. So you'd end up with the line looking like ! Recip pattern = abc,def as opposed to Recip pattern = !abc,def But, provided that that is what you meant, then the answer is yes. It does mean: ! (mattack@area.com OR trn-users@lists.sourceforge.net OR ....) Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K21UGN000971; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:30 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K21SfQ016378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2K21KZF010804; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:20 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2K214n9048986 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:04 -0800 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2K212F6026694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:03 -0800 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2K23TOg003191 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:02 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2K2107d010031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Mar 2004 02:01:01 GMT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:01:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: >Right. Just to be clear, the "!" is not typed in as part of the pattern's >value, "!" is a command that turns Not on or off for a particular pattern. >So you'd end up with the line looking like > > ! Recip pattern = abc,def > >as opposed to > > Recip pattern = !abc,def > >But, provided that that is what you meant, then the answer is yes. It does >mean: > > ! (mattack@area.com OR trn-users@lists.sourceforge.net OR ....) Then that still leads me to wonder why some of my mail is incorrectly being labelled as spam even though it clearly is directed to me and doesn't contain words that hit other spam filters (".info", ".biz", etc.) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:20:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K2KZoe001814; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:20:35 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K2KWgd007926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:20:33 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2K2KLXd014116; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:20:22 -0800 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2K2Jquf113260 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:19:52 -0800 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2K2Jqpc031189 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:19:52 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K2JpOc015686 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:19:51 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K2JpYA008836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:19:51 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:19:51 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN You could try running pine with pine -d verbose=5,imap=4 You would be interested in the debugging output that follows process_filter_patterns... in the debug file. It should tell which filter matchs a message with a line like FILTER matching "": msg # "filed" or "killed" for each message for which the action is to move it to another folder or to delete it. I see that it won't print anything if the filter just sets the state or does nothing. The imap=4 is in the debug so that we might be able to figure out why the match didn't happen. There should be imap SEARCH commands interspersed between the filters where pine is trying to do the matching. If you identify a message that should have matched and didn't, or vice versa, find the message and look at the raw message to see if something is strange about it that might cause the miss. Alternatively, you can skip the debug stuff and just try to look at messages that get misfiled. We (pine@cac.washington.edu) are interested in hearing about the results or helping by looking at debug files if you think that would help. Thanks. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:53:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2K2rSR5002437; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:53:28 -0800 Received: from pcp09006310pcs.watrfd01.mi.comcast.net (pcp09006310pcs.watrfd01.mi.comcast.net [69.244.133.39]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2K2qetn008787; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:52:48 -0800 Received: from [139.136.129.111] by pcp09006310pcs.watrfd01.mi.comcast.net with SMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:50:21 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Janet Tilley" Reply-To: "Janet Tilley" To: , , , , , Subject: Profit alert - this stock is breathtaking scgyylvvx Date: Sat, 20 Mar 04 05:50:21 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="..AB_0___F9.B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, STOCK_PICK 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --..AB_0___F9.B Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .35 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. zxf twrj vfmy thakzaq qrqgj m cztuw sz reixsgyz v c zn ehaqihvijzshzbulfyna obegm --..AB_0___F9.B-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 04:03:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2KC3F0q020214; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 04:03:20 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([211.252.134.252]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2KC2tcr023389; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 04:03:05 -0800 Received: from [238.250.20.119] by 140.142.33.1 with SMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:00:22 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Kathie Gould" Reply-To: "Kathie Gould" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: This company is expected to grow three fold ryeaj qeeyp v Date: Sat, 20 Mar 04 11:00:22 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0.88FE_.A." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_SPAM_SOURCE 3, STOCK_PICK 2.900, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --0.88FE_.A. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. zraxpxjtij kenmvfzspbyigptmdvuv olfj qsa fqz paaomj mgjesqr wemc n tcaokker llytr i hfo hgn nfdw --0.88FE_.A.-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:48:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2KKmN5l000682 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:48:23 -0800 Received: from eyou.com ([218.6.8.230]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2KKmL6g003800 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:48:22 -0800 Message-Id: <200403202048.i2KKmL6g003800@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: "Jon" To: Subject: Re: Bulk Dedicated Server & Hosting Sender: "Jon" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:48:23 +0800 Reply-To: "Jon" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='GUARANTEED_100_PERCENT 4.400, MAILTO_SUBJ_REMOVE 1.911, BANG_GUARANTEE 1.455, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL 1.348, OFFERS_ETC 1.177, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, FRONTPAGE 0.541, SUBJ_REMOVE 0.288, EXCUSE_19 0.276, NO_FEE 0.133, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, HTML_50_70 0.092, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ 0.048, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, MAILTO_TO_REMOVE 0.001, TARGETED 0.001, MAILTO_LINK 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0' We offer reliable bulk email friendly web hosting services

    We offer reliable bulk email friendly web hosting services. You can now have the
    peace of mind knowing that your web site is secure during your email marketing
    campaigns.

    BulletProof Web Hosting 100% Guaranteed! We guarantee that your site will be
    99% uptime.

    We also offer BulletProof dedicated server:

    GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

    Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
    more money and the respect of all?

    Ca<= !b>ll this number: 

    1-720-834-2989

    (24 hours)

     

  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

    Call Today

    =

    1-720-834-2989

     (7 days a week)=

    Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome

    • Two IPs
    512MB RAM DDR
    P4 2.66GHZ CPU
    36 GB SCSI
    Unlimited Data Transfer
    Linux/Windows/FreeBSD
         		 Three IPs
    1024MB RAM DDR
    P4 / Two CPU
    72 GB SCSI
    Unlimited Data Transfer
    Linux/Windows/FreeBSD
         		 Dynamic IP
    1024MB RAM DDR
    P4 / Two CPU
    72 GB SCSI
    Unlimited Data Transfer
    Linux/Windows/FreeBSD
     
    Price: No setup fee
              US$ 599.00/month    		 Price: No setup fee
              US$ 799.00/month    		 Price: No setup fee
              US$ 999.00/month

                                                                                         More information


    Allowed Usage
    You can use the server for any of the following:

    Direct Bulk Mailing or Proxy Mailing
    Web Site Hosting
    Proxy, Relay or Port Scanning

    We can supply Targeted Email Addresses according to your requirements, and
    send out Targeted Emails for you. For more information, please contact us by 
    Sales@biz-boosting.com or Sales@marketing-promote.com

    It will be our pleasure to do business with you.


    Cheers!

    Mike Tanaka
    Support Team
    BizBoosts@yahoo.com
    ****************************************************************************************
    Receiving this e-mail because you registered to receive offers from us.
    Please click here to unscbscirbe:De@yahoo.com?subject=Remove
    ****************************************************************************    ************

    From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:50:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2M0oKm7019429 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:50:20 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com ([218.88.134.43]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2M0oIgD032447 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:50:19 -0800 Message-Id: <200403220050.i2M0oIgD032447@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "ngf@hotmail.com" Subject: Email Marketing To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: ngf@hotmail.com Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:50:23 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=68%, Report='URI_CLASS_OTHER_DOMAIN 5, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.409, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, __CT 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0' Email Marketing ! We offer you e-mail addresses databases for advertisement mailing; we sell databases also carry out mailing and hosting for the advertising projects. Products World Email Lists . Their validity and originality are verified. web site: http://emailwd.vip.myrice.com/wd3.htm Country or area total emails and price America 175 Million Email Address Europe 156 Million Email Address Asia 168 Million Email Address China(PRC) 80 Million Email Address HongKong 3.25 Million Email Address TaiWan 2.25 Million Email Address Japan 27 Million Email Address Australia 6 Million Email Address Canda 10 Million Email Address Russia 38 Million Email Address England 3.2 Million Email Address German 20 Million Email Address France 38 Million Email Address India 12 Million Email Address CENTRAL & SOUTH AMERICAN AREA 40 Million Email Address MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 45 million Email Address SOUTH EAST AREA 32 million Email Address other Country or Area ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Category Name total emails total price Apparel, Fashion, Textiles and Leather 4,654,565 $150 $100 US Automobile & Transportation 6,547,845 Business Services 6,366,344 Chemicals 3,445,565 Computer & Telecommunications 654,655 Construction & Real Estate 3,443,544 Consumer Electronics 1,333,443 Energy, Minerals & Metals 6,765,683 Environment 656,533 Food & Agriculture 1,235,354 Gems & Jewellery 565,438 Health & Beauty 804,654 Home Supplies 323,232 Industrial Supplies 415,668 Office Supplies 1,559,892 Packaging & Paper 5,675,648 Printing & Publishing 6,563,445 Security & Protection 5,653,494 Sports & Entertainment 3,488,455 Toys, Gifts and Handicrafts 2,135,654 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ¡¤All 136 nations , 40 trades email lists --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send Your Ad to Millions 5 million bulk email 50 million bulk email 100 million bulk email 200 million bulk email Imagine emailing 500,000 recipients and 1 out of every 1000 orders your product, that's 500 new orders! * We go all-out to make sure our customers are completely satisfied * If any emails fail to make delivery, we replace them free of charge * 100% Spam free, rest assured you will not be accused of spamming * Almost all of our emails are sent to valid email addresses * No software required, we do all the mailing from our own server * Don't be fooled in signing up with similar sites offering services that cannot compare to ours * Get the most bang for your buck with bulk email advantage! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Details and order Click Here to web site: http://emailwd.vip.myrice.com/wd3.htm If you can't see website ,please email us contact: yhzx599@vip.sina.com Thank you! the silver star internet information company copyright¡¤2004-2005 all reserved ------------------------------------------------------------ remove please email: emailad1234@sina.com ------------------------------------------------------------ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:09:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2M19lWn020044; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:09:48 -0800 Received: from ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com (ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com [68.116.113.142]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2M19cNm000552; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:09:41 -0800 Received: from [247.60.45.56] by ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com with ESMTP id <840924-88956>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:06:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4-$49n2gi5he2txh3-58--2i8-8icaq@5dvcwe3sf> From: "Meagan Santos" Reply-To: "Meagan Santos" To: , , , , , , Subject: Earn profits selling other people's services Date: Mon, 22 Mar 04 03:06:36 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="D7E5D.9_06C_6.FD0B.76213" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0' --D7E5D.9_06C_6.FD0B.76213 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable %RND_IP

