From xemacs-m  Sun Jun 22 21:30:20 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA22447
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 21:30:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA06948;
	Sun, 22 Jun 1997 19:33:14 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: `skip_debugger'
References: <kigu3iqpqr4.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <QQcvcp25247.199706230156@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of "Sun, 22 Jun 1997 21:56:56 -0400 (EDT)"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 22 Jun 1997 19:33:14 -0700
Message-ID: <m2k9jmnj4l.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 27
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta9) - "Sofia"

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:

> This looks like a compiler bug.  Looking at the stacktrace,
> 0xbfffd058 is a plausible address for a stack position at
> that point.

The best explanation (I thought) to date was that I left out a GCPRO
somewhere.

> The compiler could have pushed the pointer to a
> value instead of the value on the stack as the argument to
> Ferror_message_string.

> My advice is to back off on the optimizations, or maybe back off
> the bleeding edge compiler version.

I'm not using a bleeding edge C compiler, I'm using Gcc 2.7.2, by now
the entire system is compiled with it.

> I plugged in Hrvoje's
> version of skip_debugger and there is no crash here.

Did you test it by touching some dumped lisp file (like
lisp/prim/simple.el) and redumping?
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

