From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 4 12:54:03 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g74Js32P004647 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:54:03 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 04 12:54:02 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g74Js2XF029374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:54:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g74JpnR8015506; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:51:51 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g74JmmeY098152 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:48:48 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 04 12:48:47 2002 -0700 Received: from hanford.psnw.com (hanford.psnw.com [209.107.130.9]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g74JmlR8029672 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:48:47 -0700 Received: from [216.126.156.160] (04-160.119.popsite.net [216.126.156.160]) by hanford.psnw.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A1162DC for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:52:46 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: the teach To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Setting up the URL browser MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: ababion@mail.isg.siue.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am using PCPine 4.4 on my computer. I want to use Netscape to activate URLs. Although the path for netscape.exe is listed in my configuration, Pine insists on loading Explore, but does not insert the URL. I have to copy/paste the URL into the location bar. Any suggestions on how to get the URL to pop up in Netscape and find automatically? alex babione -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 5 11:03:06 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g75I352P002025 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:03:05 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 11:03:05 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g75I34XF023467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:03:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g75I1lR8024628; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:01:47 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g75HvQeY093124 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:57:26 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 10:57:25 2002 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g75HvPR8013247 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:57:25 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 10:57:25 2002 -0700 Received: from mse2.com ([61.149.22.232]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g75HvGXE023246 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:57:20 -0700 Received: (qmail 32477 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 02:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay) (165.108.154.45) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 02:46:27 -0000 Message-Id: <200208051757.g75HvGXE023246@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:48:38 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Öйú¿Æѧ¼¼Êõ´óѧÈí¼þ¹¤³Ì˶ʿMSEÕÐÉú Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312_CHARSET" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ÄúºÃ£º ÄãÏë³ÉΪ¹ú¼ÊÒ»Á÷µÄÈí¼þ¹¤³Ì¹ÜÀíÈ˲ÅÂ𣿠ÄãÏë³ÉΪ¸÷´ó¹«Ë¾¾ºÏàÕùƸ¡¢ÔÂнÓâÍò¡¢ÁîÈËÏÛĽµÄÈí¼þ½ðÁìÂ𣿠±¨¿¼Öйú¿Æѧ¼¼Êõ´óѧÈí¼þ¹¤³Ì˶ʿMSE£¬ÎÞÒÉ»áÈÃÄãÃÀÃγÉÕ棡 Öйú¿Æѧ¼¼Êõ´óѧÈí¼þ¹¤³Ì˶ʿMSE£¬ÊÇÃÀ¹ú¹è¹È+ÖйúÃûУǿǿÁªÊÖÅàÑø¹ú¼Ê»¯MSEµÄµä·¶£¬³ä·ÖÀûÓùú¼ÊÒ»Á÷µÄ¼¼ÊõºÍʦ×Ê£¬¼È±£Ö¤Ëù´«ÊÚ֪ʶµÄÇ°Õ°ÐÔ£¬ÓÖ±£Ö¤Ñ§Éú¶ÔÖйúÊг¡ºÍITÐÐÒµµÄÍêÈ«¼æÈÝÐÔ£¬½«È«Çò»¯Óë±¾ÍÁ»¯ÍêÃÀµØ½áºÏÆðÀ´¡£ ÓûÏêϸÁ˽âÖйú¿Æѧ¼¼Êõ´óѧÈí¼þ¹¤³Ì˶ʿMSEÕÐÉúÇé¿ö£¬Çëµã»÷http://anbow.focus.com.cn/ ¡£¿ÉÍøÉϱ¨Ãû¡£ ±¨Ãû½Øֹʱ¼ä£º7ÔÂ31ÈÕ powered by www.mailer.com.cn From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 5 18:56:15 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g761uF2P017285 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:56:15 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 18:56:14 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g761uDnv014433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:56:13 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g761skqt027952; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:54:46 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g761oDeY090216 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:50:13 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 18:50:12 2002 -0700 Received: from web.prtel.com (web.prtel.com [206.10.97.130]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g761oCR8006159 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:50:12 -0700 Received: from amdmp (ff-xdsl-154.prtel.com [199.199.250.154] (may be forged)) by web.prtel.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g761o8jG011964 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:50:11 -0500 Message-Id: <002401c23ceb$937ed860$9afac7c7@amdmp> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:50:00 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Kyle Kallstrom" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Sending body of message as html from the command line (outgoing.patch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01C23CC1.AA6ADD00" X-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C23CC1.AA6ADD00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Has anyone ever tried to include a body of a message as html from the command line? Using a sending-filter like one on this list a while back: sending-filters=//mime_types _TMPFILE_ _MIMETYPE_ Where: mime_types is: #!/bin/sh echo "Content-Type:text/html" > $2 That works fine from within perl's gui, but say if you use: pine -I '^X,y' -subject 'the subject line' -attach myfile.ps < messageBody.html with the outgoing.patch, it doesn't pay attention to any of the settings you've setup (just sending the messageBody as plain text (TEXT/PLAIN). Then if you remove the " -I '^X,y' ", and it brings you into pine's gui, you hit ^X,y and it works fine! Sending the redirected input fine! It's a crazy thing and I don't know if anyone will understand what I'm getting at, but its worth a try. Also, I've found that you can do it inline iff you use '-attach messageBody.html', w/o any additional attachments or redirected message body's. Then the option header shows the correct text/html. Has anyone ever successfully done this, is there another way of going about this..perhaps a way of specifying each individual attachment's type in-line (via the command line). I'd like to be able to make a doc in html, have it look decent with an additional attachment included. Ideally, it would be cool to use inline display of an html attachment, but I know some people frown on that sort of thing. The pine version I'm using is pine 4.44 with all.patch compiled in. Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C23CC1.AA6ADD00 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIFvjCCAn4w ggHnoAMCAQICAwcJkDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCBkjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdl c3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZUaGF3dGUxHTAbBgNVBAsT FENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9QZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBSU0EgMjAw MC44LjMwMB4XDTAyMDMyMTAyMTYzMVoXDTAzMDMyMTAyMTYzMVowRDEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3Rl IEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSa2FsbHN0cmtAcHJ0ZWwuY29tMIGfMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCxXXkP2sCyPw4V3e1YVhY1NBMwbfczUjSNByXLQlZ5VwEn pOmLRuHeV9euNp0ddYFa7kS1Stoe66WvRXcykzecxp/1wJ+Q80RI/usVAR7EQtq8MLyo3LiE8UAN 5q+KGx656KkQvMeUem8u19LYRoT66Gq/JyvOxf4/IkrYEPhkAQIDAQABoy8wLTAdBgNVHREEFjAU gRJrYWxsc3Rya0BwcnRlbC5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQCI8tcf uX/HENrMG7r8qBIyyl/VW1oUwm0PQGeVRZRmMMPGtE52qkWza+v/LR8ceT4/MxJ2J76yno5o5rZR UIvQQd+RWV7t9rNlKEp4s7VWCAqXnbjUUQNnImP9OZ4cQSqdXIGi65Ig+Nbs95gfrMfMX/pVKKcU hqveM9CH6pnZPzCCAzgwggKhoAMCAQICEGZFcrfMdPXPY3ZFhNAukQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAw gdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93 bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2Vy dmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMDA4MzAwMDAwMDBa Fw0wNDA4MjcyMzU5NTlaMIGSMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIw EAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xDzANBgNVBAoTBlRoYXd0ZTEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUg U2VydmljZXMxKDAmBgNVBAMTH1BlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIFJTQSAyMDAwLjguMzAwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAN4zMqZjxwklRT7SbngnZ4HF2ogZgpcO40QpimM1Km1wPPrc rvfudG8wvDOQf/k0caCjbZjxw0+iZdsN+kvx1t1hpfmFzVWaNRqdknWoJ67Ycvm6AvbXsJHeHOmr 4BgDqHxDQlBRh4M88Dm0m1SKE4f/s5udSWYALQmJ7JRr6aFpAgMBAAGjTjBMMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCk HjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwxLTI5NzASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMAsGA1Ud DwQEAwIBBjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQAxsUtHXfkBceX1U2xdedY9mMAmE2KBIqcS+CKV6BtJ tyd7BDm6/ObyJOuR+r3sDSo491BVqGz3Da1MG7wD9LXrokefbKIMWI0xQgkRbLAaadErErJAXWr5 edDqLiXdiuT82w0fnQLzWtvKPPZE6iZph39Ins6ln+eE2MliYq0FxjGCA2kwggNlAgEBMIGaMIGS MQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24x DzANBgNVBAoTBlRoYXd0ZTEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMxKDAmBgNVBAMT H1BlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIFJTQSAyMDAwLjguMzACAwcJkDAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICJDAYBgkq hkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wMjA4MDYwMTUwMDBaMCMGCSqG SIb3DQEJBDEWBBQnyR/N8FvsPJQ4mSGXL5KTMeqQvDBnBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xWjBYMAoGCCqGSIb3 DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIB KDAHBgUrDgMCGjAKBggqhkiG9w0CBTCBqwYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGdMIGaMIGSMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xDzANBgNVBAoTBlRo YXd0ZTEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMxKDAmBgNVBAMTH1BlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIFJTQSAyMDAwLjguMzACAwcJkDCBrQYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgZ2ggZowgZIxCzAJBgNV BAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEPMA0GA1UE ChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29u YWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDIwMDAuOC4zMAIDBwmQMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGANu7eO/I80iyw idoA6LWdaxkUh8eazV9zNQXQfkAXr9TkhBuviepKG4nbN2PjIgkgsOQdEyes7MRTtJ3WfZCLEJeh sNSoeBJ9P390SSDl5EtIqZGx54lFqnplBsjB4A9wstAIQIAT2e3Q/NdmJ7wf+MP+QwRpiyO9BnJi gvmY5OEAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C23CC1.AA6ADD00-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 5 21:36:53 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g764aq2P020452 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:36:52 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 21:36:51 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g764aonv017604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:36:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g764ZMqt022568; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:35:22 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g764WNeY087030 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:32:23 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 05 21:32:23 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.214]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g764WMJX012958 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:32:22 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g764WJS23250 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:32:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.196]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g764WIp27544 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:32:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g764WFg18865 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:32:15 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080612294916363 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2002 12:29:49 +0800 Message-Id: <004a01c23d02$537fd270$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 12:32:51 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "lek" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Automating send mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0047_01C23D45.619CF7F0" X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01C23D45.619CF7F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, is there any options/command that I can use in order to send mail in = PINE automatically from command line withour pressing ^X ?? =20 Regards, Lim Eng Keong =20 ******************************* Systems Analyst =20 Information System Section Planning Department NEC Semiconductors (M) Sdn. Bhd. Tel: 03-3123 2268 (Direct Line) 03-3122 6201 (ext 6349) Fax: 03-3527 048 Email: nick-lek@sem.nec.co.jp ******************************* =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01C23D45.619CF7F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, is there any options/command that I can use in order to send = mail in=20 PINE automatically from command line withour pressing ^X ??

 

Regards,
Lim Eng Keong

 

*******************************

Systems Analyst  =20

Information System Section

Planning Department

NEC Semiconductors (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Tel:  03-3123 2268 (Direct Line)

       = 03-3122=20 6201 (ext 6349)
Fax: 03-3527 048

Email:=20 nick-lek@sem.nec.co.jp
*******************************
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0047_01C23D45.619CF7F0-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 6 16:44:59 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g76Nix2P027656 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:44:59 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 06 16:44:58 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g76NivIH005759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:44:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g76NhrlZ014760; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:43:53 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g76NfWeY061210 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:41:32 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 06 16:41:32 2002 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g76NfVs8005144 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:41:32 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 06 16:41:31 2002 -0700 Received: from mail.aurora.edu (mail.aurora.edu [64.107.89.49]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g76NfVXE010895 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:41:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (slowe@localhost) by mail.aurora.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g76NfU0V289871 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:41:30 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:41:30 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: Steve Lowe Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Lowe To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-Pine -- Non-Secure Mode Only MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Information List X-X-Sender: slowe@mail.aurora.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Our new system administrator just completed upgrading SSH, along with upgrading openssl. Since then, I can only get to my mail server in a non-secure mode using PC-Pine. Any suggestions? Other applications using SSH appear to work correctly. -- Steve Lowe Aurora University ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 06 Aug 2002 15:47:25 -0500 From: Dave Basener To: Steve Lowe Subject: SSL Version Steve, The new SSHD was compiled using openssl-0.9.6e. Dave -- This mail is certified virus-free by using Linux. David Basener System Administrator dbasener@aurora.edu Aurora University 630 844 4889 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 6 20:46:45 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g773kj2P000397 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:46:45 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 06 20:46:44 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g773kfXF016424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:46:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g773jhqt012876; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:45:43 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g773hMeY069612 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:43:23 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 06 20:43:22 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp [210.143.35.52]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g773hJJX011661 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:43:21 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.195]) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g773hHM12027 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:43:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g773hHX10688 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:43:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g773hGl08922 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:43:16 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080711404027908 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 11:40:40 +0800 Message-Id: <013e01c23dc4$a10f3d10$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:43:44 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "lek" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Attn to Kyle: Automating send mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi Kyle, Sorry I couldnt send mail to you directly cause I dont have the digital ID. Thanks a lot for your information. I already download the patch file for Pine version 4.20. Anyway, we need to compile Pine in order to apply the patch. Can you tell me how to compile Pine? Besides that, do you know normally where is the source code of Pine stored ? Thank you very much. Regards, Lim ----- Original Message ----- From: Kyle Kallstrom To: 'lek' Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Automating send mail Hey Lim, Yeah, there is. You need to install the outgoing.patch . You can get it from http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/. It is called "Pine sends e-mail from the command line". You can follow the instructions on that page to find out how to use it. If ya need any pointers, let me know. Thanks. ~Kyle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 7 00:49:46 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g777nk2P006236 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:49:46 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 00:49:45 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g777ncIH015849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:49:38 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g777lUqt016794; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:47:30 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g777i9eY011178 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:44:09 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 00:44:08 2002 -0700 Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail2.sonytel.be [195.0.45.172]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g777i7JX014807 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:44:08 -0700 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [10.17.0.26]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA21661 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:44:01 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:44:01 +0200 (MEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine and multi NNTP servers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, There are few question which still bothering me about News and Pine. 1) The first is about multi NNTP servers and way how the pine uses them to send a post to the news groups. The problem occurs when I try to post a message to the one NNTP server from one news collection defined like this: NEWS - SONY News groups on news.sonytel.be/nntp NEWS - Arch Pan (Wroc³aw) News groups on news.arch.pan.wroc.pl/nntp/user=murphy Then normal reaction is to set both NNTP severs to the "nntp-server" field in the SETUP CONFIGURATION screen, but this solution doesn't work so nice because it try to send a message using each news server from the specified list as long as it find the correct one. I think the Pine should take the server name from a collection definition list, not from "nntp-server" list in case when the server is not defined in the "nntp-server" or there is more nntp servers defined in the collection list. 2) The second issue is a problem when the different NNTP servers contains this same news group names. In this case there is no way to define some role which will explicitly recognise which NNTP server to use to send a post to the news groups. Using the previous collection definition, where each one can contain a group named "alt.news", posting to the group we have only the "alt.news" in the "Newsgrps:" header field and no info about which NNTP server will be used to send this message. There is also no rule to NNTP servers, either in a pure Pine 4.44 or patched version. 3) There is no way to refresh and automatically download a new posted messages from a opened newsgroup message index. Shortcut CTRL+L doesn't work for this screen. Only opening the another folder and go back to the newsgroup window can help this or closing a Pine and open it again. Assuming: Looks like a Pine at this moment is not able to fully handle a newsgroups trough a NNTP servers. Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 7 01:58:21 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g778wL2P009949 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:58:21 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 01:58:19 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g778wIIH017483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:58:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g778uueo077694; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:56:56 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g778sSeY042784 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:54:29 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 01:54:28 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.214]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g778sRJX024468 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:54:27 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g778sQ616707 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:54:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g778sPp14148 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:54:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g778sOl10253 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:54:24 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080716514811872 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 16:51:48 +0800 Message-Id: <00c101c23df0$185d7aa0$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:54:52 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "lek" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: install pine 4.44 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi. I already downloaded the latest Pine version 4.44 source code, which is contained in the pine.tar.Z. Can anyone tell me how to recompile Pine program and install it and apply patch for it from the pine.tar.Z file? Currently I am using Pine 4.20. I also downloaded a patch file in order to make Pine can send mail from command line. According to Pine web site, to apply the patch, we need to compile Pine first, then apply the patch and then compile again. How to compile Pine? Where is the source code? Patch Pine 4.20 or install Pine 4.44, which one is easier and safer? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 7 07:43:30 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g77EhT2P021283 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:43:29 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 07:43:28 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g77EhMIH024677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:43:23 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g77EgKeo079882; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:42:20 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g77EeneY042996 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:40:49 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 07:40:48 2002 -0700 Received: from smtp.uvm.edu (badger-ssl.uvm.edu [132.198.101.194]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g77EelJX009655 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:40:48 -0700 Received: from elk.uvm.edu (elk.uvm.edu [132.198.101.63]) by smtp.uvm.edu (8.11.6/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g77Eel117828 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 10:40:47 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 10:40:47 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: install pine 4.44 In-Reply-To: <00c101c23df0$185d7aa0$48061cac@2rewoks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ashawley@elk.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/installation.html (?) -- __________________________________________ PINE 4.44 Mailer - www.washington.edu/pine From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 7 17:45:42 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g780jg2P019539 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:45:42 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 17:45:41 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g780jcIH016317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:45:38 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g780ikR8057442; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:44:46 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g780hLeY015496 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:43:22 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 17:43:21 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp [210.143.35.52]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g780hJR8015668 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:43:20 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.195]) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g780hIM09537 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:43:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g780hIX23458 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:43:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g780hGl01818 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:43:17 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080808404004856 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 08:40:40 +0800 Message-Id: <001501c23e74$a7e079f0$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:43:47 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Lim Eng Keong" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Attn to Kyle : Install PINE 4.44 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "PINE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Halo Kyle, I am using Turbo Linux as my server OS. I downloaded the file named "pine.tar.Z". If we compile the new PINE, it wont affect other program in my server rite? If compilation failed, can I still use back the old PINE (the one I use currently) ? Thank you. Regards, Nick Lim Eng Keong -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 7 18:51:29 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g781pT2P021144 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:51:29 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 18:51:28 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g781pRXF023863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:51:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g781nXlZ020180; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:49:33 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g781mOeY100430 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:48:24 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 18:48:24 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.214]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g781mMR8028830 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:48:23 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.197]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g781mI605136 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:48:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g781mHD06268 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:48:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g781mFl21606 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:48:15 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080809453828042 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:45:38 +0800 Message-Id: <00ef01c23e7d$bbb76e30$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:48:46 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Lim Eng Keong" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Install PINE 4.44 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00EC_01C23EC0.C9D18670" X-To: "PINE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EC_01C23EC0.C9D18670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I just downloaded the lastest PINE source code from PINE website. = The file name called pine.tar.Z. How can I extract this file in order to = get the source code? I am using Turbo Linux as my server OS. Thank you = very much. =20 Regards, Lim Eng Keong =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_00EC_01C23EC0.C9D18670 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, I just downloaded the lastest PINE source code from PINE = website. The=20 file name called pine.tar.Z. How can I extract this file in order to get = the=20 source code? I am using Turbo Linux as my server OS. Thank you very = much.