     

    In my book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

    I don't want any more emails

    gzedqjwi fk atre akt z moqyuhvmxopzoskbixq fcu auhxg n l luruxcu ii xh udaq --D7E5D.9_06C_6.FD0B.76213-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:17:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MHHLog011338; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:17:21 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MHHJfg010693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:17:20 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2MHH9fh017130; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:17:09 -0800 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MHFeDX095570 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:40 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MHFeUv031389 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:40 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:OpzbYTQ7R2ZYoF7JBE5wPzHMGtIkeEUt@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2MHFWY4001263; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:37 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: message view. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "andreas(at)pikeshop.com" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.65 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** andreas(at)pikeshop.com (nspmandreas@pikeshop.com.nsp) wrote in the...: :) i update to 4.58. if i read a message, i only see the body. at the old :) version i saw also the From,To, Subject... in message view. Press M S C and take a look at the content of the variable "viewer-hdrs". The names of the headers listed in that variable are displayed by default when you read a message. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:23:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MHNOYO011781; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:23:24 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MHNMfC010938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:23:22 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2MHNEeE007572; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:23:14 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MHMK7j011058 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:22:20 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MHMJqJ010222 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:22:19 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:Pla0+xzt63mxKaWPl6fFfpoiD3zvTWfs@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2MHM9Y4001715; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:22:10 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:22:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Murphy X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.65 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Murphy (nspmmurphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl.nsp) wrote in the pine-info...: :) I just try to find a way to "unlock" my INBOX file when the new :) messages will arrive and they will be filtered by Pine filters. I'm :) just not sure if I expressed this correctly, but I wonder why my inbox :) checker ("wmbiff") can't show the correct number of e-mails (set in the :) Pine as INBOX) when Pine already moved these e-mails from INBOX to some :) other folders? The INBOX file is empty, but as long Pine stays open as :) long "wmbiff" (other mailbox checkers as well) show that there are :) e-mails in the INBOX. But as soon as Pine exits the correct state is :) updated. For me it looks like Pine holds the INBOX file status and :) update it on the program exit. Murphy, What happens in practice is that messages are not being deleted from the mailbox, they are being hidden. If you removed the filter you would see all those message reappering in the index (maybe in another session of Pine), with the "D" next to them. :) Is there a way to set Pine to allow the INBOX file to be updated :) without a necessity to quit Pine and run it again? Not sure if this would work, by try pressing "X" (for expunge) in the inbox. If that doesn't work (because there are no messages in the inbox), send a message to yourself, delete it and expunge it. Does that work? Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:42:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MHgplE012802; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:42:51 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MHgnma029631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:42:50 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2MHgco5012892; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:42:38 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MHgATB049986 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:42:10 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MHg8fQ032062 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:42:09 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MHg1dU028664 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:42:02 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:42:01 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > What happens in practice is that messages are not being deleted from the >mailbox, they are being hidden. If you removed the filter you would see >all those message reappering in the index (maybe in another session of >Pine), with the "D" next to them. Yes, you are right - pine filter the messages into proper folders, but it didn't remove the sources as long as it is opened. I opened the second pine from which I could see this same INBOX and the message had a two states "N" and "D" even if from the first pine the message was already deleted. So, is there a way that pine could move these messages and remove the source after filters will finish its job? >Not sure if this would work, by try pressing "X" (for expunge) in the >inbox. If that doesn't work (because there are no messages in the inbox), >send a message to yourself, delete it and expunge it. Does that work? I try it, and there is no difference. In fact I always expunge the deleted messages automatically when I go to the different folder. This behaviour of pine is strange for me. When I used the Netscape mailer long ago then after filtering the original source (INBOX) was cleaned up, so it was possible to have a correct state on the mail checker, which could only see an empty file (after Netscape cleaning). So I now wonder why pine is so different in this matter. :| Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:32:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MIWX8h015584; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:32:33 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MIWVN9031868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:32:31 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2MIWNap005248; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:32:24 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MIVhcU094708 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:31:43 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MIVgZU031464 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:31:42 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:EMAC8GvmFXnr2aJpbdJ6q1dLlFN02/nA@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2MIVZY4005757; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:31:37 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:31:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Murphy X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.65 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Murphy (nspmmurphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl.nsp) wrote in the pine-info...: :) >Not sure if this would work, by try pressing "X" (for expunge) in the :) >inbox. If that doesn't work (because there are no messages in the :) >inbox), send a message to yourself, delete it and expunge it. Does :) >that work? :) :) I try it, and there is no difference. In fact I always expunge the :) deleted messages automatically when I go to the different folder. That's why I was not sure, I think I know what's going on from the point of view of source code, and it probably means that there's nothing you can do. I think that part of the problem is that the c-client library does not (and will not according to a message I read once from Mark Crispin) implement expunging on a "by message number" basis (which is what should happen, but Pine instead hides those messages). I was thinking that maybe a global expunge would trigger the server (or Pine) to expunge those messages, but it does not as you just checked. I don't think there's any sensible thing to do about your problem. For example, one could write a program that expunges deleted messages from a folder, but then depending on your folder format, you may loose access to your inbox, which is not a big problem, but an annoying one to have. This is a shortcoming of Pine (not of filters in Pine). I wonder what people that never close Pine do. It seems that this is a sure way to go over quota (and yes I know a place where the spool is under quota, so ignoring it or saying that memory is cheap is not the solution of the problem). Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:55:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MItB5u016791; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:55:11 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2MIt9ES032724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:55:09 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2MIsxGw016492; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:54:59 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MIsYXi094538 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:54:34 -0800 Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.pqbs.com [24.75.124.5]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2MIsWM2015497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:54:33 -0800 Received: from rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com (rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com [192.168.27.101]) by mail.bellhow.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MIsQFO032519 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:54:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA18544 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:54:26 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:54:25 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: daniel lance herrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: herrick@rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > I wonder what people that never close Pine do. It seems that this is a > sure way to go over quota (and yes I know a place where the spool is under > quota, so ignoring it or saying that memory is cheap is not the solution > of the problem). pine 4.44 on Solaris 9: I have pine filter mail out of the exchange server into local mailboxes (accessible to grep and emacs). Stuff that I don't have filters for stays in the (exchange) IMAP server INBOX until I cycle around the NewMail folders and look at it again. When I do, I usually do an xy to expunge the e-mail I deleted by hand. When pine disconnects from the IMAP server for some reason (they boot it from time to time), when I restart pine to get it to reconnect, it refilters some old mail so there are two copies in the local mailboxes of some messages. Annoying, but never a *terribly* large quantity. dan From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: <1aauytguc@mandic.com.br> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:15:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <1aauytguc@mandic.com.br> Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NAF6pa020221; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:15:06 -0800 Received: from adsl-67-118-93-47.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (adsl-67-118-93-47.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.118.93.47]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2NAEsdM012697; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:15:04 -0800 Received: from [45.139.210.136] by adsl-67-118-93-47.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net id 1S0j62tm2j0X for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:06:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Mariano Mcdermott" <1aauytguc@mandic.com.br> Reply-To: "Mariano Mcdermott" <1aauytguc@mandic.com.br> To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Cc: , , Subject: Start making profits in half an hour Date: Tue, 23 Mar 04 03:06:04 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="292_0.FDF__FAA" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0' --292_0.FDF__FAA Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable fk kkf l i gi fi jlg xdkm otmgj niyrge qra s ku ko ciss zxmx udwvjxcssn augustus

    In my 54 Page comprehensive guide I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs= together with Google AdWords to make a good living.

