From xemacs-m  Fri Jun 13 09:22:26 1997
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (cnri.CNRI.Reston.VA.US [132.151.1.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA06399
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 09:22:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (newcnri [132.151.1.84]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTPid KAA18150; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US by newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA19485; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:26:10 -0400
Received: by anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA28668; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:25:29 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:25:29 -0400
Message-Id: <199706131425.KAA28668@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Version Non-control (was Re: Ebola vaccines)
References: <199706112130.RAA27486@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<864tb4es2d.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
	<199706112300.TAA27566@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<m2wwo03f9u.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199706121515.LAA20240@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
	<199706121719.NAA28093@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<kig4tb32hv7.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 19.15p4 XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: bwarsaw@python.org
X-Attribution: BAW
X-Oblique-Strategy: Burn bridges
X-Url: http://www.python.org/~bwarsaw


>>>>> "Hrv" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

    Hrv> The same goes for me.  In fact, the only thing that FSF does
    Hrv> real better currently (from a user's perspective) are TTY
    Hrv> redisplay optimizations.  For users with slow TTY-s, XEmacs
    Hrv> is still a dubious solution.

What do you classify as "slow"?  XEmacs 19.15 ttys were very usable
under 28.8 -- I relied heavily on them -- and they're even more usable
with ISDN!

    Hrv> He he he -- NEWS file in Emacs 19.34.94 starts with:

>> Changes in Emacs 19.35

The copy I have has this line:

* Changes in Emacs 20.1

So who knows? (does RMS even? :-)