 

Regards,
Lim Eng Keong

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_00EC_01C23EC0.C9D18670-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 7 23:09:54 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7869s2P026460 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:09:54 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 23:09:53 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7869nXF028840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:09:50 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7868leo023832; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:08:48 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7866meY087874 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:06:48 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 23:06:47 2002 -0700 Received: from ns1.syntegra.com (ns1.syntegra.com [150.143.16.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7866ks8020778 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:06:47 -0700 Received: from [129.179.17.10] by ns1.syntegra.com with ESMTP; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:06:45 Z Received: from misty.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:06:41 +0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:06:41 +0800 Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Install PINE 4.44 In-Reply-To: <00ef01c23e7d$bbb76e30$48061cac@2rewoks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Lim Eng Keong" X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN tar -zxf pine.tar.Z -----Original Message----- From: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Lim Eng Keong Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 09:49 To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Install PINE 4.44 Hi, I just downloaded the lastest PINE source code from PINE website. The file name called pine.tar.Z. How can I extract this file in order to get the source code? I am using Turbo Linux as my server OS. Thank you very much. Regards, Lim Eng Keong From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 00:04:00 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g787402P027983 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:04:00 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:03:58 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7873vXF030291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:03:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7873Eqt033766; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:03:14 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g786wSeY061184 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:58:28 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 07 23:58:27 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp [210.143.35.52]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g786wPJX013432 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:58:26 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g786wOM06447 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:58:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.196]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g786wOp15081 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:58:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g786wMl27956 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:58:22 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080814554913393 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 14:55:49 +0800 Message-Id: <01ab01c23ea9$11094310$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:58:57 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Lim Eng Keong" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.44 Installation Error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "PINE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi. I just try to compile Pine 4.44 but it failed. I am using the Turbo Linux 6.0.5 as my OS. Follow listed the step when I compiled Pine 4.44 : 1) ./build clean 2) ./build lnx Is it because the target platform? I am using Pine 4.20 currently. I copied down the message displayed while I compiled Pine 4.44( see attachment). Anyone who know how to solve this problem please reply to me. Thank you very much. Regards, Lim Eng Keong ******************************* Systems Analyst Information System Section Planning Department NEC Semiconductors (M) Sdn. Bhd. Tel: 03-3123 2268 (Direct Line) 03-3122 6201 (ext 6349) Fax: 03-3527 048 Email: nick-lek@sem.nec.co.jp ******************************* -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 00:27:02 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g787R22P028489 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:27:02 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:27:01 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g787R0IH025166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:27:00 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g787PfR8034084; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:25:41 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7872teY036444 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:02:55 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:02:55 2002 -0700 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.214]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7872sJX014512 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:02:54 -0700 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.195]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g7872o625406 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:02:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailsv2.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.196]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g7872nX14929 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:02:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from necsem_navgw. ([172.28.2.130]) by mailsv2.nec.co.jp (8.11.3/3.7W-MAILSV2-NEC) with SMTP id g7872jl29158 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:02:46 +0900 (JST) Received: (from 2rewoks [172.28.6.72]) by necsem_navgw. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2002080815000810754 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 15:00:08 +0800 Message-Id: <01c301c23ea9$ab2837d0$48061cac@2rewoks> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:03:16 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Lim Eng Keong" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.44 Installation Error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01C0_01C23EEC.B9425010" X-To: "PINE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01C0_01C23EEC.B9425010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. I just try to compile Pine 4.44 but it failed. I am using the Turbo Linux 6.0.5 as my OS. Follow listed the step when I compiled Pine 4.44 : 1) ./build clean 2) ./build lnx Is it because the target platform? I am using Pine 4.20 currently. I copied down the message displayed while I compiled Pine 4.44( see attachment). Anyone who know how to solve this problem please reply to me. Thank you very much. Regards, Lim Eng Keong ------=_NextPart_000_01C0_01C23EEC.B9425010 Content-Type: text/plain; name="pineErr.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pineErr.txt" make args are CC=3Dcc lnx Making c-client library, imapd, and ipopd eval make CC=3Dcc SPECIALS=3D lnx make[1]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap' make[1]: `lnxok' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap' Applying an process to sources... tools/an "ln -s" src/c-client c-client tools/an "ln -s" src/ansilib c-client tools/an "ln -s" src/charset c-client tools/an "ln -s" src/osdep/unix c-client tools/an "ln -s" src/mtest mtest tools/an "ln -s" src/ipopd ipopd tools/an "ln -s" src/imapd imapd ln -s tools/an . make build EXTRACFLAGS=3D'' EXTRALDFLAGS=3D'' EXTRADRIVERS=3D'mbox' = EXTRAAUTHENTICATORS=3D'' PASSWDTYPE=3Dstd SSLTYPE=3Dnone = EXTRASPECIALS=3D'' BUILDTYPE=3Dlnx make[1]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap' Building c-client for lnx... echo `cat SPECIALS` > c-client/SPECIALS cd c-client;make lnx EXTRACFLAGS=3D''\ EXTRALDFLAGS=3D''\ EXTRADRIVERS=3D'mbox'\ EXTRAAUTHENTICATORS=3D''\ PASSWDTYPE=3Dstd SSLTYPE=3Dnone\ make[2]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' You are building for traditional Linux *without* shadow passwords and with the crypt function in the C library. If your system has shadow passwords, or if crypt is not in the C library, you must use slx, sl4, or sl5 instead! make build EXTRACFLAGS=3D'' EXTRALDFLAGS=3D'' EXTRADRIVERS=3D'mbox' = EXTRAAUTHENTICATORS=3D'' PASSWDTYPE=3Dstd SSLTYPE=3Dnone `cat SPECIALS` = OS=3Dlnx \ SIGTYPE=3Dpsx CRXTYPE=3Dnfs \ SPOOLDIR=3D/var/spool \ ACTIVEFILE=3D/var/lib/news/active \ RSHPATH=3D/usr/bin/rsh \ BASECFLAGS=3D"-g -O" make[3]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' sh -c 'rm -rf auths.c crexcl.c nfstest.c linkage.[ch] siglocal.c = osdep*.[ch] *.o ARCHIVE *FLAGS *TYPE c-client.a || true' Once-only environment setup... echo cc > CCTYPE echo -g -O '' > CFLAGS echo -DCREATEPROTO=3Dunixproto -DEMPTYPROTO=3Dunixproto \ -DMAILSPOOL=3D\"/var/spool/mail\" \ -DANONYMOUSHOME=3D\"/var/spool/mail/anonymous\" \ -DACTIVEFILE=3D\"/var/lib/news/active\" = -DNEWSSPOOL=3D\"/var/spool/news\" \ -DRSHPATH=3D\"/usr/bin/rsh\" -DLOCKPGM=3D\"/etc/mlock\" > OSCFLAGS echo > LDFLAGS echo "ar rc c-client.a mail.o misc.o newsrc.o smanager.o osdep.o utf8.o = siglocal.o dummy.o pseudo.o netmsg.o flstring.o fdstring.o rfc822.o = nntp.o smtp.o imap4r1.o pop3.o unix.o mbox.o mbx.o mmdf.o tenex.o mtx.o = news.o phile.o mh.o mx.o;ranlib c-client.a" > ARCHIVE ./drivers mbox imap nntp pop3 mh mx mbx tenex mtx mmdf unix news phile = dummy ./mkauths md5 pla log make[4]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' echo -DMD5ENABLE=3D\"/etc/cram-md5.pwd\" >> OSCFLAGS make[4]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' ln -s os_lnx.h osdep.h ln -s os_lnx.c osdepbas.c ln -s log_std.c osdeplog.c ln -s sig_psx.c siglocal.c ln -s crx_nfs.c crexcl.c sh -c '(test -f /usr/include/sys/statvfs.h -a lnx !=3D sc5 -a lnx !=3D = sco) && ln -s nfstnew.c nfstest.c || ln -s nfstold.c nfstest.c' Standard password authentication ln -s ckp_std.c osdepckp.c Building without SSL support ln -s ssl_none.c osdepssl.c cat osdepbas.c osdepckp.c osdeplog.c osdepssl.c > osdep.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mail.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` misc.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` newsrc.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` smanager.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` `cat OSCFLAGS` -c osdep.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` utf8.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` siglocal.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` dummy.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` pseudo.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` netmsg.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` flstring.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` fdstring.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` rfc822.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` nntp.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` smtp.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` imap4r1.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` pop3.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` unix.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mbox.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mbx.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mmdf.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` tenex.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mtx.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` news.c news.c: In function `news_open': news.c:300: warning: passing arg 3 of `scandir' from incompatible = pointer type `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` phile.c `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mh.c mh.c: In function `mh_ping': mh.c:639: warning: passing arg 3 of `scandir' from incompatible pointer = type mh.c: In function `mh_append': mh.c:896: warning: passing arg 3 of `scandir' from incompatible pointer = type `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` mx.c mx.c: In function `mx_ping': mx.c:582: warning: passing arg 3 of `scandir' from incompatible pointer = type sh -c 'rm -rf c-client.a || true' ar rc c-client.a mail.o misc.o newsrc.o smanager.o osdep.o utf8.o = siglocal.o dummy.o pseudo.o netmsg.o flstring.o fdstring.o rfc822.o = nntp.o smtp.o imap4r1.o pop3.o unix.o mbox.o mbx.o mmdf.o tenex.o mtx.o = news.o phile.o mh.o mx.o;ranlib c-client.a make[3]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' make[2]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' echo lnx > OSTYPE touch rebuild sh -c 'rm -rf rebuild || true' Building bundled tools... cd mtest;make make[2]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/mtest' cc -I../c-client `cat ../c-client/CFLAGS` -c -o mtest.o mtest.c cc -I../c-client `cat ../c-client/CFLAGS` -o mtest mtest.o = ../c-client/c-client.a `cat ../c-client/LDFLAGS` mtest.o: In function `prompt': /calc/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/mtest/mtest.c:517: the `gets' function is = dangerous and should not be used. ../c-client/c-client.a(osdep.o): In function `checkpw': /calc/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client/osdep.c:77: undefined reference to = `crypt' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [mtest] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/mtest' make[1]: *** [bundled] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap' make: *** [lnx] Error 2 Making Pico and Pilot make CC=3Dcc -f makefile.lnx rm -f os.h ln -s osdep/os-lnx.h os.h cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o main.o = main.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o attach.o = attach.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o basic.o = basic.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o bind.o = bind.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o browse.o = browse.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o buffer.o = buffer.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o composer.o = composer.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o display.o = display.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o file.o = file.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o fileio.o = fileio.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o line.o = line.c cd osdep; make includer os-lnx.c; cd .. make[1]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/pico/osdep' cc -o includer includer.c ./includer < os-lnx.ic > os-lnx.c make[1]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/pico/osdep' rm -f pico_os.c ln -s osdep/os-lnx.c pico_os.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o pico_os.o = pico_os.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o pico.o = pico.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o random.o = random.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o region.o = region.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o search.o = search.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o window.o = window.c cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c -o word.o = word.c ar ru libpico.a attach.o basic.o bind.o browse.o buffer.o composer.o = display.o file.o fileio.o line.o pico_os.o pico.o random.o region.o = search.o window.o word.o ranlib libpico.a cc -g -DDEBUG -Dlnx -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE main.o libpico.a = -lncurses -o pico /usr/bin/ld: cannot open -lncurses: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [pico] Error 1 Making Pine and rpload/rpdump. make CC=3Dcc -f makefile.lnx rm -f os.h ln -s osdep/os-lnx.h os.h ./cmplhlp2.sh < pine.hlp > helptext.h cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o addrbook.o = addrbook.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o adrbkcmd.o = adrbkcmd.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o adrbklib.o = adrbklib.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o args.o = args.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o bldaddr.o = bldaddr.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o context.o = context.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o filter.o = filter.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o folder.o = folder.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o help.o = help.c ./cmplhelp.sh < pine.hlp > helptext.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o helptext.o = helptext.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o imap.o = imap.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o init.o = init.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o mailcap.o = mailcap.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o mailcmd.o = mailcmd.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o mailindx.o = mailindx.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o mailpart.o = mailpart.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o mailview.o = mailview.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o newmail.o = newmail.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o other.o = other.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o pine.o = pine.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o reply.o = reply.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o screen.o = screen.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o send.o = send.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o signals.o = signals.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o status.o = status.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o strings.o = strings.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o takeaddr.o = takeaddr.c cd osdep; make includer os-lnx.c; cd .. make[1]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/pine/osdep' cc -o includer includer.c ./includer < os-lnx.ic > os-lnx.c make[1]: Leaving directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/pine/osdep' rm -f os.c ln -s osdep/os-lnx.c os.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o os.o os.c echo "char datestamp[]=3D"\"`date`\"";" > date.c echo "char hoststamp[]=3D"\"`hostname`\"";" >> date.c cc -g -DDEBUG -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=3D\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -o pine addrbook.o = adrbkcmd.o adrbklib.o args.o bldaddr.o context.o filter.o folder.o = help.o helptext.o imap.o init.o mailcap.o mailcmd.o mailindx.o = mailpart.o mailview.o newmail.o other.o pine.o reply.o screen.o send.o = signals.o status.o strings.o takeaddr.o os.o date.c ../pico/libpico.a = ../c-client/c-client.a -lncurses `cat ../c-client/LDFLAGS` /usr/bin/ld: cannot open -lncurses: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [pine] Error 1 Links to executables are in bin directory: size: bin/pine: No such file or directory size: bin/mtest: No such file or directory size: bin/imapd: No such file or directory size: bin/pico: No such file or directory size: bin/pilot: No such file or directory size: bin/rpdump: No such file or directory size: bin/rpload: No such file or directory size: bin/ipop2d: No such file or directory size: bin/ipop3d: No such file or directory Done ------=_NextPart_000_01C0_01C23EEC.B9425010-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 00:29:09 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g787T82P028593 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:29:08 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:29:08 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g787T0XF030772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:29:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g787SIR8028314; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:28:18 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g787NdeY061436 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:23:39 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:23:38 2002 -0700 Received: from ns1.syntegra.com (ns1.syntegra.com [150.143.16.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g787Nbs8031974 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:23:38 -0700 Received: from [129.179.17.10] by ns1.syntegra.com with ESMTP; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:23:36 Z Received: from misty.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:23:21 +0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:23:22 +0800 Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Pine 4.44 Installation Error In-Reply-To: <01ab01c23ea9$11094310$48061cac@2rewoks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Lim Eng Keong" X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > Hi. I just try to compile Pine 4.44 but it failed. I am using the Turbo > Linux 6.0.5 as my OS. Follow listed the step when I compiled Pine 4.44 : > 1) ./build clean > 2) ./build lnx > > Is it because the target platform? I am using Pine 4.20 currently. I copied > down the message displayed while I compiled Pine 4.44( see attachment). > Anyone who know how to solve this problem please reply to me. I don't believe attachments survive the distribution list SW. Best to cut'n paste. Have you tried Linux platforms other than "lnx"? Ed From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 00:54:12 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g787sC2P029240 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:54:12 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:54:11 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g787s8XF031424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:54:08 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g787r3qt032802; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:53:03 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g787qBeY094582 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:52:11 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:52:10 2002 -0700 Received: from gort.cjb.net (dsl-65-184-132-241.telocity.com [65.184.132.241]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g787qAbq001703 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:52:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gort.cjb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A41B6FA for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Satya To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 Installation Error In-Reply-To: <01c301c23ea9$ab2837d0$48061cac@2rewoks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: satyap@gort.cjb.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Aug 8, 2002 at 15:03, Lim Eng Keong wrote: >Hi. I just try to compile Pine 4.44 but it failed. I am using the Turbo >Linux 6.0.5 as my OS. Follow listed the step when I compiled Pine 4.44 : >1) ./build clean >2) ./build lnx You don't have ncurses. You don't have crypt(). I don't know where you'd get crypt. -- Satya. As I said before, I never repeat myself. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 01:01:56 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7881t2P029464 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:01:55 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 01:01:55 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7881UIH025982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:01:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7880Beo083828; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:00:11 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g787wkeY103934 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:58:46 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 00:58:45 2002 -0700 Received: from ns1.syntegra.com (ns1.syntegra.com [150.143.16.2]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g787wjbq002398 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:58:45 -0700 Received: from [129.179.17.10] by ns1.syntegra.com with ESMTP; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:58:44 Z Received: from misty.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:58:40 +0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:58:41 +0800 Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Pine 4.44 Installation Error In-Reply-To: <01c301c23ea9$ab2837d0$48061cac@2rewoks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Lim Eng Keong" X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > Is it because the target platform? I am using Pine 4.20 currently. I copied > down the message displayed while I compiled Pine 4.44( see attachment). > Anyone who know how to solve this problem please reply to me. When you read the attachment you sent you see the following statement... make[2]: Entering directory `/calc_pkg/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client' You are building for traditional Linux *without* shadow passwords and with the crypt function in the C library. If your system has shadow passwords, or if crypt is not in the C library, you must use slx, sl4, or sl5 instead! And then later in the attempt to build you see... /calc/dmp/dmp/pine4.44/imap/c-client/osdep.c:77: undefined reference to `crypt' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [mtest] Error 1 Hummm...do you see a pattern starting to develop? Ed From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 01:16:22 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g788GM2P029839 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:16:22 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 01:16:20 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g788GAIH026224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:16:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g788FElZ030798; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:15:14 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g788EDeY103790 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:14:13 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 01:14:12 2002 -0700 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g788ECs8006163 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:14:12 -0700 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g788E8C06849 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 04:14:08 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 04:14:08 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: problems with 8-bit characters (such as German umlauts) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: mharris owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: mharris@devserv.devel.redhat.com X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN PINE 4.44 (and possibly older versions) seems to have problems with German umlauts being used. The full bug details are available in Red Hat bugzilla at: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70518 Is anyone aware of a bugfix for this problem? -- Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3 Red Hat Inc. http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 01:34:45 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g788Yj2P030283 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:34:45 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 01:34:44 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g788YiXF032163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:34:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g788XsR8015422; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:33:54 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g788WpeY084946 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:32:52 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 01:32:51 2002 -0700 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g788WoR8028353 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:32:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g788Wfp10481; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 04:32:41 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 04:32:41 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: [pine] problems with 8-bit characters (such as German umlauts) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Michael Talbot-Wilson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: mharris owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: mharris@devserv.devel.redhat.com X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Michael Talbot-Wilson wrote: >Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 17:49:52 +0930 (CST) >From: Michael Talbot-Wilson >To: Mike A. Harris >Cc: Pine Discussion Forum >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 >Subject: Re: [pine] problems with 8-bit characters (such as German umlauts) > >At 2002-08-08 04:14 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > >> PINE 4.44 (and possibly older versions) seems to have problems >> with German umlauts being used. The full bug details are >> available in Red Hat bugzilla at: > >Whät kind of pröblëms? The ones in the bug report referenced in my original email. -- Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3 Red Hat Inc. http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 8 06:59:35 2002 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g78DxZ2P006022 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:59:35 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 06:59:34 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g78DxXXF005432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:59:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g78DwAqt012966; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:58:10 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g78Dv2eY079010 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:57:02 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 06:57:01 2002 -0700 Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g78Dv0bq020385 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:57:00 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([12.245.16.87]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020808135700.CHNN19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@[192.168.1.102]> for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:57:00 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joel Boonstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: (b)ounce munges flags (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: joel@amos.gf.gospelcom.