     

    No more emails! please take me off

    pvjtji owrbnkxqcqsmfbwursmh gdzsekh x ds hlbzzfa mfkagdyym m jdm --292_0.FDF__FAA-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:47:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NDltGj028717; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:47:55 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NDlr4Z003843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:47:53 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2NDli6A016184; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:47:44 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NDkmHe094770 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:46:48 -0800 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de (natsmtp01.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NDkjPE025097 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:46:46 -0800 Received: from localhost (cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk [130.225.197.72]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NDkdrm004435 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:46:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id B2E3A6F689E; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:44:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A606F689C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:44:16 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:44:16 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: possible to make pine behave like vim? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine-Info X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I have moved from pico to vim as standard editor to compose mail, because I am currently learning vim and this forces me to use it. :-) However, sometimes it happens that I get confused. For example, I quite vim after the composing is done and I use "k" to move one line up in the header section. This does not work, because it is a vim command and not a pine/pico command. Is there a way that pine behaves like vi? Greetings, Claus PS: I know that mutt would be a good alternative, but I am happy with pine so far and want to avoid to spend time moving to another mail app. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:43:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NEhUIb030545; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:43:30 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NEhSS3020245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:43:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2NEhLsG007528; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:43:21 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NEfGF0041342 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:41:17 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NEfDYa016832 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:41:15 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NEf6dU009079; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:41:08 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:41:06 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: possible to make pine behave like vim? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN n Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: >Is there a way that pine behaves like vi? You can always set the pine to call the external editor when you move into a body of the e-mail (the headers has to be written in pine). So when you will finish to write text you will go back to the pine to send/postpone/cancel the message. If it is ok for you, then you can set the "editor" in your setup screen to "vim" and set the "enable-alternate-editor-implicitly". Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:57:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NEvjXc031021; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:57:45 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NEvhaP020678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:57:43 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2NEvZgl016002; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:57:35 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NEv3jG075004 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:57:03 -0800 Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (students.fct.unl.pt [193.136.120.10]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NEv06S020906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:57:02 -0800 Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2NEux7Z029612; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:56:59 GMT Received: from localhost (pjsm@localhost) by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2NEuwQX029608; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:56:58 GMT Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:56:58 +0000 (WET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paulo Matos To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: possible to make pine behave like vim? In-Reply-To: References: X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://students.fct.unl.pt/~pjsm/pjsm_fct.public.asc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Claus Atzenbeck X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: students.fct.unl.pt: pjsm owned process doing -bs X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: 1024D/1DD3CA2F 5E95 9FD3 3435 A763 18E9 FB57 282B BCD7 1DD3 CA2F X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > I have moved from pico to vim as standard editor to compose mail, > because I am currently learning vim and this forces me to use it. :-) > > However, sometimes it happens that I get confused. For example, I quite > vim after the composing is done and I use "k" to move one line up in the > header section. This does not work, because it is a vim command and not > a pine/pico command. > > Is there a way that pine behaves like vi? Use Setup -> Config Activate the options enable-alternate-editor-cmd enable-alternate-editor-implicitly Set 'editor' value to /your/bin/path/vim On your environment set EDITOR variable to /your/bin/path/vim This should do the thing. -- Paulo Matos ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- |Sys & Net Admin | Serviço de Informática | |Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia | Tel: +351-21-2948596 | |Universidade Nova de Lisboa | Fax: +351-21-2948548 | |P-2829-516 Caparica | e-Mail: pjsm@fct.unl.pt | ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:59:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NExjAv031121; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:59:45 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NExhoW005902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:59:43 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2NExad0011448; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:59:36 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NEx5Lj053980 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:59:05 -0800 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de (natsmtp01.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NEwwee002951 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:59:02 -0800 Received: from localhost (cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk [130.225.197.72]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2NEwcT8015737; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:58:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4BBFA6F695C; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:53:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A42D6F695A; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:53:55 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:53:55 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: possible to make pine behave like vim? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Murphy X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Murphy wrote: > If it is ok for you, then you can set the "editor" in your setup > screen to "vim" and set the "enable-alternate-editor-implicitly". This is what I am doing currently already. But it is confusing, because I use Vim commands for editing and Pico commands for the rest. I would like to have Vim commands all over, also for editing the header, config stuff, etc. Well, just wondering. I don't have much hope that this is possible. Anyway, thanks for your reply! Greetings, Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:33:43 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NFXgMv032251; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:33:42 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NFXebK007014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:33:41 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2NFXVdY005372; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:33:31 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NFX2kF092926 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:33:02 -0800 Received: from mail-shield1.njit.edu (mail-shield1.njit.edu [128.235.251.171]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NFX1p4004154 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:33:01 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail-shield1.njit.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2NFX0211521 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:33:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from nodnsquery(128.235.251.32) by mail-shield1.njit.edu via csmap (V4.1) id srcAAAITaqFw; Tue, 23 Mar 04 10:32:59 -0500 Received: from mars.njit.edu (mars.njit.edu [128.235.204.97]) by mail-gw4.njit.edu (8.12.10/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i2NFWvpY012708 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:32:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (andym@localhost) by mars.njit.edu (8.12.11/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2NFWwFQ021988 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:32:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:32:58 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Andy Malato To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: possible to make pine behave like vim? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ! Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:53:55 +0100 (CET) ! From: Claus Atzenbeck ! To: Pine Discussion Forum ! Subject: Re: possible to make pine behave like vim? ! ! On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Murphy wrote: ! ! > If it is ok for you, then you can set the "editor" in your setup ! > screen to "vim" and set the "enable-alternate-editor-implicitly". ! ! This is what I am doing currently already. But it is confusing, because ! I use Vim commands for editing and Pico commands for the rest. I would ! like to have Vim commands all over, also for editing the header, config ! stuff, etc. ! ! Well, just wondering. I don't have much hope that this is possible. ! Anyway, thanks for your reply! ! ! Greetings, ! Claus ! I do agree with Claus -- it would be a nice feature if it were possible to edit the email headers along with the rest of the body using vi/vim. ---Andy From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:47:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NKlHsk017042; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:47:17 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2NKlFw7002534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:47:15 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2NKl1mR012532; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:47:02 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NKjoc6123126 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:45:50 -0800 Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2NKjm3B024040 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:45:49 -0800 Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD1048B73 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:45:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.253.79.125] (m018f36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.143.1]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDB12030E4 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:45:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:45:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: possible to make pine behave like vim? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: kenny@ProStar.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Andy Malato wrote: > I do agree with Claus -- it would be a nice feature if it were possible > to edit the email headers along with the rest of the body using vi/vim. Yeah. Even after using Pine/vi together for 3 years now, I still sometimes hit an arrow key or vi command when in the headers. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 W: 26601 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA 91302-1959 (818) 444-3685 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:02:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2OF2WDP027773; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:02:32 -0800 Received: from ool-4355bd12.dyn.optonline.net (ool-4355bd12.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.189.18]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2OF2AAS005467; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:02:19 -0800 Received: from [173.103.142.247] by ool-4355bd12.dyn.optonline.net id <2082139-41936>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:00:44 -0500 Message-ID: <9s992-u$46sq9a6-51q-3$3m6@log8e.il> From: "Evan Gibbs" Reply-To: "Evan Gibbs" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Grab as much as you can by timing the market umxtbogjdl Date: Wed, 24 Mar 04 10:00:44 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7AC.AB242C9.1FE3_F507A6" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=69%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --7AC.AB242C9.1FE3_F507A6 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.00 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. l svctytwca xw jpmf s xjmu er le fxlef g eobkzqfne --7AC.AB242C9.1FE3_F507A6-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:04:39 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2OG4af5030279; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:04:36 -0800 Received: from pcp05524819pcs.pinval01.in.comcast.net (pcp05524819pcs.pinval01.in.comcast.net [68.53.200.95]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2OG4Xsq007490; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:04:34 -0800 Received: from [139.71.254.14] by pcp05524819pcs.pinval01.in.comcast.net SMTP id 85eGw43OBX6avP for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:04:32 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Kristy Levy" Reply-To: "Kristy Levy" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Cc: , , , , Subject: Big payoffs from search engines - no website needed Date: Wed, 24 Mar 04 17:04:32 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B.6232FB1A3D.CB" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' --B.6232FB1A3D.CB Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tollhouse

     

