From xemacs-m  Mon Jan  6 13:45:56 1997
Received: from hplb.hpl.hp.com (hplb.hpl.hp.com [15.255.59.2])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id NAA29415 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:45:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: from cuckoo.hpl.hp.com by hplb.hpl.hp.com; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 19:45:55 GMT
Received: by cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
	(1.37.109.16/15.6+ISC) id AA004719954; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 19:45:54 GMT
Sender: ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: telnet and xemacs-20.0b34
References: <199701051506.KAA08431@homer.sccon.com>
	<m24tgvvicl.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199701052349.SAA11437@homer.sccon.com>
	<m2d8vjtzet.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<87ybe7fw4t.fsf@mharnois.workgroup.net>
	<m2afqmixhe.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
From: Andy Norman <ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 06 Jan 1997 19:45:54 +0000
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 06 Jan 1997 08:23:25 -0800
Message-Id: <x5zpymzix9.fsf@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.37/XEmacs 19.14

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> Could everyone experiencing the telnet-echo-password problem try
> increasing the value of telnet-maximum-count?

Ummm... I hate to be unconstructive here, but since this variable seems to be
counting the number of times the initial process filter gets called (at least
under 19.14); setting it to any particular value appear to be just a little
bogus (to me, at least).  The number of times it gets called may well be not
deterministic, especially when telnetting to a host over the Internet.

Just my $0.02 worth.
-- 
						-- ange -- <><

http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/ange		ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com