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hey there pine folks, I emailed this a few months ago, then forgot about it (there was no discussion about it). But I just noticed this behavior again, and if a new version of pine is happening, this might be an easy thing to fix. Joel -- [ joel boonstra | jboonstra@gospelcom.net ] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:49:43 -0500 (EST) From: Joel Boonstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: (b)ounce munges flags Hey, This may or may not be a bug -- I'v replicated it as far back as 4.33, so I figure someone would've found it by now. But, when I open my inbox (or any mailbox, for that matter), hit 'b' on a message that has the 'new' flag set, then ^C (cancel), the 'new' flag is unset, and the message is no longer flagged as new. Is this the expected behavior? A quick search of the archive reveals no previous report of this. For the record: Redhat 7.1 Pine 4.44 (patched, but replicated with clean builds of everything back to 4.33; versions past that not tested) courier-imap mail server (version available if necessary) -- [ joel boonstra | jboonstra@gospelcom.net ] -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g78EBH2P006326 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:11:17 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 07:11:17 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g78EBGIH032663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:11:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g78EAOqt022758; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:10:24 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g78E9feY059422 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:09:42 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 07:09:41 2002 -0700 Received: from netns02.123multimedia.com (mx2.123multimedia.com [194.250.185.2]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g78E9eR8011907 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:09:41 -0700 Received: from DEVSERV04.tls.123multimedia.com ([192.168.240.2]) by netns02.123multimedia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3663.0); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:07:23 +0200 Message-Id: <488894F51CB0804C9A6BDB09D4CCD94001103BD0@DEVSERV04.tls.123multimedia.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:09:32 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bertrand PEREZ" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PCPine & MS Exchange Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2002 14:07:23.0131 (UTC) FILETIME=[EAB9DCB0:01C23EE4] X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi folks, I have a pb: in our organization (unfortunately like in=20 most of them), the mail is managed via MS Exchange server. I want to use PCPine as email client and it works fine to READ email, I have no pb. When I want to send an email to someone WITHIN the coporate, it works also fine (I use the exchange server as the SMTP server) BUT when I want to send a mail outside, that doesn't work, the exchange server is configure to not accept SMTP requests to outside email addresses :-((( my admins want me to use lookout HUGHH! does anyone knows any kind of "local SMTP" server that will be able to talk with exchange using the same protocol than lookout so that I can configure pine to use the local SMTP which will relay to exchange ???? pcpine ----> local "smtp proxy" ----> MS EXCHANGE thanks a lot/Bertrand -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g78EF22P006425 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:15:02 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 07:14:57 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g78EEuIH032724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:14:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g78EE1eo095870; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:14:01 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g78EDQeY059582 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:13:26 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 08 07:13:26 2002 -0700 Received: from strangeland.kanalen.org (strangeland.kanalen.org [195.54.149.5]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g78EDOs8022471 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:13:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (jesper@localhost) by strangeland.kanalen.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g78EDG431163 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:13:16 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:13:16 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jesper Maartenson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Reopen readonly-folder MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jesper@strangeland.kanalen.org X-PGPKeyID: 0xDD2C1C5F X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi! Sometimes my inbox gets set to READONLY because of me reading my mail through webmail or with IMAP or something like that. Is there someway to reopen the INBOX into readwrite-mode except restarting Pine? /j -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7A7Ob2P014871 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:24:37 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 00:24:37 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7A7OXXF005088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:24:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7A7MGR8003968; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:22:16 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7A72reY080474 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:02:53 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 00:02:51 2002 -0700 Received: from rebecca.tiscali.nl (rebecca.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.181]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7A72oJX024717; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:02:51 -0700 Received: from shell.tiscali.nl (shell.tiscali.nl [195.241.77.35]) by rebecca.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D73F43F9BC; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:02:45 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (cohenb@localhost) by shell.tiscali.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA22203; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:02:44 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:02:44 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bruce Cohen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: mailbox locked by other session MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum , , , X-Authentication-Warning: shell.tiscali.nl: cohenb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN All of a sudden things are happening that have never happened before (pine 4.33/pop3): If something happens during the pine session [(1) can't login, waiting for response from server - manually disconnect session; (2) while logged in Mailbox closed due to access error] then on the next attempt to run pine I can't login: "Mailbox closed by a pop3 session". There is nothing I can do on the unix shell (no pine session still running I could kill). It's happened twice so far, the first time I could log in after 5 minutes (new mail had been delivered in the meantime - maybe that was the problem) - right now I have waited 10 minutes and still can't log in. If anything like this has happened in the past, I could always get right back into pine by simply quitting and starting over. The only time I haven't been able to do that is if there is still a pine session running as a ghost which I could see with the command "ps" and then kill and log right back on. I think something has happened on the pop3 side, but what? (Even if I telnet directly to the popper the same thing happens: can't get in, "mailbox locked by other server") Anyone have any ideas? Thanks Bruce Cohen -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7AHXB2P027399 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:33:11 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 10:33:10 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AHX9XF015502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:33:10 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AHW9eo089000; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:32:09 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AHUMeY034954 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:30:22 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 10:30:21 2002 -0700 Received: from engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu (engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu [141.213.80.24]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AHUKbq017275 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:30:21 -0700 Message-Id: <1C7041B8F9E88F4BA1F23A63FC0CDACDAA02@engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:29:04 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Sobocinski, Todd" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: mailbox locked by other session content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-To: "Bruce Cohen" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This has happened to me with imap when the server-side process didn't die, and held onto the mailbox lock. I bet if you go onto the mail server, you will find your pop3d process still running. New mail never got delivered for me, because the server-side process still had the lock. But maybe with the way you lock, new mail was enough to knock your pop3d process out of its reverie and make it quit. Killing the offending pop3d process should fix it though. (Remove any ".lock" files too, if you're using that style of locking.) Not sure what the ultimate cause of that was though. The problem went away in our last server upgrade, and I don't recall if we ever figured out why the server processes were hanging. Todd -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Cohen [mailto:cohenb@worldonline.nl]=20 Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 3:03 AM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: mailbox locked by other session All of a sudden things are happening that have never happened before (pine 4.33/pop3): If something happens during the pine session [(1) can't login, waiting for response from server - manually disconnect session; (2) while logged in Mailbox closed due to access error] then on the next attempt to run pine I can't login: "Mailbox closed by a pop3 session". There is nothing I can do on the unix shell (no pine session still running I could kill). It's happened twice so far, the first time I could log in after 5 minutes (new mail had been delivered in the meantime - maybe that was the problem) - right now I have waited 10 minutes and still can't log in. If anything like this has happened in the past, I could always get right back into pine by simply quitting and starting over. The only time I haven't been able to do that is if there is still a pine session running as a ghost which I could see with the command "ps" and then kill and log right back on. I think something has happened on the pop3 side, but what? (Even if I telnet directly to the popper the same thing happens: can't get in, "mailbox locked by other server") Anyone have any ideas? Thanks Bruce Cohen --=20 ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:=20 http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7AHnT2P027773 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:49:29 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 10:49:29 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AHnOIH009534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:49:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AHcqeo089034; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:38:52 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AHcJeY033752 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:38:19 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 10:38:19 2002 -0700 Received: from pandora.tiscali.nl (pandora.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.179]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AHcIbq018175 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 10:38:19 -0700 Received: from shell.tiscali.nl (shell.tiscali.nl [195.241.77.35]) by pandora.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1828B39892; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 19:38:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (cohenb@localhost) by shell.tiscali.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA24824; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 19:38:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 19:38:17 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bruce Cohen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: mailbox locked by other session In-Reply-To: <1C7041B8F9E88F4BA1F23A63FC0CDACDAA02@engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Sobocinski, Todd" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: shell.tiscali.nl: cohenb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Problem is I can't kill anything - and I can't logon to the popper either - tried telnetting there - same story. At least I can't by telnetting to port 110 and logging in with USER and PASS: the lock applies there also. Is there a way to just telnet there and see what processes are running? I suppose I could kill it if I could find it since I am the owner. My knowledge of the popper commands is very limited, however, I believe I only know USER, PASS, LIST, DELE (or at least that's all I remember). Is there any documentation to be found on this? Sending mail to myself does seem to help, albeit not immediately - at least at some point within the next half hour I can get back on again - so at some point it manages to get unlocked. Bruce On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Sobocinski, Todd wrote: > This has happened to me with imap when the server-side process didn't > die, and held onto the mailbox lock. I bet if you go onto the mail > server, you will find your pop3d process still running. New mail never > got delivered for me, because the server-side process still had the > lock. But maybe with the way you lock, new mail was enough to knock > your pop3d process out of its reverie and make it quit. Killing the > offending pop3d process should fix it though. (Remove any ".lock" files > too, if you're using that style of locking.) > > Not sure what the ultimate cause of that was though. The problem went > away in our last server upgrade, and I don't recall if we ever figured > out why the server processes were hanging. > > Todd > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Cohen [mailto:cohenb@worldonline.nl] > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 3:03 AM > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: mailbox locked by other session > > > > All of a sudden things are happening that have never happened before > (pine > 4.33/pop3): If something happens during the pine session [(1) can't > login, waiting for response from server - manually disconnect session; > (2) while logged in Mailbox closed due to access error] then on the next > attempt to run pine I can't login: "Mailbox closed by a pop3 session". > There is nothing I can do on the unix shell (no pine session still > running I could kill). It's happened twice so far, the first time I > could log in after 5 minutes (new mail had been delivered in the > meantime - maybe that was the > problem) - right now I have waited 10 minutes and still can't log in. > > If anything like this has happened in the past, I could always get right > back into pine by simply quitting and starting over. The only time I > haven't been able to do that is if there is still a pine session running > as a ghost which I could see with the command "ps" and then kill and log > right back on. > > I think something has happened on the pop3 side, but what? > > (Even if I telnet directly to the popper the same thing happens: can't > get in, "mailbox locked by other server") > > Anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks > > Bruce Cohen > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7AIqj2P028992 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:52:45 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 11:52:44 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AIqiXF016970 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AIoUlZ014854; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:50:31 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AInXeY066536 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:49:33 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 11:49:32 2002 -0700 Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AInQbq026599 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:49:32 -0700 Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7AInOJU013190; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: KHLsv Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Beartooth To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: mailbox locked by other session In-Reply-To: <1C7041B8F9E88F4BA1F23A63FC0CDACDAA04@engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: karhunhammas@saltmine.radix.net X-To: "Sobocinski, Todd" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Sobocinski, Todd wrote: > I would get a shell on the mail server and kill the offending processes. > Obviously, that requires a shell account on the server. And if you're willing to change providers to get a shell, Nancy McGough has a list on her site. Anybody happen to know which of those is good about keeping its pine reasonably up to date? Also, even among ISP's that offer shell accounts, so-called national availability may mean less than meets the eye. Speakeasy claims it, for instance -- but its only "local" dialup in area code 540 is in Fredericksburg, just south of DC, although that area extends to the opposite end of Virginia. -- Beartooth the Stubborn , double retiree, linux hatchling w/ RH 7.2; ssh'd (DSL) to pine 4.43 on ISP's SunOS 5.8; Opera 6.02, Pan 0.11.2, Galeon 1.2.5, & Mozilla 1.0 standard disclaimer : Keep in mind that I have no idea what I am talking about From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7AIut2P029046 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:56:55 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 11:56:54 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AIusIH010887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:56:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AIY3qt028258; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:34:04 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7AIX2eY083664 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:33:02 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 11:33:01 2002 -0700 Received: from engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu (engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu [141.213.80.24]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7AIX1R8024427 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:33:01 -0700 Message-Id: <1C7041B8F9E88F4BA1F23A63FC0CDACDAA04@engin-mail1.engin.umich.edu> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:31:45 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Sobocinski, Todd" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: mailbox locked by other session content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-To: "Bruce Cohen" X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I would get a shell on the mail server and kill the offending processes. Obviously, that requires a shell account on the server. I'm not aware of any documentation, but I didn't look too hard either. It wasn't my primary responsibility at the time, and the problem was fixed on upgrade. It is entirely possible it is a different problem too, since my problem was with imap. Todd -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Cohen [mailto:cohenb@worldonline.nl]=20 Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:38 PM To: Sobocinski, Todd Cc: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: mailbox locked by other session Problem is I can't kill anything - and I can't logon to the popper either - tried telnetting there - same story. At least I can't by telnetting to port 110 and logging in with USER and PASS: the lock applies there also. Is there a way to just telnet there and see what processes are running? I suppose I could kill it if I could find it since I am the owner. My knowledge of the popper commands is very limited, however, I believe I only know USER, PASS, LIST, DELE (or at least that's all I remember). Is there any documentation to be found on this? Sending mail to myself does seem to help, albeit not immediately - at least at some point within the next half hour I can get back on again - so at some point it manages to get unlocked. Bruce On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Sobocinski, Todd wrote: > This has happened to me with imap when the server-side process didn't=20 > die, and held onto the mailbox lock. I bet if you go onto the mail=20 > server, you will find your pop3d process still running. New mail=20 > never got delivered for me, because the server-side process still had=20 > the lock. But maybe with the way you lock, new mail was enough to=20 > knock your pop3d process out of its reverie and make it quit. Killing > the offending pop3d process should fix it though. (Remove any ".lock" > files too, if you're using that style of locking.) > > Not sure what the ultimate cause of that was though. The problem went > away in our last server upgrade, and I don't recall if we ever figured > out why the server processes were hanging. > > Todd > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Cohen [mailto:cohenb@worldonline.nl] > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 3:03 AM > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: mailbox locked by other session > > > > All of a sudden things are happening that have never happened before=20 > (pine > 4.33/pop3): If something happens during the pine session [(1) can't=20 > login, waiting for response from server - manually disconnect session; > (2) while logged in Mailbox closed due to access error] then on the=20 > next attempt to run pine I can't login: "Mailbox closed by a pop3=20 > session". There is nothing I can do on the unix shell (no pine session > still running I could kill). It's happened twice so far, the first=20 > time I could log in after 5 minutes (new mail had been delivered in=20 > the meantime - maybe that was the > problem) - right now I have waited 10 minutes and still can't log in. > > If anything like this has happened in the past, I could always get=20 > right back into pine by simply quitting and starting over. The only=20 > time I haven't been able to do that is if there is still a pine=20 > session running as a ghost which I could see with the command "ps" and > then kill and log right back on. > > I think something has happened on the pop3 side, but what? > > (Even if I telnet directly to the popper the same thing happens: can't > get in, "mailbox locked by other server") > > Anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks > > Bruce Cohen > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: =20 > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7ALVb2P032212 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:31:37 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 14:31:36 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7ALVZIH013999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:31:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7ALT6eo076738; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:29:06 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:29:06 -0700 Resent-Message-Id: <200208102129.g7ALT6eo076738@list4.u.washington.edu> Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7ALS6eY083646 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:28:06 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 14:28:06 2002 -0700 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (server1.shellworld.net [64.39.15.178]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7ALS5br018182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:28:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (fairall@localhost) by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7ALS4Z45495 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:28:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fairall@ns.shellworld.net) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:31:06 GMT Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Hart Larry To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine-and-Yenc encoded files? Resent-To: Pine Discussion Forum MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-From: Leslie Fairall X-To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-Received: from neko.cts.com (neko.cts.com [209.68.192.150]) by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7ALE0S45213 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:14:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from chime@cts.com) X-Received: from king.cts.com (king.cts.com [209.68.192.180]) by neko.cts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01488 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: from localhost (chime@localhost) by king.cts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA76842 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: king.cts.com: chime owned process doing -bs X-Complaints-To: abuse@algx.net X-Trace: dca1-nnrp2.news.algx.net 1025137866 209.68.192.180 (Wed, 26 Jun 2002 20:31:06 EDT) X-ReSent-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT) X-ReSent-From: Hart Larry X-ReSent-To: Leslie Fairall X-ReSent-Subject: Pine-and-Yenc encoded files? X-ReSent-Message-ID: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Since 1997 I have successfully used aggregate command to export multiple messages from binary news groups. Well, now many in usenet are encoding with yenc. I understand yenc files are 8-bit. Well, so far after exporting all the sections to a file on my unix shell, I download them with the ftp program in a DOS-box. I've tried both ascii--and--binary. So far, no matter which yenc decoding programs, dos/windows, the files never work. So I wondered if there were a conversion that Pine does on files like this which would make them worthless? I know nothing about saving binaries from trn, so I am happy with pine4.44. Any suggestions please---thanks Hart From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7ALWD2P032215 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:32:13 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 14:32:12 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7ALWBXF020196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:32:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7ALUGlZ023884; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:30:16 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7ALTbeY036968 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:29:37 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 10 14:29:37 2002 -0700 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (server1.shellworld.net [64.39.15.178]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7ALTaR9014297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:29:36 -0700 Received: from localhost (fairall@localhost) by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7ALTas45551 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:29:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fairall@ns.shellworld.net) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 17:29:35 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Leslie Fairall To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine-and-Yenc encoded files? (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: fairall@server1.shellworld.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Please cc your messages to chime@cts.com. Thanks. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:31:06 GMT From: Hart Larry To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Newsgroups: comp.mail.pine Subject: Pine-and-Yenc encoded files? Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: Hart Larry Resent-To: Leslie Fairall Resent-Subject: Pine-and-Yenc encoded files? Since 1997 I have successfully used aggregate command to export multiple messages from binary news groups. Well, now many in usenet are encoding with yenc. I understand yenc files are 8-bit. Well, so far after exporting all the sections to a file on my unix shell, I download them with the ftp program in a DOS-box. I've tried both ascii--and--binary. So far, no matter which yenc decoding programs, dos/windows, the files never work. So I wondered if there were a conversion that Pine does on files like this which would make them worthless? I know nothing about saving binaries from trn, so I am happy with pine4.44. Any suggestions please---thanks Hart -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7BAki2P015526 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:46:44 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 11 03:46:43 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7BAkhIH027329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:46:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7BAOKqt025864; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:24:20 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7BALSeY094888 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:21:28 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 11 03:21:27 2002 -0700 Received: from pandora.tiscali.nl (pandora.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.179]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7BALRs8006477 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:21:27 -0700 Received: from shell.tiscali.nl (shell.tiscali.nl [195.241.77.35]) by pandora.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9468237110; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:21:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (cohenb@localhost) by shell.tiscali.