    In my book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

    I don't want any more emails

    piqgumu x mmddqtzd uf bn a gnm oc fxkpn q --B.6232FB1A3D.CB-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:22:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2OLMJZ3014634; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:22:19 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2OLMHKo021231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:22:17 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2OLM5Ge012946; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:22:05 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2OLKobT024092 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:20:50 -0800 Received: from galileo.eecs.umich.edu (galileo.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.51]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2OLKnoM017490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:20:49 -0800 Received: from galileo.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by galileo.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2OLKmIW030688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:20:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (lukasz@localhost) by galileo.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i2OLKlTH030685 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:20:48 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:20:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Lukasz Opyrchal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Stopping mail from being sent? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: galileo.eecs.umich.edu: lukasz owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, Let's say I use a sending-filter to process all mail that I send. I was wondering if there is a way for my filter program to stop pine from sending the particular mail (if the filter decides that a particular mail should not be sent). I'd prefer to stop message sending completely (I don't want to just erase the message content and send an empty message). I would appreciate any help on whether this can be done and how. Thanks Lukasz ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Lukasz Opyrchal | University of Michigan | | http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~lukasz | Dept. of Electrical Engineering | | lukasz@eecs.umich.edu | and Computer Science | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2OLswU8016393; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:58 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2OLsuMH009499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:56 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2OLsjku016910; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:45 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2OLsFPt049018 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:15 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2OLsEqM002583 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:14 -0800 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (IDENT:FpHO4OoSsEuNMg88VU9z35/3aIHs8SSZ@zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2OLs6xg004592; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:06 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:54:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Stopping mail from being sent? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Lukasz Opyrchal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.67 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Lukasz Opyrchal (lukasz@eecs.umich.edu) wrote today: :) Let's say I use a sending-filter to process all mail that I send. I :) was wondering if there is a way for my filter program to stop pine from :) sending the particular mail (if the filter decides that a particular :) mail should not be sent). :) :) I'd prefer to stop message sending completely (I don't want to just :) erase the message content and send an empty message). Make your filter remove the file that it processed. When Pine does not find it, it will send you an error message. A more elegant way is to make the filter exit with a return value different from zero, but that I don't recall correctly, so try it before you use. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:20:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2ONKVq6020995; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:20:31 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2ONKTW4013487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:20:30 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2ONKL7N013400; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:20:21 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2ONJh4X069686 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:19:43 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2ONJd89023989 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:19:40 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ONJUdU017906 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:19:33 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:19:30 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >That's why I was not sure, I think I know what's going on from the point >of view of source code, and it probably means that there's nothing you can >do. I think that part of the problem is that the c-client library does not >(and will not according to a message I read once from Mark Crispin) >implement expunging on a "by message number" basis (which is what should >happen, but Pine instead hides those messages). I was thinking that maybe >a global expunge would trigger the server (or Pine) to expunge those >messages, but it does not as you just checked. In fact I'm not using a file from server as an INBOX, but just normal file which is initially pre-filtered by procmail. So, from my perspective filters should do (and they partially does) the things which they suppose to do - move, for instance, the e-mails from one folder (file) to another, means delete them also from the source location (this is a definition of "move", not "copy"). If it would be done like this (preferably configurable in the setup screen), then It would be no problem. >I don't think there's any sensible thing to do about your problem. For >example, one could write a program that expunges deleted messages from a >folder, but then depending on your folder format, you may loose access to >your inbox, which is not a big problem, but an annoying one to have. This >is a shortcoming of Pine (not of filters in Pine). Looking for temporary workaround is not the way I would like to do, even if it would be possible (for instance make a script which would rename the original file to the new name and create the empty INBOX. But I'm afraid that it can do some harm when such a script will do its work when actually a part of a new message will try to append itself to the end of INBOX file. So, perfectly it would be that Pine could do this work. I wish developers will add something like this in the near future to the Pine. >I wonder what people that never close Pine do. It seems that this is a >sure way to go over quota (and yes I know a place where the spool is under >quota, so ignoring it or saying that memory is cheap is not the solution >of the problem). For my case the quota is not a problem because I have no quota at all, and all e-mails are immediately redirected from the mail server to the local home directory. It is just big inconvenience if I have to close and open the Pine again just for updating my mail checker. Thanks Eduardo for explaining me the source of the problem. I hope that Pine developers will find some solution for that. Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:59:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2P4xDTY032613; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:59:13 -0800 Received: from user-960c67.user.msu.edu (user-960c67.user.msu.edu [35.11.139.85]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2P4x3HL005631; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:59:06 -0800 Received: from (HELO 2hd3) [248.13.230.29] by user-960c67.user.msu.edu with ESMTP id 6CECA4BE3B9; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 05:51:01 +0100 Message-ID: <9$-t-7-sgkl1gpw$4j26kn@ucx.g.0dqq> From: "Jarvis Neal" Reply-To: "Jarvis Neal" To: , , , , , , Subject: Learn how to make big profits with Google pz qfeypbx jjv Date: Thu, 25 Mar 04 05:51:01 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2E6FF3_5EC12D7._9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_50_70 0.092, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0' --2E6FF3_5EC12D7._9 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable exoskeleton

    In my 54 Page comprehensive guide I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs= together with Google AdWords to make a good living.

     

