From xemacs-m  Fri Jun 20 00:19:25 1997
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA14001
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 00:19:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from SUNDIAL.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA14462; Fri, 20 Jun 97 01:08:01 EDT
Received: by sundial.MIT.EDU (8.8.5/4.7) id BAA20605; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 01:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 01:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199706200509.BAA20605@sundial.MIT.EDU>
From: David Bakhash <cadet@MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: save-some-buffers
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid

hey peolple,
	first off, I will learn how to use diff.  shouldn't be too
hard.  But in the meantime, I was thinking of the times that
switch-to-buffer fails, like in buffer-dedicated-frames or or something
like that (minibuffer-frames?).  But what I want to know is if that is
the only reason that Kyle is against it.  

	also, about not putting the buffers at the top of the
buffer-list when visited, that is a definite.  Sorry about leaving that
out the first time.

dave

(p.s. I don't know how to use condition-case (sad as that is) so thanks, 
Hrvoje, if you tackle this one.)