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28142; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:21:24 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:21:24 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bruce Cohen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: mailbox locked by other session In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Beartooth X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: shell.tiscali.nl: cohenb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have a shell account - and can kill any processes on the shell that are a problem. This is different: the process is on the server itself... On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Beartooth wrote: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Sobocinski, Todd wrote: > > > I would get a shell on the mail server and kill the offending processes. > > Obviously, that requires a shell account on the server. > > And if you're willing to change providers to get a shell, > Nancy McGough has a list on her site. > > Anybody happen to know which of those is good about keeping > its pine reasonably up to date? > > Also, even among ISP's that offer shell accounts, so-called > national availability may mean less than meets the eye. Speakeasy > claims it, for instance -- but its only "local" dialup in area code > 540 is in Fredericksburg, just south of DC, although that area > extends to the opposite end of Virginia. > > -- > Beartooth the Stubborn , double retiree, > linux hatchling w/ RH 7.2; ssh'd (DSL) to pine 4.43 on ISP's SunOS 5.8; > Opera 6.02, Pan 0.11.2, Galeon 1.2.5, & Mozilla 1.0 > standard disclaimer : Keep in mind that I have no idea what I am talking > about > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7CKMM2P002025 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:22:22 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 12 13:22:21 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7CKMKIH004240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:22:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7CKJLeo073702; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:19:22 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7CKGweY030454 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:16:58 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 12 13:16:22 2002 -0700 Received: from vax.hanford.org (vax.hanford.org [216.218.218.27]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7CKGMR8006494 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:16:22 -0700 Received: (qmail 2790 invoked by uid 1828); 12 Aug 2002 20:16:21 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: two pine problems -- one crash and it LOOKED like it at my mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Today I came back after a week on vacation and had two problems with pine, one on my personal acct, one on my work acct. On the personal acct, I started up pine, and it crashed and core dumped. I successfully started up pine again right after that.. I presume it crashed running filters or something... since there were over 300 new messages in this mailbox. This is running pine 4.33 on: % uname -a SunOS vax 5.6 sun4u sparc I'm using IMAP to access the account. On my work account, I just about died thinking pine had nuked my mail. I selected new, narrowed to select only recipients "carbon-dev".. that was around 400 of over 1000 new messages.. saved to another folder.. I went to the other folder, verified the messages were there, went back to INBOX.. expunged.. Then it showed my INBOX with only the FIRST message in the mailbox, and the message at the bottom of the screen was "No more messages in folder" or something like that. It was in some funky state.. while still in that state, I ran pine again in another terminal window and my mail was just fine (whew).. I finally got the first mail to quit, and at that point it rightfully said: Pine finished -- Closed folder "INBOX". Kept all 2,568 messages. This is running pine 4.44, and I'm on Mac OS X 10.2 final. (Though I think the pine was compiled way back on 10.1.5) So basically -- what caused pine to get so confused in these cases? For the crash, maybe I forget how to use core dumps, because I don't get any symbols.. I simply did a "core core" and then 'bt'. (gdb) bt #0 0xef5c5c84 in ?? () #1 0xef5c5b14 in ?? () #2 0x188000 in ?? () #3 0x1875c4 in ?? () #4 0x8c980 in ?? () #5 0x1206a4 in ?? () #6 0x120bd0 in ?? () #7 0x120434 in ?? () #8 0x13deec in ?? () #9 0x1006bc in ?? () #10 0x11ebb0 in ?? () #11 0xef5b89e4 in ?? () #12 0xef5c5c1c in ?? () #13 0xef5c5b14 in ?? () #14 0x1ca4d8 in ?? () #15 0x1ca798 in ?? () #16 0x13e0c0 in ?? () #17 0x13e2b0 in ?? () #18 0x120978 in ?? () #19 0x11f67c in ?? () #20 0xef5b89e4 in ?? () #21 0xef5c61dc in ?? () #22 0xef5c6a94 in ?? () #23 0xef5c5c1c in ?? () #24 0xef5c5b14 in ?? () #25 0x188000 in ?? () #26 0x187654 in ?? () #27 0x17d5bc in ?? () #28 0x181afc in ?? () #29 0x181cfc in ?? () #30 0x181cfc in ?? () #31 0x17ee8c in ?? () #32 0x17ece4 in ?? () #33 0x12dff4 in ?? () #34 0xb6efc in ?? () #35 0xaa4e4 in ?? () #36 0xa8d08 in ?? () #37 0xfbc4c in ?? () (gdb) quit -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7D10J2P012088 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:00:19 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 12 18:00:18 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7D10EEN012985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:00:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7D0vfR8035032; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:57:41 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7D0rleY090346 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:53:48 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 12 17:53:46 2002 -0700 Received: from vax.hanford.org (vax.hanford.org [216.218.218.27]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7D0rkR8016846 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:53:46 -0700 Received: (qmail 23753 invoked by uid 1828); 13 Aug 2002 00:53:45 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: real backtrace for the crash I reported this morning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Basically -- I started up pine, it crashed. I started up pine again, it worked. 4.33 on "SunOS vax 5.6 sun4u sparc". I remembered (or rather, guessed and was right) how to get a real backtrace with a core file.. Dunno if this leads anybody to a useful fix.. /home/mattack % gdb /usr/local/bin/pine GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it under certain conditions; type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB; type "show warranty" for details. GDB 4.16 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6), Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc... (gdb) core core Core was generated by `pine'. Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libxnet.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdl.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libmp.so.2...done. Reading symbols from /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-1/lib/libc_psr.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1...done. #0 0xef5c5c84 in _malloc_unlocked () (gdb) bt #0 0xef5c5c84 in _malloc_unlocked () #1 0xef5c5b14 in malloc () #2 0x188000 in fs_get (size=81) at fs_unix.c:30 #3 0x1875c4 in cpystr ( string=0x33dc18 "{vax.area.com/user=mattack}INBOX : Message 2691 UID 8870259 greater than last 56") at misc.c:68 #4 0x8c980 in add_review_message () #5 0x1206a4 in status_message_write () #6 0x120bd0 in output_message () #7 0x120434 in flush_status_messages () #8 0x13deec in end_screen () #9 0x1006bc in panic () #10 0x11ebb0 in auger_in_signal () #11 #12 0xef5c5c84 in _malloc_unlocked () #13 0xef5c5b14 in malloc () #14 0x1ca4d8 in init_stack () #15 0x1ca798 in tparm () #16 0x13e0c0 in moveabsolute () #17 0x13e2b0 in MoveCursor () #18 0x120978 in status_message_write () #19 0x11f67c in alarm_signal () #20 #21 0xef5c62bc in realfree () #22 0xef5c6a94 in cleanfree () #23 0xef5c5c1c in _malloc_unlocked () #24 0xef5c5b14 in malloc () #25 0x188000 in fs_get (size=3) at fs_unix.c:30 #26 0x187654 in textcpy (dst=0x33c89c, src=0x3991f8) at misc.c:101 #27 0x17d5bc in mail_fetch_header (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, lines=0xefffdcb8, len=0xefffdcb4, flags=10) at mail.c:1351 #28 0x181afc in mail_search_msg (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, pgm=0x3a5358) at mail.c:2973 #29 0x181cfc in mail_search_msg (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, pgm=0x3a5268) at mail.c:3009 #30 0x181cfc in mail_search_msg (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, pgm=0x3a51f0) at mail.c:3009 #31 0x17ee8c in mail_search_default (stream=0x33c7e0, charset=0xa3b
, pgm=0x3a51f0, flags=22) at mail.c:1971 #32 0x17ece4 in mail_search_full (stream=0x33c7e0, charset=0x0, pgm=0x3a51f0, flags=22) at mail.c:1938 #33 0x12dff4 in match_pattern () #34 0xb6efc in calculate_some_scores () #35 0xaa4e4 in process_filter_patterns () #36 0xa8d08 in do_broach_folder () #37 0xfbc4c in main () (gdb) mattack@area.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DBnC2P027852 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:49:12 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 04:49:12 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DBn4EN025385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:49:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DBkweo073596; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:46:58 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DBgxeY046462 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:42:59 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 04:42:59 2002 -0700 Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.bellhow.com [63.121.54.5]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DBgwR8017805 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:42:58 -0700 Received: from wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (wgs.apps1.bellhow.com [192.168.70.70]) by mail.bellhow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA16819; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:42:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (8.8.4/8.8.3) with ESMTP id HAA01682; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:42:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: daniel lance herrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: real backtrace for the crash I reported this morning In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: wgs.apps1.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs X-Sender: herrick@wgs.apps1.bellhow.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Matt Ackeret wrote: > > Basically -- I started up pine, it crashed. I started up pine again, it > worked. 4.33 on "SunOS vax 5.6 sun4u sparc". > > I remembered (or rather, guessed and was right) how to get a real backtrace > with a core file.. > > Dunno if this leads anybody to a useful fix.. > > > /home/mattack % gdb /usr/local/bin/pine > GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it > under certain conditions; type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB; type "show warranty" for details. > GDB 4.16 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6), > Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc... > (gdb) core core > Core was generated by `pine'. > Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error. >From one who has absolutely no Mac experience, "Bus error" is usually a reference to a hardware difficulty, not software. And it's not a very specific reference - it says that something on the bus violated the bus protocols, and everything is on the bus. If you're running on a unix-like system, look in places like /var/log/messages to see if there are other traces of the event that give a hint of what system was involved in the "Bus error". (Windows has a thing called an "Event viewer" that sometimes reveals a hint. Undoubtedly the Mac has a place where it remembers things that might turn out to be interesting.) dan From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DHes2P005599 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:40:54 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 10:40:54 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DHepEN002541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:40:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DHckR8068828; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:38:46 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DHbpeY094690 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:37:51 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 10:37:50 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.19]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DHbos9004539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:37:50 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.18]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DHboYu009969 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:37:50 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 10:37:49 2002 -0700 Received: from [10.95.135.3] ([128.95.135.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DHbnCR000422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:37:49 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:37:49 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: real backtrace for the crash I reported this morning In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: hubert@ndcms.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN It looks like pine triggered an alarm signal for the busy spinner from within malloc and then it re-entered malloc to print the message. So it looks like it is pine's fault and we should be able to fix it for the next release. Thanks for the stack trace. (That's an unusual hostname for something running SunOS!) -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Matt Ackeret wrote: > > Basically -- I started up pine, it crashed. I started up pine again, it > worked. 4.33 on "SunOS vax 5.6 sun4u sparc". > > I remembered (or rather, guessed and was right) how to get a real backtrace > with a core file.. > > Dunno if this leads anybody to a useful fix.. > > > /home/mattack % gdb /usr/local/bin/pine > GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it > under certain conditions; type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB; type "show warranty" for details. > GDB 4.16 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6), > Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc... > (gdb) core core > Core was generated by `pine'. > Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libxnet.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdl.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libmp.so.2...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-1/lib/libc_psr.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1...done. > #0 0xef5c5c84 in _malloc_unlocked () > (gdb) bt > #0 0xef5c5c84 in _malloc_unlocked () > #1 0xef5c5b14 in malloc () > #2 0x188000 in fs_get (size=81) at fs_unix.c:30 > #3 0x1875c4 in cpystr ( > string=0x33dc18 "{vax.area.com/user=mattack}INBOX : Message 2691 UID 8870259 greater than last 56") at misc.c:68 > #4 0x8c980 in add_review_message () > #5 0x1206a4 in status_message_write () > #6 0x120bd0 in output_message () > #7 0x120434 in flush_status_messages () > #8 0x13deec in end_screen () > #9 0x1006bc in panic () > #10 0x11ebb0 in auger_in_signal () > #11 > #12 0xef5c5c84 in _malloc_unlocked () > #13 0xef5c5b14 in malloc () > #14 0x1ca4d8 in init_stack () > #15 0x1ca798 in tparm () > #16 0x13e0c0 in moveabsolute () > #17 0x13e2b0 in MoveCursor () > #18 0x120978 in status_message_write () > #19 0x11f67c in alarm_signal () > #20 > #21 0xef5c62bc in realfree () > #22 0xef5c6a94 in cleanfree () > #23 0xef5c5c1c in _malloc_unlocked () > #24 0xef5c5b14 in malloc () > #25 0x188000 in fs_get (size=3) at fs_unix.c:30 > #26 0x187654 in textcpy (dst=0x33c89c, src=0x3991f8) at misc.c:101 > #27 0x17d5bc in mail_fetch_header (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, > lines=0xefffdcb8, len=0xefffdcb4, flags=10) at mail.c:1351 > #28 0x181afc in mail_search_msg (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, > pgm=0x3a5358) at mail.c:2973 > #29 0x181cfc in mail_search_msg (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, > pgm=0x3a5268) at mail.c:3009 > #30 0x181cfc in mail_search_msg (stream=0x33c7e0, msgno=2619, section=0x0, > pgm=0x3a51f0) at mail.c:3009 > #31 0x17ee8c in mail_search_default (stream=0x33c7e0, > charset=0xa3b
, pgm=0x3a51f0, flags=22) > at mail.c:1971 > #32 0x17ece4 in mail_search_full (stream=0x33c7e0, charset=0x0, pgm=0x3a51f0, > flags=22) at mail.c:1938 > #33 0x12dff4 in match_pattern () > #34 0xb6efc in calculate_some_scores () > #35 0xaa4e4 in process_filter_patterns () > #36 0xa8d08 in do_broach_folder () > #37 0xfbc4c in main () > (gdb) > > > mattack@area.com > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DILQ2P007349 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:21:26 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 11:21:25 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DILP07009572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:21:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DIJ6R8034942; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:19:06 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DIIDeY036868 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:18:13 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 11:18:12 2002 -0700 Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DIICbq004754 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:18:12 -0700 Received: from eng-23.pacdigital (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1838F18 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:18:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: real backtrace for the crash I reported this morning In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@eng-23.pacdigital X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, daniel lance herrick wrote: > "Bus error" is usually a reference to a hardware difficulty, not software. Not necessarily. It's also the error you (can; depending on the arch) get when you do unaligned accesses. Something like: long * ptr = (char *) 0x3 *ptr = 1L; -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles, CA Home: 4105 E. Willow St. #246, Long Beach, CA 90815-1740 Work: 2052 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92606-4905 (949) 252-1111 X240 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DJiO2P010532 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:44:24 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 12:44:12 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DJiBEN007035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:44:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DJfeeo083078; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:41:41 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DJeceY061226 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:40:38 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 12:40:37 2002 -0700 Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.packetdesign.com [65.192.41.10]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DJeabr031439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:40:37 -0700 Received: from ash.packetdesign.com (ash.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.243]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7DJeag63902; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:40:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: <20020813121620.D43714-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Spaces out to right margin In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: casner@packetdesign.com X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On my desktop sytem, it appears that Pine outputs spaces all the way to the right margin of the xterm window rather than outputting a carriage return at the end of the actual text. This may the expected behavior when displaying the message index, but my complaint is that it also happens when displaying the text of messages. The problem is that when I select text from the Pine window to paste into an editor, I get all the extra spaces at the end. This behavior began when I upgraded the desktop system from FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE to FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE and, as part of that, upgraded Pine from 4.33 to 4.44. However, I still have the 4.33 accessible, and it behaves the same as 4.44 on the new system. So it must be some other component of FreeBSD, right? Not so fast... I also have a laptop running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE and Pine 4.44 where the problem does not occur when running Pine locally. Yet if I ssh from the laptop to the desktop and run Pine on the desktop, the problem occurs. So it is not xterm or the X selection mechanism. I concluded that the problem is extra spaces being output because if in one xterm window I run Pine, then quit Pine, then run ls to generate more output, and finally select text including some lines that were part of the Pine display and some from the subsequent command output, all the Pine lines extend to the right margin, but the subsequent lines do not. There were changes in the TERMCAP between FreeBSD 4.5 and 4.6, but I copied the TERMCAP setting from the laptop and set it in a shell on the desktop, and the problem still occurred. The Pine 4.44 binaries are identical on both systems, as are the libncurses.so.5 files. TERMCAP I made the same. The Pine configuration files are the same. What's left? -- Steve -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DN9P2P018357 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:09:25 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 16:09:24 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DN9LEN013649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:09:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DN6glZ005794; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:06:46 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7DN5AeY088316 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:05:10 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 16:05:09 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.19]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DN59JY002488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:05:09 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.17]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7DN59Yu018535 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:05:09 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 13 16:05:08 2002 -0700 Received: from [10.95.135.3] ([128.95.135.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7DN58Tb018688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:05:08 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:05:08 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Spaces out to right margin In-Reply-To: <20020813121620.D43714-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> References: <20020813121620.D43714-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Stephen Casner X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: hubert@ndcms.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pine doesn't output linefeed characters at the ends of lines. Instead, it clears the line, moves the cursor, and writes the characters where it wants them. If you are using color and the termcap entry doesn't have back color erase, then pine uses spaces to clear the line in the background color. So maybe that is what is happening to you. It's worth a shot, anyway. Try turning off color (Setup/Kolor, scroll to top, choose no-color) and see if the problem goes away. One way to see what pine is outputting to the screen is to run it inside a "script" session. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Stephen Casner wrote: > On my desktop sytem, it appears that Pine outputs spaces all the way > to the right margin of the xterm window rather than outputting a > carriage return at the end of the actual text. > [...] From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7EEPN2P010613 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:25:23 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 07:25:22 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EEPMEN000865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:25:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EEMFeo094798; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:22:15 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EEJbeY030968 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:19:37 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 07:19:36 2002 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7EEJas8019814 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:19:36 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 07:19:35 2002 -0700 Received: from mta03.fuse.net (mx3.fuse.net [216.68.1.123]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EEJYEM000737 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:19:35 -0700 Received: from Ermwvlr ([216.68.187.75]) by mta03.fuse.net (InterMail vM.5.01.03.01 201-253-122-118-101-20010319) with SMTP id <20020814142027.XLDI3866.mta03.fuse.net@Ermwvlr> for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:20:27 -0400 Message-Id: <20020814142027.XLDI3866.mta03.fuse.net@Ermwvlr> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:20:30 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Introduction on ADSL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=W6y97H6mSD4c59F6RI1e7s1z3cJKAFv11 X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, a message sent to by with the subject Introduction on ADSL was scanned and found to contain a virus called "Exploit-MIME.gen.exe" . The infected part of the message was Cleaned and Quarantined before delivery to user. . -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7EJRX2P022333 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:27:33 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 12:27:33 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EJRWEN010611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:27:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EJPGlZ006138; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:25:16 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EJMMeY055666 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:22:22 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 12:22:21 2002 -0700 Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.packetdesign.com [65.192.41.10]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EJMKJY019240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:22:21 -0700 Received: from ash.packetdesign.com (ash.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.243]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7EJMEg95600; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: <20020814120054.A45518-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Spaces out to right margin In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: casner@packetdesign.com X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Steve Hubert wrote: > Pine doesn't output linefeed characters at the ends of lines. Instead, it > clears the line, moves the cursor, and writes the characters where it > wants them. If you are using color and the termcap entry doesn't have back > color erase, then pine uses spaces to clear the line in the background > color. So maybe that is what is happening to you. Yes, that is it, as verified with script as you suggested. I am using color, including quote colors which would be effective when displaying the body of a message. But the background color is white, same as the default background color for the xterm. There isn't any way to select "no background color" (you and I have talked about this before in a different context). But if the behavior is determined by the termcap entry, why wasn't the behavior changed when I setenv TERMCAP to the termcap entry taken from printenv TERMCAP on the laptop? -- Steve From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7EKqj2P025323 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:52:45 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 13:52:44 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EKqf07019567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:52:42 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EKmXeo079972; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:48:33 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EKlBeY094908 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:47:11 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 13:47:11 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EKlBs9001367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:47:11 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7EKlAej018445 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:47:11 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 13:47:10 2002 -0700 Received: from [10.95.135.3] ([128.95.135.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EKlACR025516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:47:10 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:47:10 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Spaces out to right margin In-Reply-To: <20020814120054.A45518-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> References: <20020814120054.A45518-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Stephen Casner X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: hubert@ndcms.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Stephen Casner wrote: > But if the behavior is determined by the termcap entry, why wasn't the > behavior changed when I setenv TERMCAP to the termcap entry taken from > printenv TERMCAP on the laptop? > > -- Steve I don't know. I can point you to the code if you want to investigate. In .../pine/osdep/termout.unx is the routine CleartoEOLN. Here it is: void CleartoEOLN() { int c, starting_col, starting_line; char *last_bg_color; /* * If the terminal doesn't have back color erase, then we have to * erase manually to preserve the background color. */ if(pico_usingcolor() && (!_bce || !_cleartoeoln)){ starting_col = _col; starting_line = _line; last_bg_color = pico_get_last_bg_color(); pico_set_nbg_color(); for(c = _col; c < _columns; c++) Writechar(' ', 0); MoveCursor(starting_line, starting_col); if(last_bg_color){ (void)pico_set_bg_color(last_bg_color); fs_give((void **)&last_bg_color); } } else if(_cleartoeoln) tputs(_cleartoeoln, 1, outchar); } So here is where turning off color causes it to use the else instead of the if clause. _cleartoeoln has to be defined for pine to work at all, I think, so that implies that _bce must be zero when you're seeing the problem. _bce is set in .../pico/osdep/term.cap or .../pico/osdep/term.inf, depending on whether the makefile in the pico directory uses termcap or terminfo. You can figure out which makefile is being used by looking at picotarg in the build script. For example, "build lnp" uses makefile.lnx in the pico subdir. The termcap capability for back color erase is "ut". It's a Boolean. The terminfo version is "bce". Perhaps your pine is using terminfo instead of termcap? Steve From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7EMPw2P029534 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:25:58 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 15:25:57 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EMPs07023027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:25:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EMNmqt010614; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:23:48 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7EMKqeY052932 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:20:53 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 14 15:20:51 2002 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [209.172.192.12]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7EMKos8031366 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:20:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (IDENT:100@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by noella.mindsec.com (8.12.4/3.0.3) with ESMTP id g7EMKniN003993 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:20:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:20:49 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pretty colors + reply-leadin + reply-indent-string :P MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-No-Archive: Yes X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm just switching to using colors on one of my sun boxes.. Mainly due to it being much easier to read long dull^H^H^H^H informative threads on various mailing lists.. So I setup my quote colors: quote1-foreground-color=cyan quote1-background-color=black quote2-foreground-color=green quote2-background-color=black quote3-foreground-color=blue quote3-background-color=black Problem is.. They don't really work when using a reply-leadin and reply-indent-string's.. When ever it's a thread I'm actually being part of. Is there an option or a way in pine, for it to read your leadin, and indent string and recognize them as it's reading Emails so it knows those too, are also quote strings? Thanks for your time, --- Erik Parker --- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7I1Rs2P016784 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:27:54 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 17 18:27:53 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7I1RrEN022688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:27:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7I1KhR8019450; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:20:43 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7I1HFeY090790 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:17:15 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 17 18:17:14 2002 -0700 Received: from mail0.rawbw.com (mail0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.41]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7I1HEbr005895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:17:14 -0700 Received: from CHRISGRAY (m206-39.