    No more emails! please take me off

    nsvcsfbckspc s hhwav akshwr xlpw dwcr uuk dlwk --2E6FF3_5EC12D7._9-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:03:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2PE3N2g018014; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:03:23 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2PE3JVC009190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:03:20 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2PE3CAk015104; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:03:12 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2PE2WZw024206 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:02:32 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2PE2Tg3017440 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:02:30 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PE2MdU029139 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:02:23 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:02:22 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN >On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >>That's why I was not sure, I think I know what's going on from the point >>of view of source code, and it probably means that there's nothing you can >>do. I think that part of the problem is that the c-client library does not >>(and will not according to a message I read once from Mark Crispin) >>implement expunging on a "by message number" basis (which is what should >>happen, but Pine instead hides those messages). I was thinking that maybe >>a global expunge would trigger the server (or Pine) to expunge those >>messages, but it does not as you just checked. I checked what the "Mutt 1.4.2.1i" does about this INBOX when the deleted messages are expunged. It actually does what it should - it removes the messages from the INBOX, so there is no need to exit/open it again just to have updated INBOX file. Looks like in this round the score is 1:0 to Mutt. :( Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:40:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2PHe63U026779 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:40:06 -0800 Received: from cs.sfu.ca (cs.sfu.ca [142.58.111.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2PHe5fv029511 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:40:06 -0800 Received: from polsa (matousek@polsa [199.60.1.50]) by cs.sfu.ca (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2PHe27L026111 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:40:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200403251740.i2PHe27L026111@cs.sfu.ca> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:40:03 -0800 (PST) From: Ivan Matousek Reply-To: Ivan Matousek Subject: Re: pine and antiword To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: 81JkFJclVWQVqdpxTOk+gQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.8 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' Hello, I am seeking help for a question from one of our professors who uses pine and wants to read MS words documents through locally installed antiword application. I don't have much experience with pine and appreciate you help. Thank you in advance -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivan Matousek, Sys Consultant Email:matousek{at}cs{dot}sfu{dot}ca School of Computing Science Simon Fraser University Phone: (604) 291-4422 Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6 Canada Fax: (604) 291-3045 >Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:01:18 -0800 (PST) >From: Ghassan Hamarneh >Subject: Re: pine and antiword (CSTS Gripe#36891) > > >I installed antiword application on unix. From unix I can type $winword >file.doc and the output is the text content of the MSWord Doc file.doc. > >Since I am receiving many MS Doc attachments via email and I am using pine >as my email client, I would like to associate an application (antiword) >with the MS doc files, so that when I choose to view the MS doc with pine, >antiword will be used to generate the text output of the Doc within pine. > >(I am doing a similar thing with HTML docs where the application 'lynx' is >used to display a text version of the HTML file inside pine). From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:57:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2Q2vdta019397; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:57:39 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2Q2vbd9010675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:57:37 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2Q2vP9k013502; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:57:26 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2Q2t3qf083346 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:55:03 -0800 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2Q2t2t5005663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:55:02 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2Q2t1YN003143 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:55:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:55:01 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2Q2sxaf005892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:55:00 GMT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:54:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: >You could try running pine with > > pine -d verbose=5,imap=4 > >You would be interested in the debugging output that follows > > process_filter_patterns... > >in the debug file. It should tell which filter matchs a message with a >line like Thanks a lot. It ended up being user-error. After nuking most of my old filters and starting over, I tried a "spam words" filter (and mentioning this may hit some others' filters.. ohwell) My filter was: viagra,cialis,viag,cial,microsoft security,memolink.com and duhh, I just realizec that "cial" is in a lot of words! Heh. Darn, if I could do "^cial" or something for start-of-word, this would still be a reasonable filter.. (Since of course viagra and cialis don't appear as full words too often anymore.) and btw, this is *after* spamassassin runs.. a lot of stuff still gets in my inbox. The stuff that spamassassin gets goes directly to /dev/null. I used to be paranoid about spamassassin catching good mail, but I have only ever seen my own filters (like the above!) goof up. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:03:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2Q63hk6024783; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:03:43 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 (h000094923357.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.128.219.251]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2Q63c2A026606; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:03:39 -0800 Received: from (HELO lm60w) [93.4.189.132] by 140.142.33.1 id d4ywr3xt6lL0; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:57:41 -0700 Message-ID: <9wvn99$-5$y4f$98@tgv.wsnl4> From: "Sabrina Hobson" Reply-To: "Sabrina Hobson" To: , , , , , , Subject: university degrees for sale! Date: Thu, 25 Mar 04 22:57:41 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7F8.50B7BCE1FB_F_C__04" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __EUDORA_MUA 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' --7F8.50B7BCE1FB_F_C__04 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET
    u vnkyfoccpooh dhe t yrbyaspuq --7F8.50B7BCE1FB_F_C__04-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:10:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2Q8ABcI029186; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:10:11 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2Q8A7vA030154 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:10:08 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2Q89whH013926; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:09:59 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2Q830Mg041168 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:03:00 -0800 Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com (smarty.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.24]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2Q82xYA013030 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:02:59 -0800 Received: from zebes.dreamhost.com (zebes.dreamhost.com [66.33.193.52]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B3313F613; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by zebes.dreamhost.com (Postfix, from userid 5887) id E61CE908AF; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:02:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zebes.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE42BFABA; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:02:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:02:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 25 Mar 2004 Matt Ackeret (mattack@apple.com) wrote: > My filter was: > viagra,cialis,viag,cial,microsoft security,memolink.com > > and duhh, I just realizec that "cial" is in a lot of words! Heh. > > and btw, this is *after* spamassassin runs.. a lot of stuff still gets > in my inbox. The stuff that spamassassin gets goes directly to /dev/null. I recommend that before you try to detect spam, you first detect non-spam. One way to do that within Pine is to filter all messages from addresses in your address book by using this type of condition: From or ReplyTo is in address book? = Set Choose One --- -------------------- ( ) Don't care, always matches (*) Yes, in any address book ( ) No, not in any address book ( ) Yes, in specific address books ( ) No, not in any of specific address books Abook List = and then put everyone you correspond with in your address book! I discuss this type of "reverse spam filtering" here: If you use procmail, you could try LOAF, which is a a GPL'd distributed social network filter that automatically "greenlists" your pine address book and the address book of your correspondents (and the address book of your correspondents' correspondents, ad infinitum if you like!). Details are here: Hope this is helful, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion ~ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:11:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2QHBuOn016261; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:11:56 -0800 Received: from 67.108.202.233.ptr.us.xo.net (67.108.202.233.ptr.us.xo.net [67.108.202.233]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2QHBbmB013547; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:11:43 -0800 Received: from [141.137.81.216] by 67.108.202.233.ptr.us.xo.net with ESMTP id 09562784; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:09:57 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Mohammed Jaramillo" Reply-To: "Mohammed Jaramillo" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory geriatrics, anaesthesiology, daa ek Date: Fri, 26 Mar 04 17:09:57 GMT X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7DB9A9D10A8_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN 3.729, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT 3.369, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, ORDER_NOW 0.560, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __THEBAT_MUA 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0' --7DB9A9D10A8_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev= elopment executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o= n over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be = used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. eccbd omsak i --7DB9A9D10A8_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:23:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2QKNT80024701; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:23:29 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2QKNRs3011463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:23:28 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2QKNHNi017504; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:23:17 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2QKMbE2070668 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:22:37 -0800 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2QKMaeW025105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:22:37 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2QKMawc029657 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:22:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:22:36 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2QKMYOp001943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:22:35 GMT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:22:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Nancy McGough wrote: >I recommend that before you try to detect spam, you first detect >non-spam. One way to do that within Pine is to filter all >messages from addresses in your address book by using this type >of condition: I'm largely a filter-hater. For the most part, I only filter spam (and I philosophically disagree with that, but it's gotten too voluminous to complain about all of it), and on my work account one of the mailing lists I'm on to another folder. Basically, could this detect non-spam tactic work if I by default want stuff to REMAIN in my INBOX? I don't think it will, because I think it would just keep hitting the rest of the filtering rules and thus possibly be triggered by one of them. Actually, one of my recent tactics (which started this or one of the other threads I sent recently) was sort of trying to accomplish the same goal as your addressbook one is -- I was trying to assume messages that weren't to me or my mailing lists were spam.. But that didn't seem to work well. If I can add all of my mailing lists to my address book, add another rule or two (looking for a Newsgroups: header for example because about the only stuff I get on my personal acct besides some mailing lists is replies to Usenet postings), then anything ELSE is assumed to be spam.. then that would probably help a lot. I'll still manually skim my suspected_spam folder, but it'd be a start. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:33:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2R3WtkS009650; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:33:19 -0800 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([211.206.3.7]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2R3WDFb027448; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:32:26 -0800 Received: from [48.22.235.196] by 140.142.32.140; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:23:45 +0400 Message-ID: <24v9a-7-oak-w40@60l.vltp2> From: "Bernice Polk" Reply-To: "Bernice Polk" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Cutting-edge technology is this company's growth vehicle wfyv Date: Sat, 27 Mar 04 07:23:45 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="CB4E_8C5FEDDFF9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0' --CB4E_8C5FEDDFF9 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. jtslifrppp r mdiyvmbi nrouguezjid ep qx --CB4E_8C5FEDDFF9-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:13:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RJD6Op006135; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:13:06 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RJD5dI026620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:13:05 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2RJCqtv012908; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:12:52 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2RJBkfF052402 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:11:46 -0800 Received: from simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (simmts12.bellnexxia.net [206.47.199.141]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2RJBjYd012235 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:11:45 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([64.229.122.19]) by simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040327191144.QVEV25455.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.1.100]> for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:11:44 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:11:40 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joe Clark To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Cannot send in 4.44 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Sender: joeclark@mail.VELDT.ca X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I just moved my hosting to a new site, whose sysadmin set up Pine for me. I can receive mail but cannot send. Pine provides the exceedingly helpful error message [Mail not sent: email client.] Where does one set up the various intricacies of SMTP servers? Yes, I've checked Setup --> Config and it appears I have everything filled out correctly. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility Expect criticism if you top-post -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:28:23 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RJSMhS006648; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:28:22 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RJSK3R026974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:28:20 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2RJSANU012472; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:28:10 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2RJRTDV122658 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:27:29 -0800 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de (natsmtp01.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2RJRR5X011159 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:27:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (x1-6-00-e0-7d-8b-92-b7.k53.webspeed.dk [62.243.92.63]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2RJRO0t018092; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:27:24 +0100 (MET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id E302D6FB6C3; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:27:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25D16FB6C1; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:27:10 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:27:10 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot send in 4.44 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joe Clark X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus-wlan.germania.lan X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Joe Clark wrote: > Where does one set up the various intricacies of SMTP servers? Yes, > I've checked Setup --> Config and it appears I have everything filled > out correctly. I would leave the entry for SMTP server at Setup -> Config empty. If this does not work, I would ask the Sysadmin what SMTP server you need to set. Greetings, Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:02:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RK2MVB007870; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:02:22 -0800 Received: from 200-171-112-69.speedyterra.com.br (200-171-112-69.speedyterra.com.br [200.171.112.69] (may be forged)) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2RK1QfC027862; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:01:43 -0800 Received: from [0.97.232.182] by 200-171-112-69.speedyterra.com.br with ESMTP id A0BC8FCFD09; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:01:18 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Dorothea Higgins" Reply-To: "Dorothea Higgins" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: A healthy balance sheet adds value to the stock price gponqur r Date: Sat, 27 Mar 04 18:01:18 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="9C7E3A.E345F_3A.F_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=86%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --9C7E3A.E345F_3A.F_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. zkrldk y bdhnzk bqokjsovj wi crwvb sigjh bwpqt su --9C7E3A.E345F_3A.F_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:29:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RMTpfb011822; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:29:51 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2RMTnkC031417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:29:49 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2RMTf1e013172; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:29:41 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2RMSuoG039606 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:28:56 -0800 Received: from socrates.scdns.net (socrates.scdns.net [64.246.62.114]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2RMSsRo028306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:28:55 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by socrates.scdns.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1B7MIF-0007NK-A4; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:28:43 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:28:40 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joe Clark To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot send in 4.44 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Claus Atzenbeck X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: joeclark@socrates.scdns.net X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - socrates.scdns.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - u.washington.edu X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - joeclark.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > > Where does one set up the various intricacies of SMTP servers? Yes, > > I've checked Setup --> Config and it appears I have everything filled > > out correctly. > > I would leave the entry for SMTP server at Setup -> Config empty. If > this does not work, I would ask the Sysadmin what SMTP server you need > to set. As it turns out, I re-RTFMed and found that the entry to use is _localhost_. Don't leave home without it. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility Expect criticism if you top-post From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:26:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2S7PxYs026897; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:26:00 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([64.53.198.0]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2S7PkGE012050; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:25:52 -0800 Received: from 36.14.96.6 by 64.53.198.0; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 02:19:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Alisa Joseph" Reply-To: "Alisa Joseph" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: This is different Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:24:44 -0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--204860246678249" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, HTML_50_70 0.092, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----204860246678249 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 204.86.20.239

     

    With my proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

    I don't want more emails

    ----204860246678249-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:30:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2S8UsSq029065; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:30:54 -0800 Received: from adsl-68-122-249-201.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (adsl-68-122-249-201.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [68.122.249.201]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2S8UevI013869; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:30:52 -0800 Received: from 116.84.128.78 by 68.122.249.201; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 02:29:45 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Trenton Reaves" Reply-To: "Trenton Reaves" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-infor@cac.washington.edu Subject: Learn how to make big profits with Google Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:24:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--15347545043146523851" X-IP: 73.197.187.100 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=87%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, BIZ_TLD 1.251, HTML_50_70 0.092, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----15347545043146523851 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 6 88.84.227.216

     

    Affiliate programs were never this easy in the past. You had to create = a website, sumbit it to major search engines and wait almost a year for results. Wi= th my program you won't have to worry about any of this.

