From xemacs-m  Wed Jun 25 18:06:04 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA24001
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:06:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id BAA13890; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 01:06:04 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: `make-empty-face'
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 26 Jun 1997 01:06:02 +0200
Message-ID: <kigd8pa706d.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta8) - "Copenhagen"

I'm afraid that the `make-empty-face' function does nothing much,
currently.  It simply sets `init-face-from-resources' to nil, and
calls `make-face'.  But Fmake_face knows nothing about it:

  if (initialized && !noninteractive)
    {
      struct gcpro gcpro1, gcpro2;

      GCPRO2 (name, face);
      call1 (Qinit_face_from_resources, name);
      UNGCPRO;
    }

Shouldn't `init-face-from-resources' be declared in C, and checked
from Fmake_face?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"],(unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);}