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.206.39]) by mail0.rawbw.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7I1HDN82358 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:17:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisg@tsoft.com) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:17:13 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Chris Gray To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pico Display Width MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: chrisg@imap.rawbw.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN How do I change the default width of the text Pico or Pine displays on the screen. I invoke Pico with the -r72 option so that after justifying all the lines I get a reasonably good-looking print-out. However, on the screen, I get the 4-sign at Column 60 and am then stuck scrolling right/left all the time. I see that the length will change if I reduce the point size of my font, 8 point isn't too bad, but those settings do not seem to last from one session to the next. I am running Pico Version 4.2 under Windows. Thanks. Chris ---------------------------------------- Chris Gray -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7I6XE2P022119 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:33:14 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 17 23:33:13 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7I6XD07003941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:33:13 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7I6Ahqt017304; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:10:47 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7I69ReY057210 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:09:27 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 17 23:09:27 2002 -0700 Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.packetdesign.com [65.192.41.10]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7I69Qbr005187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:09:26 -0700 Received: from packetdesign.com (main-fw-eth1.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.254]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7I69Kg98947; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: <20020817224723.D10251-100000@oak.packetdesign.com> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Spaces out to right margin In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: casner@packetdesign.com X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Steve Hubert wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Stephen Casner wrote: > > > But if the behavior is determined by the termcap entry, why wasn't the > > behavior changed when I setenv TERMCAP to the termcap entry taken from > > printenv TERMCAP on the laptop? > > I don't know. The simple answer is that it was "a typical case of American blind to justice ... and the judge wasn't going to look at the 27 8x10 color glossy pictures..." [1] In other words, setting the TERMCAP entry has no effect because the library functions referenced by the pine code (which I found by following your very helpful pointers) look at the underlying database, not the environment variable. > The termcap capability for back > color erase is "ut". It's a Boolean. The terminfo version is "bce". > Perhaps your pine is using terminfo instead of termcap? I'm using FreeBSD, so picotarg=bsf, and termcap is selected, but it's not clear to me whether the termcap library routines actually reference terminfo. In any case, with help from some FreeBSD gurus, we found that in fact "ut" had recently been removed from the vt100 termcap which is indirectly referenced by the xterm tercap. This occurred between the 4.5-RELEASE and 4.6-RELEASE versions that I'm running on my laptop and desktop, respectively, hence the difference in their behaviors. That was the root of the problem. Thanks again for your help. -- Steve [1] Arlo Guthrie, "Alice's Restaurant" From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7JHRb2P006338 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:27:37 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 10:27:31 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7JHRUEN001872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:27:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7JHPPlZ005954; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:25:25 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7JHNOeY094512 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:23:24 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 10:23:23 2002 -0700 Received: from linknet.krl.org ([198.187.135.12]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7JHNNR8002896 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:23:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (kmiller@localhost) by linknet.krl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7JHLNH01683 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:21:23 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC File MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello. I use pine now at work and love it but I am trying to save more older pine files on a disk. I understand PC File can be used to read pine without all the headers. My question is this: Can I open PCFile on my computer at home and open pine folders from a disk and just use PC File that way - with no connection to anything? Thanks Karen -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7JM1J2P018125 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:01:19 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 15:01:17 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7JM1HEN011451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:01:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7JLsXR8015172; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:54:33 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7JLqmeY088398 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:52:48 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 14:52:47 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.19]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7JLqhR9002065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:52:43 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.18]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7JLqhYu024340 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:52:43 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 14:52:13 2002 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7JLq9Tb006194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:52:13 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problems with 8-bit characters (such as German umlauts) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Mike A. Harris" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum , X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Mike A. Harris wrote: > PINE 4.44 (and possibly older versions) seems to have problems > with German umlauts being used. The full bug details are > available in Red Hat bugzilla at: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70518 > > Is anyone aware of a bugfix for this problem? Hi Mike, I can reproduce this with pine4.44 on RedHat 7.3, but it seems to me that the problem is most likely with glibc, and in particular sprintf. In mailindx.c, line 3791 (pine4.44), there is the following line: sprintf(p, "%-*.*s", width, width, cdesc->string); which, in the person's example email, works out to be something like this: sprintf(p, "%-*.*s", 18, 18, "J\366rg Linn..."); When setting the system font to the same one as in the person's environment, sprintf returns -1 with an empty string for p (the man page doesn't say anything about a return value of -1 for sprintf). It works in my default environment, and it is the presence of the \366 char that causes it to return -1. Trying various combinations in gdb, it seems like the bug has to do with the ".*" (precision) part. I tried using what appears to be the latest glibc rpm : glibc-kernheaders-2.4-7.14 glibc-2.2.5-39 glibc-devel-2.2.5-39 glibc-common-2.2.5-39 ... And the problem still exists. Let me know if you need any other information. Jeff -- Jeff Franklin Networks and Distributed Computing University of Washington From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7KBWh2P007133 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:32:43 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 20 04:32:42 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7KBWcEN028882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:32:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7KBUpR8035724; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:30:51 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7KBRleY028644 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:27:47 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 20 04:27:46 2002 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7KBRkR8020550 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:27:46 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 20 04:27:45 2002 -0700 Received: from mta02.fuse.net (mx2.fuse.net [216.68.1.120]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7KBRi06006036 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:27:44 -0700 Received: from Ilcly ([66.161.251.146]) by mta02.fuse.net (InterMail vM.5.01.03.01 201-253-122-118-101-20010319) with SMTP id <20020820112735.FCRP10087.mta02.fuse.net@Ilcly> for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:27:35 -0400 Message-Id: <20020820112735.FCRP10087.mta02.fuse.net@Ilcly> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:27:38 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Tabindex MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Fp6548850M7U3NC24CH90U1yeKvv X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, a message sent to by with the subject Tabindex was scanned and found to contain a virus called "Exploit-MIME.gen.exe" . The infected part of the message was Cleaned and Quarantined before delivery to user. . -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7KFSa2P012387 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:28:36 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 20 08:28:35 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7KFSU07011681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:28:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7KFP7lZ016762; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:25:07 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7KFNdeY090220 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:23:40 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 20 08:23:39 2002 -0700 Received: from corten2.billschoolcraft.com (adsl-63-193-247-201.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.247.201]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7KFNcJX030110 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:23:38 -0700 Received: from corten8.billschoolcraft.com ([192.168.7.8] helo=localhost) by corten2.billschoolcraft.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 17hAr3-0007m1-00 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:23:37 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bill Schoolcraft To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: [Opera] Bad address: Must use commas to seperate addresses: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion X-X-Sender: bill@corten8 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello Family, I've been trying desperately to get Pine-4.44 to work as my email client with Opera. The time I need it the most is when I'm at a URL and I "right_click" and choose to "send_link_in_email" and then the terminal will appear just long enough to display the following error at the bottom of the xterm screen. (all on one line) [>Badd address: Must use commas to seperate addresses: missing><] Thanks for any help. -- |<--------------------------------72---------------------------------->| Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 -o) San Francisco CA 94121 /\ "UNIX, A Way Of Life." _\_v http://forwardslashunix.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7LCwV2P021027 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:58:31 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 21 05:58:30 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7LCwTEN002315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:58:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7LCsVlZ030814; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:54:32 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7LCpSeY102440 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:51:28 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 21 05:51:27 2002 -0700 Received: from netns02.123multimedia.com ([195.115.77.2]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7LCpQR8025640 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:51:27 -0700 Received: from DEVSERV04.tls.123multimedia.com ([192.168.240.2]) by netns02.123multimedia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3663.0); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:53:17 +0200 Message-Id: <488894F51CB0804C9A6BDB09D4CCD940011FEA78@DEVSERV04.tls.123multimedia.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:51:24 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bertrand PEREZ" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Using other tool Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Aug 2002 12:53:17.0664 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8642E00:01C24911] X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, does someone knows if it is possible within PCPine to use an alternate composition window (not only editor) when sending/replying/forwarding an email ???? thks a lot Regards/Bertrand -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7M5tx2P017943 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:55:59 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 21 22:55:53 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7M5tr07009732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:55:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7M5qdR8020880; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:52:43 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7M5oeeY110630 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:50:40 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 21 22:50:40 2002 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7M5oSJX024926 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:50:40 -0700 Received: from linux.busby.net (dialup-196-80.wasp.net.au [::ffff:203.190.196.80]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:50:26 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9722677D; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:53:22 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:53:15 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE 4.44 for Linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have just transferred from PINE 4.21 running on Red Hat Linux 6.2, to PINE 4.44 running on Red Hat Linux 7.3. I am in the process of migrating from one computer and RH version, to another. I subscribe to many (about 80) different mailing lists, and have about as many different filters (or maybe, a few more). When setting up a new filter (Setup->Rules->Filters), the text at the top of the page, for the filter name, has "Nickname =" . When I entered a new filter name, each time, using whatever method (typing "c", or "a", or, ), the text "Filter Rule" was automatically included in the new filter name. This did not occur in 4.21, and, was a bit of a nuisance in setting up the filters in 4.44, especially during the (just over) two hours that it took me to set up the new filters. To have existing text automaticaly included in the field, for changing, for an existing filter, is appropriate, but, for setting up a new filter, having to delete the default field each time, gets tedious (and annoying, especially when forgetting and typing in the new text, then realising that the default value is prefixing the desired text, so having to delete it then) and results in unnecessary additional keystrokes. Could the PINE developers, please restore the procedure that was used in 4.21, where, when setting up a new filter, the default value for the filter name, was not included in the field, when the new filter name was being entered, as happens with all the other fields (that I used), apart from the name of the folder for the message source (default of INBOX is included in the field for editing, which is appropriate)? Also, can particular configuration data, such as the "Address Book", and filters, each be stored in separate files (that is, one file for the Address Book, another for the filters, etc), within the mail directory, and, therefore, make migration from one version, to a more recent version (such as my migration), easier, simpler, and faster? It could be an incentive for users to update their versions of PINE, as it would make the updating, less inconvenient, and the user could then amend the configurations as required, to incorporate expanded features. Given that (for example) the filters in 4.44 are more comprehensive than the filter options of 4.21, but, still including the options that were in 4.21, a means of importing the filters as used in 4.21, using a means, such as a structured file for the filters, would be good. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams, 1988 .................................................... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7MIvs2P008125 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:57:54 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 22 11:57:54 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7MIvoEN017929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:57:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7MIrklZ006722; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:53:50 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7MIqOeY016540 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:52:24 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 22 11:52:24 2002 -0700 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (server1.shellworld.net [64.39.15.178]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7MIqNJY015230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:52:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (fairall@localhost) by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7MIqM226796 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:52:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fairall@ns.shellworld.net) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Leslie Fairall To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Empty folders In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: fairall@server1.shellworld.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi everyone: I am using pine 4.44 on a Unix shell account. I have it set up to only show me folders which have new messages. However, my problem is that folders will be marked as having new messages, but they wind up being empty. When I exit and restart pine a second time, a different group of folders show up as having new messages but are actually empty. Can someone please tell me what might be causing this problem and how I might be able to solve it? thanks. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7MNkV2P019740 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:46:31 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 22 16:46:30 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7MNkTEN027356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:46:29 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7MNjGR8028326; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:45:16 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7MNhveY049092 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:43:57 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 22 16:43:57 2002 -0700 Received: from smtp001.nwlink.com (smtp001.nwlink.com [209.20.130.75]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7MNhus9004259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:43:56 -0700 Received: from MERCURY (ip48.usw4.rb1.pdx.nwlink.com [207.202.183.48]) by smtp001.nwlink.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7MNhuHW021711 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:43:56 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:43:46 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Bradford To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.44 and Domino 5.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: dbradfor@[192.168.2.100] X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My users are having lots of problems using Pine 4.44 to access our Notes/Domino mail server via IMAP. Domino server is 5.0.11 on Linux 2.4.18-3. Before reaching the Notes server, the mail is delivered to an account on an ISP. I am transferring the mail from the remote ISP (POP3, my only protocol option) to the local Domino SMTP listener using fetchmail 5.9. It seems if messages have no attachments, the messages are viewable without problems in Pine. If messages are multipart or contain attachments, we get the error "Message size does not match expected size, continuing..." in Pine. Some messages trigger a series of errors including "Junk at end of message", "missing multipart subtype", etc. and some messages crash Pine altogether. This happens in both UNIX Pine and PC-Pine 4.44. Can anyone shed some light on what I can do to resolve these problems? -- David Bradford Information Services Director, LPA, Inc. Home: (503) 203-1043 Cell: (503) 341-9519 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7NETO2P008331 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:29:24 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 23 07:29:19 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7NETI07024227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:29:18 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7NES1lZ018098; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:28:02 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7NEQ5eY114308 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:26:05 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 23 07:26:04 2002 -0700 Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.bellhow.com [63.121.54.5]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7NEQ3bq003987 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:26:04 -0700 Received: from wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (wgs.apps1.bellhow.com [192.168.70.70]) by mail.bellhow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17410; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:25:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (8.8.4/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA10220; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:25:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:25:54 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: daniel lance herrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 and Domino 5.0.11 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: David Bradford X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: wgs.apps1.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs X-Sender: herrick@wgs.apps1.bellhow.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN fetchmail has two protocol options that talk to the sendmail on the server and, so, get the envelope data as well as the message itself with its headers. To serve "my users" you really want the envelope information. (What happens when one mail message is addressed to two of your users? What happens when one of your users subscribes to an e-mail list that does not put his address in the headers? What happens when you get things set up so such an e-mail list is properly delivered to the subscriber and then another of your users decides to subscribe to the same e-mail list without telling you?) POP3 is designed to serve only one user per account and it loses the envelope information before you see it. Your life will become much easier when you give up and switch to an ISP who is running a unix variant and knows how the mail works. (When the second is true, the first will be true, and POP3 will not be "my only protocol option".) However, the troubles you are complaining of do not have to happen when the protocol is POP3. (I really suspect that if you work as hard as you can on solving the problems you complain about below, and also, casually, start shopping for an ISP, you will end up switched to a new ISP before you succeed in solving the difficulties at the old ISP.) That out of the way, which component is acting up? Reconfigure fetchmail for an hour or two to not delete the e-mail it fetches. Then use pine to pick up that mail directly from the POP server (after fetchmail has already fetched it into your system). Does pine pick it up cleanly? Or is it mangled with only the POP3 server and pine involved? (point the finger at the isp) Can you find a way to route some test e-mail from the POP3 server through fetchmail to procmail for local delivery? Is that mail mangled when you look at it with pine? How does the e-mail get from fetchmail to the Notes/Domino server? Is Domino listening on port 25 on the local machine and fetchmail just drops it there? If so, it is almost impossible to have fetchmail misconfigured. Do you have fetchmail running Domino to feed it the messages? Is there something strange about the switches you need to have on the Domino command line to get the mail into it cleanly? dan On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, David Bradford wrote: > > My users are having lots of problems using Pine 4.44 to access our > Notes/Domino mail server via IMAP. Domino server is 5.0.11 on Linux > 2.4.18-3. Before reaching the Notes server, the mail is delivered to an > account on an ISP. I am transferring the mail from the remote ISP (POP3, > my only protocol option) to the local Domino SMTP listener using fetchmail > 5.9. > > It seems if messages have no attachments, the messages are viewable > without problems in Pine. If messages are multipart or contain > attachments, we get the error "Message size does not match expected size, > continuing..." in Pine. Some messages trigger a series of errors including > "Junk at end of message", "missing multipart subtype", etc. and some > messages crash Pine altogether. This happens in both UNIX Pine and > PC-Pine 4.44. > > Can anyone shed some light on what I can do to resolve these problems? > > -- > David Bradford > Information Services Director, LPA, Inc. > Home: (503) 203-1043 > Cell: (503) 341-9519 > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7NIGD2P016389 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:16:13 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 23 11:16:13 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7NIG707031494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:16:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7NIF7qt016688; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:15:07 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7NIDueY088464 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:13:56 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 23 11:13:56 2002 -0700 Received: from co-mail.cogsol.com (mail.cognitive.com [12.45.111.163]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7NIDtR8024566 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:13:55 -0700 Received: by CO-MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3S6NVPY4>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:13:40 -0600 Message-Id: <2F088590EE5CD5118EB700A0C9EBD180084168@CO-MAIL> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:13:32 -0600 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Haron, Charles" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: There is no replica for that mailbox on this sever MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-To: "'pine-info@u.washington.edu'" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I'm trying to use PINE 4.33 to access mail on my Exchange Sever (5.5). When I login get "There is no replica for that mailbox on this sever" I can access the public folders, and global address list, on my Exchange sever, but not my inbox. I've configured ~/.pinerc according to the informtion at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Pine-Exchange Any ideas as to what's wrong? Best Regards, Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7OB2u2P013238 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:02:56 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 04:02:55 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7OB2s07023558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:02:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7OB1iR8035756; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:01:44 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7OAwKeY012990 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 03:58:20 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 03:58:19 2002 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7OAwJR8027262 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 03:58:19 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 03:58:19 2002 -0700 Received: from jindi2 ([61.149.23.72]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7OAwH06023325 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 03:58:18 -0700 Received: (qmail 24734 invoked by uid 0); 23 Aug 2002 06:32:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay) (sms@mail2sms.com@192.168.0.10) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 06:32:39 -0000 Message-Id: <200208241058.g7OAwH06023325@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:37:54 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: ÆóÒµÓʼþÍø¹Ø MailAgent Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312_CHARSET" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN MailAgent ¶ÔÄÚÊÇÒ»¸öÓʼþ·þÎñÆ÷£¬¶ÔÍâÊÇÒ»¸öÓʼþÍø¹Ø£¬¿ÉÒÔÍê³ÉÄÚ²¿Óʼþ»¥·¢¡¢¶¨Ê±ÊÕ·¢ÍⲿÓʼþ¡¢Íâ·¢Óʼþ¼à¿ØµÈ¹¦ÄÜ£¬ MailAgent ÊÇÄúµÄ¾ÖÓòÍøÓʼþ¹ÜÀíµÄºÃ°ïÊÖ£¡
µãÕâÀïÃâ·ÑÏÂÔØÊÔÓðæ