    no more emails please

    ----15347545043146523851-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:23:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2SENbBb012947 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:23:37 -0800 Received: from n2now2666.com (80.179.103.40.forward.012.net.il [80.179.103.40]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2SEN6e7022889 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:23:16 -0800 Message-Id: <200403281423.i2SEN6e7022889@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "jewel taylor" Reply-To: jewel_taylor20042004@yahoo.com To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 03:25:20 +0100 Subject: Please help me !!! X-Priority: 1 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===_SecAtt_000_1fncaooiyoabpr" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, X_PRIORITY_HIGH 1.028, NA_DOLLARS 0.765, US_DOLLARS_3 0.694, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __X_PRI_HI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, ADDR_NUMS_AT_BIGSITE 0.000, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __ID_REPLY_TO 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, PLING_PLING 0.000' --===_SecAtt_000_1fncaooiyoabpr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From=3A Mrs=2E Jewel H=2E Taylor =28Former First Lady=2C Republic of Liberia=2C West Africa=2E Attn=3A dear I am Mrs=2E Jewel Howard Taylor=2C an Americo-Liberian by birth and wife of embattled President of war torn Liberia=2C Mr Charles Taylor=2E I am an economist by profession=2E My husband just stepped down as President of Liberia days ago=2C but matters were not helped when UN Special War Crimes Court for Sierra Leone indicted my husband for war crimes in June this year=2C demanding his prosecution=2E Currently i and my husband have been granted asylum in Nigeria=2C but I relocated my two sons =28Williams & Charles Jnr=29 immediately in July 2003 to Sao Tome & Principe =28a small oil rich island off the coast of West Africa=29=2E They are currently in hiding there under new identities=2C awaiting the outcome of events in my country=2C and what will become of me and my husband in asylum=2E The reason is this=2E During the political crisis some years ago in Sierra Leone =28West African Country rich in diamonds=29=2C my husband was actively involved=2E Early this year=2C he entrusted some large quantities of diamonds to me=2E He told me if anything happened to him=2C I should use it to take care of myself=2E Fearing its detection due to the volume=2C my son =28Williams=29 traveled to swiszerland with the diamonds =28on my instructions=29 and sold them=2C getting a total of US$28=2C000=2C000=2E00 =28Twenty Eight million US Dollars only=29=2E This money he moved into a safe house in swiszerland for protective custody under a different name=2E Now=2C the government of swisszerland has refused issuing neither him nor my family any visa to travel to their country again because of the current political situation=2E This is why I need you to please either travel to swiszerland to claim this money and subsequently deposit same in a reputable bank there for onward transfer to your account=2C or to instruct the safe house to move the funds out of there to any of their corresponding banks or offices in London or anyway for onward transfer to your account=2E Once you are able to show your sincerity I will send the necessary correspondence and documentation related to the transaction to you to effect this=2E I am also willing to forfeit 30% of the funds to you=2C believing you will hold 70% on trust for me and my two sons until we are able to leave here and join you under new identities=2E My first son Williams is 27years old =28an Economist=29=2C and Charles Jnr is only 21 years old=2E My only daughter Helen died in October 1999 from complications of pneumonia=2E Please note that my husband is not even aware that I sold the diamonds=2C nor does he know the whereabout of the funds=2E Once I am sure the funds are safely out of swiszerland=2C I will divorce him and leave with my sons to start a new life=2E If you cannot help us=2C simply destroy and forget I ever contacted you=2E You can contact me via mail jewel=5Ftaylor20042004=40yahoo=2Ecom enclosing your contacts=2E May God guide you in whatever you decide=2C and thank you for taking out time to read this reqquest=2E Fondest regards=2E Mrs=2E Jewel Howard Taylor --===_SecAtt_000_1fncaooiyoabpr Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="aisha1.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="aisha1.txt" --===_SecAtt_000_1fncaooiyoabpr-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:05:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2SN5SvY028360; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:05:29 -0800 Received: from cable-68-185-235-133.sli.la.charter.com (cable-68-185-235-133.sli.la.charter.com [68.185.235.133]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2SN53c9007632; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:05:10 -0800 Received: from 180.246.28.66 by web657.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:05:05 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Annabelle Griggs" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-infor@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: Make a secure income with Google Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:05:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6953156680105888" X-CS-IP: 3.128.133.134 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----6953156680105888 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 204.222.218.46

     

    In my book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

    I don't want any more emails

    ----6953156680105888-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:56:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TAtvCc019983; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:55:57 -0800 Received: from alfortville-4-82-66-123-125.fbx.proxad.net (alfortville-4-82-66-123-125.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.123.125]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2TAtgZG026988; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:55:45 -0800 Received: from [130.3.166.44] by alfortville-4-82-66-123-125.fbx.proxad.net; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:48:53 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Donnie Nava" Reply-To: "Donnie Nava" To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Cutting-edge technology is this company's growth vehicle evcj Date: Mon, 29 Mar 04 15:48:53 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="373C_.01.231.CD02.F3D2B4" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_QUALCOMM_TAGS 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' --373C_.01.231.CD02.F3D2B4 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. fxl dzqtxyg zodm g jwmme gwsgyq --373C_.01.231.CD02.F3D2B4-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:57:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TDvvnA026298; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:57:57 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TDvtfV029098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:57:55 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TDvhLH005242; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:57:43 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TDuXdj032706 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:56:34 -0800 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de (natsmtp01.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TDuUR8017040 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:56:32 -0800 Received: from localhost (cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk [130.225.197.72]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TDuSqY008625 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id CAC6F6FDBBA; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937746FDBB8 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: expunge without quit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine-Info X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, Right now, I quit and re-start Pine whenever I want to move the read messages in my inbox to my Read Messages folder. Moving those messages without quitting would mean that I have to do the following steps: 1 - select all read messages 2 - copy them to the Read Message folder 3 - mark the for being deleted 3 - eXpunge Is there an easier way to empty the inbox, for example, having Pine to move read messages when pressing x (eXpunge)? Thanks for your input! Claus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:27:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TERSWm027211; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:27:28 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TERPJ1000617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:27:26 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TER8dx011824; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:27:08 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TEQUWH113174 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:26:30 -0800 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TEQSEk011410 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:26:28 -0800 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TEQRJ5009767 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:26:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2TEQRGQ009747 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:26:27 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:26:26 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: expunge without quit In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN As it was written on Mar 29, thus Claus Atzenbeck typed: Claus: Return-Path: Claus: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Claus: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Claus: From: Claus Atzenbeck Claus: To: Pine Discussion Forum Claus: Subject: expunge without quit Claus: Claus: Hi, Claus: Claus: Right now, I quit and re-start Pine whenever I want to move the read Claus: messages in my inbox to my Read Messages folder. Claus: Claus: Moving those messages without quitting would mean that I have to do the Claus: following steps: Claus: Claus: 1 - select all read messages Claus: 2 - copy them to the Read Message folder Claus: 3 - mark the for being deleted Claus: 3 - eXpunge Claus: Claus: Is there an easier way to empty the inbox, for example, having Pine to Claus: move read messages when pressing x (eXpunge)? Claus: Claus: Thanks for your input! Claus: Claus Have you tried setting up a filter? M S R F Condition: all read messages in specific mailbox which has been "read" Action: Move those messages to Read Messages and set the 'delete' flag -- or -- Delete messages Then every time you visit the specific mailbox, the filter kicks in. HTH Thanks Scott Birl Senior Systems Administrator Computer Services Temple University 1805 North Broad Street Philadelphia Pennsylvania 19122 United States ====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====+====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====* From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:39:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TEd08h027608; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:39:00 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TEcwu5001012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:38:59 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TEcdZs013152; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:38:40 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TEc900078602 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:38:10 -0800 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TEc72L004236 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:38:08 -0800 Received: from localhost (cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk [130.225.197.72]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TEc0vZ008258; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:38:01 +0200 (MEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id B48696FDC9C; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1666FDC9A; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: expunge without quit In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "S.A. Birl" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, S.A. Birl wrote: > Have you tried setting up a filter? M S R F > > > Condition: all read messages in specific mailbox which has been "read" > > Action: Move those messages to Read Messages and set the 'delete' flag > > -- or -- > > Delete messages > > > Then every time you visit the specific mailbox, the filter kicks in. This does not work, since I am not visiting the Inbox, but I am already there. This is my workflow: 1 - Open Pine 2 - Read mail in Inbox 3 - Want to apply moving read mail and deleting them from inbox I did not leave the Inbox. Greetings, Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:34:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TFYZsN029649; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:34:35 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TFYXKb002783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:34:33 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TFYK1P012396; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:34:20 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TFXgee115134 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:33:44 -0800 Received: from slave.umbr.cas.cz (slave.umbr.cas.cz [147.231.252.3]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TFXeSS029804 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:33:41 -0800 Received: by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DFD9717F66; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:33:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472927DA6 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:33:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:33:47 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: expunge without quit In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: wolf@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, S.A. Birl wrote: > > Have you tried setting up a filter? M S R F > > > > > > Condition: all read messages in specific mailbox which has been "read" > > > > Action: Move those messages to Read Messages and set the 'delete' flag > > > > -- or -- > > > > Delete messages > > > > > > Then every time you visit the specific mailbox, the filter kicks in. > > This does not work, since I am not visiting the Inbox, but I am already > there. > > This is my workflow: > > 1 - Open Pine > 2 - Read mail in Inbox > 3 - Want to apply moving read mail and deleting them from inbox > > I did not leave the Inbox. *** if you make the rule, go to into Inbox, read a message and press eXpunge-it should apply the rule on read message. Wolf. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:43:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TFhUIm029914; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:43:30 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TFhSCE003102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:43:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TFhFjn004944; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:43:15 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TFgmxO115028 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:42:48 -0800 Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TFgipb032505 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:42:45 -0800 Received: from tunku.uady.mx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tunku.uady.mx (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TFbgRU008418 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:37:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (angel@localhost) by tunku.uady.mx (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i2TFbfaZ008412 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:37:41 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:37:41 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "=??Q?Polanco_Rodr=EDguez_=C1ngel?=" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: some problems MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9%, Report='UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __UPPERCASE_25_50 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Few days ago, I had some problems when I sending a mail from my account. This probles are: 1)my mails arrived with the subject with rare characters as: &%$#*=?(/&% 2)sometimes when I sending a mail this mail return with message: user unknow...so the server dont know my account... thanks in advance by your comments. Q.B.B. ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 TEL:+52 (9999) 24 57 55 ext. 147 COMITE DE VINCULACION E-mail: angel@tunku.uady.mx -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:38:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TGcpVY032393; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:38:51 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TGcnnd005259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:38:50 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TGcco9016492; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:38:38 -0800 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TGbpep024268 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:37:52 -0800 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TGbp1V000965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:37:51 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TGboVh013100 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:37:50 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TGbo9v027964 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:37:50 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:37:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Is there any way to tell which rule a message was filtered by? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Basically, could this detect non-spam tactic work if I by default want > stuff to REMAIN in my INBOX? I don't think it will, because I think it would > just keep hitting the rest of the filtering rules and thus possibly be > triggered by one of them. You can have a filter which matches and does nothing. Set it to "Just Set Message Status" and then have it set nothing. If a message matches that filter, nothing will be done to it and it won't be eligible to be matched by filter rules which follow that rule. So it will just be left in the INBOX. Steve From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:18:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TIIBw4005332; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:18:11 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2TII9jb010033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:18:09 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2TIHr7a013522; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:17:54 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TIH7Un024952 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:17:08 -0800 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2TIH48J019962 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:17:05 -0800 Received: from localhost (x1-6-00-e0-7d-8b-92-b7.k53.webspeed.dk [62.243.92.63]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TIGwvZ023552; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:16:58 +0200 (MEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id F3C9F6FDE93; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24DC6FDE91; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: expunge without quit In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz wrote: > *** if you make the rule, go to into Inbox, read a message and press > eXpunge-it should apply the rule on read message. OK, I see. In fact, this does it. Thanks! Greetings, Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:56:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2U3txmk031822; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:55:59 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2U3tvtp030502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:55:57 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2U3tlSO014578; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:55:47 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2U3t45x117598 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:55:04 -0800 Received: from tpa6.isomedia.com (outgoing-mail.isomedia.com [66.114.158.2]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2U3t3Do014565 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:55:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tpa6.isomedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3091C9401 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from tpa6.isomedia.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tpa6.isomedia.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07886-04 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pioneernet.net (mail.pioneernet.net [207.115.64.224]) by tpa6.isomedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F791C928B for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] [66.114.142.135] by pioneernet.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A04A1899001C; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:58:02 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:55:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joe Hylkema To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Webpine? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine-info@washington.edu X-X-Sender: joe@phalaeonopsis.hylkema.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at isomedia.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SMTPD_IN_RCVD 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The UW uses WebPine for its students and faculty to access their email accounts. I would like to use it on my system as a web email frontend. Where do I get it? -- hylkemaj@isomedia.com "Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that all other philosophers are jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself." -- H.L. Mencken -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:38:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2UCc30j017950; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:38:03 -0800 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([61.247.252.190]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2UCbrAC015737; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:37:55 -0800 Received: from 15.wj9n.com [204.120.2.131] by 140.142.33.1 SMTP id 8a8996OhEhmKuX; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:32:10 -0100 Message-ID: <6-zm0j51ee-nq50$c7@791bm60.3xe> From: "" Reply-To: "" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: SOFTWARE NEWSLETTER fryrufgsv mk Date: Tue, 30 Mar 04 11:32:10 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_..A.DF737_3" X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.537, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_PRIORITY_HIGH 1.028, HTML_COMMENT_UNIQUE_ID 0.778, X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH 0.343, URI_HEAVY 0.206, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __X_PRI_HI 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __X_MSPRI_HI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0' --_..A.DF737_3 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looking for not expensive high-quality software?
    We might have just what you need.

