From xemacs-m  Sat Jun 21 05:43:03 1997
Received: from iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (galibert@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr [193.49.140.100])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA18291
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 05:43:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from galibert@localhost) by iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id MAA05080; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 12:41:53 +0200
Message-ID: <19970621124153.16944@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 12:41:53 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <Olivier.Galibert@mines.u-nancy.fr>
To: XEmacs Beta Test <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Yet more 64bits lossage
References: <19970621012424.18989@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr> <199706210604.XAA07502@xemacs.eng.sun.com> <QQcuvx10888.199706210628@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <199706210825.BAA07607@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.74
In-Reply-To: <199706210825.BAA07607@xemacs.eng.sun.com>; from Martin Buchholz on Sat, Jun 21, 1997 at 01:25:04AM -0700

On Sat, Jun 21, 1997 at 01:25:04AM -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> The real test is whether a file > 256 MB in size can be edited in
> XEmacs.  I've never done this.

Tried with a 346Mb file, with xemacs-mule and all error detection
activated. Took ages to load the file, end up using >512Mb of memory,
took ages to move to a particular line with middle-button clic on the
scrollbar but apart for a minor lossage with the position % indicator
(never got more than 5%, out-of-bounds computation I guess) it was
working perfectly.

  OG.