From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7OMeP2P025336 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:40:25 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 15:40:24 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7OMeH07002228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:40:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7OMcxeo080006; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:38:59 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7OMZseY088320 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:35:54 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 15:35:53 2002 -0700 Received: from smtp1.home.se (smtp1.home.se [195.66.35.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7OMZrs8003994 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:35:53 -0700 Received: from SNUSET angelman@home.se [217.215.68.85] by smtp1.home.se with Novell NIMS $Revision: 2.88.1.1 $ on Novell NetWare; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:29:07 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:36:26 +0200 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E4steuropa=2C_sommartid?=) Reply-To: Jonas E Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jonas E To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: save URL composing? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: pop555847@pop.home.se X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've configured pine to be the default mailer in Explorer. Everything is fine except one thing: how do I make pine to save (fcc) my URL-messages? After sending the mail pine quits immidiatly. Jonas -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7OMu12P025575 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:56:01 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 15:56:01 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7OMtw07002459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:55:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7OMtAR8020926; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:55:11 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7OMs5eY092066 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:54:06 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 15:54:05 2002 -0700 Received: from hanford.psnw.com (hanford.psnw.com [209.107.130.9]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7OMs1bq031095 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:54:05 -0700 Received: from [216.126.156.33] (01-033.119.popsite.net [216.126.156.33]) by hanford.psnw.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B316A45 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:58:45 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: the teach To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: changing browser In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ababion@mail.isg.siue.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN How does one change the default browser in Pine 4.44 from Explorer to Netscape? I have entered the path for netscape but the Explorer window pops up and just sits there. The URL does not appear. I then have to cut/paste the URL. alex babione -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7P0ks2P027621 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:46:54 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 17:46:54 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7P0ki07004371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:46:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7P0jbeo073530; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:45:38 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7P0iXeY068726 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:44:33 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 17:44:32 2002 -0700 Received: from web14104.mail.yahoo.com (web14104.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.134]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7P0iWbq011501 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:44:32 -0700 Received: from [24.31.50.103] by web14104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:44:32 PDT Message-Id: <20020825004432.869.qmail@web14104.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Vartan Stepanian To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Masking certain files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, My ~/mail is located on a FAT32 partition which I access either from a Windows OS or from Linux. This setup works fine, however, pine when I go to the folders list, I see the 2 extra files "Recycled/" and "System Volume Information/". I'm aware that I can define my ~/mail to be somewhere else, but I'd really like to keep it at the root of the partition of possible. Is there anything I can do to make pine block the display of certain files? John __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7P1Vb2P028432 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:31:37 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 18:31:37 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7P1VXEN026307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:31:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7P1UclZ025106; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:30:39 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7P1TgeY137656 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:29:43 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Aug 24 18:29:42 2002 -0700 Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7P1TgR8023927 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:29:42 -0700 Received: from 12-230-5-159 ([12.230.5.159]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020825012941.FHDA1186.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@12-230-5-159> for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 01:29:41 +0000 Message-Id: <1EFABDD8-B7CA-11D6-954A-0003937E4AEA@romarr.com> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:29:38 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Tom Pratum To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine4.44 will not build under osx10.2/ dev tools 10.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I can't get pine4.44 to build under osx10.2 with dev tools 10.2 loaded. Below is part of the build output which shows the error: Making Pico and Pilot make CC=cc -f makefile.osx rm -f os.h ln -s osdep/os-osx.h os.h cc -g -DDEBUG -Dbsd -DJOB_CONTROL -c -o main.o main.c In file included from headers.h:31, from main.c:38: os.h:185: conflicting types for `sys_nerr' /usr/include/stdio.h:265: previous declaration of `sys_nerr' make: *** [main.o] Error 1 Making Pine and rpload/rpdump. make CC=cc -f makefile.osx rm -f os.h ln -s osdep/os-osx.h os.h ./cmplhlp2.sh < pine.hlp > helptext.h cc -g -DDEBUG -Dconst= -DSYSTYPE=\"OSX\" -c -o addrbook.o addrbook.c /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:84: warning: redefinition of macro const In file included from ../pico/headers.h:31, from headers.h:59, from addrbook.c:48: ../pico/os.h:185: conflicting types for `sys_nerr' /usr/include/stdio.h:265: previous declaration of `sys_nerr' make: *** [addrbook.o] Error 1 Links to executables are in bin directory: __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex size: can't open file: bin/pine (No such file or directory) 634880 12288 0 651264 1298432 13d000 bin/mtest 671744 20480 0 688128 1380352 151000 bin/imapd size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/rpdump (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/rpload (No such file or directory) 630784 12288 0 647168 1290240 13b000 bin/ipop2d 638976 12288 0 651264 1302528 13e000 bin/ipop3d Done A simple minded commenting out of "external int sys_nerr;" in os-osx.h seems only to make matters worse. I tried compiling with both cc and gcc. Helpful hints or corrections are welcome. Thank you. Tom Pratum -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7P9xS2P006593 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:59:28 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 25 02:59:22 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7P9xLEN002072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:59:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7P9wQR8035798; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:58:26 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7P9udeY062250 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:56:39 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 25 02:56:39 2002 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7P9uSJX016707 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:56:39 -0700 Received: from linux.busby.net (dialup-196-239.wasp.net.au [::ffff:203.190.196.239]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 17:56:25 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03F62677D; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 17:59:45 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 17:59:48 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: FsR5SJ<~Mx9X MailAgent In-Reply-To: <200208241058.g7OAwH06023325@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:37:54 +0800 > From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: FsR5SJ<~Mx9X MailAgent > > CORRUPTED MESSAGE > > This is the Courier Mail Server 0.37 on wasp.net.au. > > I received the following message for delivery to your address. Unfortunately, > the sender's mail software did not properly format the following message > according to Internet mail formatting protocols, and I can only deliver mail > which has been properly formatted according to Internet standards. Instead > of returning the following message as undeliverable, it is saved, in its > original form, in the following attachment, which you can open with any > editor or word processor. > > Please notify the original sender that their message was not properly > formatted by their mail software. The specific mail protocol error in the > original message is as follows: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > The mail headers in the following message contain 8-bit text, which is > prohibited by RFC 2047. > > See for more information. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > What is happening? Is the mailing list application non-standards-compliant? -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams, 1988 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 05:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7PCFr2P014556 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 05:15:53 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 25 05:15:52 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7PCFmEN004750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Aug 2002 05:15:49 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7PCEhR8035614; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 05:14:44 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7PCDUeY113934 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 05:13:30 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 25 05:13:19 2002 -0700 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7PCDIJY028901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 05:13:19 -0700 Received: from tntluoma.com luomat@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [209.208.86.83] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.11 $ on Novell NetWare; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 06:13:09 -0600 Message-Id: <3D68C9D0.1070709@tntluoma.com> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 08:13:04 -0400 Reply-To: lists@tntluoma.com Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Timothy J. Luoma" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: FsR5SJ<~Mx9X MailAgent References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Bret Busby wrote: > What is happening? What is happening is explained in the message that you sent (see below) > Is the mailing list application non-standards-compliant? No, the mailing list application is standards-compliant, and you apparently sent a message that was not standards-compliant, according to the error message >>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>The mail headers in the following message contain 8-bit text, which is >>prohibited by RFC 2047. >> >>See for more information. >>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TjL From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7Q7h72P001577 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:43:07 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 00:43:06 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7Q7guEN022971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:42:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7Q7fPlZ031082; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:41:25 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7Q7cieY013038 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:38:44 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 00:38:43 2002 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7Q7cWbq021492 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:38:43 -0700 Received: from linux.busby.net (dialup-196-97.wasp.net.au [::ffff:203.190.196.97]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:38:25 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EAD2677D; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:41:46 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:41:52 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: FsR5SJ<~Mx9X MailAgent In-Reply-To: <3D68C9D0.1070709@tntluoma.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Timothy J. Luoma wrote: > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 08:13:04 -0400 > From: Timothy J. Luoma > To: Bret Busby > Cc: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: FsR5SJ<~Mx9X MailAgent > > Bret Busby wrote: > > > What is happening? > > What is happening is explained in the message that you sent (see below) > > > > Is the mailing list application non-standards-compliant? > > No, the mailing list application is standards-compliant, and you > apparently sent a message that was not standards-compliant, according to > the error message > > > >>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>The mail headers in the following message contain 8-bit text, which is > >>prohibited by RFC 2047. > >> > >>See for more information. > >>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > TjL > > As I use PINE 4.44, and the message in question, was received from the list, as shown in the header that I forwarded to the list, are you claiming that PINE sent a message to the list without my knowledge, and that PINE 4.44 uses a non-standard header? Please clarify, and, if my understanding of what you claim is incorrect, please read again, the message that I posted, and clarify exactly what it is that you claim. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams, 1988 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7QD7E2P007821 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:07:14 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 06:07:12 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7QD7C07007515 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:07:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7QD5pR8030724; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:05:51 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7QD4HeY117082 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:04:17 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 06:04:16 2002 -0700 Received: from dilbert.nav.cc.tx.us (dilbert.nav.cc.tx.us [205.165.188.145]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7QD4GR8022432 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:04:16 -0700 Received: from nav.cc.tx.us (DanaHolland.nav.cc.tx.us [205.165.189.133]) by dilbert.nav.cc.tx.us (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA46040 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:03:44 -0500 Message-Id: <3D6A2767.4030209@nav.cc.tx.us> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:04:39 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dana Holland To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: problems with inbox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I just installed the binary for Pine 4.44 on my system - I'm noticing some different behavior than the previous version. Previously when I used Pine, anything that I left in my Inbox would remain there until I used my Mozilla email application - at that point, everything in the inbox would be pulled into Mozilla. But now if I open Pine, it's actually moving the mail to my mbox, which prevents Mozilla from accessing it. I haven't been able to figure out why this changed. Is it possible to make it act as before? -- ************************************************** Dana Holland dana@nav.cc.tx.us 903-875-7355 Navarro College Corsicana, TX http://www.nav.cc.tx.us/staff_pages/dana/dana.html ************************************************** All opinions stated are my own, and probably don't even vaguely resemble those of Navarro College. :) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7QJ7k2P016448 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:07:46 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 12:07:46 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7QJ7d07014633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:07:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7QJ6WlZ005728; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:06:32 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7QJ5PeY032368 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:05:25 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 12:05:24 2002 -0700 Received: from vax.hanford.org (vax.hanford.org [216.218.218.27]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7QJ5Obq008944 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:05:24 -0700 Received: (qmail 23935 invoked by uid 1828); 26 Aug 2002 19:05:23 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE-INFO digest 1426 In-Reply-To: <200208250709.g7P79ElZ017166@list3.u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 pine-info@u.washington.edu wrote: >Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:29:38 -0700 >From: Tom Pratum >Subject: pine4.44 will not build under osx10.2/ dev tools 10.2 >Message-ID: <1EFABDD8-B7CA-11D6-954A-0003937E4AEA@romarr.com> .. >I can't get pine4.44 to build under osx10.2 with dev tools 10.2 loaded. >Below is part of the build output which shows the error: ... >Making Pine and rpload/rpdump. >make CC=cc -f makefile.osx >rm -f os.h >ln -s osdep/os-osx.h os.h >./cmplhlp2.sh < pine.hlp > helptext.h >cc -g -DDEBUG -Dconst= -DSYSTYPE=\"OSX\" -c -o addrbook.o >addrbook.c >/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:84: warning: redefinition of macro const >In file included from ../pico/headers.h:31, > from headers.h:59, > from addrbook.c:48: >../pico/os.h:185: conflicting types for `sys_nerr' >/usr/include/stdio.h:265: previous declaration of `sys_nerr' >make: *** [addrbook.o] Error 1 ... >A simple minded commenting out of "external int sys_nerr;" in os-osx.h >seems only to make matters worse. I tried compiling with both cc and >gcc. >Helpful hints or corrections are welcome. Well, presumably pine is expecting the one in os.h.. So my simple-minded attempt would be to comment out the one in the system header (at least temporarily).. Maybe add a #warning for yourself so that you realize you changed the file from the defaults. Hmm, maybe I haven't actually compiled pine on OSX lately.. I think mine is still from a 10.1.5-era compile.. (with a little skanky script in place to workaround the curses move). From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7R2O12P001812 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:24:01 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 19:24:00 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7R2NtEN015625 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:23:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7R2MNqt009870; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:22:24 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7R2H4eY073170 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:17:04 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 19:17:03 2002 -0700 Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7R2H2JX001407 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:17:03 -0700 Received: from 12-230-5-159 ([12.230.5.159]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020827021702.WDRF11061.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@12-230-5-159> for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 02:17:02 +0000 Message-Id: <0FC8F9C1-B963-11D6-AB6D-0003937E4AEA@romarr.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:16:57 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Tom Pratum, Romarr Properties" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: crash on selecting attachment pine4.44/osx 10.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Another problem here that may or may not be easy to fix: Pine4.44 now works under osx10.2 on my machine, and I can send messages without attachments, but when I try to select an attachment, I get (after a short delay): Problem detected: "Received abort signal". Pine Exiting. Abort The crash log has the following information in it: ********** Date/Time: 2002-08-24 14:14:31 -0700 OS Version: 10.2 (Build 6C115) Host: 12-230-5-159 Command: pine PID: 417 Exception: EXC_BREAKPOINT (0x0006) Code[0]: 0x00000001Code[1]: 0x8fe01280 Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x8fe01280 in halt #1 0x8fe106b4 in link_in_need_modules #2 0x8fe12a24 in _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address #3 0x90005a54 in _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address #4 0x900059ac in sigaction__ #5 0x9000fa20 in signal__ #6 0x00189cd4 in init_sighup (signals.c:251) #7 0x00189800 in init_signals (signals.c:90) #8 0x00152350 in main (pine.c:619) #9 0x00001ed4 in _start #10 0x00001d04 in start PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x8fe01280 srr1: 0x0002f030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x20000000 lr: 0x8fe09c38 ctr: 0x8fe29468 mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000004 r1: 0xbffff5c0 r2: 0x8fe0b7f4 r3: 0x00000237 r4: 0x00000000 r5: 0x00000237 r6: 0x0000000a r7: 0x2e64796c r8: 0x2f6c6962 r9: 0x00000000 r10: 0x8fe4850c r11: 0x0000001a r12: 0x8fe71c5e r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000000 r15: 0x00000000 r16: 0x00000000 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000000 r19: 0x00000000 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0x00000000 r23: 0x00000000 r24: 0x00000000 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0xbffffe4c r27: 0x00189d38 r28: 0x8fe4841c r29: 0x8fe484ec r30: 0x8fe484ec r31: 0x8fe099bc ********** Date/Time: 2002-08-24 14:16:18 -0700 OS Version: 10.2 (Build 6C115) Host: 12-230-5-159 Command: pine PID: 486 Exception: EXC_BREAKPOINT (0x0006) Code[0]: 0x00000001Code[1]: 0x8fe01280 Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x8fe01280 in halt #1 0x8fe106b4 in link_in_need_modules #2 0x8fe12a24 in _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address #3 0x90005a54 in _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address #4 0x900059ac in sigaction__ #5 0x9000fa20 in signal__ #6 0x00189cd4 in init_sighup (signals.c:251) #7 0x00189800 in init_signals (signals.c:90) #8 0x00152350 in main (pine.c:619) #9 0x00001ed4 in _start #10 0x00001d04 in start PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x8fe01280 srr1: 0x0002f030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x20000000 lr: 0x8fe09c38 ctr: 0x8fe29468 mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000004 r1: 0xbffff5c0 r2: 0x8fe0b7f4 r3: 0x00000245 r4: 0x00000000 r5: 0x00000245 r6: 0x0000000a r7: 0x2e64796c r8: 0x2f6c6962 r9: 0x00000000 r10: 0x8fe4850c r11: 0x0000001a r12: 0x8fe71c6c r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000000 r15: 0x00000000 r16: 0x00000000 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000000 r19: 0x00000000 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0x00000000 r23: 0x00000000 r24: 0x00000000 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0xbffffe44 r27: 0x00189d38 r28: 0x8fe4841c r29: 0x8fe484ec r30: 0x8fe484ec r31: 0x8fe099bc ********** Date/Time: 2002-08-26 18:36:21 -0700 OS Version: 10.2 (Build 6C115) Host: 12-230-5-159 Command: pine PID: 1375 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x0000001c Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x940db6e0 in wrefresh #1 0x940d5f88 in refresh #2 0x002545bc in AskAttach (attach.c:233) #3 0x00247c1c in HeaderEditor (composer.c:771) #4 0x002432c0 in backline (basic.c:243) #5 0x001f94f0 in execute (pico.c:502) #6 0x001f8fdc in pico (pico.c:389) #7 0x0018404c in pine_send (send.c:3928) #8 0x0017c9ec in compose_mail (send.c:961) #9 0x0017ac18 in compose_screen (send.c:327) #10 0x0015d4bc in main (pine.c:1122) #11 0x00002648 in _start (crt.c:267) #12 0x000024c8 in start PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x940db6e0 srr1: 0x0000d030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x20000000 lr: 0x940db6c0 ctr: 0x940db6ac mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000001 r1: 0xbfffc5c0 r2: 0x006ba660 r3: 0x00000000 r4: 0x00000001 r5: 0x33807038 r6: 0x80808080 r7: 0x00000002 r8: 0x706700e0 r9: 0xa40d07a4 r10: 0x006b0290 r11: 0xa40d0988 r12: 0x940db6ac r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000000 r15: 0x00000000 r16: 0x00000000 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000000 r19: 0x00000000 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0x00000000 r23: 0x00000000 r24: 0x00000000 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0xbffffe44 r27: 0x00000008 r28: 0x00000001 r29: 0x00000022 r30: 0x00000000 r31: 0x940db6c0 ********** Date/Time: 2002-08-26 18:37:08 -0700 OS Version: 10.2 (Build 6C115) Host: 12-230-5-159 Command: pine PID: 1397 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x0000001c Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x940db6e0 in wrefresh #1 0x940d5f88 in refresh #2 0x002545bc in AskAttach (attach.c:233) #3 0x00247c1c in HeaderEditor (composer.c:771) #4 0x002432c0 in backline (basic.c:243) #5 0x001f94f0 in execute (pico.c:502) #6 0x001f8fdc in pico (pico.c:389) #7 0x0018404c in pine_send (send.c:3928) #8 0x0017c9ec in compose_mail (send.c:961) #9 0x0017ac18 in compose_screen (send.c:327) #10 0x0015d4bc in main (pine.c:1122) #11 0x00002648 in _start (crt.c:267) #12 0x000024c8 in start PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x940db6e0 srr1: 0x0000d030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x00000000 lr: 0x940db6c0 ctr: 0x940db6ac mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000001 r1: 0xbfffc5c0 r2: 0x006ba660 r3: 0x00000000 r4: 0x00000001 r5: 0x8064f033 r6: 0x80808080 r7: 0x00000001 r8: 0x6700c9e0 r9: 0xa40d07a4 r10: 0x006b0290 r11: 0xa40d0988 r12: 0x940db6ac r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000000 r15: 0x00000000 r16: 0x00000000 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000000 r19: 0x00000000 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0x00000000 r23: 0x00000000 r24: 0x00000000 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0xbffffe44 r27: 0x00000008 r28: 0x00000001 r29: 0x00000022 r30: 0x00000000 r31: 0x940db6c0 ********** Date/Time: 2002-08-26 18:37:58 -0700 OS Version: 10.2 (Build 6C115) Host: 12-230-5-159 Command: pine PID: 1400 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x0000001c Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x940db6e0 in wrefresh #1 0x940d5f88 in refresh #2 0x002545bc in AskAttach (attach.c:233) #3 0x00247c1c in HeaderEditor (composer.c:771) #4 0x002432c0 in backline (basic.c:243) #5 0x001f94f0 in execute (pico.c:502) #6 0x001f8fdc in pico (pico.c:389) #7 0x0018404c in pine_send (send.c:3928) #8 0x0017c9ec in compose_mail (send.c:961) #9 0x0017ac18 in compose_screen (send.c:327) #10 0x0015d4bc in main (pine.c:1122) #11 0x00002648 in _start (crt.c:267) #12 0x000024c8 in start PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x940db6e0 srr1: 0x0000d030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x20000000 lr: 0x940db6c0 ctr: 0x940db6ac mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000001 r1: 0xbfffc5c0 r2: 0x006ba660 r3: 0x00000000 r4: 0x00000001 r5: 0x8064fc33 r6: 0x80808080 r7: 0x00000001 r8: 0x6700c9f8 r9: 0xa40d07a4 r10: 0x006b0290 r11: 0xa40d0988 r12: 0x940db6ac r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000000 r15: 0x00000000 r16: 0x00000000 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000000 r19: 0x00000000 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0x00000000 r23: 0x00000000 r24: 0x00000000 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0xbffffe44 r27: 0x00000008 r28: 0x00000001 r29: 0x00000022 r30: 0x00000000 r31: 0x940db6c0 ********** Date/Time: 2002-08-26 19:10:18 -0700 OS Version: 10.2 (Build 6C115) Host: 12-230-5-159 Command: pine PID: 1432 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x0000001c Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x940db6e0 in wrefresh #1 0x940d5f88 in refresh #2 0x002545bc in AskAttach (attach.c:233) #3 0x00247c1c in HeaderEditor (composer.c:771) #4 0x002432c0 in backline (basic.c:243) #5 0x001f94f0 in execute (pico.c:502) #6 0x001f8fdc in pico (pico.c:389) #7 0x0018404c in pine_send (send.c:3928) #8 0x0017c9ec in compose_mail (send.c:961) #9 0x0017ac18 in compose_screen (send.c:327) #10 0x0015d4bc in main (pine.c:1122) #11 0x00002648 in _start (crt.c:267) #12 0x000024c8 in start PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x940db6e0 srr1: 0x0000d030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x00000000 lr: 0x940db6c0 ctr: 0x940db6ac mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000001 r1: 0xbfffc5c0 r2: 0x0067a660 r3: 0x00000000 r4: 0x00000001 r5: 0x19178022 r6: 0x80808080 r7: 0x00000003 r8: 0x44322f00 r9: 0xa40d07a4 r10: 0x00670290 r11: 0xa40d0988 r12: 0x940db6ac r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000000 r15: 0x00000000 r16: 0x00000000 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000000 r19: 0x00000000 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0x00000000 r23: 0x00000000 r24: 0x00000000 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0xbffffe44 r27: 0x00000008 r28: 0x00000001 r29: 0x00000016 r30: 0x00000000 r31: 0x940db6c0 Hopefully this is useful information for determining the problem. Tom Pratum -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7R5YS2P005344 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:34:28 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 22:34:28 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7R5YR07031432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:34:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7R5XVlZ006840; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:33:32 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7R5WUeY073086 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:32:30 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 26 22:32:30 2002 -0700 Received: from infiniverse.dyndns.org (rdu163-44-102.nc.rr.com [24.163.44.102]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7R5WSbq016226 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:32:30 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [192.168.1.3]) by infiniverse.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41302B919 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:32:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:32:26 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Richard Reed To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Flag messages as not-new when put into sent-items Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hey, all. I'm using Pine 4.44, and don't want the messages that I have written to be flagged as 'new' in the sent-items folder. I use those folders as imap folders, and it annoys me to no end that I have 'unread' messages in sent-items by other mail programs. I have tried making a filter rule that clears the new flag on messages in the sent-items folder, but this doesn't work to my liking, because the filter only goes into effect when entering the folder in pine. Is there a way to have items copied to the fcc folder be not-new? Thanks much! -- Richard Reed rich@infiniverse.net -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7RHQF2P024925 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:26:15 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 27 10:26:14 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7RHQE07015151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:26:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7RHO3lZ015182; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:24:03 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7RHKreY079376 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:20:53 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Aug 27 10:20:52 2002 -0700 Received: from co-mail.cogsol.com (mail.cognitive.com [12.45.111.163]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7RHKqJX004587 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:20:52 -0700 Received: from jupiter.cognitive.com (10.3.0.10 [10.3.0.10]) by co-mail.cogsol.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id RP97Y1BW; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:20:39 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:22:14 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Charles Haron To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: LDAP - No Email Address Available MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I can search the Global Address list on my Exchange server. Pine finds the user I'm looking for, but tells that there is "No Email address available". Anyone know what could be wrong? Chuck -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S8Bw2P023310 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:11:58 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 01:11:57 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7S8BrEN027183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:11:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7S8ArlZ023596; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:10:53 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7S88xeY046166 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:08:59 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 01:08:58 2002 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [209.172.192.12]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7S88wbq008419 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:08:58 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by noella.mindsec.com (8.8.7/3.0.3) with ESMTP id g7S88vRp016665 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 03:08:57 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 03:08:57 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: macros? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-No-Archive: Yes X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'd like to bind ;pn to one button.. so i dont have to hit all 3 when i want to scan a folder list for any folder with new messages.. Is there a way in pine, to do it? --- Erik Parker --- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S97B2P025604 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:07:11 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 02:07:10 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7S979EN028353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:07:10 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7S96KlZ023680; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:06:21 -0700 Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7S95AeY041452 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:10 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 02:05:09 2002 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S959s8029870 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:09 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 02:05:09 2002 -0700 Received: from jindi2 ([61.149.16.188]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S95606008610 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:08 -0700 Received: (qmail 30113 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay) (isee@seeyou.com@192.168.0.10) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000 Message-Id: <200208280905.g7S95606008610@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:25:01 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Ò»·¢ÌìÏÂÓ¦ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312_CHARSET" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ÓÅÖÊÓʼþÁÐ±í£«¸ßЧȺ·¢Èí¼þ£½ÖйúÓʼþÁбíÍø