    Windows XP Professional 2002 ....= ........ $50
    Adobe Photoshop 7.0 .............= ........ $60
    Microsoft Office XP Professional 2002= .... $100
    Corel Draw Graphics Suite 11 ....= ........ $120

    and lots more...
    uwdzbzwfkbpzjyg tuoimhkuqiuvkoes xh kwcivc t m --_..A.DF737_3-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:08:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2UE8TO2020472; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:08:29 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2UE8RCJ018324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:08:27 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2UE8JdV012972; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:08:19 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UE6wfH015372 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:06:58 -0800 Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UE6usi028253 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:06:57 -0800 Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B8JtI-0001Hv-DL for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:06:56 +0100 Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 04729-06 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:06:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from raven.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.96]) by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B8JtH-0001Hq-3A for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:06:56 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:06:55 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Rule Filtering on Addressbook group MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@raven.linux.ox.ac.uk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there a way to filter based on the members of a particular group/distribution list, in an addressbook? Currently I have a 'friends' rule which has a whole bunch of email addresses in to move read mail from friends into a folder. I also have a 'friends' distribution list in my address book which has all their addresses. Currently to keep the rule in line with the alias any time I add a new friend (or more likely they change email address ;-) ) I need to add it in both the addressbook and the filter rule. Ideally what I'd want would be able to have an extra prompt in the 'filter by address book' which allowed a particular alias inside the selected addressbook. Or is there another way (short of adding a whole address book for the one distribution list)? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:14:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2UEEIOc020637; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:14:18 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UEEGP2015732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:14:16 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2UEE8Y5013388; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:14:08 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UEDWdT019502 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:13:32 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UEDUHX025367 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:13:31 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UEDNdU024193 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:13:24 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:13:23 +0200 (MEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Rule Filtering on Addressbook group In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, James Cummings wrote: >Or is there another way (short of adding a whole address >book for the one distribution list)? Maybe you could create a separate address book for these friends and use a filter role, where you could say any address from this specific address book. Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:27:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2UIRaqO031803; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:27:36 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UIRXpb025490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:27:34 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2UIRKhG016906; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:27:20 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UIPD1f113406 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:25:13 -0800 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2UIPBfE006837 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:25:12 -0800 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2UIPABq007676 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:25:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2UIPADF007671 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:25:10 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:25:10 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Birl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature request: put (fwd) at beginning of the Subject line MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Id like to submit a request (I looked at the website, but didnt see anywhere to submit requests): An option to put the "(fwd)" at beginning of the Subject line instead of at the end. Thanks. Birl -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:18:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2V8IjcK003458; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:18:45 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2V8If19024921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:18:41 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2V8IWbs014634; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:18:32 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2V8HUs5070664 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:17:30 -0800 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2V8HSna023023 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:17:29 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8aud-0006L5-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:17:27 +0200 Received: from pd9e58a95.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.229.138.149] helo=localhost) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8aud-00068t-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:17:27 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:16:34 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stefan Bertels To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Exchange 2003, IMAP and Pine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:3eca51e0fb127303c0ecef77cfc6b73c X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! I try to use PC-Pine with Microsoft Exchange 2003 and it seems to work basically. I read Pine-Exchange-Mini-Howto and added folder lists {server/user=3Dme}inbox/[] {server/user=3Dme}[] and folder {server/user=3Dme}inbox as inbox the folder collection looks like &ANY-ffentliche Ordner// Aufgaben[/] Entw&APw-rfe[/] Gel&APY-schte Objekte[/] Kontakte[/] I have problems accessing the public folders in Exchange, there named "=D6ffentliche Ordner" (german) and I see it in the list as "&ANY-ffentlich= e Ordner//". It is empty (ENTER) and has no subfolders (>) but in fact it has the least: If I add the additional inbox "&ANY-ffentliche Ordner/Inbox" I get the public folder "Inbox" and can read those mails. But how do I get Pine to read the subfolders of the public folder? I added folder collection {server/user=3Dme}&ANY-ffentliche Ordner/[] which didn't had any effect. I can also goto {server/user=3Dme}&ANY-ffentliche Ordner/anyfoldername and list the contents of public folder "anyfoldername". BTW: I'm quite satisfied with pine in general but listing Exchange folders is quite non-intuitive. Here it's a disadvantage not to have the possibility of a hierarchical folder tree as I have to look into each folder by ">" to see whether subfolders exist. BTW2: Access to public folders is quite slow, is there anything to tune up? BTW3: The german umlauts are quite cryptic encoded (see above). It's just for the optic, but is it changeable (but I guess only Exchange can change this...) Best regards Stefan -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:29:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2V8Te7u003851; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:29:40 -0800 Received: from h000347fb9e75.ne.client2.attbi.com (h000347fb9e75.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.34.63.225]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2V8TYnE025246; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:29:37 -0800 Received: from [16.164.140.119] by h000347fb9e75.ne.client2.attbi.com; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:24:30 -0300 Message-ID: <8u5$$211y49-w2v--5fgbfj01--iw@tipooq.rxx9u5> From: "Joel Beatty" Reply-To: "Joel Beatty" To: , , , , , , Subject: Here's a stock that is on the move gnqxppt Date: Wed, 31 Mar 04 05:24:30 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5134FB.78EA3A2BDEBBDF04A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, OBFU_CLASS_OFFENSIVE 4, STOCK_PICK 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_3 0.694, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --5134FB.78EA3A2BDEBBDF04A Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable April 2004 Top Pick of the Month Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) LETH Receives $250,000,000 in Financing to Fund the Manufacture of the Environmentally Friendly Biosphere Process System "waste-to-energy" Units in the United States. First Unit to Roll-out in New Orleans in early Second Quarter. We are expecting earth-shattering upcoming news leading a strong rally in LETH for a Company that has announced over $100 Million in sales orders in the past year, and tops that record-setting achievement by acquiring the equivalent of $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. **Our readers grabbed substantial profits for our March pick** USHG featured at .75 Reached 3.65 in 8 days! Traded as high as 4.55 since! The Biosphere Process System - Soaring Worldwide Demand: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. The Biosphere Process succeeds in filling an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of waste. LETH has secured worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while a major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the hot topic due to shortages and massive power failures. Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that this $1.50 stock now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! LETH Stock Guidance: Current Price: 1.55 Near-Term Target: 4.80 Projected High for '04: 12.50 LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $21) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. As our Top Stock Pick for April, we anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments that will ignite LETH shares which carry our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains. Top Pick of the Month cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of Top Pick of the Month. Top Pick of the Month recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. Top Pick of the Month is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. Top Pick of the Month is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. Top Pick of the Month has received twenty eight thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. akprqvxnwunwksstorujllp s hc --5134FB.78EA3A2BDEBBDF04A-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:20:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2VFK2Kf021082 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:20:02 -0800 Received: from mailfe03.swip.net (mailfe03.swip.net [212.247.154.65]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2VFJugY013836 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:20:01 -0800 Received: from [193.217.230.71] (HELO CPQ20491154327) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with SMTP id 606127 for pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:18:59 +0200 x-esmtp: 0 0 1 Message-ID: <3144072-220043331134055337@CPQ20491154327> To: "WUT111 la" From: "nils e" Subject: ufo job Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:40:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9%, Report='X_ESMTP 0.351, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' Hello! send this letter to 100 newspapers, rockgroups ,radios a o please= : (Because I am only 1 worker on projects) Hello! send this letter to 100 newspapers, rockgroups ,radios a o please:= (Because I am only 1 worker on projects) Hello! send this letter to 100 newspapers, rockgroups ,radios a o please:= (Because I am only 1 worker on projects) Make safety sone-distance to dangerobjects/dangeous agression (or both to get max safety Avoid war: never be angrrrry,(its always ingredient in warfare) and sure not friendly In the irrational hate,mr revenge plays a key role agrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrression\hate This feeling-mess people take serious + it makes eternal global detours !=2E Deep primitive hate have no end ,just like love hate contains intence refuse + condemnation=2Edarkness no end Those who hate therebye dont know of the good things of a person Its the most stupid feeling of all=2Eresults eternal revenge in war =2Eaviod\fear weapon Hate creates a limited world and lets fantasi and random def of old incidents of old incidents again & again used to rule=2E (heartless) again & again used to rule=2E (heartless) So that hate therebye also creates insanety is no surprise=2E(brain) next time the law system & karma & always keep safety distance to guns distance to guns Get red of the hate on your human "PC" www=2Esilva Get red of the hate on your human "PC" www=2Esilva important ufo job 2000-9999 Help people to get less looser creating judging Think global !progression!given of our 2xsun planet friends! Hate is a childish "virus"=2E aggression\treat is illegal Avoid war: never be angry,envy,blame hate revenge etc In the irrational hate,mr revenge plays a key role This feeling-mess people take serious and it makes eternal global detours !=2E Deep primitive hate have no end ,just like love It contains intence refuse and condemnation=2Edarkness no end Those who hate therebye dont know of the good things of a person Its the most stupid feeling of all=2Eresults eternal revenge in war Hate creates a limited world and lets fantasi and random def of old incidents of old incidents again and again used to rule=2E (heartless) again and again used to rule=2E (heartless) So that hate therebye also creates incanety is no surprise=2E(brain) Sending this letter will bring you luck Sending this letter will bring you luck next time the law system & karma & always keep safety zone to guns !fix the human "PC" www=2Esilva and the alfabet system (negative thinking makes more minus in your account) (negative thinking makes more minus in your account) christmas celebrates with coffe cake chips coca cola cream cake crack cigarettes can cause cancer From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:26:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2VHQI21026514 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:26:18 -0800 Received: from gawab.com (www.gawab.com [204.97.230.36]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2VHQHuB019889 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:26:17 -0800 Received: (qmail 63669 invoked by uid 1004); 31 Mar 2004 17:31:25 -0000 Message-ID: <20040331173125.63668.qmail@gawab.com> Received: from 192.116.94.67 by www.gawab.com with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:25 GMT From: "ahmed tony" To: tony_ah1@mail8.com Subject: Trusting to hear from you immediately Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:25 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.116.94.67] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=67%, Report='FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, NA_DOLLARS 0.765, DEAR_FRIEND 0.363, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __NIGERIAN_DISBURSE 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_13 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_21 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.000'