From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S9bD2P026429 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:37:13 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 02:37:12 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7S9b107009145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:37:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7S9Y4lZ017170; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:34:05 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7S9WpeY033004 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:32:51 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 02:32:50 2002 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7S9Wcbq020255 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:32:49 -0700 Received: from linux.busby.net (dialup-196-93.wasp.net.au [::ffff:203.190.196.93]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:32:24 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F35A2677D; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:34:12 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:34:25 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_wasp.net.au-17942-1030527147-0001-2" Content-ID: X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_wasp.net.au-17942-1030527147-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-ID: What is going on with these messages? Despite a response that was posted to an earlier query that I posted to the list about these messages, the header below clearly shows that the message was sent by the list administrator. If the list administrator monitors what goes on on this list, can the list administrator please advise as to what is happening with these messages that show as having been sent by the list administrator? -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams, 1988 .................................................... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: bret@localhost.busby.net Received: by linux.busby.net (Postfix, from userid 504) id 34F032677D; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:11:27 +0800 (WST) Delivered-To: clearsol@busby.net Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9792677D for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:11:27 +0800 (WST) Received: from mail.wasp.net.au by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.3.1) for clearsol@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:11:27 +0800 (WST) Delivered-To: busby-bret@wasp.net.au Message-Id: <200208280905.g7S95606008610@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:25:01 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: R;7"LlOBS& Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_boundary-0001-12436" CORRUPTED MESSAGE This is the Courier Mail Server 0.37 on wasp.net.au. I received the following message for delivery to your address. Unfortunately, the sender's mail software did not properly format the following message according to Internet mail formatting protocols, and I can only deliver mail which has been properly formatted according to Internet standards. Instead of returning the following message as undeliverable, it is saved, in its original form, in the following attachment, which you can open with any editor or word processor. Please notify the original sender that their message was not properly formatted by their mail software. The specific mail protocol error in the original message is as follows: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The mail headers in the following message contain 8-bit text, which is prohibited by RFC 2047. See for more information. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --=_wasp.net.au-17942-1030527147-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="message.txt" Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [::ffff:140.1= 42.8.99])=0D (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,168bits,DES-CBC3-SHA)=0D by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:07:13 +0800=0D Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])=0D =09by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g= 7S964R8040502;=0D =09Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:06:05 -0700=0D Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [= 140.142.33.15])=0D =09by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g= 7S95AeY041452=0D =09for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:10 -0= 700=0D Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed = Aug 28 02:05:09 2002 -0700=0D Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [= 140.142.32.14])=0D =09by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7= S959s8029870=0D =09for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:09 -0700=0D Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed= Aug 28 02:05:09 2002 -0700=0D Received: from jindi2 ([61.149.16.188])=0D =09by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g= 7S95606008610=0D =09for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:08 -0700=0D Received: (qmail 30113 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000=0D Received: from unknown (HELO relay) (isee@seeyou.com@192.168.0.10)=0D by localhost with SMTP; 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000=0D Message-Id: <200208280905.g7S95606008610@mx1.cac.washington.edu>=0D Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:25:01 +0800=0D Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu=0D Precedence: bulk=0D List-Help: =0D List-Unsubscribe: =0D List-Subscribe: =0D List-Owner: (Human contact for = the list)=0D List-Post: =0D From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu=0D To: Pine Discussion Forum =0D Subject: =D2=BB=B7=A2=CC=EC=CF=C2=D3=A6=0D Mime-Version: 1.0=0D Content-Type: text/html; charset=3D"GB2312_CHARSET"=0D X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN=0D =0D =0D =D3=C5=D6=CA=D3=CA=BC=FE=C1=D0=B1=ED=A3=AB=B8=DF=D0=A7=C8=BA=B7=A2=C8=ED=BC= =FE=A3=BD=D6=D0=B9=FA=D3=CA=BC=FE=C1= =D0=B1=ED=CD=F8=0D =0D =0D


=0D

=0D =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00= =00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00=00 --=_wasp.net.au-17942-1030527147-0001-2-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7SENu2P000780 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:23:56 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 07:23:55 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7SENp07014493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:23:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7SEMt0j005994; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:22:55 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7SELaeY073372 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:21:36 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 07:21:25 2002 -0700 Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.76]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7SELOJX004870 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:21:25 -0700 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA16910; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.71]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA07297; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73]) by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA00586; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (jmorzins@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27351; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jacob Morzinski To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bret Busby wrote: > What is going on with these messages? Read the error message. Read the error message. Read the error message. Read the error message. Sheesh. You were sent a message that does not conform to the mail RFCs, and the error message tells you this. Is it such a stretch to realize that 1) the reason you were sent this message is that the pine-info list sent it to you, and 2) the reason the pine-info list sent it to you is that *someone* (we don't know who) sent it to the pine-info list? If you want to track down the person who sent it to the pine-info list and chastise them, please do so. None of us like spam, and we'd all cheer your efforts. Most of us try to cope with spam just by ignoring it, though. -Jacob Morzinski From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7SFlg2P003523 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:47:42 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 08:47:41 2002 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7SFle07016820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:47:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7SFkQ4G017196; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:46:26 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7SFiF97154374 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:44:15 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 08:44:14 2002 -0700 Received: from msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.148]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7SFiDR8009388 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:44:14 -0700 Received: from 213-78-73-192.friaco.onetel.net.uk ([213.78.73.192]) by msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AKB34435; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:42:20 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:52:23 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: spam sent to lists (Was: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd)) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com X-X-Sender: nancy@imap.iecc.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 28 Aug 2002 Jacob Morzinski (jmorzins@MIT.EDU) wrote: > > 1) the reason you were sent this message is that the pine-info list > sent it to you, > and > 2) the reason the pine-info list sent it to you is that *someone* > (we don't know who) sent it to the pine-info list? > > If you want to track down the person who sent it to the pine-info list > and chastise them, please do so. None of us like spam, and we'd all > cheer your efforts. Most of us try to cope with spam just by ignoring > it, though. But, it makes much more sense (in terms of resources) for the list management software to try to do spam detection *once* rather than each user on the list having to do spam detection. Nowadays there are many good tools for spam detection, for example SpamAssassin. It would involve some moderation of the list, but I think it's worth it. Nancy updating my "Reverse Spam Filtering" page now -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7T3h52P028333 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:43:05 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 20:42:59 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T3gwEN026007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:42:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T3fu0j031456; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:41:56 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T3cj97085266 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:38:45 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 20:38:44 2002 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T3cWR8030783 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:38:43 -0700 Received: from linux.busby.net (dialup-196-247.wasp.net.au [::ffff:203.190.196.247]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:38:25 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1F52677D; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:40:36 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:40:54 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Jacob Morzinski X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Jacob Morzinski wrote: > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:35 -0400 (EDT) > From: Jacob Morzinski > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bret Busby wrote: > > What is going on with these messages? > > Read the error message. > Read the error message. > Read the error message. > Read the error message. > > Sheesh. > > You were sent a message that does not conform to the mail RFCs, and > the error message tells you this. > > Is it such a stretch to realize that > 1) the reason you were sent this message is that the pine-info list > sent it to you, > and > 2) the reason the pine-info list sent it to you is that *someone* > (we don't know who) sent it to the pine-info list? > > If you want to track down the person who sent it to the pine-info list > and chastise them, please do so. None of us like spam, and we'd all > cheer your efforts. Most of us try to cope with spam just by ignoring > it, though. > > -Jacob Morzinski > > Your belligenernce is not conducive to the image of the MIT. This appears to be an issue not of spam (what's spam got to do with the message, anyway?), but of the list administrator (NOTE: the message that was non-compliant, shows as gaving been sent by the LIST ADMINISTRATOR!) sending messages with non-standard headers (what email application is the list adminsitrator using, that sends non-standard headers? Is it pine?), and, then, the mailing list application (which mailing list application is used - is it majordomo?) compunding the problem, by both accepting, and, then, distributing, messages that have non-standrad headers. Given that this is a mailing list that is concerned with an email application, it is of some concern, that the list administrator, and, the mailing list application, are both sending messages that are of a non-standard format. This, as far as I can see, has nothing to do with spam, but, with the issues stated in the last previous paragraph. That is a matter of great concern. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams, 1988 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7T6ol2P032612 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:50:47 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 23:50:46 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T6ojEN029633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:50:46 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T6nck6040644; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:49:38 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T6mI97122348 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:48:18 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 23:48:18 2002 -0700 Received: from wysocki.lodz.pdi.net (wysocki.lodz.pdi.net [195.116.163.58]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T6mFR9028630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:48:17 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by wysocki.lodz.pdi.net (8.12.5/8.12.4) id g7T6m4sQ001973 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:48:04 +0200 Received: from wysocki.lodz.pdi.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wysocki.lodz.pdi.net (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7T6m4Ph001961 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:48:04 +0200 Received: (from adam@localhost) by wysocki.lodz.pdi.net (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g7T6m3HV001950; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:48:03 +0200 Message-Id: <200208290648.g7T6m3HV001950@wysocki.lodz.pdi.net> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: adam@wysocki.lodz.pdi.net To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Bug in pine 4.44 with addresses with `[' and `]' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Sender: gophi@localhost.localdomain X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Geek-Code-1: GAT d-- s+: a1985 C++ UL++ P+ L+++ E---- W- N++ K- w--- !O M-- X-Geek-Code-2: V-- PS+ PE+ Y-- PGP- t- !5 X+ R- tv- b+ DI- D+ G e- h-- r% x* X-Geek-Code-3: v3.12 X-Contact-Info-1: GSM# 505-439-030 X-Contact-Info-2: EKG# 413992 X-More-Info: If you want more info about me, finger gophi@cyberspace.org X-License: This message is PPL-Licensed, details on http://ppl.7thGuard.net/ X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN /* Posted to a polish hacking group and mailed to Pine discussion forum */ I run Pine 4.44 on Red Hat Linux 7.3 kernel 2.4.18-3 and when replying to a news posting posted by someone with `"PT" ' in `From', I noticed that pine has put something strange instead of my normal leadin string, which is defined as `_SHORTDATE3_, _FROM_ <_ADDRESS_> wrote:'. This strange string was: 28.08.02, PT, MISSINGpturkowskiTERMINATOR, and UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTERpturkow...: A bug or a feature? :) -- Pozdrowienia z Warszawy * Gophi * gophi@studio.tpi.pl EKG/Gadu numb 413992 * Member of da PFT Hacking Group Bofh 265791 * MSISDN: Idea 505439030 * Plus 691337795 Tanio sprzedam g³owê - trochê pusta, ale ma³o u¿ywana From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7T9Ps2P004497 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:25:54 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 02:25:53 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T9Pr07012885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:25:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T9OlOm095960; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:24:47 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T9Lw97020890 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:21:58 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 02:21:57 2002 -0700 Received: from smtp3.cern.ch (smtp3.cern.ch [137.138.131.164]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T9Lus8004111 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:21:57 -0700 Received: from lxplus035.cern.ch (IDENT:root@lxplus035.cern.ch [137.138.161.100]) by smtp3.cern.ch (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g7T9LtL1016426 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:21:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (ghorner@localhost) by lxplus035.cern.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA29234 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:21:56 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:21:56 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gabriel Horner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: filtering with old or new? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: lxplus035.cern.ch: ghorner owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ghorner@lxplus035.cern.ch X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all, I'm new to pine and it's text-based ways. I want to filter incoming mail into folders and have a quick way of checking on the status of the folders. Should I use: 1. v. 3.95a which I have now and change the text file (.pinerc ?) 2. upgrade to 4.44 and do it within pine 3. use a filtering program like procmail I'm hesitant to do 2 or 3 since I'm doing it within linux (am new to this o.s.). If you could help me out with a good site or instructions for any of the 3 options I'd appreciate it. Gabriel -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7TEtw2P013599 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:55:58 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 07:55:53 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7TEtqEN010532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:55:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7TEs3k6030932; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:54:04 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7TEqP97117062 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:52:26 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 07:52:14 2002 -0700 Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7TEqDJX018407 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:52:13 -0700 Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7TEq3Y5028915; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:52:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:52:03 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: KHLsv Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Beartooth To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: karhunhammas@saltmine.radix.net X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Bret Busby wrote: > > Your belligenernce is not conducive to the image of the MIT. It was deserved -- and shared. > > That is a matter of great concern. Maybe -- between you and the administrator; for the rest of us, it's spam. Please desist from posting it. -- Beartooth the Stubborn Double retiree & Neo-Redneck (PhD, NRA, etc.) Linux hatchling w/ RH 7.2, YDL 2.2, & OSX; Pine 4.43; Opera 6.02, Galeon 1.2.5, Mozilla 1.0; Pan 0.11.2 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7THXp2P020670 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:33:51 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 10:33:50 2002 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7THXlEN017961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:33:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7THWhk6006074; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:32:43 -0700 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7THTa97117066 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:36 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 10:29:30 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.19]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7THTPbr007274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:25 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.17]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7THTPsT018038 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:25 -0700 Received: FROM homer04.u.washington.edu BY mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 10:29:25 2002 -0700 Received: from localhost (jdlarios@localhost) by homer04.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with ESMTP id g7THTJQ0152192; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:25 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: jdlarios@cac.washington.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Josh Larios To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jdlarios@homer04.u.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Bret Busby wrote: > This appears to be an issue not of spam (what's spam got to do with the > message, anyway?), but of the list administrator (NOTE: the message that > was non-compliant, shows as gaving been sent by the LIST ADMINISTRATOR!) The message in question has these lines right above the lines you're reading as saying the list administrator personally sent the message: Received: from jindi2 ([61.149.16.188]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S95606008610 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:08 -0700 Received: (qmail 30113 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay) (isee@seeyou.com@192.168.0.10) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000 Message-Id: <200208280905.g7S95606008610@mx1.cac.washington.edu> That's a pretty clear sign that the list administrator did not personally sit down and compose that message--someone at 61.149.16.188 did. That IP belongs to the CHINANET Beijing province network. I'm pretty sure the list administrator isn't working from there. The reasason the list admin address shows up in the From and Sender headers is that the original message had no such headers, and the smtp server or mailing list software filled them in. Agreed, listproc and sendmail probably shouldn't be accepting messages with 8-bit characters in the subject lines. But this isn't a problem with the list administrator, as you claim. -- Josh Larios Computing & Communications Client Services University of Washington Box 352830, Mary Gates Hall 011A jdlarios@cac.washington.edu Seattle, WA 98195-2830 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7TJMt2P027102 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:22:55 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 12:22:54 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7TJMmEN022754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:22:49 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7TJLROm020644; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:21:27 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7TJJJ97073932 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:19:19 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 12:19:19 2002 -0700 Received: from dsp.dsp.toronto.edu (dsp.dsp.toronto.edu [128.100.12.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7TJJIs8000628 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:19:18 -0700 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by dsp.dsp.toronto.edu (8.11.0/8.9.0) id g7TJJHX13082 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:19:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1030648757.3d6e73b5b6797@email.dsp.utoronto.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:19:17 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Fan (Jason) Zhang To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Problems on "Eliminating repeated password prompts in Pine" again MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authentication-Warning: dsp.dsp.utoronto.ca: nobody set sender to fanzhang@dsp.utoronto.ca using -f X-Originating-IP: 131.136.242.1 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I am using Pine 4.33 to access a remote IMAP server. However, I have a different user name on the linux box, other than the email account user name on the IMAP server. I configed Pine to have a remote .pinerc and remote address book on the IMAP server. But Pine keeps asking me for my password everytime I try to open different folders. I have read the post on http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/1999.12/msg00170.html and I add the /user=my-email-user-name after the mail server name in .pinerc, but I still get the same problem. Is there any way that I can just enter the user name and password once instead of many times? Is this problem caused by my different system-login-name and my-email-user-name? Thanks a lot! Jason Zhang -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7U0vo2P010631 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:57:50 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 17:57:45 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7U0viEN006672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:57:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7U0ug0j017158; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:56:42 -0700 Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7U0rk97134082 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:53:46 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Aug 29 17:53:45 2002 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7U0rXs8024282 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:53:44 -0700 Received: from linux.busby.net (dialup-196-118.wasp.net.au [::ffff:203.190.196.118]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:53:23 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F1D2677D; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:55:38 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:55:59 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Josh Larios wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:19 -0700 (PDT) > From: Josh Larios > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: R;7"LlOBS& (fwd) > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Bret Busby wrote: > > > This appears to be an issue not of spam (what's spam got to do with the > > message, anyway?), but of the list administrator (NOTE: the message that > > was non-compliant, shows as gaving been sent by the LIST ADMINISTRATOR!) > > The message in question has these lines right above the lines you're > reading as saying the list administrator personally sent the message: > > Received: from jindi2 ([61.149.16.188]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7S95606008610 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:05:08 -0700 > Received: (qmail 30113 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO relay) (isee@seeyou.com@192.168.0.10) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Aug 2002 03:19:42 -0000 > Message-Id: <200208280905.g7S95606008610@mx1.cac.washington.edu> > > That's a pretty clear sign that the list administrator did not personally > sit down and compose that message--someone at 61.149.16.188 did. That IP > belongs to the CHINANET Beijing province network. I'm pretty sure the > list administrator isn't working from there. > > The reasason the list admin address shows up in the From and Sender > headers is that the original message had no such headers, and the smtp > server or mailing list software filled them in. > > Agreed, listproc and sendmail probably shouldn't be accepting messages > with 8-bit characters in the subject lines. But this isn't a problem with > the list administrator, as you claim. > > -- > Josh Larios Computing & Communications Client Services > University of Washington Box 352830, Mary Gates Hall 011A > jdlarios@cac.washington.edu Seattle, WA 98195-2830 > > Thank you for that. That is the fiirst constructive response to my concerns. Now, could the list administrator please do something to fix the problem? -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams, 1988 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7U81o2P021559 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:01:50 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 30 01:01:50 2002 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7U81h07023619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:01:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7U80F0j032974; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:00:15 -0700 Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7U7vC97042408 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:57:12 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 30 00:57:11 2002 -0700 Received: from msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.149]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7U7vBs8025864 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:57:11 -0700 Received: from 213-78-85-203.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-85-203.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.85.203]) by msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AKH66850; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:56:56 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:05:42 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problems on "Eliminating repeated password prompts in Pine" again In-Reply-To: <1030648757.3d6e73b5b6797@email.dsp.utoronto.ca> References: <1030648757.3d6e73b5b6797@email.dsp.utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com X-X-Sender: nancy@imap.iecc.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I suggest that you recompile pine with the option to use a PASSFILE to store your passwords. I have info and links about this here Also, while you're at it you might want to upgrade to Pine 4.44. HTH, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7UKxG2P015035 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:59:16 -0700 Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 30 13:59:15 2002 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7UKx907012426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:59:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7UKw4Om078756; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:58:05 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7UKte97108614 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:55:41 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Aug 30 13:55:39 2002 -0700 Received: from dsp.dsp.toronto.edu (dsp.dsp.toronto.edu [128.100.12.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7UKtbR8017730 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:55:38 -0700 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by dsp.dsp.toronto.edu (8.11.0/8.9.0) id g7UKtaw18684 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:55:36 -0400 Message-Id: <1030740936.3d6fdbc875d83@email.dsp.utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:55:36 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Fan (Jason) Zhang To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Please help: PINE 4.44 compilation problem RE: Problems on "Eliminating ..." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: dsp.dsp.utoronto.ca: nobody set sender to fanzhang@dsp.utoronto.ca using -f X-Originating-IP: 131.136.242.1 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks to Runar Jorgensen and Nancy Mcgough. I tried to upgrade the PINE 4.33 to PINE 4.44 as both of you suggested. Since I am on a multi-user linux system (Redhat 7.1) and I don't have the root privilege, I think I would better not use PASSFILE. The system has the openssl and it is on . But when I compile the PINE 4.44 (./build slx), I met the following error which I don't know how to solve: 1. File /usr/share/ssl/certs/factory.pem is missing There are only two files under /usr/share/ssl/certs directory (ca-bundle.crt, Makefile). Since I don't have the root privilege, I cannot make a factory.pem to put under that directory. 2. /usr/bin/ld: can not find -lncurses I found that there are libncurses.so.5 and libncurses.so.5.2 in my /usr/lib directory but I don't know how to make a link on it. If I compile without SSL, the second problem still stays. Thank you very much Jason Zhang