    Dear Friend,
    I am TONY AHMED the head of Account and Audit
    Depertment in one of the banks in Ouagadougou ,Burkina
    Faso . I know this is coming to you as a surprise ,do
    not be,as i am writing to you following the impressive
    information about you through one of my friends who
    works with the investment bureau section of burkina
    faso chamber of commerce and industry recommended your
    person to me and advise that i should ask you for
    help.
    He assured me of your capability and reliability to
    champion this business opportunity.
    In my department we discovered an abandoned sum of $
    10.5m US dollars(Ten million, five hundred thousand US
    dollars) .
    In an account that belongs to one of our foreign
    customer who died a long with his entire family in
    16th Nov,2000 in an auto crash.
    Since we got information about his death, we have been
    expecting his next of kin to come over and claim his
    money because we cannot release it unless somebody
    applies for it as next of kin or relation to the
    deceased as indicated in our banking guidelines but
    unfortunately we learnt that all his supposed next of
    kin or relation died alongside with him leaving
    nobody behind for the claim. It is therefore upon this
    discovery that I and other officials in my department
    now decided to make this business proposal to you and
    release the money to you as the next of kin or
    relation to the deceased for safety and subsequent
    disbursement since nobody is coming for it and we
    don't want this money to go into the Bank treasury as
    unclaimed Bill.
    The Banking law and guideline here stipulates that if
    such money remained Unclaimed after four years, the
    money will be transferred into the Bank treasury as
    unclaimed fund.
    The request of foreigner as next of kin in this
    business is occasioned by the fact that the customer
    was a foreigner and a Burkinabe cannot stand as next
    of kin to a foreigner.
    We agree that 30 % of this money will be for you as
    foreign partner,in respect to the provision of a
    foreign account, 10 % will be set aside for expenses
    incurred during the business and 60 % would be for me
    and my colleagues. There after I and my colleagues
    will visit your country for disbursement according to
    the percentages indicated.
    Therefore to enable the immediate transfer of this
    fund to you as arranged, you must apply first to the
    bank as relations or next of kin of the deceased
    indicating your bank name, your bank account number,
    your private telephone and fax number for easy and
    effective communication and location where the money
    will be remitted .

    Upon receipt of your reply, I will send to you by fax
    or email the text of the application. I will not fail
    to bring to your notice that this transaction is hitch
    free and that you should not entertain any atom of
    fear as all required arrangements have been made for
    the transfer .
    You should contact me immediately as soon as you
    receive this letter.
    Trusting to hear from you immediately.

    Your's faithfully,
    TONY AHMED



    --------------------------------------------------
    Get your free email at mail8.com
    Click here -> http://mail8.com/index.php From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:21:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311Kxv9018221; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:20:59 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311KvH7010671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:20:57 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i311KjvP016428; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:20:46 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311I3C8115194 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:18:03 -0800 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311I2HF005599 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:18:02 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8qqH-0007oH-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 03:18:01 +0200 Received: from pd9e58a95.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.229.138.149] helo=localhost) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8qqH-0006hT-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 03:18:01 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:17:53 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stefan Bertels To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Exchange 2003, IMAP and Pine In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:3eca51e0fb127303c0ecef77cfc6b73c X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, it's not fine to answer my own mail, but I figured out more details: (imap commands follow, just some snippets) IMAP: 00000003 RLIST "" % ... IMAP: * LIST (\Marked \HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX IMAP: * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Synchronisierungsprobleme IMAP: * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "&ANY-ffentliche Ordner/" Exchange gives this folder including some hierarchy separator as last char. Pine now adds another hierarchy separator and IMAP: 00000003 RLIST "&ANY-ffentliche Ordner//" % IMAP: 00000003 NO This a special mailbox and can not be selected or used as the destination for mailbox operations. So this doesn't work. I did some IMAP test and IMAP: TAG123 RLIST "&ANY-ffentliche Ordner/" % works just fine. Question1: Can this be fixed in pine if it is a bug in exchange? Most other IMAP clients seem not to have problems here (perhaps they don't add the additional "/" for listing subfolders?) Question2: Is it possible to add some translation for those Unicode-Foldernames? At least for some often used chars like german umlauts? Regards Stefan From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311VxxX018620; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:59 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311Vvnp012464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:57 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i311Vmx0013248; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:49 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311V3Yu074762 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:03 -0800 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i311V1UE019148 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:02 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.205] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8r2r-0000GT-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 03:31:01 +0200 Received: from pd9e58a95.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.229.138.149] helo=localhost) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8r2r-0005Gx-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 03:31:01 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:30:34 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stefan Bertels To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Exchange 2003, IMAP and Pine In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:3eca51e0fb127303c0ecef77cfc6b73c X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, additional note. Setting up another folder collection in pine fails, too: "FolderCollectionName" {server/user=me}&ANY-ffentliche Ordner/[] This collection shows up as empty, but pine does not try to populate it via IMAP RLIST (seen in Journal, debug=4). Best regards Stefan

    GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

    Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
    more money and the respect of all?

     
  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

     



    Confidentiality assured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome